|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agroenergia. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpae.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agroenergia. |
Data corrente: |
05/12/2022 |
Data da última atualização: |
05/12/2022 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo de Divulgação na Mídia |
Autoria: |
LOPES, M. A. |
Afiliação: |
MAURICIO ANTONIO LOPES, CNPAE. |
Título: |
A energia do hidrogênio. |
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Revista Globo Rural, fev., p. 73, 2022. Futuro. |
Idioma: |
Português |
Palavras-Chave: |
Descarbonização; Hidrogênio verde. |
Thesagro: |
Água; Biocombustível; Bioenergia; Biomassa; Energia Eólica; Energia Solar; Hidrocarboneto; Hidrogênio; Impacto Ambiental. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
Marc: |
LEADER 00615nam a2200229 a 4500 001 2149192 005 2022-12-05 008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aLOPES, M. A. 245 $aA energia do hidrogênio.$h[electronic resource] 260 $aRevista Globo Rural, fev., p. 73, 2022. Futuro.$c2022 650 $aÁgua 650 $aBiocombustível 650 $aBioenergia 650 $aBiomassa 650 $aEnergia Eólica 650 $aEnergia Solar 650 $aHidrocarboneto 650 $aHidrogênio 650 $aImpacto Ambiental 653 $aDescarbonização 653 $aHidrogênio verde
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agroenergia (CNPAE) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Soja. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com valeria.cardoso@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Soja. |
Data corrente: |
10/09/2015 |
Data da última atualização: |
03/11/2017 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
Autoria: |
MOREIRA, A.; MORAES, L. A. C.; SCHROTH, G.; MANDARINO, J. M. G. |
Afiliação: |
ADONIS MOREIRA, CNPSO; LARISSA ALEXANDRA CARDOSO MORAES, CNPSO; GÖTZ SCHROTH; JOSE MARCOS GONTIJO MANDARINO, CNPSO. |
Título: |
Effect of nitrogen, row spacing, and plant density on yield, yield components, and plant physiology in soybean-wheat intercropping. |
Ano de publicação: |
2015 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Agronomy Journal, v. 107, n. 6, p. 2162-2170, Aug. 2015. |
DOI: |
10.2134/agronj15.0121 |
Idioma: |
Português |
Conteúdo: |
The introduction of cultivars with earlier development and greater productivity has raised questions about the effect of management practices on soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr] yield in a no-till (NT) system. The objective of the study was to evaluate the interaction between N fertilization, row spacing, and plant density on photosynthetic index, yield components, yield, and nutritional status of soybean–wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) intercropping. For soybean cultivation, three N rates, three row spacing, and three planting densities were assessed during two growing seasons, while for wheat, 17.5-cm row spacing and no N fertilization were used. No significant effects of row spacing and plant density were detected. The yields for 0 and 40 kg N ha–1 rates were similar, while applying 20 kg N ha–1 reduced, on average, soybean yield by 14.5%. The planting densities, row spacing, and N rates did not affect wheat yield, or oil and protein content in soybean seeds. Soil temperature (ST), intercellular carbon dioxide concentration (Ci), and intrinsic water use efficiency (IWUE) increased, while plant height, chlorophyll content (CC), and transpiration rate (Trmmol) decreased with increasing spacing of soybean. Plant density changed ST, Ci, chlorophyll content, and stomatal conductance (gs). Leaf tissue analysis indicated adequate nutrient levels in soybean and wheat. The current management practice with 50-cm row spacing, no N fertilization to complement biological nitrogen fixation (BNF), and 333,000 plants ha–1 is adequate for soybean cultivation, while N supplied from soil organic matter (SOM) and BNF is sufficient to meet requirements of associated wheat crops. MenosThe introduction of cultivars with earlier development and greater productivity has raised questions about the effect of management practices on soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr] yield in a no-till (NT) system. The objective of the study was to evaluate the interaction between N fertilization, row spacing, and plant density on photosynthetic index, yield components, yield, and nutritional status of soybean–wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) intercropping. For soybean cultivation, three N rates, three row spacing, and three planting densities were assessed during two growing seasons, while for wheat, 17.5-cm row spacing and no N fertilization were used. No significant effects of row spacing and plant density were detected. The yields for 0 and 40 kg N ha–1 rates were similar, while applying 20 kg N ha–1 reduced, on average, soybean yield by 14.5%. The planting densities, row spacing, and N rates did not affect wheat yield, or oil and protein content in soybean seeds. Soil temperature (ST), intercellular carbon dioxide concentration (Ci), and intrinsic water use efficiency (IWUE) increased, while plant height, chlorophyll content (CC), and transpiration rate (Trmmol) decreased with increasing spacing of soybean. Plant density changed ST, Ci, chlorophyll content, and stomatal conductance (gs). Leaf tissue analysis indicated adequate nutrient levels in soybean and wheat. The current management practice with 50-cm row spacing, no N fertilization to complement biological nitrogen fixation... Mostrar Tudo |
Thesagro: |
Soja; Trigo. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
Marc: |
LEADER 02308naa a2200193 a 4500 001 2023686 005 2017-11-03 008 2015 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.2134/agronj15.0121$2DOI 100 1 $aMOREIRA, A. 245 $aEffect of nitrogen, row spacing, and plant density on yield, yield components, and plant physiology in soybean-wheat intercropping.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2015 520 $aThe introduction of cultivars with earlier development and greater productivity has raised questions about the effect of management practices on soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr] yield in a no-till (NT) system. The objective of the study was to evaluate the interaction between N fertilization, row spacing, and plant density on photosynthetic index, yield components, yield, and nutritional status of soybean–wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) intercropping. For soybean cultivation, three N rates, three row spacing, and three planting densities were assessed during two growing seasons, while for wheat, 17.5-cm row spacing and no N fertilization were used. No significant effects of row spacing and plant density were detected. The yields for 0 and 40 kg N ha–1 rates were similar, while applying 20 kg N ha–1 reduced, on average, soybean yield by 14.5%. The planting densities, row spacing, and N rates did not affect wheat yield, or oil and protein content in soybean seeds. Soil temperature (ST), intercellular carbon dioxide concentration (Ci), and intrinsic water use efficiency (IWUE) increased, while plant height, chlorophyll content (CC), and transpiration rate (Trmmol) decreased with increasing spacing of soybean. Plant density changed ST, Ci, chlorophyll content, and stomatal conductance (gs). Leaf tissue analysis indicated adequate nutrient levels in soybean and wheat. The current management practice with 50-cm row spacing, no N fertilization to complement biological nitrogen fixation (BNF), and 333,000 plants ha–1 is adequate for soybean cultivation, while N supplied from soil organic matter (SOM) and BNF is sufficient to meet requirements of associated wheat crops. 650 $aSoja 650 $aTrigo 700 1 $aMORAES, L. A. C. 700 1 $aSCHROTH, G. 700 1 $aMANDARINO, J. M. G. 773 $tAgronomy Journal$gv. 107, n. 6, p. 2162-2170, Aug. 2015.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Soja (CNPSO) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|