|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Hortaliças. |
Data corrente: |
25/11/2022 |
Data da última atualização: |
20/12/2022 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo de Divulgação na Mídia |
Autoria: |
SILVA, G. O. da; RAGASSI, C. F.; AZEVEDO, F. Q.; CARVALHO, A. D. F. de; BORTOLETTO, A. C.; PEREIRA, A. da S.; EMYGDIO, B. M.; LOPES, C. A.; FELDBERG, N. P. |
Afiliação: |
GIOVANI OLEGARIO DA SILVA, CNPH; CARLOS FRANCISCO RAGASSI, CNPH; FERNANDA QUINTANILHA AZEVEDO, CPACT; AGNALDO DONIZETE FERREIRA DE CARVALHO, CNPH; ANTONIO CESAR BORTOLETTO, CPACT; ARIONE DA SILVA PEREIRA, CPACT; BEATRIZ MARTI EMYGDIO, CPACT; CARLOS ALBERTO LOPES, CNPH; NELSON PIRES FELDBERG, CPACT. |
Título: |
Avaliação do crescimento de genótipos de batata. |
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Revista Batata Show, v. 22, n. 64, p. 36-41, nov. 2022. |
Idioma: |
Português |
Conteúdo: |
Neste estudo foi verificado o desenvolvimento de cultivares de batata ao longo do ciclo da cultura, sendo estas: BRS F183 - Potira, BRS F50 - Cecília, comparando com a cultivar Asterix, em três ambientes: Canoinhas-SC, Pelotas-RS e Brasília-DF. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Asterix; BRS F183 Potira; BRS F50 Cecília. |
Thesagro: |
Batata; Etapa de Desenvolvimento da Planta; Folha; Melhoramento Genético Vegetal; Raiz; Solanum Tuberosum. |
Categoria do assunto: |
G Melhoramento Genético |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1148758/1/Batata-Show-v64-p19a21-rotatedfinal.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01134nam a2200313 a 4500 001 2148758 005 2022-12-20 008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aSILVA, G. O. da 245 $aAvaliação do crescimento de genótipos de batata.$h[electronic resource] 260 $aRevista Batata Show, v. 22, n. 64, p. 36-41, nov. 2022.$c2022 520 $aNeste estudo foi verificado o desenvolvimento de cultivares de batata ao longo do ciclo da cultura, sendo estas: BRS F183 - Potira, BRS F50 - Cecília, comparando com a cultivar Asterix, em três ambientes: Canoinhas-SC, Pelotas-RS e Brasília-DF. 650 $aBatata 650 $aEtapa de Desenvolvimento da Planta 650 $aFolha 650 $aMelhoramento Genético Vegetal 650 $aRaiz 650 $aSolanum Tuberosum 653 $aAsterix 653 $aBRS F183 Potira 653 $aBRS F50 Cecília 700 1 $aRAGASSI, C. F. 700 1 $aAZEVEDO, F. Q. 700 1 $aCARVALHO, A. D. F. de 700 1 $aBORTOLETTO, A. C. 700 1 $aPEREIRA, A. da S. 700 1 $aEMYGDIO, B. M. 700 1 $aLOPES, C. A. 700 1 $aFELDBERG, N. P.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Hortaliças (CNPH) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Soja. |
Data corrente: |
04/03/2016 |
Data da última atualização: |
01/06/2017 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 2 |
Autoria: |
FUKAMI, J.; NOGUEIRA, M. A.; ARAUJO, R. S.; HUNGRIA, M. |
Afiliação: |
JOSIANE FUKAMI, UEL; MARCO ANTONIO NOGUEIRA, CNPSO; RICARDO SILVA ARAUJO, Total Biotecnologia Indústria e Comércio Ltda.; MARIANGELA HUNGRIA DA CUNHA, CNPSO. |
Título: |
Accessing inoculation methods of maize and wheat with Azospirillum brasilense. |
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
AMB Express, v. 6, n. 3, p. 2-13, 2016. |
ISSN: |
2191-0855 |
DOI: |
10.1186/s13568-015-0171-y |
Idioma: |
Português |
Conteúdo: |
The utilization of inoculants containing Azospirillum is becoming more popular due to increasing reports of expressive gains in grain yields. However, incompatibility with pesticides used in seed treatments represents a main limitation for a successful inoculation. Therefore, in this study we searched for alternatives methods for seed inoculation of maize and wheat, aiming to avoid the direct contact of bacteria with pesticides. Different doses of inoculants containing Azospirillum brasilense were employed to perform inoculation in-furrow, via soil spray at sowing and via leaf spray after seedlings had emerged, in comparison to seed inoculation. Experiments were conducted first under greenhouse controlled conditions and then confirmed in the field at different locations in Brazil. In the greenhouse, most parameters measured responded positively to the largest inoculant dose used in foliar sprays, but benefits could also be observed from both in-furrow and soil spray inoculation. However, our results present evidence that field inoculation with plant-growth promoting bacteria must consider inoculant doses, and point to the need of fine adjustments to avoid crossing the threshold of growth stimulation and inhibition. All inoculation techniques increased the abundance of diazotrophic bacteria in plant tissues, and foliar spray improved colonization of leaves, while soil inoculations favored root and rhizosphere colonization. In field