| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio-Norte. |
|
Data corrente: |
19/07/2013 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
14/12/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
SILVA, K. J. D. e; ROCHA, M. de M.; VIEIRA, P. F. de M. J.; CECCON, G.; SANTOS, A. dos; LUIZ NETO NETO, A.; SILVA, J. F. da; CORREA, A. M.; ALVAREZ, R. de C. F. |
|
Afiliação: |
KAESEL JACKSON DAMASCENO E SILVA, CPAMN; MAURISRAEL DE MOURA ROCHA, CPAMN; PAULO FERNANDO DE MELO JORGE VIEIRA, CPAMN; GESSI CECCON, CPAO; ADRIANO DOS SANTOS, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE MATO GROSSO DO SUL, AQUIDAUANA, MS.; ANTONIO LUIZ NETO NETO; JUSLEI FIGUEIREDO DA SILVA; AGENOR MARTINHO CORREA, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE MATO GROSSO DO SUL, AQUIDAUANA, MS.; RITA DE CÁSSIA FÉLIX ALVAREZ, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MATO GROSSO DO SUL, CHAPADÃO DO SUL, MS. |
|
Título: |
Adaptabilidade e estabilidade produtiva de genótipos de feijão-caupi de portes ereto e semiereto na região Centro-Oeste do Brasil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2013 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE FEIJÃO-CAUPI, 3., 2013, Recife. Feijão-Caupi como alternativa sustentável para os sistemas produtivos familiares e empresariais. Recife: IPA, 2013. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Notas: |
CONAC 2012. Disponível em: http://www.conac2012.org/resumos/pdf/124l.pdf. Acesso em: 19 jul. 2013. |
|
Conteúdo: |
Estudos de adaptabilidade e estabilidade de genótipos são importantes nas fases finais de um programa de melhoramento para subsidiar a recomendação de novas cultivares. O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a adaptabilidade e estabilidade produtiva de genótipos de feijão-caupi de portes ereto e semiereto na região Centro-Oeste do Brasil. Foram avaliados 20 genótipos (16 linhagens e quatro cultivares), em 11 ambientes dos estados do Mato Grosso e Mato Grosso do Sul, no triênio 2010-2012. Os ensaios foram conduzidos em delineamento de blocos ao acaso com quatro repetições. Foram realizadas análises de variância conjunta e a adaptabilidade e a estabilidade dos genótipos foram analisadas pelo método de Lin e Bins modificado por Carneiro (1998). Observaram-se diferenças para os efeitos de genótipos, ambientes e interação genótipo x ambiente. As cultivares BRS Tumucumaque e BRS Guariba apresentam ampla adaptabilidade e alta estabilidade aos ambientes da região Centro-Oeste do Brasil, sendo a cultivar BRS Tumucumaque adaptada tanto a condições favoráveis quanto desfavoráveis. Entre as linhagens, destaca-se a MNC03-737F-5-1, com adaptabilidade a condições favoráveis. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Interação genótipos x ambientes. |
|
Thesagro: |
Produtividade; Vigna Unguiculata. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
X Pesquisa, Tecnologia e Engenharia |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/86236/1/124l.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02237nam a2200253 a 4500
001 1962456
005 2023-12-14
008 2013 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aSILVA, K. J. D. e
245 $aAdaptabilidade e estabilidade produtiva de genótipos de feijão-caupi de portes ereto e semiereto na região Centro-Oeste do Brasil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE FEIJÃO-CAUPI, 3., 2013, Recife. Feijão-Caupi como alternativa sustentável para os sistemas produtivos familiares e empresariais. Recife: IPA$c2013
500 $aCONAC 2012. Disponível em: http://www.conac2012.org/resumos/pdf/124l.pdf. Acesso em: 19 jul. 2013.
520 $aEstudos de adaptabilidade e estabilidade de genótipos são importantes nas fases finais de um programa de melhoramento para subsidiar a recomendação de novas cultivares. O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a adaptabilidade e estabilidade produtiva de genótipos de feijão-caupi de portes ereto e semiereto na região Centro-Oeste do Brasil. Foram avaliados 20 genótipos (16 linhagens e quatro cultivares), em 11 ambientes dos estados do Mato Grosso e Mato Grosso do Sul, no triênio 2010-2012. Os ensaios foram conduzidos em delineamento de blocos ao acaso com quatro repetições. Foram realizadas análises de variância conjunta e a adaptabilidade e a estabilidade dos genótipos foram analisadas pelo método de Lin e Bins modificado por Carneiro (1998). Observaram-se diferenças para os efeitos de genótipos, ambientes e interação genótipo x ambiente. As cultivares BRS Tumucumaque e BRS Guariba apresentam ampla adaptabilidade e alta estabilidade aos ambientes da região Centro-Oeste do Brasil, sendo a cultivar BRS Tumucumaque adaptada tanto a condições favoráveis quanto desfavoráveis. Entre as linhagens, destaca-se a MNC03-737F-5-1, com adaptabilidade a condições favoráveis.
