| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 27 | |
| 8. |  | REISSMANN, C. B.; SANTOS FILHO, A.; ROCHA, H. O. da. Composição química foliar do palmito (Euterpe edulis, Mart.) em quatro sítios distintos da Mata Atlântica do Paraná. Silvicultura, São Paulo, v. 12, n. 42, t. 3, p. 662-666, 1992. Edição dos Anais do Congresso Florestal Brasileiro, 6., 1990, Campos do Jordão.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
|   |
| 10. | | ROCHA, H. O. da; GHANI, N. L. B. Sobreposição dos solo com vegetação, geólogia, hipsometria, zoneamento, através do sistema de informações geográficas. IN: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE CIÊNÇIA DO SOLO, 25., 1995, Viçosa, MG. Resumos expandidos. Viçosa: UFV, 1995. v.3, p. 1640-1642.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Tabuleiros Costeiros. |
| |
| 15. | | SILVA, G. M. da; SCOPEL, I.; ROCHA, H. O. da; RODRIGUES, A. dos S. Comparação de métodos para avaliação de terras em áreas marginais com proposição de ajustes para levantamentos semidetalhados. IN: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE CIÊNÇIA DO SOLO, 25., 1995, Viçosa, MG. Resumos expandidos. Viçosa: UFV, 1995. v.4, p. 2065-2067.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Tabuleiros Costeiros. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 27 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpatu.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
|
Data corrente: |
20/12/2012 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
10/11/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
GARDNER, T. A.; BURGESS, N. D.; AGUILAR-AMUCHASTEGUI, N.; BARLOW, J.; BERENGUER, E.; CLEMENTS, T.; DANIELSEN, F.; FERREIRA, J.; FODEN, W.; KAPOS, V.; KHAN, S. M.; LEES, A. C.; PARRY, L.; ROMAN-CUESTA, R. M.; SCHMITT, C. B.; STRANGE, N.; THEILADE, I.; VIEIRA, I. C. G. |
|
Afiliação: |
TOBY A. GARDNER, UNIVERSITY PF CAMBRIDGE / MPEG; NEIL D. BURGESS, UNIVERSITY OS CAMBRIDGE / WWF-US / UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN; NAIKOA AGUILAR-AMUCHASTEGUI, WWF-US; JOS BARLOW, LANCASTER UNIVERSITY; ERIKA BERENGUER, LANCASTER UNIVERSITY; TOM CLEMENTS, WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY; FINN DANIELSEN, NORDISK FOND FOR MILJO OG UDVIKLING; JOICE NUNES FERREIRA, CPATU; WENDY FODEN, IUCN GLOBAL SPECIES PROGRAMME; VALERIE KAPOS, UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM WORLD CONSERVATION MONITORING CENTRE; SAIFUL M. KHAN, COPENHAGEN UNIVERSITY; ALEXANDER C. LEES, MPEG; LUKE PARRY, LANCASTER UNIVERSITY / MPEG; ROSA MARIA ROMAN-CUESTA, FAO; CHRISTINE B. SCHMITT, INSTITUTE FOR LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT; NIELS STRANGE, UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN / FAO; IDA THEILADE, COPENHAGEN UNIVERSITY; IMA C. G. VIEIRA, MPEG. |
|
Título: |
A framework for integrating biodiversity concerns into national REDD+ programmes. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2012 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Biological Conservation, v. 154, p. 61-71, Oct. 2012. |
|
DOI: |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.11.018 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The UNFCCC mechanism for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation in developing countries (REDD+) represents an unprecedented opportunity for the conservation of forest biodiversity. Nevertheless, there are widespread concerns surrounding the possibility of negative environmental outcomes if biodiversity is not given adequate consideration throughout the REDD+ process. We propose a general framework for incorporating biodiversity concerns into national REDD+ programmes based on well-established ecological principles and experiences. First, we identify how biodiversity distribution and threat data, together with data on biodiversity responses to forest change and management, can be readily incorporated into the strategic planning process for REDD+ in order to identify priority areas and activities for investment that will deliver returns for both carbon and biodiversity. Second, we propose that assessments of changes in biodiversity following REDD+ implementation could be greatly facilitated by paralleling, where possible, the existing IPCC architecture for assessing carbon emissions. A three-tiered approach is proposed for biodiversity assessment, where lower tiers can provide a realistic starting point for countries with fewer data and lower technical capacities. Planning and assessment of biodiversity safeguards for REDD+ need not overburden an already encumbered UNFCCC process. Immediate progress is already possible for a large number of developing countries, and a gradual, phased approach to implementation would minimise risks and facilitate the