| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
|
Data corrente: |
06/12/2021 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
06/12/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
MATOS, B. F. de; ARAÚJO, G. P. de; BEHLING NETO, A.; WRUCK, F. J.; OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, O. L. de; PEDREIRA, B. C. e. |
|
Afiliação: |
BETANIA FLORENCIO DE MATOS, UFMT, Sinop-MT; GRAZIELA PAULA DE ARAÚJO, UFMT, Sinop-MT; ARTHUR BEHLING NETO, UFMT, Sinop-MT; FLAVIO JESUS WRUCK, CPAMT; ORLANDO LUCIO DE OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, CPAMT; BRUNO CARNEIRO E PEDREIRA, CPAMT. |
|
Título: |
The effect of the harvesting frequency on the residual forage mass in mixed pastures. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 56., 2021, Florianópolis. Animal science: challenges in production and sustainability: proceedings... Brasília, DF: Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia, 2021. p. 108. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Evento virtual. |
|
Conteúdo: |
The use of different forage species in a mixed pasture is recommended to improve forage mass and soil characteristics. However, the frequency of harvest (e.g.; grazing or hay) can increase the forage removal during the off-season, and affect the residual forage mass to the following crop, especially in the non-till crop-livestock systems. We aimed to assess the harvest frequency effect in a mixed pasture compounded by Urochloa ruziziensis, pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan ?Super N?); Sunflower (Helianthus annuus), and Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) on the residual forage mass at the Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril, in Sinop, MT, Brazil. The mixed were planted on March 10, 2020, after the soybean harvest. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design with three replicates. The treatments were four harvest frequencies. The harvesting frequencies were: Straw ? no-harvest during the off-season; Lax - with one harvest (at 115 days after planting); Moderate - two harvests (80 and 115 days after planting); and Heavy - three harvests (45, 80, and 115 days after The plots were harvested at 20-cm stubble height and there were not fertilized. On September 30, 2020, forage mass was harvested using three quadrats (0.5 m2) per plot, at soil level, to calculate residual forage mass, which was desiccated (4 L ha-1 of glyphosate) on October 23, 2020. The soybean (BG4781, Brevant) was seeded on November 07, when 88 kg of P2O5 was applied. On December 01, 68 kg of K surface-applied. The crop management practices (e.g.; herbicide, insecticide, and fungicide) were similar to all plots, and on March 09, 2021, the soybean was harvested (data not showed). The residual forage mass was affected by the harvesting frequency (P=0.0296). The greatest residual forage mass was measured in the treatment where there was no harvesting (straw), on average 5625 kg DM ha-1. On the other hand, lax, moderate and heavy treatments presented similar residual forage mass (on average, 3000 kg DM ha-1). We concluded that although the residual forage mass was reduced when the off-season pastures were harvested, the number of harvest events did not affect the forage mass left on the field to assure the non-till cropping system. It is important to mention the soybean grain yield needs to be measured in the following crop season to understand the effect of the harvesting frequency during the off-season. MenosThe use of different forage species in a mixed pasture is recommended to improve forage mass and soil characteristics. However, the frequency of harvest (e.g.; grazing or hay) can increase the forage removal during the off-season, and affect the residual forage mass to the following crop, especially in the non-till crop-livestock systems. We aimed to assess the harvest frequency effect in a mixed pasture compounded by Urochloa ruziziensis, pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan ?Super N?); Sunflower (Helianthus annuus), and Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) on the residual forage mass at the Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril, in Sinop, MT, Brazil. The mixed were planted on March 10, 2020, after the soybean harvest. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design with three replicates. The treatments were four harvest frequencies. The harvesting frequencies were: Straw ? no-harvest during the off-season; Lax - with one harvest (at 115 days after planting); Moderate - two harvests (80 and 115 days after planting); and Heavy - three harvests (45, 80, and 115 days after The plots were harvested at 20-cm stubble height and there were not fertilized. On September 30, 2020, forage mass was harvested using three quadrats (0.5 m2) per plot, at soil level, to calculate residual forage mass, which was desiccated (4 L ha-1 of glyphosate) on October 23, 2020. The soybean (BG4781, Brevant) was seeded on November 07, when 88 kg of P2O5 was applied. On December 01, 68 kg of K surface-applied. The... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesagro: |
Colheita; Forragem; Fungicida; Herbicida; Inseticida; Pastagem Mista. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Cropping systems; Helianthus; Livestock; Urochloa ruziziensis. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/228583/1/2021-cpamt-bcp-effects-harvesting-frequency-residual-forage-mass-mixed-pasture.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03432nam a2200301 a 4500
001 2137189
005 2021-12-06
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aMATOS, B. F. de
245 $aThe effect of the harvesting frequency on the residual forage mass in mixed pastures.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 56., 2021, Florianópolis. Animal science: challenges in production and sustainability: proceedings... Brasília, DF: Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia, 2021. p. 108.$c2021
500 $aEvento virtual.
