| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Florestas. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
|
Data corrente: |
16/02/2024 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
16/02/2024 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
JESUS, G. L. de; LAVORANTI, O. J.; SCHAFER, G.; OLIVEIRA, G. D. de; SILVA, R. S. de A.; CUQUEL, F. L. |
|
Afiliação: |
GABRIEL LUCAS DE JESUS, FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PARANÁ; OSMIR JOSE LAVORANTI, CNPF; GILMAR SCHAFER, FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL; GABRIEL DIAS DE OLIVEIRA, FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PARANÁ; RICARDO SCHEFFER DE ANDRADE SILVA, FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PARANÁ; FRANCINE LORENA CUQUEL, FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PARANÁ. |
|
Título: |
Nutrient uptake in supplemented substrate by oyster mushroom. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2023 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, v. 39, n. 7, p. 1-9, 2023. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-023-03622-3 |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
Spent mushroom substrate (SMS) is a promising alternative for supplementing oyster mushroom substrate, replacing conventional cereal bran. Therefore, the objective was to evaluate the production of Pleurotus ostreatus supplemented with Lentinula edodes’ SMS, through the nutritional analysis of the substrate. Wheat straw was used as substrate and supplemented with rice bran (RB) or SMS in 0%, 7%,15% and 30%. Ca, K, Mg, Mn, Zn, Cu and Fe contents of the cultivation substrates (before and after harvest) were determined through atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Mycelial growth (cm²/day), mycelial time colonization (days), number of clusters, number of pileus, average clusters weight (g), pileus lenght (cm) and width (cm), productivity (1st, 2nd and 3rd flush) (%), biological efficiency (%) of mushrooms were evaluated. Results indicated mycelial growth was higher (0.87 cm²/day compared to the Control) when the substrate was supplemented regardless of the source. The proportions of 15% of SMS achieved the highest biological efficiency (107% − 15% SMS versus 66% - Control). The only nutrients that showed differences in absorption were Ca, K and Mn, in which substrates supplemented with SMS had greater absorption of Ca (5.37 g.kg− 1 versus 1.94 g.kg− 1 in Control) while substrates supplemented with RB absorbed more K (6.56 g.kg− 1 versus 3.74 g.kg− 1 in Control). The mineral composi- tion of the substrate has a direct impact on the growth and yield of P. ostreatus, highlighting the potential of SMS as a alternative to traditional bran supplementation. MenosSpent mushroom substrate (SMS) is a promising alternative for supplementing oyster mushroom substrate, replacing conventional cereal bran. Therefore, the objective was to evaluate the production of Pleurotus ostreatus supplemented with Lentinula edodes’ SMS, through the nutritional analysis of the substrate. Wheat straw was used as substrate and supplemented with rice bran (RB) or SMS in 0%, 7%,15% and 30%. Ca, K, Mg, Mn, Zn, Cu and Fe contents of the cultivation substrates (before and after harvest) were determined through atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Mycelial growth (cm²/day), mycelial time colonization (days), number of clusters, number of pileus, average clusters weight (g), pileus lenght (cm) and width (cm), productivity (1st, 2nd and 3rd flush) (%), biological efficiency (%) of mushrooms were evaluated. Results indicated mycelial growth was higher (0.87 cm²/day compared to the Control) when the substrate was supplemented regardless of the source. The proportions of 15% of SMS achieved the highest biological efficiency (107% − 15% SMS versus 66% - Control). The only nutrients that showed differences in absorption were Ca, K and Mn, in which substrates supplemented with SMS had greater absorption of Ca (5.37 g.kg− 1 versus 1.94 g.kg− 1 in Control) while substrates supplemented with RB absorbed more K (6.56 g.kg− 1 versus 3.74 g.kg− 1 in Control). The mineral composi- tion of the substrate has a direct impact on the growth and yield of P. ostreatus, highlighting t... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Macronutrients; Micronutrients; Nutrient absorption; Shimeji mushroom; Spent mushroom substrate; Substrato. |
|
Thesagro: |
Cogumelo; Lentinula Edodes. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Pleurotus ostreatus. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02488naa a2200301 a 4500
001 2162061
005 2024-02-16
008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-023-03622-3$2DOI
100 1 $aJESUS, G. L. de
245 $aNutrient uptake in supplemented substrate by oyster mushroom.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2023
520 $aSpent mushroom substrate (SMS) is a promising alternative for supplementing oyster mushroom substrate, replacing conventional cereal bran. Therefore, the objective was to evaluate the production of Pleurotus ostreatus supplemented with Lentinula edodes’ SMS, through the nutritional analysis of the substrate. Wheat straw was used as substrate and supplemented with rice bran (RB) or SMS in 0%, 7%,15% and 30%. Ca, K, Mg, Mn, Zn, Cu and Fe contents of the cultivation substrates (before and after harvest) were determined through atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Mycelial growth (cm²/day), mycelial time colonization (days), number of clusters, number of pileus, average clusters weight (g), pileus lenght (cm) and width (cm), productivity (1st, 2nd and 3rd flush) (%), biological efficiency (%) of mushrooms were evaluated. Results indicated mycelial growth was higher (0.87 cm²/day compared to the Control) when the substrate was supplemented regardless of the source. The proportions of 15% of SMS achieved the highest biological efficiency (107% − 15% SMS versus 66% - Control). The only nutrients that showed differences in absorption were Ca, K and Mn, in which substrates supplemented with SMS had greater absorption of Ca (5.37 g.kg− 1 versus 1.94 g.kg− 1 in Control) while substrates supplemented with RB absorbed more K (6.56 g.kg− 1 versus 3.74 g.kg− 1 in Control). The mineral composi- tion of the substrate has a direct impact on the growth and yield of P. ostreatus, highlighting the potential of SMS as a alternative to traditional bran supplementation.
