| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Instrumentação. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpdia.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Instrumentação. |
|
Data corrente: |
28/09/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
23/01/2024 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
GORANOV, A. I.; TADINI, A. M.; MARTIN NETO, L.; BERNARDI, A. C. de C.; PEZZOPANE, J. R. M.; MILORI, D. M. B. P.; MOUNIER, S.; HATCHER, P. G. |
|
Afiliação: |
LADISLAU MARTIN NETO, CNPDIA; ALBERTO CARLOS DE CAMPOS BERNARDI, CPPSE; JOSE RICARDO MACEDO PEZZOPANE, CPPSE; DEBORA MARCONDES BASTOS PEREIRA, CNPDIA. |
|
Título: |
Comparison of sample preparation techniques for the (--)ESI-FT-ICR-MS analysis of humic and fulvic acids. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Environmental Science & Technology, v. 56, 2022. |
|
Páginas: |
12688 - 12701 |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c01125 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
: Soil organic matter (SOM) plays a key role in the global carbon and nitrogen cycles. Soil biogeochemistry is regularly studied by extracting the base-soluble fractions of SOM: acidinsoluble humic acid (HA) and acid-soluble fulvic acid (FA). Electrospray ionization−Fourier transform−ion cyclotron resonance−mass spectrometry (ESI-FT-ICR-MS) is commonly utilized for molecularly characterizing these fractions. Different sample preparation techniques exist for the analysis of HA and FA though questions remain regarding data comparability following different preparations. Comparisons of different sample preparation techniques here revealed that the negative-mode ESI-FT-ICRMS analytical window can be skewed to detect different groups of molecules, with primary differences in oxygenation, aromaticity, and molecular weight. It was also observed that HA and FA from soils versus an aquatic matrix behaved very differently. Thus, we conclude that sample preparation techniques determined to be ?most optimal? in our study are in no way universal. We recommend that future studies of HA and FA involve similar comparative studies for determining the most suitable sample preparation technique for their particular type of HA or FA matrices. This will enhance data comparability among different studies and environmental systems and ultimately allow us to better understand the complex composition of environmental matrices. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Data comparability; Electrospray ionization; FT-ICR-MS; Organic matter characterization. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02315naa a2200277 a 4500
001 2146932
005 2024-01-23
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c01125$2DOI
100 1 $aGORANOV, A. I.
245 $aComparison of sample preparation techniques for the (--)ESI-FT-ICR-MS analysis of humic and fulvic acids.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
300 $a12688 - 12701
520 $a: Soil organic matter (SOM) plays a key role in the global carbon and nitrogen cycles. Soil biogeochemistry is regularly studied by extracting the base-soluble fractions of SOM: acidinsoluble humic acid (HA) and acid-soluble fulvic acid (FA). Electrospray ionization−Fourier transform−ion cyclotron resonance−mass spectrometry (ESI-FT-ICR-MS) is commonly utilized for molecularly characterizing these fractions. Different sample preparation techniques exist for the analysis of HA and FA though questions remain regarding data comparability following different preparations. Comparisons of different sample preparation techniques here revealed that the negative-mode ESI-FT-ICRMS analytical window can be skewed to detect different groups of molecules, with primary differences in oxygenation, aromaticity, and molecular weight. It was also observed that HA and FA from soils versus an aquatic matrix behaved very differently. Thus, we conclude that sample preparation techniques determined to be ?most optimal? in our study are in no way universal. We recommend that future studies of HA and FA involve similar comparative studies for determining the most suitable sample preparation technique for their particular type of HA or FA matrices. This will enhance data comparability among different studies and environmental systems and ultimately allow us to better understand the complex composition of environmental matrices.
653 $aData comparability
653 $aElectrospray ionization
653 $aFT-ICR-MS
653 $aOrganic matter characterization
700 1 $aTADINI, A. M.
700 1 $aMARTIN NETO, L.
700 1 $aBERNARDI, A. C. de C.
700 1 $aPEZZOPANE, J. R. M.
700 1 $aMILORI, D. M. B. P.
700 1 $aMOUNIER, S.
700 1 $aHATCHER, P. G.
773 $tEnvironmental Science & Technology$gv. 56, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Instrumentação (CNPDIA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 183 | |
| 4. |  | HIGA, A. R.; PRADO. C. de A. Acrocarpus fraxinifolius Wight & Arn. In: GALVAO, A. P. M. (Coord.). Espécies não tradicionais para plantios com finalidades produtivas e ambientais. Colombo: Embrapa Florestas, 1998. p. 57-60. Seminário realizado em Curitiba, de 6 a 8 de outubro de 1998.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
|    |
| 5. | | HIGA, A. R.; CARVALHO, P. E. R. Sobrevivência e crescimento de doze espécies de eucalipto em Dois Vizinhos, Paraná. Silvicultura, São Paulo, v. 12, n. 42, t. 3, p. 459-462, 1992. Edição dos Anais do Congresso Florestal Brasileiro, 6., 1990, Campos do Jordão.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
| 7. | | HIGA, A. R.; HIGA, R. C. V. Indicação de espécies para reflorestamento. In: GALVAO, A.P.M., org. Reflorestamento de propriedades rurais para fins produtivos e ambientais: um guia para acoes municipais e regionais. Brasilia: Embrapa Comunicacao para Transferencia de Tecnologia / Colombo: Embrapa Florestas, 2000. p. 101-124.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 183 | |
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
