| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão; Embrapa Hortaliças. |
|
Data corrente: |
25/11/2003 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
15/03/2011 |
|
Autoria: |
REGO, E. R. do; RÊGO, M. M. do; CRUZ, C. D.; CECON, P. R.; AMARAL, D. S. S. L.; FINGER, F. L. |
|
Título: |
Genetic diversity analysis of peppers: a comparison of discarding variable methods. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2003 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, Londrina, v. 3, n. 1, p. 19-25, Mar. 2003. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
There are a lot of variables in genetic diversity studies, and it is nevessary to know whether or not they are all important and which ones can be discarded. There are often little changes in clutering patterns if a subset of these variables is used, becaurse the discarded variables are redundant or of little contribution to the variability. This study aimed at comparing two discards of variables methods - the Singh method and the principal components method - as well as evaluating the effect of the discards on the cluster analysis. In this analysis data of six ripe fruits traits were used. Other characters with previously know variability or collinearity were added to the analysis. The method considered being the most efficient was the one, which indicated variables that did not after the initial clustering pattern when discarded. The Singh method did not detect variation differences when standardized data were used. When the distanced was obtained by the non-standardized data, the pericarp thickness (0.018%), total soluble solids (0.1668%) and minimum width (2.99%) had the lowest contirbution to the divergence. The principal components pointed out that the characteristics fruit length, total soluble solids and seeds yield fruit were considered as dispensable variables. There were no changes in the initial clustering pattern when fruit length was discarded. The data showed that the two compared methods different, since Singh's and principal component methods showed different variables to be discarded. The Singh method was not efficient in detecting multicollinearity among variables. The principal component method was more efficient in pointing out the variables that can be discarded. It is advisable that the genetic divergence is calculated based on the scores of the principal components. In future studies, when there is no replicated data, the genetic divergence and the pinpoint of characters should be calculated based on the principal component scores to avoid discarding some important variables when determining divergence. However, if the variable values differ independently, the Singh method based on Euclidean distance is appropriate. MenosThere are a lot of variables in genetic diversity studies, and it is nevessary to know whether or not they are all important and which ones can be discarded. There are often little changes in clutering patterns if a subset of these variables is used, becaurse the discarded variables are redundant or of little contribution to the variability. This study aimed at comparing two discards of variables methods - the Singh method and the principal components method - as well as evaluating the effect of the discards on the cluster analysis. In this analysis data of six ripe fruits traits were used. Other characters with previously know variability or collinearity were added to the analysis. The method considered being the most efficient was the one, which indicated variables that did not after the initial clustering pattern when discarded. The Singh method did not detect variation differences when standardized data were used. When the distanced was obtained by the non-standardized data, the pericarp thickness (0.018%), total soluble solids (0.1668%) and minimum width (2.99%) had the lowest contirbution to the divergence. The principal components pointed out that the characteristics fruit length, total soluble solids and seeds yield fruit were considered as dispensable variables. There were no changes in the initial clustering pattern when fruit length was discarded. The data showed that the two compared methods different, since Singh's and principal component methods showed differen... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Análise multivariada; Diversidade genética; Metodologia. |
|
Thesagro: |
Biodiversidade; Pimenta. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Capsicum. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02908naa a2200253 a 4500
001 1212617
005 2011-03-15
008 2003 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aREGO, E. R. do
245 $aGenetic diversity analysis of peppers$ba comparison of discarding variable methods.
260 $c2003
520 $aThere are a lot of variables in genetic diversity studies, and it is nevessary to know whether or not they are all important and which ones can be discarded. There are often little changes in clutering patterns if a subset of these variables is used, becaurse the discarded variables are redundant or of little contribution to the variability. This study aimed at comparing two discards of variables methods - the Singh method and the principal components method - as well as evaluating the effect of the discards on the cluster analysis. In this analysis data of six ripe fruits traits were used. Other characters with previously know variability or collinearity were added to the analysis. The method considered being the most efficient was the one, which indicated variables that did not after the initial clustering pattern when discarded. The Singh method did not detect variation differences when standardized data were used. When the distanced was obtained by the non-standardized data, the pericarp thickness (0.018%), total soluble solids (0.1668%) and minimum width (2.99%) had the lowest contirbution to the divergence. The principal components pointed out that the characteristics fruit length, total soluble solids and seeds yield fruit were considered as dispensable variables. There were no changes in the initial clustering pattern when fruit length was discarded. The data showed that the two compared methods different, since Singh's and principal component methods showed different variables to be discarded. The Singh method was not efficient in detecting multicollinearity among variables. The principal component method was more efficient in pointing out the variables that can be discarded. It is advisable that the genetic divergence is calculated based on the scores of the principal components. In future studies, when there is no replicated data, the genetic divergence and the pinpoint of characters should be calculated based on the principal component scores to avoid discarding some important variables when determining divergence. However, if the variable values differ independently, the Singh method based on Euclidean distance is appropriate.
650 $aCapsicum
650 $aBiodiversidade
650 $aPimenta
653 $aAnálise multivariada
653 $aDiversidade genética
653 $aMetodologia
700 1 $aRÊGO, M. M. do
700 1 $aCRUZ, C. D.
700 1 $aCECON, P. R.
700 1 $aAMARAL, D. S. S. L.
700 1 $aFINGER, F. L.
773 $tCrop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, Londrina$gv. 3, n. 1, p. 19-25, Mar. 2003.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão (CNPAF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
