|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agrobiologia. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpab.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrobiologia. |
Data corrente: |
27/09/2022 |
Data da última atualização: |
27/09/2022 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
FERREIRA, T. dos S.; PÊGO, R. G.; ANTUNES, L. F. de S.; CORREIA, M. E. F.; MARTINS, R. da C. F.; CARMO, M. G. F. do. |
Afiliação: |
TALITA DOS SANTOS FERREIRA, UFRRJ; ROGÉRIO GOMES PÊGO, UFRRJ; LUIZ FERNANDO DE SOUSA ANTUNES, UFRRJ; MARIA ELIZABETH FERNANDES CORREIA, CNPAB; ROSÁRIA DA COSTA FARIA MARTINS, UFRRJ; MARGARIDA GORÉTE FERREIRA DO CARMO, UFRRJ. |
Título: |
Quality of seedlings of different pepper genotypes grown in millicompost: An organic substrate generated by millipedes activity. |
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, v. 11, n. 3, p. 29-300, sept., 2022. |
ISSN: |
2251-7715 |
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.30486/ijrowa.2021.1908263.1126 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Purpose To evaluate the production and the quality of seedlings of different pepper genotypes produced on millicompost as an organic substrate.Method Three experiments were carried out, one for each pepper genotype (ENAS-5007, ENAS-5031 and ENAS-5032) in which three substrates were evaluated: 100% Millicompost (S1); Millicompost MIX (50% millicompost + 50% powdered coconut fiber) (S2) and Carolina organic® commercial substrate (S3). Variables evaluated: shoot and root dry mass (SDM and RDM), number of leaves (NL), plant height (PH), seedling vigor (SV) and clod stability (CS). The data were subjected to the analysis of variance and the means were compared by the Tukey?s test at 5% probability level.Results For the ENAS-5007 and ENAS-5032 genotypes, there was a significant difference in all the variables analyzed, being S1 and S3 the substrates with the highest and the lowest performances, respectively. In the ENAS-5031 genotype, SDM and RDM did not differ between S1 and S2. For ENAS-5031, there were significant differences in PH, NL and SV, in which S1 promoted the best results; however, no significant difference was observed for CS.Conclusion The 100% millicompost substrate promoted the best development of pepper seedlings in all the three genotypes evaluated. However, the combination of the millicompost MIX has the potential to be used, as it promotes seedlings of superior quality in comparison to the commercial substrate, maximizing the use of millicompost as a substrate for the product MenosPurpose To evaluate the production and the quality of seedlings of different pepper genotypes produced on millicompost as an organic substrate.Method Three experiments were carried out, one for each pepper genotype (ENAS-5007, ENAS-5031 and ENAS-5032) in which three substrates were evaluated: 100% Millicompost (S1); Millicompost MIX (50% millicompost + 50% powdered coconut fiber) (S2) and Carolina organic® commercial substrate (S3). Variables evaluated: shoot and root dry mass (SDM and RDM), number of leaves (NL), plant height (PH), seedling vigor (SV) and clod stability (CS). The data were subjected to the analysis of variance and the means were compared by the Tukey?s test at 5% probability level.Results For the ENAS-5007 and ENAS-5032 genotypes, there was a significant difference in all the variables analyzed, being S1 and S3 the substrates with the highest and the lowest performances, respectively. In the ENAS-5031 genotype, SDM and RDM did not differ between S1 and S2. For ENAS-5031, there were significant differences in PH, NL and SV, in which S1 promoted the best results; however, no significant difference was observed for CS.Conclusion The 100% millicompost substrate promoted the best development of pepper seedlings in all the three genotypes evaluated. However, the combination of the millicompost MIX has the potential to be used, as it promotes seedlings of superior quality in comparison to the commercial substrate, maximizing the use of millicompost as a substrate ... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Coconut fiber; Millicomposting; Plug seedlings. |
