|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos. |
Data corrente: |
01/02/2016 |
Data da última atualização: |
01/12/2023 |
Autoria: |
NORDFELT, W.; NORDFELT, C. R.; FOOTE, W. C.; NELSON, E. A.; FOOTE, D. |
Título: |
Induced breeding in dairy goats by increased photoperiod. |
Ano de publicação: |
1982 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GOAT PRODUCTION AND DISEASE, 3., 1982, Tucson. Proceedings... Scottsdale: Dairy Goat Journal, 1982. p. 570. |
ISBN: |
0930848179 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
A project developed as part of the management procedure of Laurelwood Acres Dairy was conducted to induce spring and summer breeding. Yearling springborn does and mature bucks of all five common dairy breeds were exposed to 20 hours of continuous light daily (4 a.m. to 12 a.m.) for approximately 70 days during winter and spring. The bucks were placed with the does approximately six weeks after the end of the light treatment. Control animals consisted of spring-born does that were exposed to the bucks the following fall. The results of two years have been calculated. In 1978 135 does were light-treated from 26 January through 5 April. Estrual activity was first observed 25 May. Fifty-nine percent of the light-treated does kidded from 30 October to 15 December, 1978. The average number of kids per treated doe kidding was 1.2. Fifty control does were included in 1978 and 68 percent of these kidded the following spring. The average number of kids per control doe kidding was 1.5. In 1980, 119 does were light-treated from 2 February through 5 April. Estrual-activity began 22 May. Seventy-two percent of does kidded from 8 October to 21 December, 1980. The average number of kids per treated doe kidding was 1.4. As in the previous year, 68 percent of control does kidded the following spring. The average number of kids per control doe kidding was 1.4. Although no untreated does were exposed to bucks with those that were light-treated, concurrent research and experience have shown that kidding by untreated does exposed to bucks during spring and early summer rarely exceeds 5 percent. This work suggests that the light treatment given can cause conception rates during spring and summer comparable to those of untreated does during the regular fall breeding season MenosA project developed as part of the management procedure of Laurelwood Acres Dairy was conducted to induce spring and summer breeding. Yearling springborn does and mature bucks of all five common dairy breeds were exposed to 20 hours of continuous light daily (4 a.m. to 12 a.m.) for approximately 70 days during winter and spring. The bucks were placed with the does approximately six weeks after the end of the light treatment. Control animals consisted of spring-born does that were exposed to the bucks the following fall. The results of two years have been calculated. In 1978 135 does were light-treated from 26 January through 5 April. Estrual activity was first observed 25 May. Fifty-nine percent of the light-treated does kidded from 30 October to 15 December, 1978. The average number of kids per treated doe kidding was 1.2. Fifty control does were included in 1978 and 68 percent of these kidded the following spring. The average number of kids per control doe kidding was 1.5. In 1980, 119 does were light-treated from 2 February through 5 April. Estrual-activity began 22 May. Seventy-two percent of does kidded from 8 October to 21 December, 1980. The average number of kids per treated doe kidding was 1.4. As in the previous year, 68 percent of control does kidded the following spring. The average number of kids per control doe kidding was 1.4. Although no untreated does were exposed to bucks with those that were light-treated, concurrent research and experience have shown that... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Estacionalidade; Fotoperíodo; Medição do corpo; Photoperiodicity; Seasonality; USA. |
Thesagro: |
Caprino; Fotoperiodismo; Reprodução animal. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
Body measurements; Goats; Reproduction. |
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
Marc: |
LEADER 02680nam a2200313 a 4500 001 2035767 005 2023-12-01 008 1982 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 020 $a0930848179 100 1 $aNORDFELT, W. 245 $aInduced breeding in dairy goats by increased photoperiod. 260 $aIn: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GOAT PRODUCTION AND DISEASE, 3., 1982, Tucson. Proceedings... Scottsdale: Dairy Goat Journal, 1982. p. 570.$c1982 520 $aA project developed as part of the management procedure of Laurelwood Acres Dairy was conducted to induce spring and summer breeding. Yearling springborn does and mature bucks of all five common dairy breeds were exposed to 20 hours of continuous light daily (4 a.m. to 12 a.m.) for approximately 70 days during winter and spring. The bucks were placed with the does approximately six weeks after the end of the light treatment. Control animals consisted of spring-born does that were exposed to the bucks the following fall. The results of two years have been calculated. In 1978 135 does were light-treated from 26 January through 5 April. Estrual activity was first observed 25 May. Fifty-nine percent of the light-treated does kidded from 30 October to 15 December, 1978. The average number of kids per treated doe kidding was 1.2. Fifty control does were included in 1978 and 68 percent of these kidded the following spring. The average number of kids per control doe kidding was 1.5. In 1980, 119 does were light-treated from 2 February through 5 April. Estrual-activity began 22 May. Seventy-two percent of does kidded from 8 October to 21 December, 1980. The average number of kids per treated doe kidding was 1.4. As in the previous year, 68 percent of control does kidded the following spring. The average number of kids per control doe kidding was 1.4. Although no untreated does were exposed to bucks with those that were light-treated, concurrent research and experience have shown that kidding by untreated does exposed to bucks during spring and early summer rarely exceeds 5 percent. This work suggests that the light treatment given can cause conception rates during spring and summer comparable to those of untreated does during the regular fall breeding season 650 $aBody measurements 650 $aGoats 650 $aReproduction 650 $aCaprino 650 $aFotoperiodismo 650 $aReprodução animal 653 $aEstacionalidade 653 $aFotoperíodo 653 $aMedição do corpo 653 $aPhotoperiodicity 653 $aSeasonality 653 $aUSA 700 1 $aNORDFELT, C. R. 700 1 $aFOOTE, W. C. 700 1 $aNELSON, E. A. 700 1 $aFOOTE, D.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos (CNPC) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registros recuperados : 3 | |
3. | ![Imagem marcado/desmarcado](/consulta/web/img/desmarcado.png) | JOSHI, L. R.; MOHR, K. A.; CLEMENT, T.; HAIN, K. S.; MYERS, B.; YAROS, J.; NELSON, E. A.; HENNINGS, J. C; GAVA, D.; SCHAEFER, R.; CARON, L.; DEE, S.; DIEL, D. G. Detection of the emerging picornavirus senecavirus a in pigs, mice, and houseflies. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, v. 54, n. 6, p. 1536-1545, 2016.Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: A - 1 |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
| ![Visualizar detalhes do registro](/consulta/web/img/visualizar.png) ![Acesso restrito ao objeto digital](/consulta/web/img/lock.png) ![Imprime registro no formato completo](/consulta/web/img/print.png) |
Registros recuperados : 3 | |
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|