| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpamt.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
|
Data corrente: |
29/01/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
29/01/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
BRANCALION, P. H. S.; MELI, P.; TYMUS, J. R. C.; LENTI, F. E. B.; BENINI, R. M.; SILVA, A. P. M.; ISERNHAGEN, I.; HOLL, K. D. |
|
Afiliação: |
PEDRO H. S. BRANCALION, USP, ESALQ, Piracicaba; PAULA MELI, USP, ESALQ, Piracicaba; JULIO R. C. TYMUS, TNC, São Paulo; FELIPE E. B. LENTI, IPEA, Brasilia; RUBENS M. BENINI, TNC, São Paulo; ANA PAULA M. SILVA, IPEA, Brasilia; INGO ISERNHAGEN, CPAMT; KAREN D. HOLL, UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, Santa Cruz, USA. |
|
Título: |
What makes ecosystem restoration expensive? A systematic cost assessment of projects in Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2019 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Biological Conservation, v. 240, 108274, 2019. |
|
ISSN: |
0006-3207 |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108274 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Limited funding is a major barrier to implementing ambitious global restoration commitments, so reducing restoration costs is essential to upscale restoration. The lack of rigorous analyses about the major components and drivers of restoration costs limit the development of alternatives to reduce costs and the selection of the most cost-effective methods to achieve restoration goals. We conducted detailed restoration cost assessments for the three most widespread biomes in Brazil (Amazon, Cerrado, and Atlantic Forest) and estimated the restoration costs associated with implementing Brazil?s National Plan for Native Vegetation Recovery (12M hectares). Most surveys (60?90%) reported using the costly methods of planting seedlings or sowing seeds throughout the site, regardless of the biome. Natural regeneration and assisted regeneration approaches were an order of magnitude cheaper but were reported in < 15% of projects. The vast majority of tree planting and direct seeding costs were incurred during the implementation phase, and nearly 80% of projects ended maintenance within 30 months. We estimated a price tag of US$0.7-1.2 billion per year until 2030 to implement Brazil?s restoration plan depending on the area that recovers through natural regeneration. Our results offer valuable insights for developing strategies to make restoration cheaper and to increase its cost-effectiveness for achieving diverse benefits in Brazilian ecosystems. Our survey also provides a starting point for sound assessments of restoration costs and their drivers in other biomes, which are needed to reduce the financial barriers to scaling up restoration at a global scale. MenosLimited funding is a major barrier to implementing ambitious global restoration commitments, so reducing restoration costs is essential to upscale restoration. The lack of rigorous analyses about the major components and drivers of restoration costs limit the development of alternatives to reduce costs and the selection of the most cost-effective methods to achieve restoration goals. We conducted detailed restoration cost assessments for the three most widespread biomes in Brazil (Amazon, Cerrado, and Atlantic Forest) and estimated the restoration costs associated with implementing Brazil?s National Plan for Native Vegetation Recovery (12M hectares). Most surveys (60?90%) reported using the costly methods of planting seedlings or sowing seeds throughout the site, regardless of the biome. Natural regeneration and assisted regeneration approaches were an order of magnitude cheaper but were reported in < 15% of projects. The vast majority of tree planting and direct seeding costs were incurred during the implementation phase, and nearly 80% of projects ended maintenance within 30 months. We estimated a price tag of US$0.7-1.2 billion per year until 2030 to implement Brazil?s restoration plan depending on the area that recovers through natural regeneration. Our results offer valuable insights for developing strategies to make restoration cheaper and to increase its cost-effectiveness for achieving diverse benefits in Brazilian ecosystems. Our survey also provides a starting poin... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Brazil; Ecosystems; Forest restoration. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
K Ciência Florestal e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02457naa a2200265 a 4500
001 2119524
005 2020-01-29
008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0006-3207
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108274$2DOI
100 1 $aBRANCALION, P. H. S.
