|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpms.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Milho e Sorgo; Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
Data corrente: |
23/04/2024 |
Data da última atualização: |
24/04/2024 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
WYCKHUYS, K. A.; AKUTSE, K. S.; AMALIN, D. M.; ARAJ, S.-E.; BARRERA, G.; BELTRAN, M. J. B.; FEKIH, I. B.; CALATAYUD, P.; CICERO, L.; COKOLA, M. C.; COLMENAREZ, Y. C.; DESSAUVAGES, K.; DUBOIS, T.; DUROCHER-GRANGER, L.; ESPINEL, C.; FALLET, P.; FERNÁNDEZ-TRIANA, J. L.; FRANCIS, F.; GÓMEZ, J.; HADDI, K.; HARRISON, R. D.; HASEEB, M.; IWANICKI, N. S.; JABER, L. R.; KHAMIS, F. M.; LEGASPI, J. C.; LOMELI-FLORES, R. J.; LOPES, R. B.; LYU, B.; MONTOYA-LERMA, J.; MONTECALVO, M. P.; POLASZEK, A.; NGUYEN, T. D.; NURKOMAR, I.; O'HARA, J. E.; PERIER, J. D.; RAMÍREZ-ROMERO, R.; SÁNCHEZ-GARCÍA, F. J.; ROBINSON-BAKER, A. M.; SILVEIRA, L. C.; SIMEON, L.; SOLTER, L. F.; SANTOS-AMAYA, O. F.; TALAMAS, E. J.; TAVARES, W. de S.; TRABANINO, R.; TURLINGS, T. C.; VALICENTE, F. H.; VÁSQUEZ, C.; WANG, Z.; WENGRAT, A. P.; ZANG, L.-S.; ZHANG, W.; ZIMBA, K. J.; WU, K.; ELKAHKY, M.; HADI, B. A. |
Afiliação: |
KRIS A. G. WYCKHUYS, CHRYSALIS CONSULTING; KOMIVI S. AKUTSE, INTERNATIONAL CENTRE OF INSECT PHYSIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY; DIVINA M. AMALIN, DE LA SALLE UNIVERSITY; SALAH-EDDIN ARAJ, UNIVERSITY OF JORDAN; GLORIA BARRERA, CORPORACION COLOMBIANA DE INVESTIGACION AGROPECUARIA - AGROSAVIA; MARIE JOY B. BELTRAN, UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES LOS BANOS; IBTISSEM BEN FEKIH, UNIVERSITY OF LIEGE; PAUL-ANDRÉ CALATAYUD, UNIVERSIT´E PARIS-SACLAY; LIZETTE CICERO, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIONES FORESTALES, AGRÍCOLAS Y PECUARIAS; MARCELLIN C. COKOLA, UNIVERSITY OF LIEGE; YELITZA C. COLMENAREZ, CAB INTERNATIONAL LATIN AMERICA; KENZA DESSAUVAGES, UNIVERSITY OF LIEGE; THOMAS DUBOIS, INTERNATIONAL CENTRE OF INSECT PHYSIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY; LÉNA DUROCHER-GRANGER, CAB INTERNATIONAL; CARLOS ESPINEL, CORPORACION COLOMBIANA DE INVESTIGACION AGROPECUARIA - AGROSAVIA; PATRICK FALLET, UNIVERSITY OF NEUCHATEL; JOSÉ L. FERNÁNDEZ-TRIANA, CANADIAN NATIONAL COLLECTION OF INSECTS, ARACHNIDS AND NEMATODES, AGRICULTURE AND AGRI-FOOD CANADA; FREDERIC FRANCIS, UNIVERSITY OF LIEGE; JULIANA GÓMEZ, CORPORACION COLOMBIANA DE INVESTIGACION AGROPECUARIA - AGROSAVIA; KHALID HADDI, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE LAVRAS; RHETT D. HARRISON, CIFOR-ICRAF; MUHAMMAD HASEEB, FLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITY; NATASHA S.A. IWANICKI, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; LARA R. JABER, UNIVERSITY OF JORDAN; FATHIYA M. KHAMIS, INTERNATIONAL CENTRE OF INSECT PHYSIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY; JESUSA C. LEGASPI, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE-AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE; REFUGIO J. LOMELI-FLORES; ROGERIO BIAGGIONI LOPES, CENARGEN; BAOQIAN LYU, CHINA ACADEMY OF TROPICAL AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES; JAMES MONTOYA-LERMA, UNIVERSIDAD DEL VALLE; MELISSA P. MONTECALVO, UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES LOS BANOS; ANDREW POLASZEK, NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM; TUNG D. NGUYEN, CHRYSALIS CONSULTING; IHSAN NURKOMAR, CHINESE ACADEMY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES; JAMES E. O'HARA, CANADIAN NATIONAL COLLECTION OF INSECTS, ARACHNIDS AND NEMATODES, AGRICULTURE AND AGRI-FOOD CANADA; JERMAINE D. PERIER, UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND; RICARDO RAMÍREZ-ROMERO, INTERNATIONAL CENTRE OF INSECT PHYSIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY; FRANCISCO J. SÁNCHEZ-GARCÍA, NORTH-WEST UNIVERSITY; ANN M. ROBINSON-BAKER, FLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITY; LUIS C. SILVEIRA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE LAVRAS; LARISNER SIMEON, FLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITY; LEELLEN F. SOLTER, DE LA SALLE UNIVERSITY; OSCAR F. SANTOS-AMAYA, UNIVERSITY OF JORDAN; ELIJAH J. TALAMAS, CORPORACION COLOMBIANA DE INVESTIGACION AGROPECUARIA - AGROSAVIA; WAGNER DE SOUZA TAVARES, UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES