| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpat.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical. |
|
Data corrente: |
16/05/2025 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
16/05/2025 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
SALES, J. R. DA S.; BARROS, V. DA S.; LACERDA, C. F. DE; FIGUEIREDO, M. C. B. de; LIMA, A. F. DA S.; CORREA-GUIMARAES, A. |
|
Afiliação: |
JONNATHAN RICHEDS DA SILVA SALES, FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF CEARÁ; VIVIANE DA SILVA BARROS, FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF CEARÁ; CLAUDIVAN FEITOSA DE LACERDA, FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF CEARÁ; MARIA CLEA BRITO DE FIGUEIREDO, CNPAT; ANTONIO FABIO DA SILVA LIMA, FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF CEARÁ; ADRIANA CORREA-GUIMARAES, UNIVERSITY OF VALLADOLID. |
|
Título: |
Quantification of GHG Emissions Using Different Methodologies in Tropical Conventional Cashew Cultivation. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2025 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Sustainability, 17, 3042, 2025. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073042 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Quantifying GHG emissions from cashew cultivation, especially in Brazil, is essential to assess the environmental impact and promote the sustainable development of this activity. The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare methods for quan- tifying GHG emissions based on empirical equations for life cycle inventories, using the conventional cashew production system in Brazil as a case study. The scope of the study encompasses, from gate to gate in a dwarf cashew production system, considering the production of one ton of cashew as a functional unit. GHG emissions were assessed and compared using the following methodologies: Nemecek-Calc, WFLDB, IPCC-Calc, BR-Calc, and Agri-footprint. The environmental assessment followed ISO standards (14040, 14044, and 14067). The results showed that the carbon footprint varied among the evaluated methodologies, with a difference of 24.5% between the highest value (129.5 kg CO2 eq- IPCC-Calc and BR-Calc) and the lowest (104 kg CO2 eq-Nemecek-Calc) per ton of cashew. N2O was the main contributor to emissions, accounting for up to 75.9%, while CO2 repre- sented up to 25.8%. Based on the analysis criteria, WFLDB, IPCC-Calc, and BR-Calc are the most recommended methodologies, balancing clarity, scientifi c robustness, and regional adaptation. The choice of methodology is fundamental, as it directly infl uences the results and interpretation of the carbon footprint in cashew farming, impacting the sustainability of this agricultural activity. MenosQuantifying GHG emissions from cashew cultivation, especially in Brazil, is essential to assess the environmental impact and promote the sustainable development of this activity. The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare methods for quan- tifying GHG emissions based on empirical equations for life cycle inventories, using the conventional cashew production system in Brazil as a case study. The scope of the study encompasses, from gate to gate in a dwarf cashew production system, considering the production of one ton of cashew as a functional unit. GHG emissions were assessed and compared using the following methodologies: Nemecek-Calc, WFLDB, IPCC-Calc, BR-Calc, and Agri-footprint. The environmental assessment followed ISO standards (14040, 14044, and 14067). The results showed that the carbon footprint varied among the evaluated methodologies, with a difference of 24.5% between the highest value (129.5 kg CO2 eq- IPCC-Calc and BR-Calc) and the lowest (104 kg CO2 eq-Nemecek-Calc) per ton of cashew. N2O was the main contributor to emissions, accounting for up to 75.9%, while CO2 repre- sented up to 25.8%. Based on the analysis criteria, WFLDB, IPCC-Calc, and BR-Calc are the most recommended methodologies, balancing clarity, scientifi c robustness, and regional adaptation. The choice of methodology is fundamental, as it directly infl uences the results and interpretation of the carbon footprint in cashew farming, impacting the sustainability of this agricultural a... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Avaliação do ciclo de vida; Pegada de carbono; Sustentabilidade. |
|
Thesagro: |
Anacardium Occidentale; Caju. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Carbon footprint; Environmental sustainability; Life cycle assessment. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02418naa a2200289 a 4500
001 2175689
005 2025-05-16
008 2025 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.3390/su17073042$2DOI
100 1 $aSALES, J. R. DA S.
245 $aQuantification of GHG Emissions Using Different Methodologies in Tropical Conventional Cashew Cultivation.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2025
520 $aQuantifying GHG emissions from cashew cultivation, especially in Brazil, is essential to assess the environmental impact and promote the sustainable development of this activity. The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare methods for quan- tifying GHG emissions based on empirical equations for life cycle inventories, using the conventional cashew production system in Brazil as a case study. The scope of the study encompasses, from gate to gate in a dwarf cashew production system, considering the production of one ton of cashew as a functional unit. GHG emissions were assessed and compared using the following methodologies: Nemecek-Calc, WFLDB, IPCC-Calc, BR-Calc, and Agri-footprint. The environmental assessment followed ISO standards (14040, 14044, and 14067). The results showed that the carbon footprint varied among the evaluated methodologies, with a difference of 24.5% between the highest value (129.5 kg CO2 eq- IPCC-Calc and BR-Calc) and the lowest (104 kg CO2 eq-Nemecek-Calc) per ton of cashew. N2O was the main contributor to emissions, accounting for up to 75.9%, while CO2 repre- sented up to 25.8%. Based on the analysis criteria, WFLDB, IPCC-Calc, and BR-Calc are the most recommended methodologies, balancing clarity, scientifi c robustness, and regional adaptation. The choice of methodology is fundamental, as it directly infl uences the results and interpretation of the carbon footprint in cashew farming, impacting the sustainability of this agricultural activity.
650 $aCarbon footprint
650 $aEnvironmental sustainability
650 $aLife cycle assessment
650 $aAnacardium Occidentale
650 $aCaju
653 $aAvaliação do ciclo de vida
653 $aPegada de carbono
653 $aSustentabilidade
700 1 $aBARROS, V. DA S.
700 1 $aLACERDA, C. F. DE
700 1 $aFIGUEIREDO, M. C. B. de
700 1 $aLIMA, A. F. DA S.
700 1 $aCORREA-GUIMARAES, A.
773 $tSustainability, 17, 3042, 2025.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical (CNPAT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
| 1. |  | PERTILLE, C. T.; OLIVEIRA, E. B. de; NICOLETTI, M. F.; PICCINATTO FILHO, V.; LIESENBERG, V.; SCHIMALSKI, M. B. Wood production from a Pinus taeda L. stand attacked by Sapajus nigritus. Advances in Forestry Science, v. 9, n. 2, p. 1729-1734, 2022.| Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: B - 3 |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
|    |
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
