|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
Data corrente: |
24/08/2015 |
Data da última atualização: |
25/02/2016 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
AZEVEDO, C. F.; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; SILVA, F. F. e; VIANA, J. M. S.; VALENTE, M. S. F.; RESENDE JUNIOR, M. F. R.; MUÑOZ, P. |
Afiliação: |
Camila Ferreira Azevedo, UFV; MARCOS DEON VILELA DE RESENDE, CNPF; Fabyano Fonseca e Silva, UFV; José Marcelo Soriano Viana, UFV; Magno Sávio Ferreira Valente, UFV; Márcio Fernando Ribeiro Resende Jr, Florida Innovation Hub; Patricio Muñoz, University of Florida. |
Título: |
Ridge, Lasso and Bayesian additive dominance genomic models. |
Ano de publicação: |
2015 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
BMC Genetics, v. 16, art. 105, Aug. 2015. 13 p. |
DOI: |
10.1186/s12863-015-0264-2 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Background: A complete approach for genome-wide selection (GWS) involves reliable statistical genetics models and methods. Reports on this topic are common for additive genetic models but not for additive-dominance models. The objective of this paper was (i) to compare the performance of 10 additive-dominance predictive models (including current models and proposed modifications), fitted using Bayesian, Lasso and Ridge regression approaches; and (ii) to decompose genomic heritability and accuracy in terms of three quantitative genetic information sources, namely, linkage disequilibrium (LD), co-segregation (CS) and pedigree relationships or family structure (PR). The simulation study considered two broad sense heritability levels (0.30 and 0.50, associated with narrow sense heritabilities of 0.20 and 0.35, respectively) and two genetic architectures for traits (the first consisting of small gene effects and the second consisting of a mixed inheritance model with five major genes). Results: G-REML/G-BLUP and a modified Bayesian/Lasso (called BayesA*B* or t-BLASSO) method performed best in the prediction of genomic breeding as well as the total genotypic values of individuals in all four scenarios (two heritabilities x two genetic architectures). The BayesA*B*-type method showed a better ability to recover the dominance variance/additive variance ratio. Decomposition of genomic heritability and accuracy revealed the following descending importance order of information: LD, CS and PR not captured by markers, the last two being very close. Conclusions: Amongst the 10 models/methods evaluated, the G-BLUP, BAYESA*B* (−2,8) and BAYESA*B* (4,6) methods presented the best results and were found to be adequate for accurately predicting genomic breeding and total genotypic values as well as for estimating additive and dominance in additive-dominance genomic models. MenosBackground: A complete approach for genome-wide selection (GWS) involves reliable statistical genetics models and methods. Reports on this topic are common for additive genetic models but not for additive-dominance models. The objective of this paper was (i) to compare the performance of 10 additive-dominance predictive models (including current models and proposed modifications), fitted using Bayesian, Lasso and Ridge regression approaches; and (ii) to decompose genomic heritability and accuracy in terms of three quantitative genetic information sources, namely, linkage disequilibrium (LD), co-segregation (CS) and pedigree relationships or family structure (PR). The simulation study considered two broad sense heritability levels (0.30 and 0.50, associated with narrow sense heritabilities of 0.20 and 0.35, respectively) and two genetic architectures for traits (the first consisting of small gene effects and the second consisting of a mixed inheritance model with five major genes). Results: G-REML/G-BLUP and a modified Bayesian/Lasso (called BayesA*B* or t-BLASSO) method performed best in the prediction of genomic breeding as well as the total genotypic values of individuals in all four scenarios (two heritabilities x two genetic architectures). The BayesA*B*-type method showed a better ability to recover the dominance variance/additive variance ratio. Decomposition of genomic heritability and accuracy revealed the following descending importance order of information: LD, CS ... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Bayesian methods; Dominance genomic models; Genética quantitativa; Lasso methods; Melhoramento genético; Modelo Bayesiano; Selection accuracy. |
