| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpaf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura. |
|
Data corrente: |
03/09/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
04/09/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
PIEROZAN JUNIOR, C.; FAVARIN, J. L.; LAGO, B. C.; ALMEIDA, R. E. M. de; OLIVEIRA, S. M. de; TRIVELIN, P. C. O.; OLIVEIRA, F. B.; GILABEL, A. P. |
|
Afiliação: |
CLOVEIS PIEROZAN JUNIOR, INSTITUTO FEDERAL DO PARANÁ, Campus Palmas-TO; JOSE LAERCIO FAVARIN, ESALQ; BRUNO COCCO LAGO, ESALQ; RODRIGO ESTEVAM MUNHOZ DE ALMEIDA, CNPASA; SILAS MACIEL DE OLIVEIRA, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE MARINGÁ; PAULO CESAR OCHEUZE TRIVELIN, CENA; FELIPE BRENDLER OLIVEIRA, ESALQ; AMANDA PRADO GILABEL, ESALQ. |
|
Título: |
Nitrogen fertilizer recovery and partitioning related to soybean yield. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2020. |
|
ISSN: |
0718-9508 |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-020-00322-x |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Published: 24 August 2020. |
|
Conteúdo: |
This study checked the nitrogen (N) uptake, fate of the N fertilizer, fertilizer recovery efficiency (FRE) and the residual amount of N fertilizer in the soil via 15N-labelled fertilizer applied to soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.), to explain any differences in the yields. Two soybean field experiments were established in Brazil, one conducted in a tropical (Trop) zone located at Cerrado Biome and the other in a subtropical (Subt) environment. The experimental design was a 2-factor in randomized complete block with four replications. Five doses of N (0, 20, 40, 80 and 120 kg ha−1) were applied at two soybean growth stages (VE and R3). For all treatments, except No-N, 15N-labelled fertilizer was used. The N uptake and the amount of N fertilizer were analysed in the roots, shoots, grains and whole plant, the FRE and yield by soybean, and the residual of fertilizer in the soil. The total N uptake (Nplant) was greater with fertilization at R3 stage compared to the other stage, and N application increased the yield just at this stage and in the Trop condition. The increase in N shoot (not specifically from fertilizer) with the application at R3 appeared to be related to the increased in yield. However, the N from fertilizer found in the plant shoot was about 20% higher when fertilizer was applied at VE compared with R3. Under Subt condition, the FRE averaging 55%. In contrast, the FRE decreased from low to high nitrogen rates (64 to 40%, respectively) when soybean grown under Trop condition. Most N from fertilizer (38%) was found in the grains, followed by the shoot (14.6%) and the root (0.58%). The use of N fertilizer at reproductive growth stages is a better approach to meet soybean N demand through N fertilization. Potential yield gains are more reliable under Trop condition. MenosThis study checked the nitrogen (N) uptake, fate of the N fertilizer, fertilizer recovery efficiency (FRE) and the residual amount of N fertilizer in the soil via 15N-labelled fertilizer applied to soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.), to explain any differences in the yields. Two soybean field experiments were established in Brazil, one conducted in a tropical (Trop) zone located at Cerrado Biome and the other in a subtropical (Subt) environment. The experimental design was a 2-factor in randomized complete block with four replications. Five doses of N (0, 20, 40, 80 and 120 kg ha−1) were applied at two soybean growth stages (VE and R3). For all treatments, except No-N, 15N-labelled fertilizer was used. The N uptake and the amount of N fertilizer were analysed in the roots, shoots, grains and whole plant, the FRE and yield by soybean, and the residual of fertilizer in the soil. The total N uptake (Nplant) was greater with fertilization at R3 stage compared to the other stage, and N application increased the yield just at this stage and in the Trop condition. The increase in N shoot (not specifically from fertilizer) with the application at R3 appeared to be related to the increased in yield. However, the N from fertilizer found in the plant shoot was about 20% higher when fertilizer was applied at VE compared with R3. Under Subt condition, the FRE averaging 55%. In contrast, the FRE decreased from low to high nitrogen rates (64 to 40%, respectively) when soybean grown under... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesagro: |
Fertilizante Nitrogenado; Glycine Max; Nitrogênio; Soja; Solo Tropical. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Nitrogen; Nitrogen fertilizers; Soybeans; Tropical agriculture. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02816naa a2200349 a 4500
001 2124693
005 2020-09-04
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0718-9508
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-020-00322-x$2DOI
100 1 $aPIEROZAN JUNIOR, C.
245 $aNitrogen fertilizer recovery and partitioning related to soybean yield.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
500 $aPublished: 24 August 2020.
