| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Soja. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com valeria.cardoso@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Soja. |
|
Data corrente: |
03/02/2017 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
03/11/2017 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
KUWANO, B. H.; NOGUEIRA, M. A.; SANTOS, C. A.; FAGOTTI, D. S. L.; SANTOS, M. B.; LESCANO, L. E. A. M.; ANDRADE, D. S.; BARBOSA, G. M. C.; TAVARES-FILHO, J. |
|
Afiliação: |
MARCO ANTONIO NOGUEIRA, CNPSO. |
|
Título: |
Application of Landfill Leachate Improves Wheat Nutrition and Yield but Has Minor Effects on Soil Properties. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2017 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal of Environmental Quality, Madison, v. 46, n. 1, p. 153-159, Jan./Feb. 2017. |
|
ISSN: |
1537-2537 |
|
DOI: |
10.2134/jeq2016.02.0041 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Landfill leachates, which are potential pollutants, may also carry significant amounts of nutrients that can be recycled by plants. We assessed the nutritional status and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and properties of a Rhodic Kandiudult soil (depths of 0–10, 10–20, 20–40, and 40–60 cm) after 11 applications of landfill leachate over 4 yr. In the last application, wheat received 0, 32.7, 65.4, 98.1, or 130.8 m3 ha?1 (875 mg L?1 of nitrogen, N) of leachate and a positive control (90 kg ha?1 of N as urea) 15 d after sowing. Urea increased nitrate (>160 mg kg?1) in the topsoil (down to 40 cm), whereas landfill leachate increased nitrate (>60 mg kg?1) only at 40 to 60 cm with the highest dose, suggesting leaching. Urea-treated soil had less negative ?pH, which might have led to greater retention of nitrate in the topsoil. Sodium (0.02–0.26 cmolc Na kg?1), potassium (0.18–0.82 cmolc K kg?1), and electrical conductivity (0.05–0.14 dS m?1) all increased with leachate dosage. Treatments did not affect resistance to penetration and clay dispersion. Basal respiration increased with leachate dosage, whereas dehydrogenase activity decreased, suggesting effects on soil microbial metabolism. Microbial biomass and soil enzyme activities were not affected by addition of leachate. Nitrogen nutrition (15.1–22.7 g N kg?1 in flag leaves) and grain yield (1381–2378 kg grain ha?1) increased with leachate dosage so that the highest dose gave results similar to those for urea-treated plants (2563 kg grain ha?1). Landfill leachate showed strong potential as source of N for wheat but caused none, or transient, effects on soil properties. However, nitrate from leachate was more leachable than nitrate from urea. MenosLandfill leachates, which are potential pollutants, may also carry significant amounts of nutrients that can be recycled by plants. We assessed the nutritional status and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and properties of a Rhodic Kandiudult soil (depths of 0–10, 10–20, 20–40, and 40–60 cm) after 11 applications of landfill leachate over 4 yr. In the last application, wheat received 0, 32.7, 65.4, 98.1, or 130.8 m3 ha?1 (875 mg L?1 of nitrogen, N) of leachate and a positive control (90 kg ha?1 of N as urea) 15 d after sowing. Urea increased nitrate (>160 mg kg?1) in the topsoil (down to 40 cm), whereas landfill leachate increased nitrate (>60 mg kg?1) only at 40 to 60 cm with the highest dose, suggesting leaching. Urea-treated soil had less negative ?pH, which might have led to greater retention of nitrate in the topsoil. Sodium (0.02–0.26 cmolc Na kg?1), potassium (0.18–0.82 cmolc K kg?1), and electrical conductivity (0.05–0.14 dS m?1) all increased with leachate dosage. Treatments did not affect resistance to penetration and clay dispersion. Basal respiration increased with leachate dosage, whereas dehydrogenase activity decreased, suggesting effects on soil microbial metabolism. Microbial biomass and soil enzyme activities were not affected by addition of leachate. Nitrogen nutrition (15.1–22.7 g N kg?1 in flag leaves) and grain yield (1381–2378 kg grain ha?1) increased with leachate dosage so that the highest dose gave results similar to those for urea-treated plant... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesagro: |
Pedologia; Trigo. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Soil properties; Wheat. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02618naa a2200289 a 4500
001 2062630
005 2017-11-03
008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1537-2537
024 7 $a10.2134/jeq2016.02.0041$2DOI
100 1 $aKUWANO, B. H.
