| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Roraima. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpafrr.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Roraima. |
|
Data corrente: |
14/02/2017 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
11/04/2018 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
SMIDERLE, O. J.; GIANLUPPI, D.; GIANLUPPI, V.; SOUZA, A. das G. |
|
Afiliação: |
OSCAR JOSE SMIDERLE, CPAF-Roraima; DANIEL GIANLUPPI, CPAF-Roraima; VICENTE GIANLUPPI, CPAF-Roraima. |
|
Título: |
Variability among BRS 8381 soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill.) yield components under different liming rates and sowing densities on a savanna in Roraima, Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Revista Colombiana de Investigaciones Agroindustriales, v.3, p. 49-55, 2016. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
harvest index. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
null
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Roraima (CPAF-RR) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Acre. |
|
Data corrente: |
10/06/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
28/06/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
MATUK, F. A.; TURNHOUT, E.; FLESKENS, L.; AMARAL, E. F. do; HAVERROTH, M.; BEHAGEL, J. H. |
|
Afiliação: |
Fernanda Ayaviri Matuk, Wageningen University; Esther Turnhout, Wageningen University; Luuk Fleskens, Wageningen University; EUFRAN FERREIRA DO AMARAL, CPAF-AC; MOACIR HAVERROTH, CPAF-AC; Jelle Hendrik Behagel, Wageningen University. |
|
Título: |
Allying knowledge integration and co-production for knowledge legitimacy and usability: The Amazonian SISA policy and the Kaxinawá Indigenous people case. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Environmental Science and Policy, v. 112, p. 1-9, 2020. |
|
ISSN: |
1462-9011 |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.04.018 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Environmental policies that aim to enhance nature conservation, biodiversity, and well-being of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLC) rely on knowledge integration and co-production processes that include both science and Indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) systems. While these processes are expected to safeguard the diversity of knowledge systems, uneven power relations among participants often prevent them from achieving this which can affect the legitimacy and usability of the outcomes of these processes. Using a case study in the Acre state (Brazil), where policy practitioners implemented the REDD+policy System of Incentives for Ecosystem Services in the Brazilian Kaxinawá Nova Olinda Indigenous Land, we investigate how participants manage challenges to safeguard knowledge diversity and usability during policy assessment and planning. Our findings show how, despite the use of participatory approaches, knowledge diversity ended up being compromised because policy practitioners were insufficiently attentive to power asymmetries and their implications. This, however, did not negatively affect the usability of the knowledge outcomes. Rather than focusing on the perfection of participatory methods, we call for a practical ethics that relies on culturally and ethically sensitive dialogues and that include continuous reflection. Such reflection will enable adaptation and improvisation to be able to respond to emerging power dynamics in an adequate and timely manner, thereby ensuring both the legitimacy and the usability of the outcomes of knowledge integration and co-production. MenosEnvironmental policies that aim to enhance nature conservation, biodiversity, and well-being of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLC) rely on knowledge integration and co-production processes that include both science and Indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) systems. While these processes are expected to safeguard the diversity of knowledge systems, uneven power relations among participants often prevent them from achieving this which can affect the legitimacy and usability of the outcomes of these processes. Using a case study in the Acre state (Brazil), where policy practitioners implemented the REDD+policy System of Incentives for Ecosystem Services in the Brazilian Kaxinawá Nova Olinda Indigenous Land, we investigate how participants manage challenges to safeguard knowledge diversity and usability during policy assessment and planning. Our findings show how, despite the use of participatory approaches, knowledge diversity ended up being compromised because policy practitioners were insufficiently attentive to power asymmetries and their implications. This, however, did not negatively affect the usability of the knowledge outcomes. Rather than focusing on the perfection of participatory methods, we call for a practical ethics that relies on culturally and ethically sensitive dialogues and that include continuous reflection. Such reflection will enable adaptation and improvisation to be able to respond to emerging power dynamics in an adequate and timely manner, ... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Acre; Amazonia Occidental; Amazônia Ocidental; Conhecimento tradicional; Feijó (AC); Gestão participativa; Método participativo; Participative management; Povos indígenas; Pueblos indigenas; REDD+; Servicios ecosistémicos; Serviços ecossistêmicos; SISA; Terra Indígena Kaxinawá de Nova Olinda (TIKNO); Western Amazon. |
|
Thesagro: |
Planejamento Participativo. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Ecosystem services; Environmental policy; Indigenous knowledge; Indigenous peoples. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/bitstream/doc/1123244/1/27006.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
null
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Acre (CPAF-AC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
