| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
|
Data corrente: |
02/08/1994 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
24/01/2020 |
|
Autoria: |
URBIZAGASTEGUI ALVARADO, R. |
|
Afiliação: |
RUBÉN URBIZAGÁSTEGUI ALVARADO, IICA/EMBRAPA-DID. |
|
Título: |
Experiencia de evaluación de publicaciones periódicas en ciencias agrícolas en América Latina. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
1986 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Quarterly Bulletin of the IAALD, v. 31, n. 2, p. 55-66, 1986. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The different models used to assess agricultural periodicals of Latin America and the Caribbean are reviewed. Some of the factors that led librarians and information specialists to search for these methods were the increasing prices of journals, the constant and permanent inflation of national currencies, unavailability of space in libraries, the continuous reduction in library budgets, the gap between acquisition policies and user needs, and the continuous increase in science specialization. The models discussed inc1ude productivity studies, analysis of the utilization of journals, studies on requests for photocopies, studies on bibliographic citations and estimation of impact, the users' opinion, the cost-benefit and the Rio Piedras models, indexing of secondary services and their evaluation, among others. Empirical research has followed a quantitative approach in attempts to derive quality from quantity. Most of the empirical efforts have concentrated on searching and identifying a core list of journals able to meet a large demando Originally the models are North American and, in general, no new contributions have been made to them. Emphasis has been on productivity (Bradford Law), use of journals, and users' opinion models. The Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária EMBRAPA, Brazil, is the institution that has been most concerned about applying and searching for models to evaluate Latin Americanjournals, thus most ofthe regional experience on this topic is concentrated in Brazil. MenosThe different models used to assess agricultural periodicals of Latin America and the Caribbean are reviewed. Some of the factors that led librarians and information specialists to search for these methods were the increasing prices of journals, the constant and permanent inflation of national currencies, unavailability of space in libraries, the continuous reduction in library budgets, the gap between acquisition policies and user needs, and the continuous increase in science specialization. The models discussed inc1ude productivity studies, analysis of the utilization of journals, studies on requests for photocopies, studies on bibliographic citations and estimation of impact, the users' opinion, the cost-benefit and the Rio Piedras models, indexing of secondary services and their evaluation, among others. Empirical research has followed a quantitative approach in attempts to derive quality from quantity. Most of the empirical efforts have concentrated on searching and identifying a core list of journals able to meet a large demando Originally the models are North American and, in general, no new contributions have been made to them. Emphasis has been on productivity (Bradford Law), use of journals, and users' opinion models. The Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária EMBRAPA, Brazil, is the institution that has been most concerned about applying and searching for models to evaluate Latin Americanjournals, thus most ofthe regional experience on this topic is concentra... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Agriculture periodical; Bradford; Comutacao bibliografica; Fotocopia; Periodico agricola; Publication. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/209575/1/Experiencia-de-evaluacion-de-publicaciones.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02104naa a2200193 a 4500
001 1090472
005 2020-01-24
008 1986 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aURBIZAGASTEGUI ALVARADO, R.
245 $aExperiencia de evaluación de publicaciones periódicas en ciencias agrícolas en América Latina.
260 $c1986
520 $aThe different models used to assess agricultural periodicals of Latin America and the Caribbean are reviewed. Some of the factors that led librarians and information specialists to search for these methods were the increasing prices of journals, the constant and permanent inflation of national currencies, unavailability of space in libraries, the continuous reduction in library budgets, the gap between acquisition policies and user needs, and the continuous increase in science specialization. The models discussed inc1ude productivity studies, analysis of the utilization of journals, studies on requests for photocopies, studies on bibliographic citations and estimation of impact, the users' opinion, the cost-benefit and the Rio Piedras models, indexing of secondary services and their evaluation, among others. Empirical research has followed a quantitative approach in attempts to derive quality from quantity. Most of the empirical efforts have concentrated on searching and identifying a core list of journals able to meet a large demando Originally the models are North American and, in general, no new contributions have been made to them. Emphasis has been on productivity (Bradford Law), use of journals, and users' opinion models. The Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária EMBRAPA, Brazil, is the institution that has been most concerned about applying and searching for models to evaluate Latin Americanjournals, thus most ofthe regional experience on this topic is concentrated in Brazil.