Thesagro: |
Capsicum sp. |
Categoria do assunto: |
S Ciências Biológicas |
Marc: |
LEADER 02390naa a2200253 a 4500 001 2146885 005 2022-09-27 008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a2251-7715 024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.30486/ijrowa.2021.1908263.1126$2DOI 100 1 $aFERREIRA, T. dos S. 245 $aQuality of seedlings of different pepper genotypes grown in millicompost$bAn organic substrate generated by millipedes activity.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2022 520 $aPurpose To evaluate the production and the quality of seedlings of different pepper genotypes produced on millicompost as an organic substrate.Method Three experiments were carried out, one for each pepper genotype (ENAS-5007, ENAS-5031 and ENAS-5032) in which three substrates were evaluated: 100% Millicompost (S1); Millicompost MIX (50% millicompost + 50% powdered coconut fiber) (S2) and Carolina organic® commercial substrate (S3). Variables evaluated: shoot and root dry mass (SDM and RDM), number of leaves (NL), plant height (PH), seedling vigor (SV) and clod stability (CS). The data were subjected to the analysis of variance and the means were compared by the Tukey?s test at 5% probability level.Results For the ENAS-5007 and ENAS-5032 genotypes, there was a significant difference in all the variables analyzed, being S1 and S3 the substrates with the highest and the lowest performances, respectively. In the ENAS-5031 genotype, SDM and RDM did not differ between S1 and S2. For ENAS-5031, there were significant differences in PH, NL and SV, in which S1 promoted the best results; however, no significant difference was observed for CS.Conclusion The 100% millicompost substrate promoted the best development of pepper seedlings in all the three genotypes evaluated. However, the combination of the millicompost MIX has the potential to be used, as it promotes seedlings of superior quality in comparison to the commercial substrate, maximizing the use of millicompost as a substrate for the product 650 $aCapsicum sp 653 $aCoconut fiber 653 $aMillicomposting 653 $aPlug seedlings 700 1 $aPÊGO, R. G. 700 1 $aANTUNES, L. F. de S. 700 1 $aCORREIA, M. E. F. 700 1 $aMARTINS, R. da C. F. 700 1 $aCARMO, M. G. F. do 773 $tInternational Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture$gv. 11, n. 3, p. 29-300, sept., 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrobiologia (CNPAB) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registros recuperados : 15 | |
9. |  | BASTOS, E. A.; AGUIAR NETTO, A. de O.; ANDRADE JUNIOR, A. S. de; OLIVEIRA, C. de M. M. de. Distribuição de frequência da evapotranspiração de referência para fins de dimensionamento de sistemas de irrigação na região de Teresina, PI. In: SEMINÁRIO DE PESQUISA AGROPECUÁRIA DO PIAUÍ, 8.; SIMPÓSIO AGROPECUÁRIO E FLORESTAL DO MEIO-NORTE, 1., 1994, Teresina. Pesquisa e desenvolvimento para o Meio-Norte: anais. Teresina: EMBRAPA Meio-Norte; São Luís: EMAPA, 1997. p. 13-18 (EMBRAPA-CPAMN. Documentos, 16).Tipo: Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio-Norte. |
|    |
12. |  | COELHO, E. F.; OLIVEIRA, A. S. de; AGUIAR NETTO, A. de O.; TEIXEIRA, A. H. de C.; ARAUJO, E. C. E.; BASSOI, L. H. Irrigação. In: GENU, P. J. de C.; PINTO, A. C. de Q. (Ed.). A cultura da mangueira. Brasília, DF: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2002. cap. 9, p. 165-189. il.Tipo: Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio-Norte; Embrapa Semiárido. |
|    |
13. |  | AGUIAR NETTO, A. de O.; MOURA, E. G. de; SOUZA, V. F. de; BARBOSA, E. M.; CAIRES, E. F.; RODRIGUES, J. D.; PEDRAS, J. F.; ONO, E. O. Efeito de sombreamento e adubacao nitrogenada no crescimento e na producao da cultura de feijoeiro (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Cientifica, v. 23, n. 2, p. 209-221, 1996.Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio-Norte. |
|   |
Registros recuperados : 15 | |
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|