| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
|
Data corrente: |
24/09/2008 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
24/09/2008 |
|
Autoria: |
KUPERMAN, R. G.; CHECKAI, R. T.; ROMBKE, J.; STEPHENSON. G. L.; SOUSA, J. P. |
|
Título: |
Ecotoxicological assessment of contaminated land. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2008 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON SOIL ZOOLOGY, 15; INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON APTERYGOTA, 12., 2008, Curitiba. Biodiversity, conservation and sustainabele management of soil animal: abstracts. Colombo: Embrapa Florestas. Editors: George Gardner Brown; Klaus Dieter Sautter; Renato Marques; Amarildo Pasini. 1 CD-ROM. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Over the past two decades, soil ecotoxicologists have made strides in utilizing the basic concepts
and advancements in soil zoology and ecology. They have applied the existing tools, and
developed new tools to investigate how chemical contamination can affect soil ecosystems,
including the degradation or destruction of soil habitats, diminishment of below-ground biodiversity,
and negative impacts on complex food webs and the associated above-ground biotic
communities. Soil ecotoxicologists at present are applying a suite of standard protocols, originally
developed for laboratory soil toxicity testing, and further enhancing both the approaches and
protocols for the assessment of contaminated lands. The current challenge is how to integrate
species-specific sensitivities, the effects of physical and chemical soil properties, contaminant
bioavailability and toxicity, uptake and bioconcentration, and spatial and temporal variations in
abundance and diversity of soil organisms, into coherent toxicological assessments of soil
ecosystems amid contaminated lands. This overview will attempt to address the question that
usually confronts an ecotoxicologist in any assessment of a soil ecosystem: ?Which terrestrial
toxicity tests constitute an appropriate test battery?? There is a plethora of methods that focus
on the assessment of soils via spiking, or amendment, with chemicals or other test substances.
However, only those methods that contain procedures for assessing contaminated site-specific
soils (or those methods that can easily be adapted for that purpose) are recommended for such
a test battery, and those will be discussed in this overview. Important considerations that will be
addressed include: 1) a need for a greatly improved understanding of the potential effects of
chemical contaminants on the structure and function of soil ecosystems; and 2) ready availability
of reliable appropriate soil toxicity test methods that have been developed explicitly to assess
the toxicity of contaminated site soils. International soil toxicity test methods that have been
standardized, or those that are in the process of being standardized, will also be reviewed. MenosOver the past two decades, soil ecotoxicologists have made strides in utilizing the basic concepts
and advancements in soil zoology and ecology. They have applied the existing tools, and
developed new tools to investigate how chemical contamination can affect soil ecosystems,
including the degradation or destruction of soil habitats, diminishment of below-ground biodiversity,
and negative impacts on complex food webs and the associated above-ground biotic
communities. Soil ecotoxicologists at present are applying a suite of standard protocols, originally
developed for laboratory soil toxicity testing, and further enhancing both the approaches and
protocols for the assessment of contaminated lands. The current challenge is how to integrate
species-specific sensitivities, the effects of physical and chemical soil properties, contaminant
bioavailability and toxicity, uptake and bioconcentration, and spatial and temporal variations in
abundance and diversity of soil organisms, into coherent toxicological assessments of soil
ecosystems amid contaminated lands. This overview will attempt to address the question that
usually confronts an ecotoxicologist in any assessment of a soil ecosystem: ?Which terrestrial
toxicity tests constitute an appropriate test battery?? There is a plethora of methods that focus
on the assessment of soils via spiking, or amendment, with chemicals or other test substances.
However, only those methods that contain procedures for assessing contaminated site... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02893naa a2200169 a 4500
001 1314868
005 2008-09-24
008 2008 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aKUPERMAN, R. G.
245 $aEcotoxicological assessment of contaminated land.
