|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Soja. |
Data corrente: |
21/08/2008 |
Data da última atualização: |
22/08/2008 |
Autoria: |
KORASAKI, V.; BROWN, G. G.; PASINI, A.; LOPES, J. |
Título: |
Earthworm populations in three Atlantic Rainforest fragments with different disturbance levels near Londrina, Paraná, Brazil. |
Ano de publicação: |
2006 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: International Symposium on Earthworm Ecology, 8., 2006, Kraków. Abstracts... Kraków: Jagiellonian University, 2006. p. 74. |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Earthworms are known to be good indicators of soil conditions, due to their susceptibility to management practices, vegetation types, disturbance, and other environmental properties. Little is known of the earthworm communities of Paraná State, Brazil, and therefore the present study was undertaken to evaluate the earthworm communities in Atlantic Rainforest fragments in the vicinity of Londrina, Paraná State, Brazil, and the effect of forest disturbance on their populations. Earthworms were sampled from three forest fragments at 1) the Godoy Forest State Park (GF); 2) the Arthur Thomas Municipal Park (AT); 3) the State University of Londrina (UEL) campus. GF is a moderately well preserved primary forest, AT is a secondary forest, at advanced level of succession, while UEL is a secondary forest at the incipient level of succession. Disturbance levels could thus be classified as UEL>AT>GF. Samples were taken in the wet and dry seasons (March and July) of 2005, and consisted 25 square soil blocks of 25 x 25 cm (1/16 m2), taken in a grid format, with 10 m distance between samples. Twenty samples were taken to 10 cm depth and five to 30 cm depth (diagonally in the grid). In the dry season, highest earthworm density was observed at AT (475 ind.m-2), followed by UEL (326 ind.m-2) and GF (24 ind.m-2). Earthworm biomass followed the order UEL (15.8 g.m-2) > AT (6 g.m-2) > GF (0.8 g.m-2). In the rainy season, highest populations were again observed at AT (1069 ind.m-2), followed by UEL (149 ind.m-2) and GF (139 ind.m-2). Earthworm biomass again followed the order UEL (23.1 g.m-2) > AT (18 g.m-2) > GF (3 g.m-2). Therefore, abundance and biomass were generally higher in the rainy season. Cocoon abundance and biomass was also greatest at all sites in the rainy season. In the dry season, more worms were found in the 20-30 cm layer compared to the top 10 cm, with the exception of the UEL forest. In the wet season, most earthworms inhabited the top 10 cm layer. Earthworm abundance was greater in the disturbed (UEL and AT) sites than the primary forest (GF). Species composition in the forests was also different. GF had only native earthworms (Urobenus brasiliensis, Urobenus sp. and Glossoscolex sp.), while both UEL and AT had both native (Urobenus brasiliensis, Fimoscolex sp., Glossoscolex sp., Belladrilus sp.) and exotic (Amynthas gracilis, Dichogaster spp. and Pontoscolex MenosEarthworms are known to be good indicators of soil conditions, due to their susceptibility to management practices, vegetation types, disturbance, and other environmental properties. Little is known of the earthworm communities of Paraná State, Brazil, and therefore the present study was undertaken to evaluate the earthworm communities in Atlantic Rainforest fragments in the vicinity of Londrina, Paraná State, Brazil, and the effect of forest disturbance on their populations. Earthworms were sampled from three forest fragments at 1) the Godoy Forest State Park (GF); 2) the Arthur Thomas Municipal Park (AT); 3) the State University of Londrina (UEL) campus. GF is a moderately well preserved primary forest, AT is a secondary forest, at advanced level of succession, while UEL is a secondary forest at the incipient level of succession. Disturbance levels could thus be classified as UEL>AT>GF. Samples were taken in the wet and dry seasons (March and July) of 2005, and consisted 25 square soil blocks of 25 x 25 cm (1/16 m2), taken in a grid format, with 10 m distance between samples. Twenty samples were taken to 10 cm depth and five to 30 cm depth (diagonally in the grid). In the dry season, highest earthworm density was observed at AT (475 ind.m-2), followed by UEL (326 ind.m-2) and GF (24 ind.m-2). Earthworm biomass followed the order UEL (15.8 g.m-2) > AT (6 g.m-2) > GF (0.8 g.m-2). In the rainy season, highest populations were again observed at AT (1069 ind.m-2), followed by U... Mostrar Tudo |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