520 $aThe use of different forage species in a mixed pasture is recommended to improve forage mass and soil characteristics. However, the frequency of harvest (e.g.; grazing or hay) can increase the forage removal during the off-season, and affect the residual forage mass to the following crop, especially in the non-till crop-livestock systems. We aimed to assess the harvest frequency effect in a mixed pasture compounded by Urochloa ruziziensis, pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan ?Super N?); Sunflower (Helianthus annuus), and Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) on the residual forage mass at the Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril, in Sinop, MT, Brazil. The mixed were planted on March 10, 2020, after the soybean harvest. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design with three replicates. The treatments were four harvest frequencies. The harvesting frequencies were: Straw ? no-harvest during the off-season; Lax - with one harvest (at 115 days after planting); Moderate - two harvests (80 and 115 days after planting); and Heavy - three harvests (45, 80, and 115 days after The plots were harvested at 20-cm stubble height and there were not fertilized. On September 30, 2020, forage mass was harvested using three quadrats (0.5 m2) per plot, at soil level, to calculate residual forage mass, which was desiccated (4 L ha-1 of glyphosate) on October 23, 2020. The soybean (BG4781, Brevant) was seeded on November 07, when 88 kg of P2O5 was applied. On December 01, 68 kg of K surface-applied. The crop management practices (e.g.; herbicide, insecticide, and fungicide) were similar to all plots, and on March 09, 2021, the soybean was harvested (data not showed). The residual forage mass was affected by the harvesting frequency (P=0.0296). The greatest residual forage mass was measured in the treatment where there was no harvesting (straw), on average 5625 kg DM ha-1. On the other hand, lax, moderate and heavy treatments presented similar residual forage mass (on average, 3000 kg DM ha-1). We concluded that although the residual forage mass was reduced when the off-season pastures were harvested, the number of harvest events did not affect the forage mass left on the field to assure the non-till cropping system. It is important to mention the soybean grain yield needs to be measured in the following crop season to understand the effect of the harvesting frequency during the off-season.
650 $aCropping systems
650 $aHelianthus
650 $aLivestock
650 $aUrochloa ruziziensis
650 $aColheita
650 $aForragem
650 $aFungicida
650 $aHerbicida
650 $aInseticida
650 $aPastagem Mista
700 1 $aARAÚJO, G. P. de
700 1 $aBEHLING NETO, A.