520 $aThis study checked the nitrogen (N) uptake, fate of the N fertilizer, fertilizer recovery efficiency (FRE) and the residual amount of N fertilizer in the soil via 15N-labelled fertilizer applied to soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.), to explain any differences in the yields. Two soybean field experiments were established in Brazil, one conducted in a tropical (Trop) zone located at Cerrado Biome and the other in a subtropical (Subt) environment. The experimental design was a 2-factor in randomized complete block with four replications. Five doses of N (0, 20, 40, 80 and 120 kg ha−1) were applied at two soybean growth stages (VE and R3). For all treatments, except No-N, 15N-labelled fertilizer was used. The N uptake and the amount of N fertilizer were analysed in the roots, shoots, grains and whole plant, the FRE and yield by soybean, and the residual of fertilizer in the soil. The total N uptake (Nplant) was greater with fertilization at R3 stage compared to the other stage, and N application increased the yield just at this stage and in the Trop condition. The increase in N shoot (not specifically from fertilizer) with the application at R3 appeared to be related to the increased in yield. However, the N from fertilizer found in the plant shoot was about 20% higher when fertilizer was applied at VE compared with R3. Under Subt condition, the FRE averaging 55%. In contrast, the FRE decreased from low to high nitrogen rates (64 to 40%, respectively) when soybean grown under Trop condition. Most N from fertilizer (38%) was found in the grains, followed by the shoot (14.6%) and the root (0.58%). The use of N fertilizer at reproductive growth stages is a better approach to meet soybean N demand through N fertilization. Potential yield gains are more reliable under Trop condition.
650 $aNitrogen
650 $aNitrogen fertilizers
650 $aSoybeans
650 $aTropical agriculture
650 $aFertilizante Nitrogenado
650 $aGlycine Max
650 $aNitrogênio
650 $aSoja
650 $aSolo Tropical
700 1 $aFAVARIN, J. L.
700 1 $aLAGO, B. C.
700 1 $aALMEIDA, R. E. M. de
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, S. M. de
700 1 $aTRIVELIN, P. C. O.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, F. B.
700 1 $aGILABEL, A. P.
773 $tJournal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura (CNPASA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 5 | |
| 1. |  | OLIVEIRA, Y. M. M. de; MATTOS, P. P. de; GOUVEIA, V. M.; MORAES, L. F. D. de; BENTES, M. P. de M. Sustainable forest management. In: VILELA, G. F.; BENTES, M. P. de M.; OLIVEIRA, Y. M. M. de; MARQUES, D. K. S.; SILVA, J. C. B. (Ed.). Life on land: contributions of Embrapa. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2019. p. 47-60| Tipo: Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrobiologia; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Maranhão. |
|    |
| 2. | | OLIVEIRA, Y. M. M. de; MATTOS, P. P. de; GOUVEIA, V. M.; MORAES, L. F. D. de; BENTES, M. P. de M. Gestão florestal sustentável. In: VILELA, G. F.; BENTES, M. P. de M.; OLIVEIRA, Y. M. M. de; MARQUES, D. K. S.; SILVA, J. C. B. (Ed.). Vida terrestre: contribuições da Embrapa. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2018. Cap. 4. E-book. (Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável, 15).| Tipo: Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrobiologia; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Maranhão. |
| |
| 3. | | KANASHIRO, M.; SANTOS, A. M.; PORTO, D. D.; MOREIRA, J. M. M. A. P.; PULROLNIK, K.; MORAES, L. F. D. de; CARVALHAES, M. A.; GASPAR, S. M. M.; SCHAEFER, S. M. Desafios de inovação tecnológica e institucional do portfólio florestal da Embrapa no contexto de emergências climáticas globais e epidemias zoonóticas. In: CONFERÊNCIA IUFRO 2023 AMÉRICA LATINA, 2023, Curitiba. Anais… Colombo: Embrapa Florestas, 2023. p. 102. (Embrapa Florestas. Eventos técnicos & científicos, 2).| Tipo: Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrobiologia; Embrapa Amapá; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Semiárido; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
| |
| 4. | | VIEIRA, D. L. M.; SAMPAIO, A. B.; SKORUPA, L. A.; ARCO-VERDE, M. F.; CAMPELLO, E. F. C.; MORAES, L. F. D. de; PERES, M. K.; ROCHA, F. S.; OGATA, R. S.; OLIVEIRA, M. C. de; DURIGAN, G.; ISERNHAGEN, I.; SOUZA, R. B. de; TURAZI, C. M. V.; ARAUJO, S. C. B. de; RIBEIRO, J. F. Espécies arbóreas e estratégias para a recomposição da vegetação nativa no bioma cerrado. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2017 1 Folder| Tipo: Folder/Folheto/Cartilha |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrobiologia; Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril; Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Meio Ambiente; Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
| |
| 5. | | PRADO, R. B.; FERREIRA, J. N.; PEDREIRA, B. da C. C. G.; SILVA, G. B. S. da; BERGIER, I.; MONTEIRO, J. M. G.; TONUCCI, R. G.; PARRON, L. M.; CAMPANHA, M. M.; FERRAZ, R. P. D.; DRUCKER, D. P.; BRAGA, A. R. dos S.; AHRENS, S.; SIMÕES, M.; MORAES, L. F. D. de. Serviços ecossistêmicos: instrumentos legais e políticos no Brasil. In: FERRAZ, R. P. D.; PRADO, R. B.; PARRON, L. M.; CAMPANHA, M. M. (Ed.). Marco referencial em serviços ecossistêmicos. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2019. cap. 3, p. 57-87.| Tipo: Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agricultura Digital; Embrapa Agrobiologia; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Meio Ambiente; Embrapa Milho e Sorgo; Embrapa Pantanal; Embrapa Solos. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 5 | |
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