Thesagro: |
Parâmetro Genético. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/128510/1/2015-API-Deon-Ridge.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02783naa a2200301 a 4500 001 2022575 005 2016-02-25 008 2015 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1186/s12863-015-0264-2$2DOI 100 1 $aAZEVEDO, C. F. 245 $aRidge, Lasso and Bayesian additive dominance genomic models.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2015 520 $aBackground: A complete approach for genome-wide selection (GWS) involves reliable statistical genetics models and methods. Reports on this topic are common for additive genetic models but not for additive-dominance models. The objective of this paper was (i) to compare the performance of 10 additive-dominance predictive models (including current models and proposed modifications), fitted using Bayesian, Lasso and Ridge regression approaches; and (ii) to decompose genomic heritability and accuracy in terms of three quantitative genetic information sources, namely, linkage disequilibrium (LD), co-segregation (CS) and pedigree relationships or family structure (PR). The simulation study considered two broad sense heritability levels (0.30 and 0.50, associated with narrow sense heritabilities of 0.20 and 0.35, respectively) and two genetic architectures for traits (the first consisting of small gene effects and the second consisting of a mixed inheritance model with five major genes). Results: G-REML/G-BLUP and a modified Bayesian/Lasso (called BayesA*B* or t-BLASSO) method performed best in the prediction of genomic breeding as well as the total genotypic values of individuals in all four scenarios (two heritabilities x two genetic architectures). The BayesA*B*-type method showed a better ability to recover the dominance variance/additive variance ratio. Decomposition of genomic heritability and accuracy revealed the following descending importance order of information: LD, CS and PR not captured by markers, the last two being very close. Conclusions: Amongst the 10 models/methods evaluated, the G-BLUP, BAYESA*B* (−2,8) and BAYESA*B* (4,6) methods presented the best results and were found to be adequate for accurately predicting genomic breeding and total genotypic values as well as for estimating additive and dominance in additive-dominance genomic models. 650 $aParâmetro Genético 653 $aBayesian methods 653 $aDominance genomic models 653 $aGenética quantitativa 653 $aLasso methods 653 $aMelhoramento genético 653 $aModelo Bayesiano 653 $aSelection accuracy 700 1 $aRESENDE, M. D. V. de 700 1 $aSILVA, F. F. e 700 1 $aVIANA, J. M. S. 700 1 $aVALENTE, M. S. F. 700 1 $aRESENDE JUNIOR, M. F. R. 700 1 $aMUÑOZ, P. 773 $tBMC Genetics$gv. 16, art. 105, Aug. 2015. 13 p.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registros recuperados : 28 | |
8. | | ROSADO, A. M.; ROSADO, T. B.; RESENDE JÚNIOR, M. F. R.; BHERING, L. L.; CRUZ, C. D. Ganhos genéticos preditos por diferentes métodos de seleção em progênies de Eucalyptus urophylla Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, DF, v. 44, n. 12, p. 1653-1659, dez. 2009 Título em inglês: Predicted genetic gains by various selection methods in Eucalyptus urophylla progenies.Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: B - 1 |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agroenergia; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
| |
9. | | RESENDE JUNIOR, M. F. R.; ALVES, A. A.; BARRERA SÁNCHES, C. F.; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; CRUZ, C. D. Seleção genômica ampla. In: CRUZ, C. D.; SALGADO, C. C.; BHERING, L. L. (Ed.). Genômica aplicada. Viçosa, MG: Suprema, 2013. p. 375-424.Tipo: Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agroenergia; Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
10. | | RESENDE JUNIOR, M. F. R.; MUÑOZ, P.; ACOSTA, J. J.; PETER, G. F.; DAVIS, J. M.; GRATTAPAGLIA, D.; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; KIRST, M. Accelerating the domestication of trees using genomic selection: accuracy of prediction models across ages and environments. New Phytologist, v. 193, p. 617-624, 2012.Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: A - 1 |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
