| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 10.321 | |
| 144. |  | GONDIM, T. M. de S.; COSTA, A. G. F.; FREITAS, J. G.; VASCONCELOS, R. A. de; ARAUJO, G. P. de; VERAS, L. DE G. C. Doses de nitrogênio em mamoneira brs energia em consórcio com feijão-caupi inoculado. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE MAMONA, 6.; SIMPÓSIO INTERNACIONAL DE OLEAGINOSAS ENERGÉTICAS, 3., 2014, Fortaleza. Energia e segurança alimentar na agricultura familiar: anais. Campina Grande, PB: Embrapa Algodão, 2014. p. 150| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Algodão. |
|   |
| 150. | | PICARELLI, É. V.; RAKOCEVIC, M.; BONA, C.; MEDRADO, M. J. S.; ASSAD, E. D.; BORSATO, A. V. Distribuição e número de estômatos em folhas da erva-mate cultivada em dois ambientes com luminosidade distinta. In: CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE BOTÂNICA, 58., 2007, São Paulo. A botânica no Brasil: pesquisa, ensino e políticas públicas ambientais: resumo. [Porto Alegre]: Sociedade Botânica do Brasil, 2007.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
| 155. | | RIBEIRO, C. M. C.; NASCIMENTO, S. M. C. do; ISHIDA, A. K. N.; OLIVEIRA NETO, C. F. de; CARVALHO, E. de A. Efeito de fungicidas sobre o crescimento micelial de Trichoderma spp. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE FITOPATOLOGIA, 51., 2019, Recife. Anais... Brasília, DF: Sociedade Brasileira de Fitopatologia, 2019. p. 653.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
|  |
| 156. | | LOPEZ, B. D. O.; MACHADO, D. de O.; BREDA, F. A. da F.; ALVES, G. C. A.; REIS, V. M. Efeito de duas classes de solo sem correção de acidez no estabelecimento da estirpe BR 11417. In: REUNIÃO BRASILEIRA DE FERTILIDADE DO SOLO E NUTRIÇÃO DE PLANTAS, 31.; REUNIÃO BRASILEIRA SOBRE MICORRIZAS, 15.; SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE MICROBIOLOGIA DO SOLO, 13.; REUNIÃO BRASILEIRA DE BIOLOGIA DO SOLO, 10., 2014, Araxá. Fertilidade e biologia do solo: integração e tecnologias para todos: anais. Araxá: Núcleo Regional Leste da Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 2014. FertBio 2014.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrobiologia. |
| |
| 158. | | CHAVES, L. H. G.; FERNANDES, J. D.; MONTEIRO FILHO, A. F.; AZEVEDO, M. R. de Q. A.; CRUZ, M. P.; BRITO, L. Fontes de adubação e seus efeitos no crescimento da cultivar BRS Energia. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE MAMONA, 4.; SIMPÓSIO INTERNACIONAL DE OLEAGINOSAS ENERGÉTICAS, 1., 2010, João Pessoa. Inclusão social e energia: anais. Campina Grande: Embrapa Algodão, 2010.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Algodão. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 10.321 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
|
Data corrente: |
30/04/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
10/03/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 5 |
|
Autoria: |
WATANABE, M. A.; ABREU, L. S. de; LUIZ, A. J. B. |
|
Afiliação: |
MARIA AICO WATANABE, CNPMA; LUCIMAR SANTIAGO DE ABREU, CNPMA; ALFREDO JOSE BARRETO LUIZ, CNPMA. |
|
Título: |
The fallacy of organic and conventional fruit and vegetable prices in the metropolitan region of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal of Asian Rural Studies, v. 4, n. 1, p. 1-22, 2020. |
|
Páginas: |
p. 1-22. |
|
ISSN: |
2548-3269 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Abstract: There is a popular myth or fallacy based on the idea that organic fruits and vegetables are always more expensive than conventional products. To assess whether this statement is true, a qualitative and quantitative research was conducted between September and December 2017, involving four supermarkets and seven outdoor markets, located in Campinas, in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. This statement was confirmed for the research conducted in supermarkets, but not for outdoor markets, where some organic products are cheaper than conventional ones. In fact, supermarkets sell organic products at higher prices and, normally, only the upper middle class has access to the products, but the consumer will have the option to buy conventional products at lower prices. Conventional supermarket products serve a larger number of consumers, including those with lower incomes. Most outdoor market traders are farmers who sell their own harvested products. Thus, these producers set their own prices, which are more attractive to the consumer; however, prices may vary. Due to price differences between supermarkets and free markets, consumers in general, and especially low-income consumers, obtain affordable, healthy, fresh and seasonal products, especially in outdoor markets. It is concluded that the best option for the low-income consumer is to buy organic products in open-air markets, since in these locations? prices are generally cheaper, the products are