|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agroindústria de Alimentos. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com ctaa.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agroindústria de Alimentos. |
Data corrente: |
11/12/2023 |
Data da última atualização: |
12/12/2023 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
Autoria: |
GONZALES, M. J.; MARTINS, I. B. A.; ALCANTARA, M.; ALMEIDA, M. DE; ASSIS, R. DE; SANTOS, G. N.; ROSENTHAL, A.; DELIZA, R. |
Afiliação: |
M. J. GONZALES, UFRRJ; I. B. A. MARTINS, UFRRJ; M. ALCANTARA, UFRJ; M. DE ALMEIDA, UFRRJ; R. DE ASSIS, UFRRJ; G. N. SANTOS, UFRJ; AMAURI ROSENTHAL, CTAA; ROSIRES DELIZA, CTAA. |
Título: |
Brazilian consumers' understanding of food processing level: how the healthy, industrialized, and ultra-processed foods are perceived? |
Ano de publicação: |
2023 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: SIMPÓSIO LATINO AMERICANO DE CIÊNCIA DE ALIMENTOS E NUTRIÇÃO, 15., 2023, Campinas. A revolução da ciência de alimentos e nutrição: alimentando o mundo de forma sustentável: caderno [eletrônico] de resumos. Campinas: Galoá, 2023. |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Notas: |
Pôster 168499; SLACAN. |
Conteúdo: |
Food processing includes a series of operations that transform raw materials into new products, ensuring the preservation and allowing safety to the consumer. The NOVA classification system includes the category named ultra-processed foods, which seems to be unfamiliar to Brazilians. This study aimed to explore the perception of Brazilians about food processing level, including their views on healthy food. 513 participants were recruited and took part in an online study through a word association task. They were invited to write down the first four words that came to mind when they thought of healthy, industrialized, and ultra-processed foods (UPF). They also answered socio-demographic questions. The terms with the same meaning were grouped into categories using inductive triangulation coding. A consensus between three researchers was achieved through open discussion. Statistical differences were assessed using X2 tests. A total of 6,138 associations were mentioned by participants and grouped into 50 categories. The most mentioned categories when participants thought of Healthy Foods were legumes and vegetables (61%), fruits with (47%), health (43%). For Industrialized they mentioned commercial brands (30%), convenience (25%) and bad to the health (22%). UPF comprised meat products (55%), bad to the health (26%), commercial brands (23%), and negative associations (23%). Industrialized and UPF had a more negative perception (p<0.05), being considered harmful to health, differently of the healthy food, which had positive mentions. Participant's level of education had a significant effect when making the associations and, the higher education, the greater the positive association with healthy foods, and the negative association with industrialized and ultra-processed foods. Results suggest that there was a misunderstanding between the meaning of industrialized and ultra-processed foods among participants. Communication strategies are recommended to inform the population about the difference between them aiming at allowing conscious food choices by Brazilian consumers. MenosFood processing includes a series of operations that transform raw materials into new products, ensuring the preservation and allowing safety to the consumer. The NOVA classification system includes the category named ultra-processed foods, which seems to be unfamiliar to Brazilians. This study aimed to explore the perception of Brazilians about food processing level, including their views on healthy food. 513 participants were recruited and took part in an online study through a word association task. They were invited to write down the first four words that came to mind when they thought of healthy, industrialized, and ultra-processed foods (UPF). They also answered socio-demographic questions. The terms with the same meaning were grouped into categories using inductive triangulation coding. A consensus between three researchers was achieved through open discussion. Statistical differences were assessed using X2 tests. A total of 6,138 associations were mentioned by participants and grouped into 50 categories. The most mentioned categories when participants thought of Healthy Foods were legumes and vegetables (61%), fruits with (47%), health (43%). For Industrialized they mentioned commercial brands (30%), convenience (25%) and bad to the health (22%). UPF comprised meat products (55%), bad to the health (26%), commercial brands (23%), and negative associations (23%). Industrialized and UPF had a more negative perception (p<0.05), being considered harmful to health, differ... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Food perception; Ultra-processed foods. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
Food processing. |
Categoria do assunto: |
Q Alimentos e Nutrição Humana |
Marc: |
LEADER 03061nam a2200241 a 4500 001 2159492 005 2023-12-12 008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aGONZALES, M. J. 245 $aBrazilian consumers' understanding of food processing level$bhow the healthy, industrialized, and ultra-processed foods are perceived?$h[electronic resource] 260 $aIn: SIMPÓSIO LATINO AMERICANO DE CIÊNCIA DE ALIMENTOS E NUTRIÇÃO, 15., 2023, Campinas. A revolução da ciência de alimentos e nutrição: alimentando o mundo de forma sustentável: caderno [eletrônico] de resumos. Campinas: Galoá$c2023 500 $aPôster 168499; SLACAN. 