|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Solos. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnps.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Solos. |
Data corrente: |
17/07/2020 |
Data da última atualização: |
06/10/2020 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
COELHO JUNIOR, M. G.; BIJU, B. P.; SILVA NETO, E. C. da; OLIVEIRA, A. L. de; TAVARES, A. A. de O.; BASSO, V. M.; TURETTA, A. P. D.; CARVALHO, A. G. de; SANSEVERO, J. B. B. |
Afiliação: |
MARCONDES GERALDO COELHO JUNIOR, UFRRJ; BARBARA PAVANI BIJU, UNIVERSIDADE DO PORTO; EDUARDO CARVALHO DA SILVA NETO, UFRRJ; ATHILA LEANDRO DE OLIVEIRA, UFRRJ; ANA ALICE DE OLIVEIRA TAVARES, UFRRJ; VANESSA MARIA BASSO, UFRRJ; ANA PAULA DIAS TURETTA, CNPS; ACACIO GERALDO DE CARVALHO, UFRRJ; JERONIMO BOELSUMS BARRETO SANSEVERO, UFRRJ. |
Título: |
Improving the management effectiveness and decision-making by stakeholders' perspectives: a case study in a protected area from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. |
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal of Environmental Management, v. 272, 111083, Oct. 2020. |
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111083 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Assessing management effectiveness in protected areas is a fundamental instrument to achieve socio-biodiversity protection goals. This study aimed to analyze the management effectiveness of Cunhambebe State Park (from now on, "PEC") in the State of Rio de Janeiro in Brazil, from the perception of stakeholders and the multi-temporal analysis of land use and land cover between 1998 and 2018. We used the Rapid Assessment and Prioritization of Protected Area Management method for a participatory approach. Seventy-two indicators were used and applied to assess the perception of stakeholders related to the Advisory Council. The management effectiveness of PEC was classified as moderately satisfactory (63.41%). Indicators of "Legal security", "Vulnerability", "Site design and planning" and "Financial resources" revealed the weaknesses and threats of management and what should be the priority projects for better effectiveness. Through the multi-temporal analysis, we identified that the advances of pasture and urban areas are the highest pressures and threats, as perceived by stakeholders. In our case study, we provide evidence of actions that must be performed by the PEC management team. These actions must consider the weaknesses and threats presented by the SWOT analysis. Finally, we recommend some political and management measures: 1) Financial resources for the land regularization of areas overlapping with PEC, 2) Guidelines about PEC areas must be included in the Master Plans of municipalities that cover PEC limits, 3) Technical assistance to improve land management, and 4) Strengthen environmental education initiatives at all school levels. MenosAssessing management effectiveness in protected areas is a fundamental instrument to achieve socio-biodiversity protection goals. This study aimed to analyze the management effectiveness of Cunhambebe State Park (from now on, "PEC") in the State of Rio de Janeiro in Brazil, from the perception of stakeholders and the multi-temporal analysis of land use and land cover between 1998 and 2018. We used the Rapid Assessment and Prioritization of Protected Area Management method for a participatory approach. Seventy-two indicators were used and applied to assess the perception of stakeholders related to the Advisory Council. The management effectiveness of PEC was classified as moderately satisfactory (63.41%). Indicators of "Legal security", "Vulnerability", "Site design and planning" and "Financial resources" revealed the weaknesses and threats of management and what should be the priority projects for better effectiveness. Through the multi-temporal analysis, we identified that the advances of pasture and urban areas are the highest pressures and threats, as perceived by stakeholders. In our case study, we provide evidence of actions that must be performed by the PEC management team. These actions must consider the weaknesses and threats presented by the SWOT analysis. Finally, we recommend some political and management measures: 1) Financial resources for the land regularization of areas overlapping with PEC, 2) Guidelines about PEC areas must be included in the Master Plans of... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Gerenciamento de áreas protegidas; Mata Atlântica; Planejamento de conservação; RAPPAM; Uso e cobertura do solo. |
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
Marc: |