650 $aProdutividade
650 $aVigna Unguiculata
653 $aInteração genótipos x ambientes
700 1 $aROCHA, M. de M.
700 1 $aVIEIRA, P. F. de M. J.
700 1 $aCECCON, G.
700 1 $aSANTOS, A. dos
700 1 $aLUIZ NETO NETO, A.
700 1 $aSILVA, J. F. da
700 1 $aCORREA, A. M.
700 1 $aALVAREZ, R. de C. F.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Meio-Norte (CPAMN) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. |
|
Data corrente: |
13/12/2021 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
13/12/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
BOULAY, A. M.; DRASTIG, K.; AMANULLAH; CHAPAGAIN, A.; CHARLON, V.; CIVIT, B.; CAMILLIS, C. DE; SOUZA, M. DE; HESS, T.; HOEKSTRA, A. Y.; IBIDHI, R.; LATHUILLIERE, M. J.; MANZARDO, A.; MCALLISTER, T.; MORALES, R. A.; MOTOSHITA, M.; PALHARES, J. C. P.; PIRLO, G.; RIDOUTT, B.; RUSSO, V.; SALMORAL, G.; SINGH, R.; VANHAM, D.; WIEDEMANN, S.; ZHENG, W.; PFISTER, S. |
|
Afiliação: |
ANNE-MARIE BOULAY, Sherbrooke University; KATRIN DRASTIG, Polytechnique Montreal; AMANULLAH, Faculty of Crop Production Sciences; ASHOK CHAPAGAIN, Pacific Institute, USA; VERONICA CHARLON, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA); BÁRBARA CIVIT, INAHE CONICET and UTN FRM Mendoza; CAMILLO DE CAMILLIS, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); MARLOS DE SOUZA, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); TIM HESS, Cranfield Water Science Institute, Cranfield University, United Kingdom; ARJEN Y. HOEKSTRA, Twente Water Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; RIDHA IBIDHI, Department of Animal and Forage Production, National Institute of Agronomic Research of Tunisia (INRAT), Ariana, Tunisia; MICHAEL J. LATHUILLIÈRE, Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; ALESSANDRO MANZARDO, CESQA, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; TIM MCALLISTER, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada; RICARDO A. MORALES, AgroDer SC, Mexico DF, Mexico; MASAHARU MOTOSHITA, Institute of Science for Safety and Sustainability, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Japan; JULIO CESAR PASCALE PALHARES, CPPSE; GIACOMO PIRLO, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Animal Production and Aquaculture, Lodi, Italy; BRAD RIDOUTT, Department Agricultural Economics, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa; VALENTINA RUSSO, Environmental and Process Systems Engineering Research Group, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Cape Town, 7701 Rondebosch, South Africa; GLORIA SALMORAL, Cranfield Water Science Institute, Cranfield University, United Kingdom; RANVIR SINGH, School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand; DAVY VANHAM, European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy; STEPHEN WIEDEMANN, Integrity Ag and Environment, Toowoomba, Qld, Australia; WEICHAO ZHENG, China Agricultural University, China; STEPHAN PFISTER, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, ETH-Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland. |
|
Título: |
Building consensus on water use assessment of livestock production systems and supply chains: outcome and recommendations from the FAO LEAP partnership. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Ecological Indicators, v.124, may 2021, 107391. |
|
Páginas: |
11 p. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107391 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The FAO Livestock Environmental Assessment and Performance (LEAP) Partnership organised a Technical Advisory Group (TAG) to develop reference guidelines on water footprinting for livestock production systems and supply chains. The mandate of the TAG was to i) provide recommendations to monitor the environmental performance of feed and livestock supply chains over time so that progress towards improvement targets can be measured, ii) be applicable for feed and water demand of small ruminants, poultry, large ruminants and pig supply chains, iii) build on, and go beyond, the existing FAO LEAP guidelines and iv) pursue alignment with relevant international standards, specifically ISO 14040 (2006)/ISO 14044 (2006), and ISO 14046 (2014). The recommended guidelines on livestock water use address both impact assessment (water scarcity footprint as defined by ISO 14046, 2014) and water productivity (water use efficiency). While most aspects of livestock water use assessment have been proposed or discussed independently elsewhere, the TAG reviewed and connected these concepts and information in relation with each other and made recommendations towards comprehensive assessment of water use in livestock production systems and supply chains. The approaches to assess the quantity of water used for livestock systems are addressed and the specific assessment methods for water productivity and water scarcity are recommended. Water productivity assessment is further advanced by its quantification and reporting with fractions of green and blue water consumed. This allows the assessment of the environmental performance related to water use of a livestock-related system by assessing potential environmental impacts of anthropogenic water consumption (only ?blue water?); as well as the assessment of overall water productivity of the system (including ?green? and ?blue water? consumption). A consistent combination of water productivity and water scarcity footprint metrics provides a complete picture both in terms of potential productivity improvements of the water consumption as well as minimizing potential environmental impacts related to water scarcity. This process resulted for the first time in an international consensus on water use assessment, including both the life-cycle assessment community with the water scarcity footprint and the water management community