| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Meio Ambiente. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpma.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
|
Data corrente: |
07/01/2013 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
14/07/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
|
Autoria: |
ABREU, L. S. de; BELLON, S. |
|
Afiliação: |
LUCIMAR SANTIAGO DE ABREU, CNPMA; STÉPHANE BELLON, INRA. |
|
Título: |
The dynamics and recomposition of agroecology in Latin America. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2012 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: HALBERG, N.; MULLER, A. (Ed.). Organic agriculture for sustainable livelihoods. London: Routeledge, 2012. p. 223-245. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The growth of ecological agriculture in some Latin Anlerican countries has been supported Dr srudied by several scholars. Among them, Brandenburg (2002) identified three important phases in its trajectory: (i) emergence of a movement against industrialization of agricultural production; (ii) formation of new groups and social organization forms; and (iii) institutionalization of ecologically based agriculture, accompanied by a partial dilution of its principies. However, a fourth stage of redefinition and recomposition of several alternative agriculture versions can be seen, in which agroeco\ogy occupies an important place and influence in agriculture (Ollivier and Bellon, 2011) and rural developmenr (Caporal, 2006). Accordingly, we intend to retrace this process of agroecology recomposition in Latin America, by describing its characteristics and determinants. This is a gradual alternative agriculture regrouping process, under the umbrella of agroecology, whose realm is defended by numerous social players. Agroecology can be viewed as a scientific proposaI, a set of practices and a social movement (Wezel et aI., 2009). It relies on ecological and social principles and aims to promote changes in the conventional agricultural production process, through an interdisciplinary approach, with the support of participative research work (interaction with rural development players and farmers) and valuing local or lay knowledge. Its future is at stake in this fourth moment. Will agroecology be a new scientific paradigm leading to specific research topics, an alternative way to do research, reconnectin science, nature and society? Will it contribute to sustainable livelihoods, especially for aml y armers, or be a cornerstone for the development of agricultural enterprises? Will it be appropriated by social movements to support agricultural and rural transitions? ln order to contribute to answer these issues, this chapter includes five sections. After describing our approach, we show that family farming is socially and economically important in Latin Anlerica, with part of the certified production originating therefrom. We stress the need for taking into accoun tlocal conditions and differentiated groups of family producers characterized by both social and cultural differences and diversity of ecologically inspired production styles. Another aspect dealt with is the history of alternative agriculture from the 1970s, with identification of its successive events and characteristics, and the dynamics of alternative agriculture into the building up of agroecology and its different features in Latin Arnerica. Then, we analyse the current status of agroecology structuring in Latin America, i.e. the elements favoring the setting up of research and development programmes, as well as the participation of social movements . MenosThe growth of ecological agriculture in some Latin Anlerican countries has been supported Dr srudied by several scholars. Among them, Brandenburg (2002) identified three important phases in its trajectory: (i) emergence of a movement against industrialization of agricultural production; (ii) formation of new groups and social organization forms; and (iii) institutionalization of ecologically based agriculture, accompanied by a partial dilution of its principies. However, a fourth stage of redefinition and recomposition of several alternative agriculture versions can be seen, in which agroeco\ogy occupies an important place and influence in agriculture (Ollivier and Bellon, 2011) and rural developmenr (Caporal, 2006). Accordingly, we intend to retrace this process of agroecology recomposition in Latin America, by describing its characteristics and determinants. This is a gradual alternative agriculture regrouping process, under the umbrella of agroecology, whose realm is defended by numerous social players. Agroecology can be viewed as a scientific proposaI, a set of practices and a social movement (Wezel et aI., 2009). It relies on ecological and social principles and aims to promote changes in the conventional agricultural production process, through an interdisciplinary approach, with the support of participative research work (interaction with rural development players and farmers) and valuing local or lay knowledge. Its future is at stake in this fourth moment. Will agro... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Agroecologia; América Latina. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Agroecology. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
