| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. |
|
Data corrente: |
11/12/2013 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
10/03/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
NASCIMENTO, M.; NASCIMENTO, A. C. C.; CIRILLO, M. A.; FERREIRA, A.; PETERNELLI, L. A.; FERREIRA, R. de P. |
|
Afiliação: |
MOYSES NASCIMENTO, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; ANA CAROLINA CAMPANA NASCIMENTO, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; MARCELO ANGELO CIRILLO, Universidade Federal de Lavras; ADESIO FERREIRA, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo; LUIZ ALEXANDRE PETERNELLI, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; REINALDO DE PAULA FERREIRA, CPPSE. |
|
Título: |
Association between responses obtained using adaptability and stability methods in alfalfa. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2013 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias, Londrina, v. 34, n. 6, p. 2545-2554, nov./dez. 2013. |
|
DOI: |
10.5433/1679-0359.2013v34n6p2545 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
This study aimed to evaluate the association between responses obtained using methods of adaptability and stability by using correspondence analysis. The forage yield of 92 genotypes of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) was investigated. The trial had a randomized block design, with 2 replicates, and the data were used to test the reliability of the different methods. Twenty cuttings were obtained from each genotype between November 2004 and June 2006. Each cutting was grown in a different environment. The estimates of adaptability and stability were obtained using the methods of Eberhart and Russell (1966), Cruz, Torres and Vencovsky (1989), Nascimento et al. (2009b), and Lin and Binns (1988). Following the association analysis, correspondence analysis was conducted for determining association and discriminating the responses obtained using the methods of adaptability and stability. The unfavorable (D) and unpredictable unfavorable (DI) responses obtained using the methods of Lin and Binns (1988) and Eberhart and Russell (1966), respectively, were discrepant in relation to other responses obtained using these methods. The greatest association between responses was confirmed using the methods of Eberhart and Russell (1966) and Cruz, Torres and Vencovsky (1989). |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Eberhart and Russell (1966); Genotype × environment interaction; Multiple centroid method. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
correspondence analysis. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/93848/1/PROCI-2013.00191.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02093naa a2200241 a 4500
001 1973556
005 2023-03-10
008 2013 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.5433/1679-0359.2013v34n6p2545$2DOI
100 1 $aNASCIMENTO, M.
245 $aAssociation between responses obtained using adaptability and stability methods in alfalfa.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2013
520 $aThis study aimed to evaluate the association between responses obtained using methods of adaptability and stability by using correspondence analysis. The forage yield of 92 genotypes of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) was investigated. The trial had a randomized block design, with 2 replicates, and the data were used to test the reliability of the different methods. Twenty cuttings were obtained from each genotype between November 2004 and June 2006. Each cutting was grown in a different environment. The estimates of adaptability and stability were obtained using the methods of Eberhart and Russell (1966), Cruz, Torres and Vencovsky (1989), Nascimento et al. (2009b), and Lin and Binns (1988). Following the association analysis, correspondence analysis was conducted for determining association and discriminating the responses obtained using the methods of adaptability and stability. The unfavorable (D) and unpredictable unfavorable (DI) responses obtained using the methods of Lin and Binns (1988) and Eberhart and Russell (1966), respectively, were discrepant in relation to other responses obtained using these methods. The greatest association between responses was confirmed using the methods of Eberhart and Russell (1966) and Cruz, Torres and Vencovsky (1989).
650 $acorrespondence analysis
653 $aEberhart and Russell (1966)
653 $aGenotype × environment interaction
653 $aMultiple centroid method
700 1 $aNASCIMENTO, A. C. C.
700 1 $aCIRILLO, M. A.
700 1 $aFERREIRA, A.
700 1 $aPETERNELLI, L. A.
700 1 $aFERREIRA, R. de P.
773 $tSemina: Ciências Agrárias, Londrina$gv. 34, n. 6, p. 2545-2554, nov./dez. 2013.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste (CPPSE) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 7 | |
| 6. |  | MEINKE, H.; BASTIAANS, L.; BOUMAN, B.; DINGKUHN, M.; GAYDON, D.; HASEGAWA, T.; HEINEMANN, A. B.; KIEPE, P.; LAFARGE, T.; LUQUET, D.; MASOOD, A.; OORT, P. van; RODENBURG, J.; YAN, J.; YIN, X. An international collaborative research network helps to design climate robust rice systems. In: MARCO SYMPOSIUM 2009: WORKSHOP 2: CROP PRODUCTION UNDER HEAT STRESS: MONITORING, IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND ADAPTATION, 2009, Tsukuba. Challenges for agro-environmental research in Monsoon Asia. Tsukuba: National Institute for AGr-Environmental Sciences, 2009. 11 p.| Tipo: Artigo em Anais de Congresso / Nota Técnica |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. |
|   |
| 7. | | KHAWAJA, C.; JANSSEN, R.; RUTZ, D.; LUQUET, D.; TROUCHE, G.; REDDY, B.; RAO, P. S.; BASAVARAJ, G.; SCHAFFERT, R.; DAMASCENO, C.; PARRELLA, R.; ZACHARIAS, A.; BUSHMANN, R.; RETTENMAIER, N.; REINHARD, G.; MONTI, A.; LIZARAZU, W. Z.; AMADUCCI, S.; MAROCCO, A.; SNIJMAN, W.; SHARGIE, N.; TERBLANCHE, H.; ZAVALA-GARCIA, F.; BRACONNIER, S. Energy sorghum: an alternative energy crop: a handbook. Munich: WIP Renewable Energies, 2014.| Tipo: Autoria/Organização/Edição de Livros |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. |
|  |
| Registros recuperados : 7 | |
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