| |
11. | | RESENDE, M. D. V. de; RESENDE JUNIOR, M. F. R.; AGUIAR, A. M.; ABAD, J. I. M.; MISSIAGGIA, A. A.; SANSALONI, C. P.; PETROLI, C. D.; GRATTAPAGLIA, D. Computação da Seleção Genômica Ampla (GWS). Colombo: Embrapa Florestas, 2010. CD-ROM. (Embrapa Florestas. Documentos, 210).Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
12. | | ALMEIDA FILHO, J. E. de; GUIMARÃES, J. F. R.; SILVA, F. F. e; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; MUÑOZ, P.; KIRST, M.; RESENDE JUNIOR, M. F. R. The contribution of dominance to phenotype prediction in a pine breeding and simulated population. Heredity, v. 117, p. 33-41, July 2016.Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: A - 1 |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
14. | | MÜLLER, B. S. F.; NEVES, L. G.; RESENDE JÚNIOR, M. F. R.; MUÑOZ, P. R.; KIRST, M.; SANTOS, P. E. T. dos; PALUDZYSZYN FILHO, E.; GRATTAPAGLIA, D. Genomic selection for growth traits in Eucalyptus benthamii and E. pellita populations using a genome-wide Eucalyptus 60K SNPs chip. In: IUFRO TREE BIOTECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE, 2015, Florence. Forests: the importance to the planet and society. [S.l.]: IBBR: ICCOM, 2015.Tipo: Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
| |
15. | | MÜLLER, B. S. F.; NEVES, L. G.; RESENDE JÚNIOR, M. F. R.; MUÑOZ, P. R.; KIRST, M.; SANTOS, P. E. T. dos; PALUDZYSZYN FILHO, E.; GRATTAPAGLIA, D. Genomic selection for growth traits in Eucalyptus benthamii and E. pellita populations using a genome-wide Eucalyptus 60K SNPs chip. In: IUFRO TREE BIOTECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE, 2015, Florence. Forests: the importance to the planet and society. [S.l.]: IBBR: ICCOM, 2015. Pen-drive.Tipo: Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
16. | | AZEVEDO, C. F.; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; SILVA, F. F. e; VIANA, J. M. S.; VALENTE, M. S. F.; RESENDE JUNIOR, M. F. R.; MUÑOZ, P. Ridge, Lasso and Bayesian additive dominance genomic models. BMC Genetics, v. 16, art. 105, Aug. 2015. 13 p.Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: A - 1 |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
17. | | MUÑOZ, P. R.; RESENDE JUNIOR, M. F. R.; GEZAN, S. A.; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; CAMPOS, G. de los; KIRST, M.; HUBER, D.; PETER, G. F. Unraveling additive from nonadditive effects using genomic relationship matrices. Genetics, v. 198, p. 1759-1768, Dec. 2014.Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: A - 1 |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
18. | | AZEVEDO, C. F.; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; SILVA, F. F.; VIANA, J. M. S.; VALENTE, M. S. F.; RESENDE JUNIOR, M. F. R.; OLIVEIRA, E. J. de. New accuracy estimators for genomic selection with application in a cassava (Manihot esculenta) breeding program. Genetics and Molecular Research, v. 15, n. 4, gmr.15048838, Oct. 2016.Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: A - 1 |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. |
| |
19. | | SOUSA, T. V.; CAIXETA, E. T.; ALKIMIM, E. R.; OLIVEIRA, A. C. B. de; PEREIRA, A. A.; SAKIYAMA, N. S.; RESENDE JÚNIOR, M. F. R. de; ZAMBOLIM, L. Population structure and genetic diversity of coffee progenies derived from Catuaí and Híbrido de Timor revealed by genome-wide SNP marker. Tree Genetics & Genomes, v. 13, n. 6, Dec. 2017.Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: A - 1 |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Café. |
| |
20. | | RESENDE JUNIOR, M. F. R.; MUÑOZ, P.; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; GARRICK, D. J.; FERNANDO, R. L.; DAVIS, J. M.; JOKELA, E. J.; MARTIN, T. A.; PETER, G. F.; KIRST, M. Accuracy of genomic selection methods in a standard data set of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Genetics, v. 190, p. 1503-1510, April 2012.Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: A - 1 |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 28 | |
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|