| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agrobiologia. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpab.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrobiologia. |
|
Data corrente: |
29/04/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
08/01/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
GUARECHI, R. F.; MARTINS, M. dos R.; URQUIAGA, S.; ALVES, B. J. R.; BODDEY, R. M.; SARKIS, L. F. |
|
Afiliação: |
Roni Fernandes Guareschi, UFRRJ; Marcio dos Reis Martins, UFRRJ; SEGUNDO SACRAMENTO U CABALLERO, CNPAB; BRUNO JOSE RODRIGUES ALVES, CNPAB; ROBERT MICHAEL BODDEY, CNPAB; Leonardo Fernandes Sarkis, UFLA. |
|
Título: |
Energy efficiency and emissions of CO2, CH4, and N2O in organic and conventional rice production. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias, v. 41, n. 3, p. 797-810, 2020. |
|
DOI: |
10.5433/1679-0359.2020v41n3p797 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Rice is the second-most produced cereal worldwide and actively contributes to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, particularly methane, especially under deepwater production. Assessments of energy efficiency (EE) and GHG emissions can indicate the sustainability level of agrosystems and support decisions related to the reduction of production costs and environmental pollution. This study aimed to assess both EE and GHG emissions in organic and conventional rice production in the Southern region of Brazil. For this study, eight rice fields were evaluated. Energy inputs and outputs were calculated by multiplying the production input amounts by their respective calorific values or energy coefficients at each stage of production. EE was determined using the ratio between the total energy output and the total energy consumed during the production process. GHG emissions were estimated using the principles of the lifecycle assessment methodology in addition to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) recommendations. Each 1.0 MJ consumed during the production of organic and conventional rice produced renewable energy averages of 10.5 MJ and 7.90 MJ, respectively, as grains. The primary energy expenses for organic rice were represented by seeds, fuel, tractors, and agricultural machinery and implements, and those for conventional rice were seeds, fuel, and fertilizers. Each kilogram of organic and conventional rice produced accounted for the emission of 0.21 and 0.32 kg of CO(2)eq, respectively, during the production cycles and delivery to the warehouse, with seeds, fuel, and fertilizers being the main sources of CO(2)eq emissions to the atmosphere. MenosRice is the second-most produced cereal worldwide and actively contributes to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, particularly methane, especially under deepwater production. Assessments of energy efficiency (EE) and GHG emissions can indicate the sustainability level of agrosystems and support decisions related to the reduction of production costs and environmental pollution. This study aimed to assess both EE and GHG emissions in organic and conventional rice production in the Southern region of Brazil. For this study, eight rice fields were evaluated. Energy inputs and outputs were calculated by multiplying the production input amounts by their respective calorific values or energy coefficients at each stage of production. EE was determined using the ratio between the total energy output and the total energy consumed during the production process. GHG emissions were estimated using the principles of the lifecycle assessment methodology in addition to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) recommendations. Each 1.0 MJ consumed during the production of organic and conventional rice produced renewable energy averages of 10.5 MJ and 7.90 MJ, respectively, as grains. The primary energy expenses for organic rice were represented by seeds, fuel, tractors, and agricultural machinery and implements, and those for conventional rice were seeds, fuel, and fertilizers. Each kilogram of organic and conventional rice produced accounted for the emission of 0.21 and 0.32 kg of C... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Rice farming. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Environmental sustainability; Greenhouse gases. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02398naa a2200229 a 4500
001 2121952
005 2021-01-08
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.5433/1679-0359.2020v41n3p797$2DOI
100 1 $aGUARECHI, R. F.
245 $aEnergy efficiency and emissions of CO2, CH4, and N2O in organic and conventional rice production.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
520 $aRice is the second-most produced cereal worldwide and actively contributes to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, particularly methane, especially under deepwater production. Assessments of energy efficiency (EE) and GHG emissions can indicate the sustainability level of agrosystems and support decisions related to the reduction of production costs and environmental pollution. This study aimed to assess both EE and GHG emissions in organic and conventional rice production in the Southern region of Brazil. For this study, eight rice fields were evaluated. Energy inputs and outputs were calculated by multiplying the production input amounts by their respective calorific values or energy coefficients at each stage of production. EE was determined using the ratio between the total energy output and the total energy consumed during the production process. GHG emissions were estimated using the principles of the lifecycle assessment methodology in addition to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) recommendations. Each 1.0 MJ consumed during the production of organic and conventional rice produced renewable energy averages of 10.5 MJ and 7.90 MJ, respectively, as grains. The primary energy expenses for organic rice were represented by seeds, fuel, tractors, and agricultural machinery and implements, and those for conventional rice were seeds, fuel, and fertilizers. Each kilogram of organic and conventional rice produced accounted for the emission of 0.21 and 0.32 kg of CO(2)eq, respectively, during the production cycles and delivery to the warehouse, with seeds, fuel, and fertilizers being the main sources of CO(2)eq emissions to the atmosphere.
650 $aEnvironmental sustainability
650 $aGreenhouse gases
653 $aRice farming
700 1 $aMARTINS, M. dos R.
700 1 $aURQUIAGA, S.
700 1 $aALVES, B. J. R.
700 1 $aBODDEY, R. M.
700 1 $aSARKIS, L. F.
773 $tSemina: Ciências Agrárias$gv. 41, n. 3, p. 797-810, 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrobiologia (CNPAB) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 445 | |
| 20. |  | HOMMA, A. K. O.; MENEZES, A. J. E. A. de. Avaliação de uma indústria beneficiadora de castanha-do-pará, na microrregião de Cametá, estado do Pará. In: HOMMA, A. K. O. (Ed.). Extrativismo vegetal na Amazônia: história, ecologia, economia e domesticação. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2014. Cap. 13, p. 201-220.| Tipo: Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
|    |
| Registros recuperados : 445 | |
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