653 $aAgriculture periodical
653 $aBradford
653 $aComutacao bibliografica
653 $aFotocopia
653 $aPeriodico agricola
653 $aPublication
773 $tQuarterly Bulletin of the IAALD$gv. 31, n. 2, p. 55-66, 1986.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Unidades Centrais (AI-SEDE) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
| 1. |  | ZUFFA, S.; SCHMID, R.; BAUERMEISTER, A.; GOMES, P. W. P.; CARABALLO-RODRIGUEZ, A. M.; EL ABIEAD, Y.; ARON, A. T.; GENTRY, E. C.; ZEMLIN, J.; MEEHAN, M. J.; AVALON, N. E.; CICHEWICZ, R. H.; BUZUN, E.; CARRILLO TERRAZAS, M.; HSU, C. Y.; OLES, R.; AYALA, A. V.; ZHAO, J.; CHU, H.; KUIJPERS, M. C. M.; JACKREL, S. L.; TUGIZIMANA, F.; NEPHALI, L. P.; DUBERY, I. A.; MADALA, N. E.; MOREIRA, E. A.; COSTA-LOTUFO, L. V.; LOPES, N. P.; REZENDE-TEIXEIRA, P.; JIMENEZ, P. C.; RIMAL, B.; PATTERSON, A. D.; TRAXLER, M. F.; PESSOTTI, R. de C.; ALVARADO-VILLALOBOS, D.; TAMAYO-CASTILLO, G.; CHAVERRI, P.; ESCUDERO-LEYVA, E.; QUIROS-GUERRERO, L. M.; BORY, A. J.; JOUBERT, J.; RUTZ, A.; WOLFENDER, J. L.; ALLARD, P. M.; SICHERT, A.; PONTRELLI, S.; PULLMAN, B. S.; BANDEIRA, N.; GERWICK, W. H.; GINDRO, K.; MASSANA-CODINA, J.; WAGNER, B. C.; FORCHHAMMER, K.; PETRAS, D.; AIOSA, N.; GARG, N.; LIEBEKE, M.; BOURCEAU, P.; KANG, K. B.; GADHAVI, H.; CARVALHO, L. P. S. de; SANTOS, M. S. dos; PÉREZ-LORENTE, A. I.; MOLINA-SANTIAGO, C.; ROMERO, D.; FRANKE, R.; BRÖNSTRUP, M.; PONCE DE LEÓN, A. V.; POPE, P. B.; LA ROSA, S. L.; LA BARBERA, G.; ROAGER, H. M.; LAURSEN, M. F.; HAMMERLE, F.; SIEWERT, B.; PEINTNER, U.; LICONA-CASSANI, C.; RODRIGUEZ-ORDUÑA, L.; RAMPLER, E.; HILDEBRAND, F.; KOELLENSPERGER, G.; SCHOENY, H.; HOHENWALLNER, K.; PANZENBOECK, L.; GREGOR, R.; O'NEILL, E. C.; ROXBOROUGH, E. T.; ODOI, J.; BALE, N. J.; DING, S.; DAMSTÉ, J. S. S.; GUAN, X. L.; CUI, J. J.; JU, K. S.; SILVA, D. B.; SILVA, F. M. R.; SILVA, G. F. da; KOOLEN, H. H. F.; GRUNDMANN, C.; CLEMENT, J. A.; MOHIMANI, H.; BRODERS, K.; McPHAIL, K. L.; OBER-SINGLETON, S. E.; RATH, C. M.; McDONALD, D.; KNIGHT, R.; WANG, M.; DORRESTEIN, P. C. MicrobeMASST: a taxonomically informed mass spectrometry search tool for microbial metabolomics data. Nature Microbiology, v. 9, p. 336-345, Feb. 2024.| Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: A - 1 |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental. |
|    |
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