650 $aPleurotus ostreatus
650 $aCogumelo
650 $aLentinula Edodes
653 $aMacronutrients
653 $aMicronutrients
653 $aNutrient absorption
653 $aShimeji mushroom
653 $aSpent mushroom substrate
653 $aSubstrato
700 1 $aLAVORANTI, O. J.
700 1 $aSCHAFER, G.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, G. D. de
700 1 $aSILVA, R. S. de A.
700 1 $aCUQUEL, F. L.
773 $tWorld Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology$gv. 39, n. 7, p. 1-9, 2023.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
|
Data corrente: |
25/02/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
25/02/2022 |
|
Autoria: |
CARVALHO, P. E. R. |
|
Afiliação: |
PAULO ERNANI RAMALHO CARVALHO, CNPF. |
|
Título: |
Bom-nome: Maytenus rigida. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2014 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: CARVALHO, P. E. R. Espécies arbóreas brasileiras. Brasília: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica; Colombo: Embrapa Florestas, 2014. v. 5, p. 141-148. |
|
Série: |
(Coleção espécies arbóreas brasileiras, v. 5). |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
NOMES VULGARES POR UNIDADES DA FEDERAÇÃO: em Alagoas, bom-nome; na Bahia, bom-nome, bonomeiro, colher, espinheira-santa e pau-de-colher; no Ceará, bom-nome e casca-grossa; em Goiás, espinheira-santa; em Minas Gerais, bom-nome e pau-de-colher; na Paraíba, bom-nome e bonome; em Pernambuco, bom-nome e bom-nome-verdadeiro; no Rio Grande do Norte, bom-nome e cabelo-de-negro; em Sergipe, bom-nome. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Bom-nome; Descrição; Maytenus rigida; Ocorrência; Uso. |
|
Thesagro: |
Crescimento; Espécie Nativa; Madeira; Nomenclatura; Taxonomia. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
K Ciência Florestal e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/232025/1/Especies-Arboreas-Brasileiras-vol-5-Bom-Nome.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01147naa a2200253 a 4500
001 2140436
005 2022-02-25
008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aCARVALHO, P. E. R.
245 $aBom-nome$bMaytenus rigida.
260 $c2014
490 $a(Coleção espécies arbóreas brasileiras, v. 5).
520 $aNOMES VULGARES POR UNIDADES DA FEDERAÇÃO: em Alagoas, bom-nome; na Bahia, bom-nome, bonomeiro, colher, espinheira-santa e pau-de-colher; no Ceará, bom-nome e casca-grossa; em Goiás, espinheira-santa; em Minas Gerais, bom-nome e pau-de-colher; na Paraíba, bom-nome e bonome; em Pernambuco, bom-nome e bom-nome-verdadeiro; no Rio Grande do Norte, bom-nome e cabelo-de-negro; em Sergipe, bom-nome.
650 $aCrescimento
650 $aEspécie Nativa
650 $aMadeira
650 $aNomenclatura
650 $aTaxonomia
653 $aBom-nome
653 $aDescrição
653 $aMaytenus rigida
653 $aOcorrência
653 $aUso
773 $tIn: CARVALHO, P. E. R. Espécies arbóreas brasileiras. Brasília: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica; Colombo: Embrapa Florestas, 2014.$gv. 5, p. 141-148.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