245 $aApplication of Landfill Leachate Improves Wheat Nutrition and Yield but Has Minor Effects on Soil Properties.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2017
520 $aLandfill leachates, which are potential pollutants, may also carry significant amounts of nutrients that can be recycled by plants. We assessed the nutritional status and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and properties of a Rhodic Kandiudult soil (depths of 0–10, 10–20, 20–40, and 40–60 cm) after 11 applications of landfill leachate over 4 yr. In the last application, wheat received 0, 32.7, 65.4, 98.1, or 130.8 m3 ha?1 (875 mg L?1 of nitrogen, N) of leachate and a positive control (90 kg ha?1 of N as urea) 15 d after sowing. Urea increased nitrate (>160 mg kg?1) in the topsoil (down to 40 cm), whereas landfill leachate increased nitrate (>60 mg kg?1) only at 40 to 60 cm with the highest dose, suggesting leaching. Urea-treated soil had less negative ?pH, which might have led to greater retention of nitrate in the topsoil. Sodium (0.02–0.26 cmolc Na kg?1), potassium (0.18–0.82 cmolc K kg?1), and electrical conductivity (0.05–0.14 dS m?1) all increased with leachate dosage. Treatments did not affect resistance to penetration and clay dispersion. Basal respiration increased with leachate dosage, whereas dehydrogenase activity decreased, suggesting effects on soil microbial metabolism. Microbial biomass and soil enzyme activities were not affected by addition of leachate. Nitrogen nutrition (15.1–22.7 g N kg?1 in flag leaves) and grain yield (1381–2378 kg grain ha?1) increased with leachate dosage so that the highest dose gave results similar to those for urea-treated plants (2563 kg grain ha?1). Landfill leachate showed strong potential as source of N for wheat but caused none, or transient, effects on soil properties. However, nitrate from leachate was more leachable than nitrate from urea.
650 $aSoil properties
650 $aWheat
650 $aPedologia
650 $aTrigo
700 1 $aNOGUEIRA, M. A.
700 1 $aSANTOS, C. A.
700 1 $aFAGOTTI, D. S. L.
700 1 $aSANTOS, M. B.
700 1 $aLESCANO, L. E. A. M.
700 1 $aANDRADE, D. S.
700 1 $aBARBOSA, G. M. C.
700 1 $aTAVARES-FILHO, J.
773 $tJournal of Environmental Quality, Madison$gv. 46, n. 1, p. 153-159, Jan./Feb. 2017.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Soja (CNPSO) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 8 | |
| 6. |  | COELHO, F. F.; SILVA, G. H. da; DIAS, E. H. O.; OTENIO, M. H.; CARNEIRO, J. da C.; MACHADO, J. C. Potencial de produção de biogás e biometano a partir da biomassa energética de genótipos de capim-elefante. In: WORKSHOP DE INICIAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA DA EMBRAPA GADO DE LEITE - PIBIC/FAPEMIG, 30., 2024, Juiz de Fora. Anais [...]. Juiz de Fora: Embrapa Gado de Leite, 2025. p. 21-26. ODS 2, ODS 7.| Tipo: Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
|    |
| 8. | | SILVA, G. T. S. T. da; LOPES, O. F.; DIAS, E. H.; TORRES, J. A.; NOGUEIRA, A. E.; FAUSTINO, L. A.; PRADO, F. S.; PATROCÍNIO, A. O. T.; RIBEIRO, C. Redução de CO2 em hidrocarbonetos e oxigenados: fundamentos, estratégias e desafios. Quimica Nova, v. 44, n. 8, 2021. 963-981| Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: A - 2 |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Instrumentação. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 8 | |
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