LOS BANOS; ROGELIO TRABANINO, UNIVERSITY OF LIEGE; TED C.J. TURLINGS, UNIVERSITY OF NEUCHATE; FERNANDO HERCOS VALICENTE, CNPMS; CARLOS VÁSQUEZ, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIONES FORESTALES, AGRÍCOLAS Y PECUARIAS; ZHENYING WANG, CHINESE ACADEMY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES; ANA P.G.S. WENGRAT, UNIVERSIDADE DE SAO PAULO; LIAN-SHENG ZANG, CAB INTERNATIONAL LATIN AMERICA; WEI ZHANG, CAB INTERNATIONAL LATIN AMERICA; KENNEDY J. ZIMBA, CAB INTERNATIONAL; KONGMING WU, CHINESE ACADEMY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES; MAGED ELKAHKY, UNIVERSITY OF NEUCHATEL; BUYUNG A.R. HADI, UNIVERSITY OF NEUCHATEL. |
Título: |
Global scientific progress and shortfalls in biological control of the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda. |
Ano de publicação: |
2024 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Biological Control, v. 191, 105460, 2024. |
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2024.105460 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Since 2016, the fall armyworm (FAW) Spodoptera frugiperda has spread over extensive areas of the tropics and subtropics, imperiling food security, economic progress and the livelihoods of millions of cereal farmers. Although FAW has received long-standing scientific attention in its home range in the Americas, chemical inputs feature prominently in its mitigation and biological control uptake is globally lagging. Here, building upon a quantitative review of the global literature, we methodically dissect FAW biological control science. Of the known entomopathogens (46), parasitoids (304) and predators (215) of FAW, approx. 40% have been subject to laboratory- or field -level scrutiny. Laboratory -level performance has partially been assessed for 14-18% of the above invertebrate taxa. Yet, organismal, geographic, methodological and thematic biases hamper efforts to relate in -field biodiversity to actual ecosystem service delivery. Often, single -guild 'snapshot' surveys are preferred over comprehensive bio-inventories or population dynamics appraisals, trophic interactions are wrongly inferred from co -occurrence, standard pest infestation metrics are lacking and natural enemy censuses are performed arbitrarily. Diurnal biota receive inordinate attention, while egg and pupal predation - the main biotic sources of mortality - are routinely overlooked. Multiple microbial and invertebrate biota are investigated with a view towards mass -rearing and augmentative release, but the basis for agent selection is often unclear. Lastly, conservation biological control receives marginal attention and cross -disciplinary engagement with the agroecology domain is lagging. We lay out several steps, including standardized methodologies, smart use of biodemographic toolkits, networked field trials and a fortification of its ecological underpinnings, to sharpen the science of (FAW) biological control and urge further momentum in its global implementation. MenosSince 2016, the fall armyworm (FAW) Spodoptera frugiperda has spread over extensive areas of the tropics and subtropics, imperiling food security, economic progress and the livelihoods of millions of cereal farmers. Although FAW has received long-standing scientific attention in its home range in the Americas, chemical inputs feature prominently in its mitigation and biological control uptake is globally lagging. Here, building upon a quantitative review of the global literature, we methodically dissect FAW biological control science. Of the known entomopathogens (46), parasitoids (304) and predators (215) of FAW, approx. 40% have been subject to laboratory- or field -level scrutiny. Laboratory -level performance has partially been assessed for 14-18% of the above invertebrate taxa. Yet, organismal, geographic, methodological and thematic biases hamper efforts to relate in -field biodiversity to actual ecosystem service delivery. Often, single -guild 'snapshot' surveys are preferred over comprehensive bio-inventories or population dynamics appraisals, trophic interactions are wrongly inferred from co -occurrence, standard pest infestation metrics are lacking and natural enemy censuses are performed arbitrarily. Diurnal biota receive inordinate attention, while egg and pupal predation - the main biotic sources of mortality - are routinely overlooked. Multiple microbial and invertebrate biota are investigated with a view towards mass -rearing and augmentative release, but the ... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Agroecologia; Ecological intensification; Intensificação ecológica; Manejo de espécies invasoras; Mudança global; Poluição agroquímica; Serviços de ecossistemas. |
