| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cppse.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. |
|
Data corrente: |
10/12/2018 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
11/01/2019 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
|
Autoria: |
MACNEIL, M. D.; MINHO, A. P.; CARDOSO, F. F.; YOKOO, M. J. I. |
|
Afiliação: |
Michael D. MacNeil, DeltaG, Montana; ALESSANDRO PELEGRINE MINHO, CPPSE; FERNANDO FLORES CARDOSO, CPPSUL; MARCOS JUN ITI YOKOO, CPPSUL. |
|
Título: |
Target selective anthelmintic treatment use in beef cattle: is it worth it? |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2018 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: MOLENTO, M. B.; MILLER, J. (Eds.). Movel approaches to the control of helminth parasites of livestock: facing the challenge of helminth infections in tropical and sbtropical areas. Curitiba: Appris, 2018. |
|
Páginas: |
p.53-61. |
|
ISBN: |
978854731475-0 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Intestinal parasitism, specifically parasitism caused by Cooperia oncophora, Ostertagia ostertagi and Haemonchus placei has been identified as an important cause of production loss in cattle. The control of these parasites relies strongly on the administration of anthelmintic drugs. However, the effectiveness of anthelmintics is threatened by the increasing prevalence and severity of anthelmintic resistance. Several novel control approaches are currently proposed, and among them the target selective anthelmintic treatment (TST) to individual animais instead of the whole herdo However, ali selective treatment strategies come with additional costs for labor and diagnostics. The pros are the slowing of resistance prevalence, lower residues of anthelmintics in meat and rnilk; the cons are the difficulty and time spent on selecting animais in need of treatment, costs with diagnostics and the possibility of lower production. Probably, in beef cattle the uses ofTST have more economic benefits when realized in animal between weaning and 24 months of age. The aim of TST uses is to reduce the frequency and number of treatment with anthelmintics and to maximize the potential benefit by considering environmental and management factors, carrying out less selective pressure on nematodes populations in cattle herds. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Cooperia oncophora; Gastrointestinal nematodes; Haemonchus placei; Ostertagia ostertagi. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
H Saúde e Patologia |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02150naa a2200229 a 4500
001 2101032
005 2019-01-11
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
020 $a978854731475-0
100 1 $aMACNEIL, M. D.
245 $aTarget selective anthelmintic treatment use in beef cattle$bis it worth it?$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
300 $ap.53-61.
520 $aIntestinal parasitism, specifically parasitism caused by Cooperia oncophora, Ostertagia ostertagi and Haemonchus placei has been identified as an important cause of production loss in cattle. The control of these parasites relies strongly on the administration of anthelmintic drugs. However, the effectiveness of anthelmintics is threatened by the increasing prevalence and severity of anthelmintic resistance. Several novel control approaches are currently proposed, and among them the target selective anthelmintic treatment (TST) to individual animais instead of the whole herdo However, ali selective treatment strategies come with additional costs for labor and diagnostics. The pros are the slowing of resistance prevalence, lower residues of anthelmintics in meat and rnilk; the cons are the difficulty and time spent on selecting animais in need of treatment, costs with diagnostics and the possibility of lower production. Probably, in beef cattle the uses ofTST have more economic benefits when realized in animal between weaning and 24 months of age. The aim of TST uses is to reduce the frequency and number of treatment with anthelmintics and to maximize the potential benefit by considering environmental and management factors, carrying out less selective pressure on nematodes populations in cattle herds.
650 $aCooperia oncophora
650 $aGastrointestinal nematodes
650 $aHaemonchus placei
650 $aOstertagia ostertagi
700 1 $aMINHO, A. P.
700 1 $aCARDOSO, F. F.
700 1 $aYOKOO, M. J. I.
773 $tIn: MOLENTO, M. B.; MILLER, J. (Eds.). Movel approaches to the control of helminth parasites of livestock: facing the challenge of helminth infections in tropical and sbtropical areas. Curitiba: Appris, 2018.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste (CPPSE) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 121 | |
| 3. |  | YOKOO, M. J. I.; CARDOSO, F. F. Imputação na seleção genômica. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE ZOOTECNIA, 23., 2013, Foz do Iguaçu. Zootecnia do futuro: produção animal sustentável. Foz do Iguaçu: ABZ: Unioeste: UTFPR, 2013. p. 5003-5010. ZOOTEC 2013.| Tipo: Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pecuária Sul. |
|    |
| 13. | | COSTA, R. F. da; SOLLERO, B. P.; YOKOO, M. J. I.; CARDOSO, F. F. Importância relativa de critérios de seleção baseados em índices de seleção econômico e empírico. In: SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE MELHORAMENTO ANIMAL, 11., 2015, Santa Maria, RS. Melhoramento animal da academia ao campo: uma parceria em construção: anais. Santa Maria, RS: SBMA: UFSM, 2015.| Tipo: Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pecuária Sul. |
|  |
| 14. | | REIS, A. P.; CARDOSO, F. F.; COSTA, R. F. da; BIEGELMEYER, P.; YOKOO, M. J. I. Ganho genético monetário para resistência ao carrapato com diferentes acurácias. In: SALÃO INTERNACIONAL DE ENSINO, EXTENSÃO E PESQUISA, 5., 2013, Bagé. Discussão, participação e cidadania: anais. Bagé: Unipampa, 2013. SIEPE.| Tipo: Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pecuária Sul. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 121 | |
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
