|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. |
Data corrente: |
20/02/2013 |
Data da última atualização: |
06/06/2017 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
AGUIAR, M. I. de; FIALHO, J. S.; ARAÚJO, F. das C. S. de; CAMPANHA, M. M.; OLIVEIRA, T. S. de. |
Afiliação: |
MONICA MATOSO CAMPANHA, CNPMS. |
Título: |
Does biomass production depend on plant community diversity? |
Ano de publicação: |
2013 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Agroforestry Systems, Dordrecht, v. 87, n. 3, p. 699-711, 2013. |
DOI: |
10.1007/s10457-012-9590-9 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
In order to ensure the sustainability of agroecosystems, biodiversity must be a priority. Agroforestry, which includes trees, is an example of such diverse systems. We evaluated plant diversity and aboveground biomass production to assess whether areas under fallow following traditional cultivation return to their initial condition. Also, plant diversity and aboveground biomass production were assessed in agroforestry systems (AFS) to determine if these were similar to unmanaged ecosystems. Another objective of the study was to observe the influence of plant diversity on aboveground biomass production in plant communities and also in the population of the dominant species, Cordia oncocalyx. Plant diversity was evaluated by assessing species richness, as well as using Shannon’s (H0) and Pielou’s (J0) indices. Aboveground plant biomass was evaluated in two AFS: agrosilvopastoral (ASP) and silvopastoral (SP), and also in a traditionally managed agricultural system (AG), areas that had been under fallow for six years (F6) and nine years (F9) and an area of unmanaged caatinga (CAT) vegetation. We observed that the ASP system had a lower diversity and number of species, especially tree species. However, it sustained the same total biomass production as CAT and fallow areas. The SP system, despite having lower H0 and J0 indices as well as lower total biomass production, had a similar number of species to CAT and cropped and fallow systems AG, F6 and F9. Plant biomass in F6 and F9 had recovered to productivity levels of unmanaged CAT vegetation; however the diversity indices were not restored to the same level. Plant diversity did not have an effect on the productivity of the agroecosystems. Likewise, annual biomass production by C. oncocalyx is not dependent upon diversity, but it is influenced by the growth stage of individuals. MenosIn order to ensure the sustainability of agroecosystems, biodiversity must be a priority. Agroforestry, which includes trees, is an example of such diverse systems. We evaluated plant diversity and aboveground biomass production to assess whether areas under fallow following traditional cultivation return to their initial condition. Also, plant diversity and aboveground biomass production were assessed in agroforestry systems (AFS) to determine if these were similar to unmanaged ecosystems. Another objective of the study was to observe the influence of plant diversity on aboveground biomass production in plant communities and also in the population of the dominant species, Cordia oncocalyx. Plant diversity was evaluated by assessing species richness, as well as using Shannon’s (H0) and Pielou’s (J0) indices. Aboveground plant biomass was evaluated in two AFS: agrosilvopastoral (ASP) and silvopastoral (SP), and also in a traditionally managed agricultural system (AG), areas that had been under fallow for six years (F6) and nine years (F9) and an area of unmanaged caatinga (CAT) vegetation. We observed that the ASP system had a lower diversity and number of species, especially tree species. However, it sustained the same total biomass production as CAT and fallow areas. The SP system, despite having lower H0 and J0 indices as well as lower total biomass production, had a similar number of species to CAT and cropped and fallow systems AG, F6 and F9. Plant biomass in F6 and F9 h... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Agroecologia. |
Thesagro: |
Ecologia vegetal. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/158878/1/Does-biomass-1.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02478naa a2200205 a 4500 001 1950111 005 2017-06-06 008 2013 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1007/s10457-012-9590-9$2DOI 100 1 $aAGUIAR, M. I. de 245 $aDoes biomass production depend on plant community diversity?