700 1 $aWRUCK, F. J.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA JUNIOR, O. L. de
700 1 $aPEDREIRA, B. C. e
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril (CPAMT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
|
Data corrente: |
06/01/2021 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
03/12/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 2 |
|
Autoria: |
EVANGELISTA, D. K. R.; SOARES, M.; SOUSA, D. N. de; BELCHIOR, E. B.; NASCIMENTO, M. dos S. |
|
Afiliação: |
DANIELE KLOPPEL ROSA EVANGELISTA, CNPASA; MARIANA SOARES; DIEGO NEVES DE SOUSA, CNPASA; ERNANDES BARBOZA BELCHIOR, CNPASA; MARCELO DOS SANTOS NASCIMENTO. |
|
Título: |
Prospecção de ofertas tecnológicas e principais demandas da carcinicultura marinha brasileira. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Cadernos de Ciência & Tecnologia, v. 38, n. 1, e26763, 2021. |
|
ISSN: |
0104-1096 |
|
DOI: |
http://dx.doi.org/10.35977/0104-1096.cct2021.v38.26763 |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Notas: |
Título em inglês: Prospection of technological offers and main demands of Brazilian marine shrimp farming. |
|
Conteúdo: |
Resumo: Este trabalho tem como objetivo prospectar as inovações tecnológicas e as principais demandas da carcinicultura marinha brasileira. O estudo prospectivo foi realizado na XVI Feira Nacional do Camarão (Fenacam), no ano de 2019, utilizando-se de entrevistas. Entre os resultados, identificou-se que as empresas expositoras ofertaram produtos de ponta e insumos, e lançaram novas tecnologias direcionadas às novas tendências de cultivo. Temas como a importância das boas práticas de manejo, associadas a diferentes sistemas de cultivo e de biossegurança na produção, foram as principais tendências tecnológicas apresentadas para a carcinicultura. Abstract: This work aims to evaluate technological innovations and the main demands of Brazilian marine shrimp farming. The prospective study was carried out at the XVI Fenacam, a Brazilian national shrimp fair in 2019, using interviews. Among the results, it was identified that the exhibiting companies offered cutting-edge products and inputs, and launched new technologies aimed at new cultivation trends. Themes such as the importance of good management practices associated with different cultivation and biosafety systems in production were the main technological trends presented for shrimp farming. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Carcinicultura marinha; Inovação tecnológica; Prospecção tecnológica; Shrimp farming. |
|
Thesagro: |
Camarão; Carcinicultura; Inovação; Transferência de Tecnologia. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Innovation adoption; Shrimp culture; Technology transfer. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/219936/1/26763-128229-1-PB.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02425naa a2200337 a 4500
001 2132681
005 2021-12-03
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0104-1096
024 7 $ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.35977/0104-1096.cct2021.v38.26763$2DOI
100 1 $aEVANGELISTA, D. K. R.
245 $aProspecção de ofertas tecnológicas e principais demandas da carcinicultura marinha brasileira.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
500 $aTítulo em inglês: Prospection of technological offers and main demands of Brazilian marine shrimp farming.
520 $aResumo: Este trabalho tem como objetivo prospectar as inovações tecnológicas e as principais demandas da carcinicultura marinha brasileira. O estudo prospectivo foi realizado na XVI Feira Nacional do Camarão (Fenacam), no ano de 2019, utilizando-se de entrevistas. Entre os resultados, identificou-se que as empresas expositoras ofertaram produtos de ponta e insumos, e lançaram novas tecnologias direcionadas às novas tendências de cultivo. Temas como a importância das boas práticas de manejo, associadas a diferentes sistemas de cultivo e de biossegurança na produção, foram as principais tendências tecnológicas apresentadas para a carcinicultura. Abstract: This work aims to evaluate technological innovations and the main demands of Brazilian marine shrimp farming. The prospective study was carried out at the XVI Fenacam, a Brazilian national shrimp fair in 2019, using interviews. Among the results, it was identified that the exhibiting companies offered cutting-edge products and inputs, and launched new technologies aimed at new cultivation trends. Themes such as the importance of good management practices associated with different cultivation and biosafety systems in production were the main technological trends presented for shrimp farming.
650 $aInnovation adoption
650 $aShrimp culture
650 $aTechnology transfer
650 $aCamarão
650 $aCarcinicultura
650 $aInovação
650 $aTransferência de Tecnologia
653 $aCarcinicultura marinha
653 $aInovação tecnológica
653 $aProspecção tecnológica
653 $aShrimp farming
700 1 $aSOARES, M.
700 1 $aSOUSA, D. N. de
700 1 $aBELCHIOR, E. B.
700 1 $aNASCIMENTO, M. dos S.
773 $tCadernos de Ciência & Tecnologia$gv. 38, n. 1, e26763, 2021.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura (CNPASA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
