| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Instrumentação. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpdia.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical; Embrapa Instrumentação. |
|
Data corrente: |
09/06/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
09/06/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
AZEREDO, H. M. C. de; MATOS, M. C. de; NIRO, C. M. |
|
Afiliação: |
HENRIETTE MONTEIRO C DE AZEREDO, CNPDIA. |
|
Título: |
Something to chew on: technological aspects for novel snacks. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, v. 102, 2022. |
|
Páginas: |
2191?2198 |
|
DOI: |
10.1002/jsfa.11701 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
According to the Merriam-Webster's, a snack (a term whose first reported use dates from 1757) is 'a light meal' or 'food eaten between regular meals'. Snacks usually do not require preparation, being convenient for people at home, school, work, or on the go. There are different motivations to snack, including hunger, social activity, distraction, and the rewarding properties of food.1 The global market for snacks was around US$ 500 billion in 2020.2 Consumers had increased their snack consumption even before the COVID-19 pandemic,3 but the whole pandemic scenario has promoted increased consumption of comfort foods, including snacks. People use several attributes to choose snacks, including sensory properties, price, and convenience. Health aspects have also been taken into account,7 and this has persuaded industries to offer healthier snack versions. Indeed, although 'snacks' are usually associated with unhealthy food,1 this concept has gradually changed, as healthier snacks have been considered as helpful tools to promote satiety and appetite control,8 and to minimize digestive and/or metabolic overload from fewer (and heavier) meals while helping consumers to meet recommendations for specific food groups (e.g. fruits) and nutrients (e.g. fiber and vitamins).9 Actually, the market for healthy snacks is expected to reach about US$ 33 billion by 2025.10 Though this figure is still small when compared with the whole snack food market, it indicates that a significant part of the global population is actually looking for healthier snacking choices. The objective of this mini-review is to summarize the technological aspects of recent evolutions on snacks and to identify studies indicating the trends and perspectives on future snacks. MenosAccording to the Merriam-Webster's, a snack (a term whose first reported use dates from 1757) is 'a light meal' or 'food eaten between regular meals'. Snacks usually do not require preparation, being convenient for people at home, school, work, or on the go. There are different motivations to snack, including hunger, social activity, distraction, and the rewarding properties of food.1 The global market for snacks was around US$ 500 billion in 2020.2 Consumers had increased their snack consumption even before the COVID-19 pandemic,3 but the whole pandemic scenario has promoted increased consumption of comfort foods, including snacks. People use several attributes to choose snacks, including sensory properties, price, and convenience. Health aspects have also been taken into account,7 and this has persuaded industries to offer healthier snack versions. Indeed, although 'snacks' are usually associated with unhealthy food,1 this concept has gradually changed, as healthier snacks have been considered as helpful tools to promote satiety and appetite control,8 and to minimize digestive and/or metabolic overload from fewer (and heavier) meals while helping consumers to meet recommendations for specific food groups (e.g. fruits) and nutrients (e.g. fiber and vitamins).9 Actually, the market for healthy snacks is expected to reach about US$ 33 billion by 2025.10 Though this figure is still small when compared with the whole snack food market, it indicates that a significant part of th... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Alternative protein sources; Fiber enrichment; Food extrusion; Fruit leathers; Non-conventional drying methods. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02447naa a2200229 a 4500 001 2143902 005 2022-06-09 008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1002/jsfa.11701$2DOI 100 1 $aAZEREDO, H. M. C. de 245 $aSomething to chew on$btechnological aspects for novel snacks.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2022 300 $a2191?2198 520 $aAccording to the Merriam-Webster's, a snack (a term whose first reported use dates from 1757) is 'a light meal' or 'food eaten between regular meals'. Snacks usually do not require preparation, being convenient for people at home, school, work, or on the go. There are different motivations to snack, including hunger, social activity, distraction, and the rewarding properties of food.1 The global market for snacks was around US$ 500 billion in 2020.2 Consumers had increased their snack consumption even before the COVID-19 pandemic,3 but the whole pandemic scenario has promoted increased consumption of comfort foods, including snacks. People use several attributes to choose snacks, including sensory properties, price, and convenience. Health aspects have also been taken into account,7 and this has persuaded industries to offer healthier snack versions. Indeed, although 'snacks' are usually associated with unhealthy food,1 this concept has gradually changed, as healthier snacks have been considered as helpful tools to promote satiety and appetite control,8 and to minimize digestive and/or metabolic overload from fewer (and heavier) meals while helping consumers to meet recommendations for specific food groups (e.g. fruits) and nutrients (e.g. fiber and vitamins).9 Actually, the market for healthy snacks is expected to reach about US$ 33 billion by 2025.10 Though this figure is still small when compared with the whole snack food market, it indicates that a significant part of the global population is actually looking for healthier snacking choices. The objective of this mini-review is to summarize the technological aspects of recent evolutions on snacks and to identify studies indicating the trends and perspectives on future snacks. 653 $aAlternative protein sources 653 $aFiber enrichment 653 $aFood extrusion 653 $aFruit leathers 653 $aNon-conventional drying methods 700 1 $aMATOS, M. C. de 700 1 $aNIRO, C. M. 773 $tJournal of the Science of Food and Agriculture$gv. 102, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Instrumentação (CNPDIA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 18 | |
