|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
|
Data corrente: |
13/05/2008 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
15/07/2025 |
|
Autoria: |
GOVE, A. D.; BASHFORD, R. BRUMLEY, C. J. |
|
Título: |
Pheromone and volatile lures for detecting the European house borer (Hylotrupes bajulus) and a manual samplin method. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2007 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Australian Forestry, v. 70, n. 2, p. 134-136, 2007. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
We evaluated commercially available cross-vane traps (‘Intercept’), loaded with either synthetic pheromone or a combination of (+)-ά-pinene and (−)-verbenone in terms of their ability to detect European house borer (Hylotrupes bajulus, ‘EHB’), and compared their effectiveness with a manual search method. We employed pairs of traps at 45 sites, 28 of which had previously been identified as infested using manual search methods. In a four-month trapping period, a total of only six female adult EHB were detected from three sites, all of which had previously been identified during the manual survey. We suggest that the general sedentary behaviour of the beetle and its tendency to reinfest the same individual host tree limits the probability of it being intercepted by chemical lure traps in the field. Although labour-intensive, manual search methods remain the most reliable means of identifying local EHB infestations. |
|
Thesagro: |
Armadilha; Coleóptero; Feromônio; Madeira; Praga. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Hylotrupes bajulus. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
O Insetos e Entomologia |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01555naa a2200205 a 4500
001 1313921
005 2025-07-15
008 2007 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aGOVE, A. D.
245 $aPheromone and volatile lures for detecting the European house borer (Hylotrupes bajulus) and a manual samplin method.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2007
520 $aWe evaluated commercially available cross-vane traps (‘Intercept’), loaded with either synthetic pheromone or a combination of (+)-ά-pinene and (−)-verbenone in terms of their ability to detect European house borer (Hylotrupes bajulus, ‘EHB’), and compared their effectiveness with a manual search method. We employed pairs of traps at 45 sites, 28 of which had previously been identified as infested using manual search methods. In a four-month trapping period, a total of only six female adult EHB were detected from three sites, all of which had previously been identified during the manual survey. We suggest that the general sedentary behaviour of the beetle and its tendency to reinfest the same individual host tree limits the probability of it being intercepted by chemical lure traps in the field. Although labour-intensive, manual search methods remain the most reliable means of identifying local EHB infestations.
650 $aHylotrupes bajulus
650 $aArmadilha
650 $aColeóptero
650 $aFeromônio
650 $aMadeira
650 $aPraga
700 1 $aBASHFORD, R. BRUMLEY, C. J.
773 $tAustralian Forestry$gv. 70, n. 2, p. 134-136, 2007.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