A Sistemas de Cultivo |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03403naa a2200169 a 4500
001 1944301
005 2021-07-14
008 2012 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aABREU, L. S. de
245 $aThe dynamics and recomposition of agroecology in Latin America.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2012
520 $aThe growth of ecological agriculture in some Latin Anlerican countries has been supported Dr srudied by several scholars. Among them, Brandenburg (2002) identified three important phases in its trajectory: (i) emergence of a movement against industrialization of agricultural production; (ii) formation of new groups and social organization forms; and (iii) institutionalization of ecologically based agriculture, accompanied by a partial dilution of its principies. However, a fourth stage of redefinition and recomposition of several alternative agriculture versions can be seen, in which agroeco\ogy occupies an important place and influence in agriculture (Ollivier and Bellon, 2011) and rural developmenr (Caporal, 2006). Accordingly, we intend to retrace this process of agroecology recomposition in Latin America, by describing its characteristics and determinants. This is a gradual alternative agriculture regrouping process, under the umbrella of agroecology, whose realm is defended by numerous social players. Agroecology can be viewed as a scientific proposaI, a set of practices and a social movement (Wezel et aI., 2009). It relies on ecological and social principles and aims to promote changes in the conventional agricultural production process, through an interdisciplinary approach, with the support of participative research work (interaction with rural development players and farmers) and valuing local or lay knowledge. Its future is at stake in this fourth moment. Will agroecology be a new scientific paradigm leading to specific research topics, an alternative way to do research, reconnectin science, nature and society? Will it contribute to sustainable livelihoods, especially for aml y armers, or be a cornerstone for the development of agricultural enterprises? Will it be appropriated by social movements to support agricultural and rural transitions? ln order to contribute to answer these issues, this chapter includes five sections. After describing our approach, we show that family farming is socially and economically important in Latin Anlerica, with part of the certified production originating therefrom. We stress the need for taking into accoun tlocal conditions and differentiated groups of family producers characterized by both social and cultural differences and diversity of ecologically inspired production styles. Another aspect dealt with is the history of alternative agriculture from the 1970s, with identification of its successive events and characteristics, and the dynamics of alternative agriculture into the building up of agroecology and its different features in Latin Arnerica. Then, we analyse the current status of agroecology structuring in Latin America, i.e. the elements favoring the setting up of research and development programmes, as well as the participation of social movements .
650 $aAgroecology
653 $aAgroecologia
653 $aAmérica Latina
700 1 $aBELLON, S.
773 $tIn: HALBERG, N.; MULLER, A. (Ed.). Organic agriculture for sustainable livelihoods. London: Routeledge, 2012. p. 223-245.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente (CNPMA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 13 | |
| 1. |  | LANGONI, H.; SALINA, A.; OLIVEIRA, G. C.; JUNQUEIRA, N. B.; MENOZZI, B. D.; JOAQUIM, S. F. Considerações sobre o tratamento das mastites. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, Rio de Janeiro, v. 37, n. 11, p. 1261-1269, novembro 2017. Título em inglês: Considerations on the treatment of mastitis.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
|    |