Marc: |
LEADER 02973naa a2200157 a 4500 001 1470762 005 2008-08-22 008 2006 bl --- 0-- u #d 100 1 $aKORASAKI, V. 245 $aEarthworm populations in three Atlantic Rainforest fragments with different disturbance levels near Londrina, Paraná, Brazil. 260 $c2006 520 $aEarthworms are known to be good indicators of soil conditions, due to their susceptibility to management practices, vegetation types, disturbance, and other environmental properties. Little is known of the earthworm communities of Paraná State, Brazil, and therefore the present study was undertaken to evaluate the earthworm communities in Atlantic Rainforest fragments in the vicinity of Londrina, Paraná State, Brazil, and the effect of forest disturbance on their populations. Earthworms were sampled from three forest fragments at 1) the Godoy Forest State Park (GF); 2) the Arthur Thomas Municipal Park (AT); 3) the State University of Londrina (UEL) campus. GF is a moderately well preserved primary forest, AT is a secondary forest, at advanced level of succession, while UEL is a secondary forest at the incipient level of succession. Disturbance levels could thus be classified as UEL>AT>GF. Samples were taken in the wet and dry seasons (March and July) of 2005, and consisted 25 square soil blocks of 25 x 25 cm (1/16 m2), taken in a grid format, with 10 m distance between samples. Twenty samples were taken to 10 cm depth and five to 30 cm depth (diagonally in the grid). In the dry season, highest earthworm density was observed at AT (475 ind.m-2), followed by UEL (326 ind.m-2) and GF (24 ind.m-2). Earthworm biomass followed the order UEL (15.8 g.m-2) > AT (6 g.m-2) > GF (0.8 g.m-2). In the rainy season, highest populations were again observed at AT (1069 ind.m-2), followed by UEL (149 ind.m-2) and GF (139 ind.m-2). Earthworm biomass again followed the order UEL (23.1 g.m-2) > AT (18 g.m-2) > GF (3 g.m-2). Therefore, abundance and biomass were generally higher in the rainy season. Cocoon abundance and biomass was also greatest at all sites in the rainy season. In the dry season, more worms were found in the 20-30 cm layer compared to the top 10 cm, with the exception of the UEL forest. In the wet season, most earthworms inhabited the top 10 cm layer. Earthworm abundance was greater in the disturbed (UEL and AT) sites than the primary forest (GF). Species composition in the forests was also different. GF had only native earthworms (Urobenus brasiliensis, Urobenus sp. and Glossoscolex sp.), while both UEL and AT had both native (Urobenus brasiliensis, Fimoscolex sp., Glossoscolex sp., Belladrilus sp.) and exotic (Amynthas gracilis, Dichogaster spp. and Pontoscolex 700 1 $aBROWN, G. G. 700 1 $aPASINI, A. 700 1 $aLOPES, J. 773 $tIn: International Symposium on Earthworm Ecology, 8., 2006, Kraków. Abstracts... Kraków: Jagiellonian University, 2006. p. 74.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Soja (CNPSO) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Cocais; Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Meio Ambiente; Embrapa Semiárido; Embrapa Solos. |
Data corrente: |
18/10/2016 |
Data da última atualização: |
31/03/2023 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Documentos |
Autoria: |
POLIDORO, J. C.; MENDONÇA-SANTOS, M. de L.; LUMBRERAS, J. F.; COELHO, M. R.; CARVALHO FILHO, A. de; MOTTA, P. E. F. da; CARVALHO JUNIOR, W. de; ARAUJO FILHO, J. C. de; CURCIO, G. R.; CORREIA, J. R.; MARTINS, E. de S.; SPERA, S. T.; OLIVEIRA, S. R. de M.; BOLFE, E. L.; MANZATTO, C. V.; TOSTO, S. G.; VENTURIERI, A.; SA, I. B.; OLIVEIRA, V. A. de; SHINZATO, E.; ANJOS, L. H. C. dos; VALLADARES, G. S.; RIBEIRO, J. L.; MEDEIROS, P. S. C. de; MOREIRA, F. M. de S.; SILVA, L. S. L.; SEQUINATTO, L.; AGLIO, M. L. D.; DART, R. de O. |
Afiliação: |