$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2013 520 $aIn order to ensure the sustainability of agroecosystems, biodiversity must be a priority. Agroforestry, which includes trees, is an example of such diverse systems. We evaluated plant diversity and aboveground biomass production to assess whether areas under fallow following traditional cultivation return to their initial condition. Also, plant diversity and aboveground biomass production were assessed in agroforestry systems (AFS) to determine if these were similar to unmanaged ecosystems. Another objective of the study was to observe the influence of plant diversity on aboveground biomass production in plant communities and also in the population of the dominant species, Cordia oncocalyx. Plant diversity was evaluated by assessing species richness, as well as using Shannon’s (H0) and Pielou’s (J0) indices. Aboveground plant biomass was evaluated in two AFS: agrosilvopastoral (ASP) and silvopastoral (SP), and also in a traditionally managed agricultural system (AG), areas that had been under fallow for six years (F6) and nine years (F9) and an area of unmanaged caatinga (CAT) vegetation. We observed that the ASP system had a lower diversity and number of species, especially tree species. However, it sustained the same total biomass production as CAT and fallow areas. The SP system, despite having lower H0 and J0 indices as well as lower total biomass production, had a similar number of species to CAT and cropped and fallow systems AG, F6 and F9. Plant biomass in F6 and F9 had recovered to productivity levels of unmanaged CAT vegetation; however the diversity indices were not restored to the same level. Plant diversity did not have an effect on the productivity of the agroecosystems. Likewise, annual biomass production by C. oncocalyx is not dependent upon diversity, but it is influenced by the growth stage of individuals. 650 $aEcologia vegetal 653 $aAgroecologia 700 1 $aFIALHO, J. S. 700 1 $aARAÚJO, F. das C. S. de 700 1 $aCAMPANHA, M. M. 700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, T. S. de 773 $tAgroforestry Systems, Dordrecht$gv. 87, n. 3, p. 699-711, 2013.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Milho e Sorgo (CNPMS) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical; Embrapa Semiárido; Embrapa Solos; Embrapa Suínos e Aves; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
Data corrente: |
26/03/2021 |
Data da última atualização: |
08/12/2021 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Autoria/Organização/Edição de Livros |
Autoria: |
SILVA, M. S. L. da; MATTHIENSEN, A.; BRITO, L. T. de L.; LIMA, J. E. F. W.; CARVALHO, C. J. R. de (ed.). |
Afiliação: |
MARIA SONIA LOPES DA SILVA, CNPS; ALEXANDRE MATTHIENSEN, CNPSA; LUIZA TEIXEIRA DE LIMA BRITO, CPATSA; JORGE ENOCH FURQUIM WERNECK LIMA, CPAC; CLAUDIO JOSE REIS DE CARVALHO, CNPAT. |
Título: |
Clean water and sanitation: contributions of Embrapa. |
Título original: |
Água e saneamento: contribuições da Embrapa. |
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Brasília, DF : Embrapa, 2020. |
Páginas: |
101 p. |
Descrição Física: |
PDF : il. color. |
Série: |
(Sustainable development goal, 6). |
ISBN: |
978-65-86056-23-5 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Notas: |
Translated by Paulo de Holanda Morais. |
Conteúdo: |
In this book, Embrapa exposes its interfaces and synergies with SDG 6 (ensure the availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all) and its respective targets, showing the alignment of this SDG with 3 of its 5 impact axes and with 4 of the 12 strategic objectives, expressed in its VI Plano Diretor (VI Master Plan). |
Palavras-Chave: |
Conservação do ecosistema; ODS 6. |
Thesagro: |
Abastecimento de Água; Desenvolvimento Sustentável; Políticas Públicas; Poluição; Produção Agrícola; Produção Animal; Qualidade da Água; Recurso Hídrico; Saneamento Rural. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Public policy; Sustainable development; Water resources. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- B Sociologia Rural P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/222188/1/SDG-6.pdf
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/222270/1/Clean-water-and-sanitation-contributions-of-Embrapa.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01524nam a2200385 a 4500 001 2130908 005 2021-12-08 008 2020 bl uuuu 00u1 u #d 020 $a978-65-86056-23-5 100 1 $aSILVA, M. S. L. da 240 $aÁgua e saneamento: contribuições da Embrapa. 245 $aClean water and sanitation$bcontributions of Embrapa.$h[electronic resource] 260 $aBrasília, DF : Embrapa$c2020 300 $a101 p.$cPDF : il. color. 490 $a(Sustainable development goal, 6). 500 $aTranslated by Paulo de Holanda Morais. 520 $aIn this book, Embrapa exposes its interfaces and synergies with SDG 6 (ensure the availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all) and its respective targets, showing the alignment of this SDG with 3 of its 5 impact axes and with 4 of the 12 strategic objectives, expressed in its VI Plano Diretor (VI Master Plan). 650 $aPublic policy 650 $aSustainable development 650 $aWater resources 650 $aAbastecimento de Água 650 $aDesenvolvimento Sustentável 650 $aPolíticas Públicas 650 $aPoluição 650 $aProdução Agrícola 650 $aProdução Animal 650 $aQualidade da Água 650 $aRecurso Hídrico 650 $aSaneamento Rural 653 $aConservação do ecosistema 653 $aODS 6 700 1 $aMATTHIENSEN, A. 700 1 $aBRITO, L. T. de L. 700 1 $aLIMA, J. E. F. W. 700 1 $aCARVALHO, C. J. R. de
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Unidades Centrais (AI-SEDE) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|