LEADER 02670naa a2200289 a 4500 001 2123910 005 2020-10-06 008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111083$2DOI 100 1 $aCOELHO JUNIOR, M. G. 245 $aImproving the management effectiveness and decision-making by stakeholders' perspectives$ba case study in a protected area from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2020 520 $aAssessing management effectiveness in protected areas is a fundamental instrument to achieve socio-biodiversity protection goals. This study aimed to analyze the management effectiveness of Cunhambebe State Park (from now on, "PEC") in the State of Rio de Janeiro in Brazil, from the perception of stakeholders and the multi-temporal analysis of land use and land cover between 1998 and 2018. We used the Rapid Assessment and Prioritization of Protected Area Management method for a participatory approach. Seventy-two indicators were used and applied to assess the perception of stakeholders related to the Advisory Council. The management effectiveness of PEC was classified as moderately satisfactory (63.41%). Indicators of "Legal security", "Vulnerability", "Site design and planning" and "Financial resources" revealed the weaknesses and threats of management and what should be the priority projects for better effectiveness. Through the multi-temporal analysis, we identified that the advances of pasture and urban areas are the highest pressures and threats, as perceived by stakeholders. In our case study, we provide evidence of actions that must be performed by the PEC management team. These actions must consider the weaknesses and threats presented by the SWOT analysis. Finally, we recommend some political and management measures: 1) Financial resources for the land regularization of areas overlapping with PEC, 2) Guidelines about PEC areas must be included in the Master Plans of municipalities that cover PEC limits, 3) Technical assistance to improve land management, and 4) Strengthen environmental education initiatives at all school levels. 653 $aGerenciamento de áreas protegidas 653 $aMata Atlântica 653 $aPlanejamento de conservação 653 $aRAPPAM 653 $aUso e cobertura do solo 700 1 $aBIJU, B. P. 700 1 $aSILVA NETO, E. C. da 700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, A. L. de 700 1 $aTAVARES, A. A. de O. 700 1 $aBASSO, V. M. 700 1 $aTURETTA, A. P. D. 700 1 $aCARVALHO, A. G. de 700 1 $aSANSEVERO, J. B. B. 773 $tJournal of Environmental Management$gv. 272, 111083, Oct. 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Solos (CNPS) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Soja. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com valeria.cardoso@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Soja. |
Data corrente: |
04/06/1998 |
Data da última atualização: |
20/10/2008 |
Autoria: |
GAZZIERO, D. L. P.; KARAM, D.; VOLL, E. |
Afiliação: |
Embrapa Soja, Cx. Postal 231, CEP 86001-970 Londrina-PR. |
Título: |
Control de malezas. |
Ano de publicação: |
1995 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: EMBRAPA. Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Soja (Londrina, PR). El cultivo de la soja en los tropicos: mejoramiento y produccion. Roma: FAO, 1995. |
Páginas: |
p.123-130. |
Série: |
(Coleccion FAO: Produccion y Proteccion Vegetal, 27). |
Idioma: |
Espanhol |
Palavras-Chave: |
Amaranthus spp; Brasil; Cassia spp; Commelina spp; Digitaria spp; Echinochloa spp; Eradication; Galisonga parviflora; Hyptis suaveolene; Ipomoea spp; Method of control; Metodo de controle; No-till; Panicum spp; Planta daninha; Semeadura direta; Soybean; Weed. |
Thesagro: |
Ageratum Conyzoides; Bidens Pilosa; Cenchrus Echinatus; Controle Biológico; Controle Cultural; Controle Físico; Controle Integrado; Controle Químico; Cynodon Dactylon; Cyperus Rotundus; Erradicação; Euphorbia Heterophylla; Portulaca Oleracea; Soja. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Brazil; Eleusine indica; physical control. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
Marc: |
LEADER 01608naa a2200577 a 4500 001 1459782 005 2008-10-20 008 1995 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aGAZZIERO, D. L. P. 245 $aControl de malezas. 260 $c1995 300 $ap.123-130. 490 $a(Coleccion FAO: Produccion y Proteccion Vegetal, 27). 650 $aBrazil 650 $aEleusine indica 650 $aphysical control 650 $aAgeratum Conyzoides 650 $aBidens Pilosa 650 $aCenchrus Echinatus 650 $aControle Biológico 650 $aControle Cultural 650 $aControle Físico 650 $aControle Integrado 650 $aControle Químico 650 $aCynodon Dactylon 650 $aCyperus Rotundus 650 $aErradicação 650 $aEuphorbia Heterophylla 650 $aPortulaca Oleracea 650 $aSoja 653 $aAmaranthus spp 653 $aBrasil 653 $aCassia spp 653 $aCommelina spp 653 $aDigitaria spp 653 $aEchinochloa spp 653 $aEradication 653 $aGalisonga parviflora 653 $aHyptis suaveolene 653 $aIpomoea spp 653 $aMethod of control 653 $aMetodo de controle 653 $aNo-till 653 $aPanicum spp 653 $aPlanta daninha 653 $aSemeadura direta 653 $aSoybean 653 $aWeed 700 1 $aKARAM, D. 700 1 $aVOLL, E. 773 $tIn: EMBRAPA. Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Soja (Londrina, PR). El cultivo de la soja en los tropicos: mejoramiento y produccion. Roma: FAO, 1995.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Soja (CNPSO) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|