|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Solos. |
Data corrente: |
10/12/2018 |
Data da última atualização: |
16/04/2019 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
Autoria: |
FERREIRA, J. N.; MONTEIRO, J. M. G.; CAMPANHA, M. M.; PEDREIRA, B. da C. C. G.; FIDALGO, E. C. C.; COUDEL, E.; AQUINO, F. de G.; PARRON, L. M.; PRADO, R. B. |
Afiliação: |
JOICE NUNES FERREIRA, CPATU; JOYCE MARIA GUIMARAES MONTEIRO, CNPS; MONICA MATOSO CAMPANHA, CNPMS; BERNADETE DA CONCEICAO C G PEDREIRA, CNPS; ELAINE CRISTINA CARDOSO FIDALGO, CNPS; Emilie Coudel; FABIANA DE GOIS AQUINO, CPAC; LUCILIA MARIA PARRON VARGAS, CNPF; RACHEL BARDY PRADO, CNPS. |
Título: |
How have ecosystem services been incorporated into public policies and programs in Brazil? |
Ano de publicação: |
2018 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: LAC ESP REGIONAL CONFERENCE, 2018. Abstracts. Campinas: Unicamp, 2018. |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Notas: |
Conferência Regional América Latina e Caribe da Ecosystem Services Partnership/ESP. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Marcos legais. |
Thesagro: |
Conservação; Ecossistema; Legislação; Políticas Públicas. |
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
Marc: |
LEADER 00891nam a2200265 a 4500 001 2101061 005 2019-04-16 008 2018 bl uuuu u01u1 u #d 100 1 $aFERREIRA, J. N. 245 $aHow have ecosystem services been incorporated into public policies and programs in Brazil?$h[electronic resource] 260 $aIn: LAC ESP REGIONAL CONFERENCE, 2018. Abstracts. Campinas: Unicamp$c2018 500 $aConferência Regional América Latina e Caribe da Ecosystem Services Partnership/ESP. 650 $aConservação 650 $aEcossistema 650 $aLegislação 650 $aPolíticas Públicas 653 $aMarcos legais 700 1 $aMONTEIRO, J. M. G. 700 1 $aCAMPANHA, M. M. 700 1 $aPEDREIRA, B. da C. C. G. 700 1 $aFIDALGO, E. C. C. 700 1 $aCOUDEL, E. 700 1 $aAQUINO, F. de G. 700 1 $aPARRON, L. M. 700 1 $aPRADO, R. B.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Solos (CNPS) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agrobiologia. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpab.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrobiologia; Embrapa Solos. |
Data corrente: |
08/11/2021 |
Data da última atualização: |
11/10/2023 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
Autoria: |
LEITE, F. F. G. D.; ALVES, B. J. R.; NÓBREGA, G. N.; CORDEIRO, R. C.; CESÁRIO, F. V.; CAMBARERI, G. S.; FAVERIN, C.; SILVEIRA, J. G. da; CIGANDA, V. S.; ARMACOLO, N. M; ALECRIM, F. B.; RODRIGUES, R. de A. R. |
Afiliação: |
FERNANDA FIGUEIREDO GRANJA DORILEO LEITE, UFF; BRUNO JOSE RODRIGUES ALVES, CNPAB; GABRIEL NUTO NÓBREGA, UFF; RENATO CAMPELLO CORDEIRO, UFF; FERNANDO VIEIRA CESÁRIO, UFF; GUSTAVO SEBASTIÁN CAMBARERI, INTA; CLAUDIA FAVERIN, INTA/UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE MAR DEL PLATA; JÚLIA GRAZIELA DA SILVEIRA, UFV; VERONICA SOLANGE CIGANDA, INIA; NATASSIA MAGALHÃES ARMACOLO, UEL; FABIANO BARBOSA ALECRIM, UFF; RENATO DE ARAGAO RIBEIRO RODRIGUES, CNPS. |
Título: |
Checking the progress of using the static chamber method for the measurement of greenhouse gases in Latin America. |
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Carbon Management, v. 12, n. 6, p. 649-661, 2021 |
ISSN: |
1758-3004 |
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2021.1995503 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Manual static chamber is one of the most widespread methods for the quantification of greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions from agricultural systems. But there are concerns about the reliability of measurements and a necessity to assess the static chambers used in the studies performed in the countries of Latin America. Thus, this study aims to investigate the quality of the characteristics from the static chamber methodology, the confidence level of the GHG measurements, and recommend what should be improved. We conducted a systematic review of databases to identify peer-reviewed articles that used the static chamber method in Latin America. A total of 90 articles were analyzed and separated according to the publication year (2000-2008, 2009-2015, 2016-2020). We evaluated eight design and deployment chamber characteristics. The depth of base insertion and type of storage vial received the lowest scores, and the number of samples received the highest score. The description and reporting of the methodological procedures in the studies should be improved. The percentage of articles with high and medium confidence levels increased within the time, and the number of articles with low and very low confidence levels reduced. Scientists/Researchers should continue to follow the protocols, especially the most updated ones. |
Palavras-Chave: |
GHG management; Methodologies; Performance measurement; Protocols and standards. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Greenhouse gases; South America. |
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
Marc: |
LEADER 02400naa a2200349 a 4500 001 2135879 005 2023-10-11 008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a1758-3004 024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2021.1995503$2DOI 100 1 $aLEITE, F. F. G. D. 245 $aChecking the progress of using the static chamber method for the measurement of greenhouse gases in Latin America.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2021 520 $aManual static chamber is one of the most widespread methods for the quantification of greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions from agricultural systems. But there are concerns about the reliability of measurements and a necessity to assess the static chambers used in the studies performed in the countries of Latin America. Thus, this study aims to investigate the quality of the characteristics from the static chamber methodology, the confidence level of the GHG measurements, and recommend what should be improved. We conducted a systematic review of databases to identify peer-reviewed articles that used the static chamber method in Latin America. A total of 90 articles were analyzed and separated according to the publication year (2000-2008, 2009-2015, 2016-2020). We evaluated eight design and deployment chamber characteristics. The depth of base insertion and type of storage vial received the lowest scores, and the number of samples received the highest score. The description and reporting of the methodological procedures in the studies should be improved. The percentage of articles with high and medium confidence levels increased within the time, and the number of articles with low and very low confidence levels reduced. Scientists/Researchers should continue to follow the protocols, especially the most updated ones. 650 $aGreenhouse gases 650 $aSouth America 653 $aGHG management 653 $aMethodologies 653 $aPerformance measurement 653 $aProtocols and standards 700 1 $aALVES, B. J. R. 700 1 $aNÓBREGA, G. N. 700 1 $aCORDEIRO, R. C. 700 1 $aCESÁRIO, F. V. 700 1 $aCAMBARERI, G. S. 700 1 $aFAVERIN, C. 700 1 $aSILVEIRA, J. G. da 700 1 $aCIGANDA, V. S. 700 1 $aARMACOLO, N. M 700 1 $aALECRIM, F. B. 700 1 $aRODRIGUES, R. de A. R. 773 $tCarbon Management$gv. 12, n. 6, p. 649-661, 2021
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrobiologia (CNPAB) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|