healthier and fresher. The consumer also has access to diverse \"seasonal\" products, which are even cheaper and fresher are offered throughout the year, thus allowing the consumer to have a healthy and diverse diet throughout the year. MenosAbstract: There is a popular myth or fallacy based on the idea that organic fruits and vegetables are always more expensive than conventional products. To assess whether this statement is true, a qualitative and quantitative research was conducted between September and December 2017, involving four supermarkets and seven outdoor markets, located in Campinas, in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. This statement was confirmed for the research conducted in supermarkets, but not for outdoor markets, where some organic products are cheaper than conventional ones. In fact, supermarkets sell organic products at higher prices and, normally, only the upper middle class has access to the products, but the consumer will have the option to buy conventional products at lower prices. Conventional supermarket products serve a larger number of consumers, including those with lower incomes. Most outdoor market traders are farmers who sell their own harvested products. Thus, these producers set their own prices, which are more attractive to the consumer; however, prices may vary. Due to price differences between supermarkets and free markets, consumers in general, and especially low-income consumers, obtain affordable, healthy, fresh and seasonal products, especially in outdoor markets. It is concluded that the best option for the low-income consumer is to buy organic products in open-air markets, since in these locations? prices are generally cheaper, the products are healthier and fresher. The... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Organic produce; Outdoor markets; Price establishment policy; Purchasing strategies; Supermarket. |
|
Thesagro: |
Agricultura Orgânica; Comercialização; Política de Preço; Preço. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Food prices; Market prices; Organic production; Supermarkets. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
E Economia e Indústria Agrícola |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/212653/1/Watanabe-fallacy-organic-2020.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02683naa a2200325 a 4500
001 2121981
005 2021-03-10
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a2548-3269
100 1 $aWATANABE, M. A.
245 $aThe fallacy of organic and conventional fruit and vegetable prices in the metropolitan region of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
300 $ap. 1-22.
520 $aAbstract: There is a popular myth or fallacy based on the idea that organic fruits and vegetables are always more expensive than conventional products. To assess whether this statement is true, a qualitative and quantitative research was conducted between September and December 2017, involving four supermarkets and seven outdoor markets, located in Campinas, in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. This statement was confirmed for the research conducted in supermarkets, but not for outdoor markets, where some organic products are cheaper than conventional ones. In fact, supermarkets sell organic products at higher prices and, normally, only the upper middle class has access to the products, but the consumer will have the option to buy conventional products at lower prices. Conventional supermarket products serve a larger number of consumers, including those with lower incomes. Most outdoor market traders are farmers who sell their own harvested products. Thus, these producers set their own prices, which are more attractive to the consumer; however, prices may vary. Due to price differences between supermarkets and free markets, consumers in general, and especially low-income consumers, obtain affordable, healthy, fresh and seasonal products, especially in outdoor markets. It is concluded that the best option for the low-income consumer is to buy organic products in open-air markets, since in these locations? prices are generally cheaper, the products are healthier and fresher. The consumer also has access to diverse \"seasonal\" products, which are even cheaper and fresher are offered throughout the year, thus allowing the consumer to have a healthy and diverse diet throughout the year.
650 $aFood prices
650 $aMarket prices
650 $aOrganic production
650 $aSupermarkets
650 $aAgricultura Orgânica
650 $aComercialização
650 $aPolítica de Preço
650 $aPreço
653 $aOrganic produce
653 $aOutdoor markets
653 $aPrice establishment policy
653 $aPurchasing strategies
653 $aSupermarket
700 1 $aABREU, L. S. de
700 1 $aLUIZ, A. J. B.
773 $tJournal of Asian Rural Studies$gv. 4, n. 1, p. 1-22, 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente (CNPMA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