Thesagro: |
Controle Biológico; Lagarta. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
Agroecology; Biological control; Ecosystem services; Global change; Invasive species. |
Categoria do assunto: |
O Insetos e Entomologia |
Marc: |
LEADER 04640naa a2200973 a 4500 001 2163839 005 2024-04-24 008 2024 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2024.105460$2DOI 100 1 $aWYCKHUYS, K. A. 245 $aGlobal scientific progress and shortfalls in biological control of the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2024 520 $aSince 2016, the fall armyworm (FAW) Spodoptera frugiperda has spread over extensive areas of the tropics and subtropics, imperiling food security, economic progress and the livelihoods of millions of cereal farmers. Although FAW has received long-standing scientific attention in its home range in the Americas, chemical inputs feature prominently in its mitigation and biological control uptake is globally lagging. Here, building upon a quantitative review of the global literature, we methodically dissect FAW biological control science. Of the known entomopathogens (46), parasitoids (304) and predators (215) of FAW, approx. 40% have been subject to laboratory- or field -level scrutiny. Laboratory -level performance has partially been assessed for 14-18% of the above invertebrate taxa. Yet, organismal, geographic, methodological and thematic biases hamper efforts to relate in -field biodiversity to actual ecosystem service delivery. Often, single -guild 'snapshot' surveys are preferred over comprehensive bio-inventories or population dynamics appraisals, trophic interactions are wrongly inferred from co -occurrence, standard pest infestation metrics are lacking and natural enemy censuses are performed arbitrarily. Diurnal biota receive inordinate attention, while egg and pupal predation - the main biotic sources of mortality - are routinely overlooked. Multiple microbial and invertebrate biota are investigated with a view towards mass -rearing and augmentative release, but the basis for agent selection is often unclear. Lastly, conservation biological control receives marginal attention and cross -disciplinary engagement with the agroecology domain is lagging. We lay out several steps, including standardized methodologies, smart use of biodemographic toolkits, networked field trials and a fortification of its ecological underpinnings, to sharpen the science of (FAW) biological control and urge further momentum in its global implementation. 650 $aAgroecology 650 $aBiological control 650 $aEcosystem services 650 $aGlobal change 650 $aInvasive species 650 $aControle Biológico 650 $aLagarta 653 $aAgroecologia 653 $aEcological intensification 653 $aIntensificação ecológica 653 $aManejo de espécies invasoras 653 $aMudança global 653 $aPoluição agroquímica 653 $aServiços de ecossistemas 700 1 $aAKUTSE, K. S. 700 1 $aAMALIN, D. M. 700 1 $aARAJ, S.-E. 700 1 $aBARRERA, G. 700 1 $aBELTRAN, M. J. B. 700 1 $aFEKIH, I. B. 700 1 $aCALATAYUD, P. 700 1 $aCICERO, L. 700 1 $aCOKOLA, M. C. 700 1 $aCOLMENAREZ, Y. C. 700 1 $aDESSAUVAGES, K. 700 1 $aDUBOIS, T. 700 1 $aDUROCHER-GRANGER, L. 700 1 $aESPINEL, C. 700 1 $aFALLET, P. 700 1 $aFERNÁNDEZ-TRIANA, J. L. 700 1 $aFRANCIS, F. 700 1 $aGÓMEZ, J. 700 1 $aHADDI, K. 700 1 $aHARRISON, R. D. 700 1 $aHASEEB, M. 700 1 $aIWANICKI, N. S. 700 1 $aJABER, L. R. 700 1 $aKHAMIS, F. M. 700 1 $aLEGASPI, J. C. 700 1 $aLOMELI-FLORES, R. J. 700 1 $aLOPES, R. B. 700 1 $aLYU, B. 700 1 $aMONTOYA-LERMA, J. 700 1 $aMONTECALVO, M. P. 700 1 $aPOLASZEK, A. 700 1 $aNGUYEN, T. D. 700 1 $aNURKOMAR, I. 700 1 $aO'HARA, J. E. 700 1 $aPERIER, J. D. 700 1 $aRAMÍREZ-ROMERO, R. 700 1 $aSÁNCHEZ-GARCÍA, F. J. 700 1 $aROBINSON-BAKER, A. M. 700 1 $aSILVEIRA, L. C. 700 1 $aSIMEON, L. 700 1 $aSOLTER, L. F. 700 1 $aSANTOS-AMAYA, O. F. 700 1 $aTALAMAS, E. J. 700 1 $aTAVARES, W. de S. 700 1 $aTRABANINO, R. 700 1 $aTURLINGS, T. C. 700 1 $aVALICENTE, F. H. 700 1 $aVÁSQUEZ, C. 700 1 $aWANG, Z. 700 1 $aWENGRAT, A. P. 700 1 $aZANG, L.-S. 700 1 $aZHANG, W. 700 1 $aZIMBA, K. J. 700 1 $aWU, K. 700 1 $aELKAHKY, M. 700 1 $aHADI, B. A. 773 $tBiological Control$gv. 191, 105460, 2024.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia (CENARGEN) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