260 $c2008
520 $aOver the past two decades, soil ecotoxicologists have made strides in utilizing the basic concepts and advancements in soil zoology and ecology. They have applied the existing tools, and developed new tools to investigate how chemical contamination can affect soil ecosystems, including the degradation or destruction of soil habitats, diminishment of below-ground biodiversity, and negative impacts on complex food webs and the associated above-ground biotic communities. Soil ecotoxicologists at present are applying a suite of standard protocols, originally developed for laboratory soil toxicity testing, and further enhancing both the approaches and protocols for the assessment of contaminated lands. The current challenge is how to integrate species-specific sensitivities, the effects of physical and chemical soil properties, contaminant bioavailability and toxicity, uptake and bioconcentration, and spatial and temporal variations in abundance and diversity of soil organisms, into coherent toxicological assessments of soil ecosystems amid contaminated lands. This overview will attempt to address the question that usually confronts an ecotoxicologist in any assessment of a soil ecosystem: ?Which terrestrial toxicity tests constitute an appropriate test battery?? There is a plethora of methods that focus on the assessment of soils via spiking, or amendment, with chemicals or other test substances. However, only those methods that contain procedures for assessing contaminated site-specific soils (or those methods that can easily be adapted for that purpose) are recommended for such a test battery, and those will be discussed in this overview. Important considerations that will be addressed include: 1) a need for a greatly improved understanding of the potential effects of chemical contaminants on the structure and function of soil ecosystems; and 2) ready availability of reliable appropriate soil toxicity test methods that have been developed explicitly to assess the toxicity of contaminated site soils. International soil toxicity test methods that have been standardized, or those that are in the process of being standardized, will also be reviewed.
700 1 $aCHECKAI, R. T.
700 1 $aROMBKE, J.
700 1 $aSTEPHENSON. G. L.
700 1 $aSOUSA, J. P.
773 $tIn: INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON SOIL ZOOLOGY, 15; INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON APTERYGOTA, 12., 2008, Curitiba. Biodiversity, conservation and sustainabele management of soil animal: abstracts. Colombo: Embrapa Florestas. Editors: George Gardner Brown; Klaus Dieter Sautter; Renato Marques; Amarildo Pasini. 1 CD-ROM.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
|
Data corrente: |
11/10/2018 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
09/04/2024 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
SILVA, K. C. da; ANACHE, N. A.; CARDOSO, C. J. T.; BEZERRA, A. de O.; JARA, J. do P.; NOGUEIRA, E.; FERREIRA, M. G. C. R.; STERZA, F. de A. M.; RODRIGUES, W. B.; SARAIVA, N. Z. |
|
Afiliação: |
Karine Casanova da Silva, Universidade Estadual de Londrina; Nathália Albaneze Anache, Universidade Estadual de Londrina; Christopher Junior Tavares Cardoso, Universidade Estadual de Londrina; Alexandre de Oliveira Bezerra, Universidade Estadual de Londrina; Jean do Prado Jara; Ériklis Nogueira; Mariane Gabriela Cesar Ribeiro Ferreira; Fabiana de Andrade Melo Sterza; Walvonvites Bares Rodrigues; NAIARA ZOCCAL SARAIVA, CNPGL. |
|
Título: |
Suplementação de búfalas com gordura protegida: efeitos na produção leiteira e taxa de prenhez à IATF. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2018 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE TECNOLOGIA DE EMBRIÕES, 32., 2018, Florianópolis. Anais... Jaboticabal: Sociedade Brasileira de Tecnologia de Embriões, 2018. |
|
Páginas: |
p. 43-44. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Concepção; Escores; Vacas nelore. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
G Melhoramento Genético |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1097231/1/Suplementacao-de-bufalas-com-gordura-protegida.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00895nam a2200253 a 4500
001 2097231
005 2024-04-09
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aSILVA, K. C. da
245 $aSuplementação de búfalas com gordura protegida$befeitos na produção leiteira e taxa de prenhez à IATF.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE TECNOLOGIA DE EMBRIÕES, 32., 2018, Florianópolis. Anais... Jaboticabal: Sociedade Brasileira de Tecnologia de Embriões$c2018
300 $ap. 43-44.
653 $aConcepção
653 $aEscores
653 $aVacas nelore
700 1 $aANACHE, N. A.
700 1 $aCARDOSO, C. J. T.
700 1 $aBEZERRA, A. de O.
700 1 $aJARA, J. do P.
700 1 $aNOGUEIRA, E.
700 1 $aFERREIRA, M. G. C. R.
700 1 $aSTERZA, F. de A. M.
700 1 $aRODRIGUES, W. B.
700 1 $aSARAIVA, N. Z.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Gado de Leite (CNPGL) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
