Data/hora: 16/06/2024 07:00:23

Biblioteca(s): | Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste.
Data corrente: | 13/12/2021
Data da última atualização: | 13/12/2021
Autoria: | BOULAY, A. M.; DRASTIG, K.; AMANULLAH; CHAPAGAIN, A.; CHARLON, V.; CIVIT, B.; CAMILLIS, C. DE; SOUZA, M. DE; HESS, T.; HOEKSTRA, A. Y.; IBIDHI, R.; LATHUILLIERE, M. J.; MANZARDO, A.; MCALLISTER, T.; MORALES, R. A.; MOTOSHITA, M.; PALHARES, J. C. P.; PIRLO, G.; RIDOUTT, B.; RUSSO, V.; SALMORAL, G.; SINGH, R.; VANHAM, D.; WIEDEMANN, S.; ZHENG, W.; PFISTER, S.
Afiliação: | ANNE-MARIE BOULAY, Sherbrooke University; KATRIN DRASTIG, Polytechnique Montreal; AMANULLAH, Faculty of Crop Production Sciences; ASHOK CHAPAGAIN, Pacific Institute, USA; VERONICA CHARLON, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA); BÁRBARA CIVIT, INAHE CONICET and UTN FRM Mendoza; CAMILLO DE CAMILLIS, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); MARLOS DE SOUZA, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); TIM HESS, Cranfield Water Science Institute, Cranfield University, United Kingdom; ARJEN Y. HOEKSTRA, Twente Water Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; RIDHA IBIDHI, Department of Animal and Forage Production, National Institute of Agronomic Research of Tunisia (INRAT), Ariana, Tunisia; MICHAEL J. LATHUILLIÈRE, Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; ALESSANDRO MANZARDO, CESQA, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; TIM MCALLISTER, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada; RICARDO A. MORALES, AgroDer SC, Mexico DF, Mexico; MASAHARU MOTOSHITA, Institute of Science for Safety and Sustainability, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Japan; JULIO CESAR PASCALE PALHARES, CPPSE; GIACOMO PIRLO, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Animal Production and Aquaculture, Lodi, Italy; BRAD RIDOUTT, Department Agricultural Economics, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa; VALENTINA RUSSO, Environmental and Process Systems Engineering Research Group, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Cape Town, 7701 Rondebosch, South Africa; GLORIA SALMORAL, Cranfield Water Science Institute, Cranfield University, United Kingdom; RANVIR SINGH, School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand; DAVY VANHAM, European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy; STEPHEN WIEDEMANN, Integrity Ag and Environment, Toowoomba, Qld, Australia; WEICHAO ZHENG, China Agricultural University, China; STEPHAN PFISTER, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, ETH-Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Título: | Building consensus on water use assessment of livestock production systems and supply chains: outcome and recommendations from the FAO LEAP partnership.
Ano de publicação: | 2021
Fonte/Imprenta: | Ecological Indicators, v.124, may 2021, 107391.
Páginas: | 11 p.
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107391
Idioma: | Inglês
Conteúdo: | The FAO Livestock Environmental Assessment and Performance (LEAP) Partnership organised a Technical Advisory Group (TAG) to develop reference guidelines on water footprinting for livestock production systems and supply chains. The mandate of the TAG was to i) provide recommendations to monitor the environmental performance of feed and livestock supply chains over time so that progress towards improvement targets can be measured, ii) be applicable for feed and water demand of small ruminants, poultry, large ruminants and pig supply chains, iii) build on, and go beyond, the existing FAO LEAP guidelines and iv) pursue alignment with relevant international standards, specifically ISO 14040 (2006)/ISO 14044 (2006), and ISO 14046 (2014). The recommended guidelines on livestock water use address both impact assessment (water scarcity footprint as defined by ISO 14046, 2014) and water productivity (water use efficiency). While most aspects of livestock water use assessment have been proposed or discussed independently elsewhere, the TAG reviewed and connected these concepts and information in relation with each other and made recommendations towards comprehensive assessment of water use in livestock production systems and supply chains. The approaches to assess the quantity of water used for livestock systems are addressed and the specific assessment methods for water productivity and water scarcity are recommended. Water productivity assessment is further advanced by its quantification and reporting with fractions of green and blue water consumed. This allows the assessment of the environmental performance related to water use of a livestock-related system by assessing potential environmental impacts of anthropogenic water consumption (only ?blue water?); as well as the assessment of overall water productivity of the system (including ?green? and ?blue water? consumption). A consistent combination of water productivity and water scarcity footprint metrics provides a complete picture both in terms of potential productivity improvements of the water consumption as well as minimizing potential environmental impacts related to water scarcity. This process resulted for the first time in an international consensus on water use assessment, including both the life-cycle assessment community with the water scarcity footprint and the water management community with water productivity metrics. Despite the main focus on feed and livestock production systems, the outcomes of this LEAP TAG are also applicable to many other agriculture sectors.
Palavras-Chave: | Water footprinting; Water productivity; Water scarcity footprint; Water use assessment.
Thesaurus Nal: | Livestock production.
Categoria do assunto: | P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra
URL: | http://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/229026/1/BuildingConsensusWater.pdf
Registro original: | Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste (CPPSE)
Exemplares: | CPPSE - (25516-1) - UPC - AP - DD - PROCI-2021.00214 - BOU - 2021.00239 - DIS