245 $aWhat makes ecosystem restoration expensive? A systematic cost assessment of projects in Brazil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2019
520 $aLimited funding is a major barrier to implementing ambitious global restoration commitments, so reducing restoration costs is essential to upscale restoration. The lack of rigorous analyses about the major components and drivers of restoration costs limit the development of alternatives to reduce costs and the selection of the most cost-effective methods to achieve restoration goals. We conducted detailed restoration cost assessments for the three most widespread biomes in Brazil (Amazon, Cerrado, and Atlantic Forest) and estimated the restoration costs associated with implementing Brazil?s National Plan for Native Vegetation Recovery (12M hectares). Most surveys (60?90%) reported using the costly methods of planting seedlings or sowing seeds throughout the site, regardless of the biome. Natural regeneration and assisted regeneration approaches were an order of magnitude cheaper but were reported in < 15% of projects. The vast majority of tree planting and direct seeding costs were incurred during the implementation phase, and nearly 80% of projects ended maintenance within 30 months. We estimated a price tag of US$0.7-1.2 billion per year until 2030 to implement Brazil?s restoration plan depending on the area that recovers through natural regeneration. Our results offer valuable insights for developing strategies to make restoration cheaper and to increase its cost-effectiveness for achieving diverse benefits in Brazilian ecosystems. Our survey also provides a starting point for sound assessments of restoration costs and their drivers in other biomes, which are needed to reduce the financial barriers to scaling up restoration at a global scale.
650 $aBrazil
650 $aEcosystems
650 $aForest restoration
700 1 $aMELI, P.
700 1 $aTYMUS, J. R. C.
700 1 $aLENTI, F. E. B.
700 1 $aBENINI, R. M.
700 1 $aSILVA, A. P. M.
700 1 $aISERNHAGEN, I.
700 1 $aHOLL, K. D.
773 $tBiological Conservation$gv. 240, 108274, 2019.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril (CPAMT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 158 | |
| 63. |  | COLLI, M. P.; BRUGNARA, E. C.; VERONA, L. A. F.; SCHWENGBER, J. E. Desempenho de cultivares de morangueiro de dias neutros submetidas a duas coberturas plásticas, em produção orgânica. In:SIMPÓSIO NACIONAL DO MORANGO, 6.; ENCONTRO SOBRE PEQUENAS FRUTAS E FRUTAS NATIVAS DO MERCOSUL, 5., 2012, Pelotas. Palestras e resumos... Pelotas: Embrapa Clima Temperado, 2012. 231 p. Organizadores: Marcia Vizzotto, Carlos Reisser Júnior, Rosa Lia Barbieri, Rodrigo Cezar Franzon.| Tipo: Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
|    |
| 66. | | SCHIEDECK, G.; SCHWENGBER, J. E.; CARDOSO, J. H.; SCHIAVON, G. de A.; GONÇALVES, M. de M. Quem tem medo do minhocão? In: ENCONTRO LATINO-AMERICANO DE ECOLOGIA E TAXONOMIA DE OLIGOQUETAS, 4., 2010, Curitiba. Minhocas como bioindicadoras ambientais: princípios e práticas: anais. Colombo: Embrapa Florestas, 2010. 1 CD-ROM. (Embrapa Florestas. Documentos, 199). 1 CD-ROM.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
| 68. | | SAUZA, R. S. de; RICHTER, A. F.; GOMES, F. T.; PIESANTI, S. R.; SCHWENGBER, J. E. Produção de mudas de alface em bandejas com diferentes tamanhos de células em sistema orgânico. In: ENCONTRO DE INICIAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA E PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO DA EMBRAPA CLIMA TEMPERADO, 6., 2016, Pelotas. Ciência: Empreendedorismo e inovação: anais. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2016. p. 125-127| Tipo: Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
| |
| 76. | | CARDOSO, J. H.; SCHIAVON, E. N.; SCHWENGBER, J. E.; SCHIEDECK, G. O processo de transição agroecológico, organização social e redesenho das práticas produtivas: o caso de um agroecossistema. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE AGROECOLOGIA, 5., 2007, Guarapari.. Agroecologia e territórios sustentáveis: resumos... Brasilia: ABA, 2007. Revista Brasileira de Agroecologia , Porto Alegre, v. 2, n. 2, p. 747-751, 2007.| Tipo: Artigo em Anais de Congresso / Nota Técnica | Circulação/Nível: -- - -- |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 158 | |
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
