| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agrobiologia. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpab.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrobiologia. |
|
Data corrente: |
27/09/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
27/09/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
FERREIRA, T. dos S.; PÊGO, R. G.; ANTUNES, L. F. de S.; CORREIA, M. E. F.; MARTINS, R. da C. F.; CARMO, M. G. F. do. |
|
Afiliação: |
TALITA DOS SANTOS FERREIRA, UFRRJ; ROGÉRIO GOMES PÊGO, UFRRJ; LUIZ FERNANDO DE SOUSA ANTUNES, UFRRJ; MARIA ELIZABETH FERNANDES CORREIA, CNPAB; ROSÁRIA DA COSTA FARIA MARTINS, UFRRJ; MARGARIDA GORÉTE FERREIRA DO CARMO, UFRRJ. |
|
Título: |
Quality of seedlings of different pepper genotypes grown in millicompost: An organic substrate generated by millipedes activity. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, v. 11, n. 3, p. 29-300, sept., 2022. |
|
ISSN: |
2251-7715 |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.30486/ijrowa.2021.1908263.1126 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Purpose To evaluate the production and the quality of seedlings of different pepper genotypes produced on millicompost as an organic substrate.Method Three experiments were carried out, one for each pepper genotype (ENAS-5007, ENAS-5031 and ENAS-5032) in which three substrates were evaluated: 100% Millicompost (S1); Millicompost MIX (50% millicompost + 50% powdered coconut fiber) (S2) and Carolina organic® commercial substrate (S3). Variables evaluated: shoot and root dry mass (SDM and RDM), number of leaves (NL), plant height (PH), seedling vigor (SV) and clod stability (CS). The data were subjected to the analysis of variance and the means were compared by the Tukey?s test at 5% probability level.Results For the ENAS-5007 and ENAS-5032 genotypes, there was a significant difference in all the variables analyzed, being S1 and S3 the substrates with the highest and the lowest performances, respectively. In the ENAS-5031 genotype, SDM and RDM did not differ between S1 and S2. For ENAS-5031, there were significant differences in PH, NL and SV, in which S1 promoted the best results; however, no significant difference was observed for CS.Conclusion The 100% millicompost substrate promoted the best development of pepper seedlings in all the three genotypes evaluated. However, the combination of the millicompost MIX has the potential to be used, as it promotes seedlings of superior quality in comparison to the commercial substrate, maximizing the use of millicompost as a substrate for the product MenosPurpose To evaluate the production and the quality of seedlings of different pepper genotypes produced on millicompost as an organic substrate.Method Three experiments were carried out, one for each pepper genotype (ENAS-5007, ENAS-5031 and ENAS-5032) in which three substrates were evaluated: 100% Millicompost (S1); Millicompost MIX (50% millicompost + 50% powdered coconut fiber) (S2) and Carolina organic® commercial substrate (S3). Variables evaluated: shoot and root dry mass (SDM and RDM), number of leaves (NL), plant height (PH), seedling vigor (SV) and clod stability (CS). The data were subjected to the analysis of variance and the means were compared by the Tukey?s test at 5% probability level.Results For the ENAS-5007 and ENAS-5032 genotypes, there was a significant difference in all the variables analyzed, being S1 and S3 the substrates with the highest and the lowest performances, respectively. In the ENAS-5031 genotype, SDM and RDM did not differ between S1 and S2. For ENAS-5031, there were significant differences in PH, NL and SV, in which S1 promoted the best results; however, no significant difference was observed for CS.Conclusion The 100% millicompost substrate promoted the best development of pepper seedlings in all the three genotypes evaluated. However, the combination of the millicompost MIX has the potential to be used, as it promotes seedlings of superior quality in comparison to the commercial substrate, maximizing the use of millicompost as a substrate ... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Coconut fiber; Millicomposting; Plug seedlings. |
|
Thesagro: |
Capsicum sp. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
S Ciências Biológicas |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02390naa a2200253 a 4500
001 2146885
005 2022-09-27
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a2251-7715
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.30486/ijrowa.2021.1908263.1126$2DOI
100 1 $aFERREIRA, T. dos S.
245 $aQuality of seedlings of different pepper genotypes grown in millicompost$bAn organic substrate generated by millipedes activity.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
520 $aPurpose To evaluate the production and the quality of seedlings of different pepper genotypes produced on millicompost as an organic substrate.Method Three experiments were carried out, one for each pepper genotype (ENAS-5007, ENAS-5031 and ENAS-5032) in which three substrates were evaluated: 100% Millicompost (S1); Millicompost MIX (50% millicompost + 50% powdered coconut fiber) (S2) and Carolina organic® commercial substrate (S3). Variables evaluated: shoot and root dry mass (SDM and RDM), number of leaves (NL), plant height (PH), seedling vigor (SV) and clod stability (CS). The data were subjected to the analysis of variance and the means were compared by the Tukey?s test at 5% probability level.Results For the ENAS-5007 and ENAS-5032 genotypes, there was a significant difference in all the variables analyzed, being S1 and S3 the substrates with the highest and the lowest performances, respectively. In the ENAS-5031 genotype, SDM and RDM did not differ between S1 and S2. For ENAS-5031, there were significant differences in PH, NL and SV, in which S1 promoted the best results; however, no significant difference was observed for CS.Conclusion The 100% millicompost substrate promoted the best development of pepper seedlings in all the three genotypes evaluated. However, the combination of the millicompost MIX has the potential to be used, as it promotes seedlings of superior quality in comparison to the commercial substrate, maximizing the use of millicompost as a substrate for the product
650 $aCapsicum sp
653 $aCoconut fiber
653 $aMillicomposting
653 $aPlug seedlings
700 1 $aPÊGO, R. G.
700 1 $aANTUNES, L. F. de S.
700 1 $aCORREIA, M. E. F.
700 1 $aMARTINS, R. da C. F.
700 1 $aCARMO, M. G. F. do
773 $tInternational Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture$gv. 11, n. 3, p. 29-300, sept., 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrobiologia (CNPAB) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 7 | |
| 6. |  | GUIESI, R. M.; BARIONI JUNIOR, W.; MACHADO, C. G. de C. F.; ESTEVES, S. N.; DUGNANI, E. L. F. Sistema de rastreabilidade utilizando brinco eletrônico inteligente. In: SIMPÓSIO DE INICIAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA DA EMBRAPA PECUÁRIA SUDESTE, 2006, São Carlos, SP. Anais... São Carlos: Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste, 2006. (Documentos / Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste, 62).| Tipo: Artigo em Anais de Congresso / Nota Técnica |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. |
|    |
| 7. | | MACHADO, R.; ZORZENON, M.; FERREIRA, L. C.; LEAL, L. S.; GUIESI, R. M.; BERGAMASCHI, M. A. C. M.; SUDANO, M. J. Progestogen and progesterone supplementation after artificial insemination in postpartum beef cows. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE REPRODUÇÃO ANIMAL, 19., 2011, Recife. Anais... Recife: CBRA, 2011. p. 82.| Tipo: Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 7 | |
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