protection of additional biodiversity benefits from REDD+ activities. Greater levels of coordination between the UNFCCC and CBD, as well as other agencies and stakeholder groups interested in forest conservation are needed if biodiversity safeguards are to be fully adopted and implemented. MenosThe UNFCCC mechanism for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation in developing countries (REDD+) represents an unprecedented opportunity for the conservation of forest biodiversity. Nevertheless, there are widespread concerns surrounding the possibility of negative environmental outcomes if biodiversity is not given adequate consideration throughout the REDD+ process. We propose a general framework for incorporating biodiversity concerns into national REDD+ programmes based on well-established ecological principles and experiences. First, we identify how biodiversity distribution and threat data, together with data on biodiversity responses to forest change and management, can be readily incorporated into the strategic planning process for REDD+ in order to identify priority areas and activities for investment that will deliver returns for both carbon and biodiversity. Second, we propose that assessments of changes in biodiversity following REDD+ implementation could be greatly facilitated by paralleling, where possible, the existing IPCC architecture for assessing carbon emissions. A three-tiered approach is proposed for biodiversity assessment, where lower tiers can provide a realistic starting point for countries with fewer data and lower technical capacities. Planning and assessment of biodiversity safeguards for REDD+ need not overburden an already encumbered UNFCCC process. Immediate progress is already possible for a large number of developing countries,... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
REDD+. |
|
Thesagro: |
Biodiversidade; Conservação; Floresta Tropical. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02954naa a2200385 a 4500
001 1943372
005 2022-11-10
008 2012 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.11.018$2DOI
100 1 $aGARDNER, T. A.
245 $aA framework for integrating biodiversity concerns into national REDD+ programmes.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2012
520 $aThe UNFCCC mechanism for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation in developing countries (REDD+) represents an unprecedented opportunity for the conservation of forest biodiversity. Nevertheless, there are widespread concerns surrounding the possibility of negative environmental outcomes if biodiversity is not given adequate consideration throughout the REDD+ process. We propose a general framework for incorporating biodiversity concerns into national REDD+ programmes based on well-established ecological principles and experiences. First, we identify how biodiversity distribution and threat data, together with data on biodiversity responses to forest change and management, can be readily incorporated into the strategic planning process for REDD+ in order to identify priority areas and activities for investment that will deliver returns for both carbon and biodiversity. Second, we propose that assessments of changes in biodiversity following REDD+ implementation could be greatly facilitated by paralleling, where possible, the existing IPCC architecture for assessing carbon emissions. A three-tiered approach is proposed for biodiversity assessment, where lower tiers can provide a realistic starting point for countries with fewer data and lower technical capacities. Planning and assessment of biodiversity safeguards for REDD+ need not overburden an already encumbered UNFCCC process. Immediate progress is already possible for a large number of developing countries, and a gradual, phased approach to implementation would minimise risks and facilitate the protection of additional biodiversity benefits from REDD+ activities. Greater levels of coordination between the UNFCCC and CBD, as well as other agencies and stakeholder groups interested in forest conservation are needed if biodiversity safeguards are to be fully adopted and implemented.
650 $aBiodiversidade
650 $aConservação
650 $aFloresta Tropical
653 $aREDD+
700 1 $aBURGESS, N. D.
700 1 $aAGUILAR-AMUCHASTEGUI, N.
700 1 $aBARLOW, J.
700 1 $aBERENGUER, E.
700 1 $aCLEMENTS, T.
700 1 $aDANIELSEN, F.
700 1 $aFERREIRA, J.
700 1 $aFODEN, W.
700 1 $aKAPOS, V.
700 1 $aKHAN, S. M.
700 1 $aLEES, A. C.
700 1 $aPARRY, L.
700 1 $aROMAN-CUESTA, R. M.
700 1 $aSCHMITT, C. B.
700 1 $aSTRANGE, N.
700 1 $aTHEILADE, I.
700 1 $aVIEIRA, I. C. G.
773 $tBiological Conservation$gv. 154, p. 61-71, Oct. 2012.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental (CPATU) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
