| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Suínos e Aves. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpsa.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
|
Data corrente: |
05/11/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
05/11/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
COSTA, E. de F.; CARDOSO, M. R. de I.; KICH, J. D.; CORBELLINI, L. G. |
|
Afiliação: |
EDUARDO DE FREITAS COSTA, UFRGS; MARISA RIBEIRO DE ITAPEMA CARDOSO, UFRGS; JALUSA DEON KICH, CNPSA; LUIS GUSTAVO CORBELLINI, UFRGS. |
|
Título: |
A qualitative risk assessment approach to microbial foodborne hazards in Brazilian intensive pork production: a step towards risk prioritization. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Microbial Risk Analysis, v.15, 2020. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mran.2020.100105 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Abstract: The application of biosecurity measures in pig farms has prompted a shift in epidemiological reality, altering the risk profile attributed to the consumption of pork. The inspection of pig carcasses in Brazil is based on incisions and palpations to seek lesions mainly related to classic zoonotic diseases. We describe the use of a qualitative risk assessment from the farm to the table to characterize the risk of foodborne disease caused by biological hazards to humans due to the consumption of pork. The model was adapted from the Codex Alimentarius and comprises four steps: (I) hazard identification, (II) hazard characterization, (III) exposure assessment, and (IV) risk characterization. The exposure assessment step considers the release of hazards at a pre-harvest level (i.e., swine in herds) and the amplification or reduction of the release during the procedure to obtain pork from a carcass. Risk characterization is classified into five levels, from very low to very high. No hazard had very high risk, Salmonella sp. [nontyphoidal] had high risk, no hazard had moderate risk, seven hazards had low risk, and other hazards had very low risk. When the initial release was increased, the risk for hazards with higher adverse effects (e.g. C. botulinum, B. suis, and E. coli [STEC]) increased to very high or high. The uncertainty was very high for seven hazards and very low for three. These findings can help the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture discuss changes in the routine inspection of the carcasses of pigs raised in industrial systems in Brazil. MenosAbstract: The application of biosecurity measures in pig farms has prompted a shift in epidemiological reality, altering the risk profile attributed to the consumption of pork. The inspection of pig carcasses in Brazil is based on incisions and palpations to seek lesions mainly related to classic zoonotic diseases. We describe the use of a qualitative risk assessment from the farm to the table to characterize the risk of foodborne disease caused by biological hazards to humans due to the consumption of pork. The model was adapted from the Codex Alimentarius and comprises four steps: (I) hazard identification, (II) hazard characterization, (III) exposure assessment, and (IV) risk characterization. The exposure assessment step considers the release of hazards at a pre-harvest level (i.e., swine in herds) and the amplification or reduction of the release during the procedure to obtain pork from a carcass. Risk characterization is classified into five levels, from very low to very high. No hazard had very high risk, Salmonella sp. [nontyphoidal] had high risk, no hazard had moderate risk, seven hazards had low risk, and other hazards had very low risk. When the initial release was increased, the risk for hazards with higher adverse effects (e.g. C. botulinum, B. suis, and E. coli [STEC]) increased to very high or high. The uncertainty was very high for seven hazards and very low for three. These findings can help the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture discuss changes in the routi... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Avaliação de risco; Carcass inspection; Hazard prioritization; Priorização de perigo. |
|
Thesagro: |
Biossegurança; Carcaça; Inspeção Sanitária; Porco Tipo Carne; Produção de Carne. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Pork; Risk assessment. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02536naa a2200301 a 4500
001 2126332
005 2020-11-05
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.mran.2020.100105$2DOI
100 1 $aCOSTA, E. de F.
245 $aA qualitative risk assessment approach to microbial foodborne hazards in Brazilian intensive pork production$ba step towards risk prioritization.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
520 $aAbstract: The application of biosecurity measures in pig farms has prompted a shift in epidemiological reality, altering the risk profile attributed to the consumption of pork. The inspection of pig carcasses in Brazil is based on incisions and palpations to seek lesions mainly related to classic zoonotic diseases. We describe the use of a qualitative risk assessment from the farm to the table to characterize the risk of foodborne disease caused by biological hazards to humans due to the consumption of pork. The model was adapted from the Codex Alimentarius and comprises four steps: (I) hazard identification, (II) hazard characterization, (III) exposure assessment, and (IV) risk characterization. The exposure assessment step considers the release of hazards at a pre-harvest level (i.e., swine in herds) and the amplification or reduction of the release during the procedure to obtain pork from a carcass. Risk characterization is classified into five levels, from very low to very high. No hazard had very high risk, Salmonella sp. [nontyphoidal] had high risk, no hazard had moderate risk, seven hazards had low risk, and other hazards had very low risk. When the initial release was increased, the risk for hazards with higher adverse effects (e.g. C. botulinum, B. suis, and E. coli [STEC]) increased to very high or high. The uncertainty was very high for seven hazards and very low for three. These findings can help the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture discuss changes in the routine inspection of the carcasses of pigs raised in industrial systems in Brazil.
650 $aPork
650 $aRisk assessment
650 $aBiossegurança
650 $aCarcaça
650 $aInspeção Sanitária
650 $aPorco Tipo Carne
650 $aProdução de Carne
653 $aAvaliação de risco
653 $aCarcass inspection
653 $aHazard prioritization
653 $aPriorização de perigo
700 1 $aCARDOSO, M. R. de I.
700 1 $aKICH, J. D.
700 1 $aCORBELLINI, L. G.
773 $tMicrobial Risk Analysis$gv.15, 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Suínos e Aves (CNPSA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 12 | |
| 4. |  | LIMA, A. L. S. de; VIUDES, P.; KUROMOTO, V. M.; FREITAS, D. G. de. Embrapa Mais Amazônia: a communication network for agricultural and forest research in the Brazilian Amazon. Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira, v. 39, e201902043, p. 700, 2019. Título equivalente: Embrapa Mais Amazônia: comunicação em rede para a pesquisa agropecuária e florestal no Brasil amazônico. Na publicação: Ana Laura Lima, Vinicius Kuromoto, Dulcivânia Freitas. Special issue. Abstracts of the XXV IUFRO...| Tipo: Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agricultura Digital. |
|   |
| 6. | | LIMA, A. L. S. de; VIUDES, P.; KUROMOTO, V. M.; FREITAS, D. G. de. Embrapa Mais Amazônia: comunicação em rede para a pesquisa agropecuária e florestal no Brasil amazônico. Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira, v. 39, e201902043, p. 700, 2019. Título equivalente: Embrapa Mais Amazônia: a communication network for agricultural and forest research in the Brazilian Amazon. Na publicação: Ana Laura Lima, Vinicius Kuromoto, Dulcivânia Freitas. Special issue. Abstracts of the XXV...| Tipo: Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amapá; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
|  |
| 9. | | BELTRÃO, S. L. L.; HEBERLÊ, A. L. O.; VIUDES, P.; SILVA, M. P. da; BENTES, M. P. de M. Orientações e dinâmicas para as oficinas do Projeto Amazocom: cardápio de ferramentas. Rio Branco, AC: Embrapa Acre, 2019. (Embrapa Acre. Documentos, 161). Material gerado na oficina de alinhamento do Projeto Amazocom, realizada em Belém, PA, no período de 4 a 6 de setembro de 2018. Selo ODS 10, Selo ODS 12.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Acre; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Café; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 12 | |
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
