Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Cerrados. |
Data corrente: |
25/04/2002 |
Data da última atualização: |
29/04/2025 |
Autoria: |
POTFORS, C. V.; FENTOS, M. B.; AGUIAR, L. M. de S.; BAUMGARTEN, J. E.; VONHOF, M. J.; BOUCHARD, S.; FARIA, D. M. de; PEDRO, W. A.; RAUNTENBACH, N. I. L.; ZORTEA, M. |
Afiliação: |
CHRISTINE V. PORTFORS, NORTHEASTERN OHIO UNIVERSITIES COLLEGE OF MEDICINE; M. BROCK FENTON, YORK UNIVERSITY, ONTARIO; LUDMILLA MOURA DE SOUZA AGUIAR, CPAC; JULIO E. BAUMGARTEN, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE CAMPINAS; MAARTEN J. VONHOF, YORK UNIVERSITY, ONTARIO; SYLVIE BOUCHARD, YORK UNIVERSITY, ONTARIO; DEBORAH M. DE FARIA, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE CAMPINAS; WAGNER A. PEDRO, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL PAULISTA; NAAS I. L. RAUNTENBACH, TRANSVAAL MUSEUM; MARLON ZORTEA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SÃO CARLOS. |
Título: |
Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods. |
Ano de publicação: |
2000 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, v. 17, n. 2, p. 533-538, 2000. |
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752000000200022 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Abstract: Assessing the composition of an area's bat fauna is typically accomplished by using captures or by monitoring echolocation calls with bat detectors. The two methods may not provide the same data regarding species composition. Mist nets and harp traps may be biased towards sampling low flying species, and bat detectors biased towards detecting high intensity echolocators. A comparison of the bat fauna of Fazenda Intervales, southeastern Brazil, as revealed by mist nets and harp trap captures, checking roosts and by monitoring echolocation calls of flying bats illustrates this point. A total of 17 species of bats was sampled. Fourteen bat species were captured and the echolocation calls of 12 species were recorded, three of them not revealed by mist nets or harp traps. The different sampling methods provided different pictures of the bat fauna. Phyllostomid bats dominated the catches in mist nets, but in the field their echolocation calls were never detected. No single sampling approach provided a complete assessment of the bat fauna in the study area. In general, bats producing low intensity echolocation calls, such as phyllostomids, are more easily assessed by netting, and bats producing high intensity echolocation calls are better surveyed by bat detectors. The results demonstrate that a combined and varied approach to sampling is required for a complete assessment of the bat fauna of an area. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Mata Atlântica; Região Sudeste. |
Thesagro: |
Amostragem; Morcego. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
Chiroptera. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
Marc: |
LEADER 02350naa a2200301 a 4500 001 1564757 005 2025-04-29 008 2000 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752000000200022$2DOI 100 1 $aPOTFORS, C. V. 245 $aBats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil$bspecies account and comparison between different sampling methods.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2000 520 $aAbstract: Assessing the composition of an area's bat fauna is typically accomplished by using captures or by monitoring echolocation calls with bat detectors. The two methods may not provide the same data regarding species composition. Mist nets and harp traps may be biased towards sampling low flying species, and bat detectors biased towards detecting high intensity echolocators. A comparison of the bat fauna of Fazenda Intervales, southeastern Brazil, as revealed by mist nets and harp trap captures, checking roosts and by monitoring echolocation calls of flying bats illustrates this point. A total of 17 species of bats was sampled. Fourteen bat species were captured and the echolocation calls of 12 species were recorded, three of them not revealed by mist nets or harp traps. The different sampling methods provided different pictures of the bat fauna. Phyllostomid bats dominated the catches in mist nets, but in the field their echolocation calls were never detected. No single sampling approach provided a complete assessment of the bat fauna in the study area. In general, bats producing low intensity echolocation calls, such as phyllostomids, are more easily assessed by netting, and bats producing high intensity echolocation calls are better surveyed by bat detectors. The results demonstrate that a combined and varied approach to sampling is required for a complete assessment of the bat fauna of an area. 650 $aChiroptera 650 $aAmostragem 650 $aMorcego 653 $aMata Atlântica 653 $aRegião Sudeste 700 1 $aFENTOS, M. B. 700 1 $aAGUIAR, L. M. de S. 700 1 $aBAUMGARTEN, J. E. 700 1 $aVONHOF, M. J. 700 1 $aBOUCHARD, S. 700 1 $aFARIA, D. M. de 700 1 $aPEDRO, W. A. 700 1 $aRAUNTENBACH, N. I. L. 700 1 $aZORTEA, M. 773 $tRevista Brasileira de Zoologia$gv. 17, n. 2, p. 533-538, 2000.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Cerrados (CPAC) |
|