JOSE CARLOS POLIDORO, CNPS; MARIA DE LOURDES M SANTOS BREFIN, CPACP; JOSE FRANCISCO LUMBRERAS, CNPS; MAURICIO RIZZATO COELHO, CNPS; AMAURY DE CARVALHO FILHO, CNPS; PAULO EMILIO FERREIRA DA MOTTA, CNPS; WALDIR DE CARVALHO JUNIOR, CNPS; JOSE COELHO DE ARAUJO FILHO, CNPS; GUSTAVO RIBAS CURCIO, CNPF; JOAO ROBERTO CORREIA, DTT; EDER DE SOUZA MARTINS, CPAC; SILVIO TULIO SPERA, CPAMT; STANLEY ROBSON DE MEDEIROS OLIVEIRA, CNPTIA; EDSON LUIS BOLFE, SIM; CELSO VAINER MANZATTO, CNPMA; SERGIO GOMES TOSTO, CNPM; ADRIANO VENTURIERI, CPATU; IEDO BEZERRA SA, CPATSA; VIRLEI ÁLVARO DE OLIVEIRA, IBGE; EDGAR SHINZATO, CPRM; LÚCIA HELENA CUNHA DOS ANJOS, UFRRJ; GUSTAVO SOUZA VALLADARES, UFPI; JEFÉ LEÃO RIBEIRO, MAPA; PAULA SUÉLEN CORRÊA DE MEDEIROS, IBGE; FÁTIMA MARIA DE SOUZA MOREIRA, UFLA; LEONARDO SCHARTH LOUREIRO SILVA, IBGE; LETÍCIA SEQUINATTO, UDESC; MARIO LUIZ DIAMANTE AGLIO, CNPS; RICARDO DE OLIVEIRA DART, CNPS. |
Título: |
Programa Nacional de Solos do Brasil (PronaSolos). |
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Rio de Janeiro: Embrapa Solos, 2016. |
Páginas: |
53 p. |
Série: |
(Embrapa Solos. Documentos, 183). |
ISSN: |
1517-2627 |
Idioma: |
Português |
Conteúdo: |
Os objetivos principais do PronaSolos são, portanto, a retomada da realização dos levantamentos pedológicos em caráter multiescalar e respectivas interpretações, de forma contínua, seguindo programação estabelecida em função de necessidades identificadas por um consórcio nacional multi-institucional e compatibilizada com as demandas oriundas das políticas dos governos federal e estaduais para o setor, bem como estabelecer uma base de dados integrada, na qual as informações de solos provenientes de trabalhos anteriores e as que vierem a ser produzidas estejam organizadas e sistematizadas para consulta do público em geral. |
Palavras-Chave: |
PronaSolos. |
Thesagro: |
Pedologia; Programa de pesquisa; Reconhecimento do solo; Recurso do solo; Solo. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Research programs; Soil; Soil science; Soil surveys. |
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/156792/1/Doc-183-Programa-Nacional-de-Solos-do-Brasil.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02283nam a2200601 a 4500 001 2054924 005 2023-03-31 008 2016 bl uuuu 00u1 u #d 022 $a1517-2627 100 1 $aPOLIDORO, J. C. 245 $aPrograma Nacional de Solos do Brasil (PronaSolos).$h[electronic resource] 260 $aRio de Janeiro: Embrapa Solos$c2016 300 $a53 p. 490 $a(Embrapa Solos. Documentos, 183). 520 $aOs objetivos principais do PronaSolos são, portanto, a retomada da realização dos levantamentos pedológicos em caráter multiescalar e respectivas interpretações, de forma contínua, seguindo programação estabelecida em função de necessidades identificadas por um consórcio nacional multi-institucional e compatibilizada com as demandas oriundas das políticas dos governos federal e estaduais para o setor, bem como estabelecer uma base de dados integrada, na qual as informações de solos provenientes de trabalhos anteriores e as que vierem a ser produzidas estejam organizadas e sistematizadas para consulta do público em geral. 650 $aResearch programs 650 $aSoil 650 $aSoil science 650 $aSoil surveys 650 $aPedologia 650 $aPrograma de pesquisa 650 $aReconhecimento do solo 650 $aRecurso do solo 650 $aSolo 653 $aPronaSolos 700 1 $aMENDONÇA-SANTOS, M. de L. 700 1 $aLUMBRERAS, J. F. 700 1 $aCOELHO, M. R. 700 1 $aCARVALHO FILHO, A. de 700 1 $aMOTTA, P. E. F. da 700 1 $aCARVALHO JUNIOR, W. de 700 1 $aARAUJO FILHO, J. C. de 700 1 $aCURCIO, G. R. 700 1 $aCORREIA, J. R. 700 1 $aMARTINS, E. de S. 700 1 $aSPERA, S. T. 700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, S. R. de M. 700 1 $aBOLFE, E. L. 700 1 $aMANZATTO, C. V. 700 1 $aTOSTO, S. G. 700 1 $aVENTURIERI, A. 700 1 $aSA, I. B. 700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, V. A. de 700 1 $aSHINZATO, E. 700 1 $aANJOS, L. H. C. dos 700 1 $aVALLADARES, G. S. 700 1 $aRIBEIRO, J. L. 700 1 $aMEDEIROS, P. S. C. de 700 1 $aMOREIRA, F. M. de S. 700 1 $aSILVA, L. S. L. 700 1 $aSEQUINATTO, L. 700 1 $aAGLIO, M. L. D. 700 1 $aDART, R. de O.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Solos (CNPS) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|