| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste; Embrapa Cerrados; Embrapa Soja; Embrapa Unidades Centrais; Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
|
Data corrente: |
29/11/2005 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
27/10/2009 |
|
Autoria: |
SHIRATSUCHI, L. S.; ZIVIANI, A. C.; MARTINS, F. da S. |
|
Título: |
Comparação de modelos receptores GPS para utilização na agricultura de precisão. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2004 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Planaltina, DF: Embrapa Cerrados, 2004. |
|
Páginas: |
5 p. |
|
Série: |
(Embrapa Cerrados. Comunicado Técnico, 112). |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
ABSTRACT: After the liberation of Selective Availability (S/A) several GPS receivers started to have enough accuracy or precision for work with grid sampling in Precision Agriculture. There are few articles describing the accuracy and precision of these receivers. The objective of this work was compared and calculated the accuracy of two models very used for grid sampling in Brazil. The study was done in a flat surface, common in the Cerrados region. The geographical reference was determined by DGPS collecting data for 10 hous. The tested models (Garmin GPSIII Plus and Garmin etrex Vista) were evaluated for 5 days in the period of 7 a.m. to 17 p.m. The concept of Circular Error Probability (CEP) was uded for the accuracy and precision calculation. The model Garmin GPSIII Plus presented CEP 50% = 3,6m, CEP 90% = 6,7m, CEP 95% = 7,4 and CEP 98% = 8,2m. The model Garmin etrex Vista presented CEP 50% = 3,3m, CEP 90% = 6,2m, CEP 95% = 6,2 and CEP 98% = 7,6m. Both models presented different error patterns, while the model GPSIII Plus presented aleatory error the etrex Vista presented systematic error (several points overlapped). It was also noticed that the GPS error increased a lot after 15 p.m. for both. In the Cerrados region the grid sampling used by the farmers is much larger than this; therefore the accuracy and precision are enough for grid sampling. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Circular error probality; GPS; Precision farming. |
|
Thesagro: |
Agricultura de Precisão; Equipamento Agrícola; Sensoriamento Remoto. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/CPAC-2009/26613/1/comtec_112.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02063nam a2200229 a 4500
001 1569252
005 2009-10-27
008 2004 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d
100 1 $aSHIRATSUCHI, L. S.
245 $aComparação de modelos receptores GPS para utilização na agricultura de precisão.
260 $aPlanaltina, DF: Embrapa Cerrados$c2004
300 $a5 p.
490 $a(Embrapa Cerrados. Comunicado Técnico, 112).
520 $aABSTRACT: After the liberation of Selective Availability (S/A) several GPS receivers started to have enough accuracy or precision for work with grid sampling in Precision Agriculture. There are few articles describing the accuracy and precision of these receivers. The objective of this work was compared and calculated the accuracy of two models very used for grid sampling in Brazil. The study was done in a flat surface, common in the Cerrados region. The geographical reference was determined by DGPS collecting data for 10 hous. The tested models (Garmin GPSIII Plus and Garmin etrex Vista) were evaluated for 5 days in the period of 7 a.m. to 17 p.m. The concept of Circular Error Probability (CEP) was uded for the accuracy and precision calculation. The model Garmin GPSIII Plus presented CEP 50% = 3,6m, CEP 90% = 6,7m, CEP 95% = 7,4 and CEP 98% = 8,2m. The model Garmin etrex Vista presented CEP 50% = 3,3m, CEP 90% = 6,2m, CEP 95% = 6,2 and CEP 98% = 7,6m. Both models presented different error patterns, while the model GPSIII Plus presented aleatory error the etrex Vista presented systematic error (several points overlapped). It was also noticed that the GPS error increased a lot after 15 p.m. for both. In the Cerrados region the grid sampling used by the farmers is much larger than this; therefore the accuracy and precision are enough for grid sampling.
650 $aAgricultura de Precisão
650 $aEquipamento Agrícola
650 $aSensoriamento Remoto
653 $aCircular error probality
653 $aGPS
653 $aPrecision farming
700 1 $aZIVIANI, A. C.
700 1 $aMARTINS, F. da S.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Cerrados (CPAC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 147 | |
| 27. |  | RESENDE, A. V.; SHIRATSUCHI, L. S. Tolerância zero. In: GAMA, L. C. (Org.). Artigos publicados na mídia: coletânea 2007. [Planaltina, DF: s.n.], 2007. Publicado na Revista Safra em 14 ago. 2007.| Tipo: Artigo de Divulgação na Mídia |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Cerrados. |
|   |
| 32. | | JERKE, C.; SHIRATSUCHI, L. S.; BARBOSA, L. M. Comparação entre aplicação em taxa fixa e variável de corretivos e fertilizantes em área de cana-de-açúcar. In: ENCONTRO DE JOVENS TALENTOS DA EMBRAPA CERRADOS, 3., 2007, Planaltina, DF. Resumos apresentados. Planaltina, DF: Embrapa Cerrados, 2007. p. 44. (Embrapa Cerrados. Documentos, 176).| Tipo: Resumo em Anais de Congresso | Circulação/Nível: -- - -- |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Cerrados. |
|  |
| Registros recuperados : 147 | |
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