520 $aFood processing includes a series of operations that transform raw materials into new products, ensuring the preservation and allowing safety to the consumer. The NOVA classification system includes the category named ultra-processed foods, which seems to be unfamiliar to Brazilians. This study aimed to explore the perception of Brazilians about food processing level, including their views on healthy food. 513 participants were recruited and took part in an online study through a word association task. They were invited to write down the first four words that came to mind when they thought of healthy, industrialized, and ultra-processed foods (UPF). They also answered socio-demographic questions. The terms with the same meaning were grouped into categories using inductive triangulation coding. A consensus between three researchers was achieved through open discussion. Statistical differences were assessed using X2 tests. A total of 6,138 associations were mentioned by participants and grouped into 50 categories. The most mentioned categories when participants thought of Healthy Foods were legumes and vegetables (61%), fruits with (47%), health (43%). For Industrialized they mentioned commercial brands (30%), convenience (25%) and bad to the health (22%). UPF comprised meat products (55%), bad to the health (26%), commercial brands (23%), and negative associations (23%). Industrialized and UPF had a more negative perception (p<0.05), being considered harmful to health, differently of the healthy food, which had positive mentions. Participant's level of education had a significant effect when making the associations and, the higher education, the greater the positive association with healthy foods, and the negative association with industrialized and ultra-processed foods. Results suggest that there was a misunderstanding between the meaning of industrialized and ultra-processed foods among participants. Communication strategies are recommended to inform the population about the difference between them aiming at allowing conscious food choices by Brazilian consumers. 650 $aFood processing 653 $aFood perception 653 $aUltra-processed foods 700 1 $aMARTINS, I. B. A. 700 1 $aALCANTARA, M. 700 1 $aALMEIDA, M. DE 700 1 $aASSIS, R. DE 700 1 $aSANTOS, G. N. 700 1 $aROSENTHAL, A. 700 1 $aDELIZA, R.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agroindústria de Alimentos (CTAA) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Semiárido. |
Data corrente: |
20/06/1997 |
Data da última atualização: |
27/02/2018 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Circulação/Nível: |
Internacional - B |
Autoria: |
SABOURIN, E.; CARON, P.; SILVA, P. C. G. da. |
Afiliação: |
ERIC SABOURIN, CIRAD; PATRICK CARON, CIRAD; PEDRO CARLOS GAMA DA SILVA, CPATSA. |
Título: |
Enjeux fonciers et gestion des communs dans le Nordeste du Bresil: le cas des vaines patures dans la region de Massaroca- Bahia. |
Ano de publicação: |
1995 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Les Cahiers de la Recherche Developpement, Montpellier, n. 42, p. 5-27, 1995. |
Idioma: |
Francês |
Conteúdo: |
Les vaines patures ou fundo de pasto du Nordeste du Bresil proviennent principalement de terres non appropriees qui ont subsiste entre les latifundia. Dans la region du fleuve Sao Francisco, elles ont fait l'objet d'un programme public de regularisation de titres collectifs de propriete. Cet article situe d'abord cette experience par rapport a l'histoire fonciere du Nordeste. Puis, il analyse les strategies des acteurs impliques dans la gestion de ces vaines patures, en particulier des communautes paysannes de la region de Massaroca dans l'Etat de Bahia. L'evolution du contexte economique a partir des annees 1970 et la mutation rapide des systemes de production ont modifie sensiblement l'utilisation des fundos de pasto. Dans un contexte de front pionnier, lesorganisations de producteurs sont confrontees a la mise en place de nouveaux modes de gestion des communs. Bien que recente, cette experience souleve nombre de questions, notamment en ce qui concerne la negociation des prises de decisions individuelles et collectives. Ce cadre original d'usage et de redistribution du foncier constitue un veritable laboratoire regional en matiere de reforme agraire. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Agrarian reform; Bahia; Fundo de pasto; Juazeiro; Massaroca; Pecuaria extensiva; Pequeno agricultor rural; Small farmers. |
Thesagro: |
Agricultura familiar; Comunidade Rural; Desenvolvimento rural; Estrutura agrária; Posse de terra. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Rural development. |
Categoria do assunto: |
B Sociologia Rural |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/CPATSA/7979/1/OPB1400.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02109naa a2200313 a 4500 001 1133079 005 2018-02-27 008 1995 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aSABOURIN, E. 245 $aEnjeux fonciers et gestion des communs dans le Nordeste du Bresil$ble cas des vaines patures dans la region de Massaroca- Bahia. 260 $c1995 520 $aLes vaines patures ou fundo de pasto du Nordeste du Bresil proviennent principalement de terres non appropriees qui ont subsiste entre les latifundia. Dans la region du fleuve Sao Francisco, elles ont fait l'objet d'un programme public de regularisation de titres collectifs de propriete. Cet article situe d'abord cette experience par rapport a l'histoire fonciere du Nordeste. Puis, il analyse les strategies des acteurs impliques dans la gestion de ces vaines patures, en particulier des communautes paysannes de la region de Massaroca dans l'Etat de Bahia. L'evolution du contexte economique a partir des annees 1970 et la mutation rapide des systemes de production ont modifie sensiblement l'utilisation des fundos de pasto. Dans un contexte de front pionnier, lesorganisations de producteurs sont confrontees a la mise en place de nouveaux modes de gestion des communs. Bien que recente, cette experience souleve nombre de questions, notamment en ce qui concerne la negociation des prises de decisions individuelles et collectives. Ce cadre original d'usage et de redistribution du foncier constitue un veritable laboratoire regional en matiere de reforme agraire. 650 $aRural development 650 $aAgricultura familiar 650 $aComunidade Rural 650 $aDesenvolvimento rural 650 $aEstrutura agrária 650 $aPosse de terra 653 $aAgrarian reform 653 $aBahia 653 $aFundo de pasto 653 $aJuazeiro 653 $aMassaroca 653 $aPecuaria extensiva 653 $aPequeno agricultor rural 653 $aSmall farmers 700 1 $aCARON, P. 700 1 $aSILVA, P. C. G. da 773 $tLes Cahiers de la Recherche Developpement, Montpellier$gn. 42, p. 5-27, 1995.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Semiárido (CPATSA) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|