| 2. | | MACHADO, G. P.; SILVA, R. C.; GUIMARÃES, F. F.; SALINA, A.; LANGONI, H. Detection of Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus agalactiae and Escherichia coli in Brazilian mastitic milk goats by multiplex-PCR. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, Rio de Janeiro, v. 38, n. 7, p. 1358-1364, julho 2018 Título em português: Detecção de Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus agalactiae e Escherichia coli em leite caprino mastítico no Brasil, por multiplex-PCR.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
| |
| 3. | | SANTANA, R. C. M.; MASSA, R.; ZAFALON, L. F.; MEGID, J.; LANGONI, H.; MATHIAS, L. A. Epidemiologic study on the reproductive losses in dairy cattle: occurrence of Neospora Caninum, Brucella abortus, Bovine Herpesvirus type-1 and Leptospira spp. in a farm in São Carlos, SP. Ars veterinária, Jaboticabal, v. 29, n. 3, p. 153-160, 2013.| Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: B - 4 |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. |
| |
| 4. | | TRONCARELLI, M. Z.; BRANDAO, H. de M.; GERN, J. C.; GUIMARAES, A. S.; LANGONI, H. Nanotechnology and antimicrobials in Veterinary Medicine. In: MÉNDEZ-VILAS, A. Microbial pathogens and strategies for combating them: science, technology and education. Badajoz, Spain: Formatex Research Center, 2013. p. 543-556. (Microbiology Book Series, 4)| Tipo: Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
|  |
| 6. | | LANGONI, H.; GUIMARÃES, F. F.; COSTA, E. O. da; JOAQUIM, S. F.; MENOZZI, B. D. Celularidade do leite e unidades formadoras de colônias nas mastites causadas por Staphylococcus coagulase positiva e coagulase negativa. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, Brasília, DF, v. 35, n. 6, p. 518-524, jun. 2015| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
| |
| 7. | | JAMAS, L. T.; SALINA, A.; ROSSI, R.; MENOZZI, B. D.; LANGONI, H. Parâmetros de qualidade do leite bovino em propriedades de agricultura familiar. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, Rio de Janeiro, v. 38, n. 4, p. 573-578, abril 2018 Título em inglês: Quality parameters of bovine milk from family farms.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
| |
| 8. | | TRONCARELLI, M. Z.; LANGONI, H.; BRANDAO, H. de M.; DIMKI, I.; STANKOVIC, S.; RIBEIRO, A. R. Stability and in vitro antimicrobial efficacy of a nanopropolis formulation intended for intramammary treatment of bovine mastitis. In: SIMPÓSIO DE QUALIDADE DO LEITE, 2., 2014, Jaboticabal. Anais... Jaboticabal: UNESP, 2014. 8 p. Publicado na Revista Brasileira de Higiene e Sanidade Animal, v. 8, n. 5, Supl 1, p. 528-535, 2014.| Tipo: Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
| |
| 9. | | TRONCARELLI, M. Z.; LANGONI, H.; BRANDAO, H. de M.; GUIMARAES, A. S.; SILVA, S. R. da; MENOZZI, B. D. Safety of a nanopropolis formulation intended for intramammary treatment of bovine mastitis in organic dairy herds. In: SIMPÓSIO DE QUALIDADE DO LEITE, 2., 2014, Jaboticabal. Anais... Jaboticabal: UNESP, 2014. 7 p. Publicado na Revista Brasileira de Higiene e Sanidade Animal, v. 8, n. 5, Supl 1, p. 520-527, 2014.| Tipo: Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
| |
| 10. | | GUIMARÃES, F. F.; JOAQUIM, S. F.; MANZI, M. P.; SILVA, R. C. da; BRUDER-NASCIMENTO, A. C. M. de O.; COSTA, E. O.; LANGONI, H. Comparison phenotypic and genotypic identification of Staphylococcus species isolated from bovine mastitis. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, Rio de Janeiro, v. 36, n. 12, p. 1155-1160-1164, dez. 2016.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
| |
| 11. | | LANGONI, H.; GUIDUCE, M. V. S.; NÓBREGA, D. B.; SILVA, R. C. da; RICHINI-PEREIRA, V. B.; SALINA, A.; GUIMARÃES, F. de F. Research o klebsiella pneumoniae in dairy herds. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, Rio de Janeiro, n. 35, n.1, p.9-12, jan. 2015.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
| |
| 12. | | MANZI, M. P.; JOAQUIM, S. F.; GUIMARÃES, F. F.; BRUDER-NASCIMENTO, A. C. M. O.; PANTOJA, J. C. F.; LANGONI, H. Prevalência de Mycoplasma bovis em rebanhos de vacas leiteiras. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, Rio de Janeiro, v. 38, n. 4, p. 665-669, abril 2018 Título em inglês: Prevalence of Mycoplasma bovis in dairy herds.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
| |
| 13. | | FERNANDES, A. R. F; COSTA, D. F.; ANDRADE, M. R.; BEZERRA, C. S.; MOTA, R. A.; ALVES, C. J.; LANGONI, H.; AZEVEDO, S. S. Soropositividade e fatores de risco para leptospirose, toxoplasmose e neosporose na população canina do Estado da Paraíba. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, Rio de Janeiro, v. 38, n. 5, p. 957-966, maio 2018 Título em inglês: Seropositivity and risk factors for leptospirosis, toxoplasmosis and neosporosis in the canine population of Paraiba state, northeastern Brazil.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 13 | |
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