| 5. |  | RAMOS, N. P.; LUCHIARI JUNIOR, A.; BATISTA, E. R.; ANDRADE JÚNIOR, A. S. de; FREITAS NETO, M. de A. Diagnóstico agroambiental rápido dos setores de produção e processamento da cana-de-açucar nos estados do Maranhão e Piauí. In: CONGRESSO NACIONAL DA SOCIEDADE DOS TÉCNICOS AÇUCAREIROS E ALCOOLEIROS DO BRASIL, STAB, 9., 2008, Maceió. Anais... Maceió: STAB, 2008. p. 788-793| Tipo: Artigo em Anais de Congresso / Nota Técnica |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio-Norte. |
|   |
| 7. |  | RAMOS, N. P.; LUCHIARI JUNIOR, A.; BATISTA, E. R.; ANDRADE JUNIOR, A. S. de; FREITAS NETO, M. de A. Diagnóstico agroambiental rápido dos setores de produção e processamento da cana-de-açúcar nos estados do Maranhão e Piauí. In: STAB: Açúcar, álcool e subprodutos, v.27, n.2, p.34, 2008. Reumos do 9. Congresso Nacional da STAB, 2008, Maceió.| Tipo: Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
|    |
| 11. |  | FREITAS NETO, M. de A. F.; FELIX, J. P. L.; ARTHAUD, I. D. B.; LEITÃO, R. C.; SANTAELLA, S. T. Remoção de compostos nitrogenados de águas residuárias de refinarias de petróleo através de reatores biológicos com fungos. Revista Tecnologia, Fortaleza, v.28, n.1, p.85-96, 2007.| Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: Nacional - C |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical. |
|   |
| 12. |  | VEDOVOTO, G. L.; ALMEIDA, M. J. de O.; FREITAS NETO, M. de A.; GAZZOLA, R.; AVILA, A. F. D.; GERHARDT, I. V. Linha de base para avaliação de impactos de variedades biofortificadas: produção e autoconsumo de alimentos no Piauí. In: REUNIÃO DE BIOFORTIFICAÇÃO NO BRASIL, 5., 2015, São Paulo. [Anais...]. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2015. Organização Embrapa Agroindústria de Alimentos. Editora técnica: Marília Regini Nutti| Tipo: Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio-Norte; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
|    |
| 13. |  | FREITAS NETO, M. A.; LEITÃO, R. C.; ROSA, M. de F.; ARAÚJO, A. M.; FARIAS FILHO, A. L.; BRITO, C. R. F.; VIANA, M. B.; SANTAELLA, S. T. Perspectiva do aproveitamento energético do biogás gerado durante o tratamento anaeróbio do líquido da casca do coco verde. In: CONGRESSO INTERNACIONAL DE AGROENERGIA E BIOCOMBUSTÍVEIS, 2007, Teresina-PI. [Resumos...] Teresina: Embrapa Meio Norte, 2007.| Tipo: Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical. |
|   |
| 14. |  | FREITAS NETO, M.; PEREIRA, T. N. S.; GERONIMO, I. G. C.; AZEVEDO, A. O. N.; RAMOS, S. R. R.; PEREIRA, M. G. Coconut genome size determined by flow cytometry: tall versus dwarf types. Genetics and Molecular Research, v. 15, n. 1, february, 2016.| Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: A - 1 |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Tabuleiros Costeiros. |
|    |
| 15. |  | FREITAS NETO, M.; PEREIRA, T. N. S.; GERONIMO, I. G. da C.; NUNES, A. O.; RAMOS, S. R. R.; PEREIRA, M. G. Tamanho do genoma em coqueiro (Cocos nucifera L.) via citometria de Fluxo. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE MELHORAMENTO DE PLANTAS, 7., 2013, Uberlândia. Variedade melhorada: a força da nossa agricultura: anais. Viçosa, MG: SBMP, 2013.| Tipo: Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Tabuleiros Costeiros. |
|    |
| 16. |  | SILVA FILHO, J. V. da; SILVA, D. R. M. da; ARRUDA, F.; FREITAS NETO, M. de A.; CUNHA, J. R. da; SANTOS, F. S. R. dos; SILVA, K. M. L.; LEITE, L. F. C. Índice de manejo de carbono em latossolo vermelho amarelo sob plantio direto e convencional no cerrado piauiense. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE CIÊNCIA DO SOLO, 33., 2011, Uberlândia. Solos nos biomas brasileiros: sustentabilidade e mudanças climáticas: anais. [Uberlândia]: SBCS: UFU, ICIAG, 2011. 4 p.| Tipo: Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio-Norte. |
|    |
| 17. |  | SILVA, K. M. L.; FREITAS NETO, M. de A.; SOUSA, N. S. de; MIRANDA, D. de S.; SANTOS, F. S. R. dos; GUIMARÃES, F. P. de A.; LEITE, L. F. C. Geoespacialização dos teores de fósforo e potássio em latossolo amarelo sob diferentes sistemas de preparo no cerrado piauiense. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE CIÊNCIA DO SOLO, 33., 2011, Uberlândia. Solos nos biomas brasileiros: sustentabilidade e mudanças climáticas: anais. [Uberlândia]: SBCS: UFU, ICIAG, 2011. 4 p.| Tipo: Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio-Norte. |
|    |
| 18. |  | LEITAO, R. C.; ARAÚJO, A. M. de; SOUSA, O. L. de; FREITAS-NETO, M. de A.; VIANA, M. B.; BRITO, C. R. F. DE; SOUSA, A. B. de; ROSA, M. de F.; PINTO, G. A. S.; SANTAELLA, S. T. Tratamento biológico do líquido da casca do coco verde. Fortaleza: Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical, 2010. 123 p. (Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical. Boletim de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento, 39).| Tipo: Boletim de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical; Embrapa Meio-Norte. |
|    |
| Registros recuperados : 18 | |
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|