with water productivity metrics. Despite the main focus on feed and livestock production systems, the outcomes of this LEAP TAG are also applicable to many other agriculture sectors. MenosThe FAO Livestock Environmental Assessment and Performance (LEAP) Partnership organised a Technical Advisory Group (TAG) to develop reference guidelines on water footprinting for livestock production systems and supply chains. The mandate of the TAG was to i) provide recommendations to monitor the environmental performance of feed and livestock supply chains over time so that progress towards improvement targets can be measured, ii) be applicable for feed and water demand of small ruminants, poultry, large ruminants and pig supply chains, iii) build on, and go beyond, the existing FAO LEAP guidelines and iv) pursue alignment with relevant international standards, specifically ISO 14040 (2006)/ISO 14044 (2006), and ISO 14046 (2014). The recommended guidelines on livestock water use address both impact assessment (water scarcity footprint as defined by ISO 14046, 2014) and water productivity (water use efficiency). While most aspects of livestock water use assessment have been proposed or discussed independently elsewhere, the TAG reviewed and connected these concepts and information in relation with each other and made recommendations towards comprehensive assessment of water use in livestock production systems and supply chains. The approaches to assess the quantity of water used for livestock systems are addressed and the specific assessment methods for water productivity and water scarcity are recommended. Water productivity assessment is further advanced by its quantifica... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Water footprinting; Water productivity; Water scarcity footprint; Water use assessment. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Livestock production. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/229026/1/BuildingConsensusWater.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 04009naa a2200505 a 4500
001 2137681
005 2021-12-13
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107391$2DOI
100 1 $aBOULAY, A. M.
245 $aBuilding consensus on water use assessment of livestock production systems and supply chains$boutcome and recommendations from the FAO LEAP partnership.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
300 $a11 p.
520 $aThe FAO Livestock Environmental Assessment and Performance (LEAP) Partnership organised a Technical Advisory Group (TAG) to develop reference guidelines on water footprinting for livestock production systems and supply chains. The mandate of the TAG was to i) provide recommendations to monitor the environmental performance of feed and livestock supply chains over time so that progress towards improvement targets can be measured, ii) be applicable for feed and water demand of small ruminants, poultry, large ruminants and pig supply chains, iii) build on, and go beyond, the existing FAO LEAP guidelines and iv) pursue alignment with relevant international standards, specifically ISO 14040 (2006)/ISO 14044 (2006), and ISO 14046 (2014). The recommended guidelines on livestock water use address both impact assessment (water scarcity footprint as defined by ISO 14046, 2014) and water productivity (water use efficiency). While most aspects of livestock water use assessment have been proposed or discussed independently elsewhere, the TAG reviewed and connected these concepts and information in relation with each other and made recommendations towards comprehensive assessment of water use in livestock production systems and supply chains. The approaches to assess the quantity of water used for livestock systems are addressed and the specific assessment methods for water productivity and water scarcity are recommended. Water productivity assessment is further advanced by its quantification and reporting with fractions of green and blue water consumed. This allows the assessment of the environmental performance related to water use of a livestock-related system by assessing potential environmental impacts of anthropogenic water consumption (only ?blue water?); as well as the assessment of overall water productivity of the system (including ?green? and ?blue water? consumption). A consistent combination of water productivity and water scarcity footprint metrics provides a complete picture both in terms of potential productivity improvements of the water consumption as well as minimizing potential environmental impacts related to water scarcity. This process resulted for the first time in an international consensus on water use assessment, including both the life-cycle assessment community with the water scarcity footprint and the water management community with water productivity metrics. Despite the main focus on feed and livestock production systems, the outcomes of this LEAP TAG are also applicable to many other agriculture sectors.
650 $aLivestock production
653 $aWater footprinting
653 $aWater productivity
653 $aWater scarcity footprint
653 $aWater use assessment
700 1 $aDRASTIG, K.
700 1 $aAMANULLAH
700 1 $aCHAPAGAIN, A.
700 1 $aCHARLON, V.
700 1 $aCIVIT, B.
700 1 $aCAMILLIS, C. DE
700 1 $aSOUZA, M. DE
700 1 $aHESS, T.
700 1 $aHOEKSTRA, A. Y.
700 1 $aIBIDHI, R.
700 1 $aLATHUILLIERE, M. J.
700 1 $aMANZARDO, A.
700 1 $aMCALLISTER, T.
700 1 $aMORALES, R. A.
700 1 $aMOTOSHITA, M.
700 1 $aPALHARES, J. C. P.
700 1 $aPIRLO, G.
700 1 $aRIDOUTT, B.
700 1 $aRUSSO, V.
700 1 $aSALMORAL, G.
700 1 $aSINGH, R.
700 1 $aVANHAM, D.
700 1 $aWIEDEMANN, S.
700 1 $aZHENG, W.
700 1 $aPFISTER, S.
773 $tEcological Indicators$gv.124, may 2021, 107391.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste (CPPSE) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