experiments, inoculation with A. brasilense allowed for a 25 % reduction in the need for N fertilizers. Our results have identified alternative methods of inoculation that were as effective as the standard seed inoculation that may represent an important strategy to avoid the incompatibility between inoculant bacteria and pesticides employed for seed treatment. MenosThe utilization of inoculants containing Azospirillum is becoming more popular due to increasing reports of expressive gains in grain yields. However, incompatibility with pesticides used in seed treatments represents a main limitation for a successful inoculation. Therefore, in this study we searched for alternatives methods for seed inoculation of maize and wheat, aiming to avoid the direct contact of bacteria with pesticides. Different doses of inoculants containing Azospirillum brasilense were employed to perform inoculation in-furrow, via soil spray at sowing and via leaf spray after seedlings had emerged, in comparison to seed inoculation. Experiments were conducted first under greenhouse controlled conditions and then confirmed in the field at different locations in Brazil. In the greenhouse, most parameters measured responded positively to the largest inoculant dose used in foliar sprays, but benefits could also be observed from both in-furrow and soil spray inoculation. However, our results present evidence that field inoculation with plant-growth promoting bacteria must consider inoculant doses, and point to the need of fine adjustments to avoid crossing the threshold of growth stimulation and inhibition. All inoculation techniques increased the abundance of diazotrophic bacteria in plant tissues, and foliar spray improved colonization of leaves, while soil inoculations favored root and rhizosphere colonization. In field experiments, inoculation with A. brasilense ... Mostrar Tudo |
Thesagro: |
Fixação de nitrogênio; Milho; Trigo. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Azospirillum brasilense; Corn; Nitrogen fixation; Wheat. |
Categoria do assunto: |
S Ciências Biológicas |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/140653/1/13568-2015-Article-171.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02544naa a2200265 a 4500 001 2039673 005 2017-06-01 008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a2191-0855 024 7 $a10.1186/s13568-015-0171-y$2DOI 100 1 $aFUKAMI, J. 245 $aAccessing inoculation methods of maize and wheat with Azospirillum brasilense.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2016 520 $aThe utilization of inoculants containing Azospirillum is becoming more popular due to increasing reports of expressive gains in grain yields. However, incompatibility with pesticides used in seed treatments represents a main limitation for a successful inoculation. Therefore, in this study we searched for alternatives methods for seed inoculation of maize and wheat, aiming to avoid the direct contact of bacteria with pesticides. Different doses of inoculants containing Azospirillum brasilense were employed to perform inoculation in-furrow, via soil spray at sowing and via leaf spray after seedlings had emerged, in comparison to seed inoculation. Experiments were conducted first under greenhouse controlled conditions and then confirmed in the field at different locations in Brazil. In the greenhouse, most parameters measured responded positively to the largest inoculant dose used in foliar sprays, but benefits could also be observed from both in-furrow and soil spray inoculation. However, our results present evidence that field inoculation with plant-growth promoting bacteria must consider inoculant doses, and point to the need of fine adjustments to avoid crossing the threshold of growth stimulation and inhibition. All inoculation techniques increased the abundance of diazotrophic bacteria in plant tissues, and foliar spray improved colonization of leaves, while soil inoculations favored root and rhizosphere colonization. In field experiments, inoculation with A. brasilense allowed for a 25 % reduction in the need for N fertilizers. Our results have identified alternative methods of inoculation that were as effective as the standard seed inoculation that may represent an important strategy to avoid the incompatibility between inoculant bacteria and pesticides employed for seed treatment. 650 $aAzospirillum brasilense 650 $aCorn 650 $aNitrogen fixation 650 $aWheat 650 $aFixação de nitrogênio 650 $aMilho 650 $aTrigo 700 1 $aNOGUEIRA, M. A. 700 1 $aARAUJO, R. S. 700 1 $aHUNGRIA, M. 773 $tAMB Express$gv. 6, n. 3, p. 2-13, 2016.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Soja (CNPSO) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|