Data corrente: |
15/01/2008 |
Data da última atualização: |
30/03/2023 |
Autoria: |
PIO, R.; DALL´ORTO, F. A. C.; BARBOSA, W.; CHAGAS, E. A.; OJIMA, M.; CIA, P. |
Afiliação: |
Rafael Pio, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná; Fernando Antônio Campo Dall?Orto, Instituto Agronômico - IAC/Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios; Wilson Barbosa, IAC/Centro Experimental Central; Edvan Alves Chagas, Instituto Agronômico - IAC/Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios; Mário Ojima, IAC/Seção de Fruticultura de Clima Temperado; Patríca Cia, IAC/Centro de Engenharia e Automação/Grupo de Pós-Colheita. |
Título: |
Produção de cultivares de nespereira na região Leste paulista |
Ano de publicação: |
2007 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, DF, v. 42, n. 7, p. 1053-1056, jul. 2007 |
Idioma: |
Português |
Notas: |
Notas Científicas.
Título em inglês: Production of loquat tree cultivars in Eastern São Paulo State. |
Conteúdo: |
O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a capacidade produtiva das cultivares de nêspera (Eriobotrya japonica Lindl.) Mizuho, Centenária, Mizumo, Mizauto e Néctar de Cristal, em Jundiaí, SP. As mudas, formadas com porta-enxertos de 'Mizumo', foram plantadas em campo em blocos ao acaso. Do terceiro ao sexto ano de plantio, quantificaram-se o número e a massa de matéria fresca dos frutos, a produção total por planta e as médias dos quatro anos de produção. Determinaram-se o comprimento, a largura, a relação sólidos solúveis totais (SST) e a acidez total titulável (ATT). As cultivares Mizuho, Mizumo, Mizauto e Néctar de Cristal apresentaram as maiores produções de frutos, acima de 14 kg por planta em média. 'Centenária' e 'Mizumo' apresentaram os maiores resultados de massa de matéria fresca dos frutos, acima de 30 g por fruto, e a melhor razão SST/ATT. |
Palavras-Chave: |
capacidade de produção; loquat; production capacity; qualidade de fruto. |
Thesagro: |
Eriobotrya Japonica; Nêspera. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
fruit quality. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/106856/1/Producao-de.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01766naa a2200277 a 4500 001 1122781 005 2023-03-30 008 2007 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aPIO, R. 245 $aProdução de cultivares de nespereira na região Leste paulista$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2007 500 $aNotas Científicas. Título em inglês: Production of loquat tree cultivars in Eastern São Paulo State. 520 $aO objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a capacidade produtiva das cultivares de nêspera (Eriobotrya japonica Lindl.) Mizuho, Centenária, Mizumo, Mizauto e Néctar de Cristal, em Jundiaí, SP. As mudas, formadas com porta-enxertos de 'Mizumo', foram plantadas em campo em blocos ao acaso. Do terceiro ao sexto ano de plantio, quantificaram-se o número e a massa de matéria fresca dos frutos, a produção total por planta e as médias dos quatro anos de produção. Determinaram-se o comprimento, a largura, a relação sólidos solúveis totais (SST) e a acidez total titulável (ATT). As cultivares Mizuho, Mizumo, Mizauto e Néctar de Cristal apresentaram as maiores produções de frutos, acima de 14 kg por planta em média. 'Centenária' e 'Mizumo' apresentaram os maiores resultados de massa de matéria fresca dos frutos, acima de 30 g por fruto, e a melhor razão SST/ATT. 650 $afruit quality 650 $aEriobotrya Japonica 650 $aNêspera 653 $acapacidade de produção 653 $aloquat 653 $aproduction capacity 653 $aqualidade de fruto 700 1 $aDALL´ORTO, F. A. C. 700 1 $aBARBOSA, W. 700 1 $aCHAGAS, E. A. 700 1 $aOJIMA, M. 700 1 $aCIA, P. 773 $tPesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, DF$gv. 42, n. 7, p. 1053-1056, jul. 2007
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Unidades Centrais (AI-SEDE) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|