| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Amapá. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpafap.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amapá. |
|
Data corrente: |
22/03/2013 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
02/04/2025 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
CASTRO, G. S. A.; CRUSCIOL, C. A. C. |
|
Afiliação: |
GUSTAVO SPADOTTI AMARAL CASTRO, CPAF-AP; C. A. C. CRUSCIOL, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL PAULISTA. |
|
Título: |
Effects of superficial liming and silicate application on soil fertility and crop yield under rotation. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2013 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Geoderma, Amsterdam, v. 195-196, p. 234-242, Jan. 2013. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Soil acidity and low natural fertility are the main problems for grain production in Brazilian ?cerrado?. Although lime has been the most applied source for soil correction, silicate may be an alternative material due to its lower solubility and Si supply, which is beneficial to several crops. This work aimed to evaluate the efficiency of superficial liming and calcium/magnesium silicate application on soil chemical attributes, plant nutrition, yield components and final yield of a soybean/white oat/maize/bean rotation under no-tillage system in a drywinter region. The experiment was conducted under no tillage system in a deep acid clayey Rhodic Hapludox, Botucatu-SP, Brazil. The design was the completely randomized block with sixteen replications. Treatments consisted of two sources for soil acidity correction (dolomitic lime: ECC=90%, CaO=36% and MgO=12%; calcium/magnesium silicate: ECC=80%, CaO=34%, MgO=10% and SiO2=22%) applied in October 2006 to raise base saturation up to 70% and a control, with no soil correction. Soybean and white oat were sown in 2006/2007 as the main crop and off-season, respectively. Maize and bean were cropped in the next year (2007/2008). Products from silicate dissociation reach deeper soil layers after 18 months from the application, compared to liming. Additionally, silicate is more efficient than lime to increasing phosphorus availability and reducing toxic aluminum. Such benefits in soil chemical attributes were only evidenced during bean cropping, when grain yield was higher after silicate application comparatively to liming. Both correction sources were improved mineral nutrition of all the other crops, mainly Ca and Mg levels and agronomical characteristics, reflecting in higher yield. MenosSoil acidity and low natural fertility are the main problems for grain production in Brazilian ?cerrado?. Although lime has been the most applied source for soil correction, silicate may be an alternative material due to its lower solubility and Si supply, which is beneficial to several crops. This work aimed to evaluate the efficiency of superficial liming and calcium/magnesium silicate application on soil chemical attributes, plant nutrition, yield components and final yield of a soybean/white oat/maize/bean rotation under no-tillage system in a drywinter region. The experiment was conducted under no tillage system in a deep acid clayey Rhodic Hapludox, Botucatu-SP, Brazil. The design was the completely randomized block with sixteen replications. Treatments consisted of two sources for soil acidity correction (dolomitic lime: ECC=90%, CaO=36% and MgO=12%; calcium/magnesium silicate: ECC=80%, CaO=34%, MgO=10% and SiO2=22%) applied in October 2006 to raise base saturation up to 70% and a control, with no soil correction. Soybean and white oat were sown in 2006/2007 as the main crop and off-season, respectively. Maize and bean were cropped in the next year (2007/2008). Products from silicate dissociation reach deeper soil layers after 18 months from the application, compared to liming. Additionally, silicate is more efficient than lime to increasing phosphorus availability and reducing toxic aluminum. Such benefits in soil chemical attributes were only evidenced during bean c... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Acidity correction source; Brazilian cerrado; No-till. |
|
Thesagro: |
Acidez; Grão; Plantio direto. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
grain yield. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02399naa a2200217 a 4500
001 1953895
005 2025-04-02
008 2013 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aCASTRO, G. S. A.
245 $aEffects of superficial liming and silicate application on soil fertility and crop yield under rotation.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2013
520 $aSoil acidity and low natural fertility are the main problems for grain production in Brazilian ?cerrado?. Although lime has been the most applied source for soil correction, silicate may be an alternative material due to its lower solubility and Si supply, which is beneficial to several crops. This work aimed to evaluate the efficiency of superficial liming and calcium/magnesium silicate application on soil chemical attributes, plant nutrition, yield components and final yield of a soybean/white oat/maize/bean rotation under no-tillage system in a drywinter region. The experiment was conducted under no tillage system in a deep acid clayey Rhodic Hapludox, Botucatu-SP, Brazil. The design was the completely randomized block with sixteen replications. Treatments consisted of two sources for soil acidity correction (dolomitic lime: ECC=90%, CaO=36% and MgO=12%; calcium/magnesium silicate: ECC=80%, CaO=34%, MgO=10% and SiO2=22%) applied in October 2006 to raise base saturation up to 70% and a control, with no soil correction. Soybean and white oat were sown in 2006/2007 as the main crop and off-season, respectively. Maize and bean were cropped in the next year (2007/2008). Products from silicate dissociation reach deeper soil layers after 18 months from the application, compared to liming. Additionally, silicate is more efficient than lime to increasing phosphorus availability and reducing toxic aluminum. Such benefits in soil chemical attributes were only evidenced during bean cropping, when grain yield was higher after silicate application comparatively to liming. Both correction sources were improved mineral nutrition of all the other crops, mainly Ca and Mg levels and agronomical characteristics, reflecting in higher yield.
650 $agrain yield
650 $aAcidez
650 $aGrão
650 $aPlantio direto
653 $aAcidity correction source
653 $aBrazilian cerrado
653 $aNo-till
700 1 $aCRUSCIOL, C. A. C.
773 $tGeoderma, Amsterdam$gv. 195-196, p. 234-242, Jan. 2013.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amapá (CPAF-AP) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
