| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpaf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão; Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura. |
|
Data corrente: |
18/09/2013 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
19/09/2013 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
BORGHI, E.; CRUSCIOL, C. A. C.; NASCENTE, A. S.; SOUSA, V. V.; MARTINS, P. O.; MATEUS, G. P.; COSTA, C. |
|
Afiliação: |
EMERSON BORGHI, CNPASA; CARLOS ALEXANDRE COSTA CRUSCIOL, UNESP, Botucatu-SP; ADRIANO STEPHAN NASCENTE, CNPAF; V. V. SOUSA, UNESP, Botucatu-SP; PRISCILA OLIVEIRA MARTINS, UNESP, Botucatu-SP; GUSTAVO PAVAN MATEUS, APTA; CINIRO COSTA, UNESP, Botucatu-SP. |
|
Título: |
Sorghum grain yield, forage biomass production and revenue as affected by intercropping time. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2013 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
European Journal of Agronomy, v. 51, p. 130-139, 2013. |
|
ISSN: |
1161-0301 |
|
DOI: |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2013.08.006 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Sorghum is an excellent alternative to other grains in poor soil where corn does not develop very well,as well as in regions with warm and dry winters. Intercropping sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]with forage crops, such as palisade grass [Brachiaria brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich) Stapf] or guinea grass(Panicum maximum Jacq.), provides large amounts of biomass for use as straw in no-tillage systems or aspasture. However, it is important to determine the appropriate time at which these forage crops have tobe sown into sorghum systems to avoid reductions in both sorghum and forage production and to maxi-mize the revenue of the cropping system. This study, conducted for three growing seasons at Botucatu inthe State of São Paulo in Brazil, evaluated how nutrient concentration, yield components, sorghum grainyield, revenue, and forage crop dry matter production were affected by the timing of forage intercrop-ping. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design. Intercropping systems werenot found to cause reductions in the nutrient concentration in sorghum plants. The number of pani-cles per unit area of sorghum alone (133,600), intercropped sorghum and palisade grass (133,300) andintercropped sorghum and guinea grass (134,300) corresponded to sorghum grain yields of 5439, 5436and 5566 kg ha−1, respectively. However, the number of panicles per unit area of intercropped sorghumand palisade grass (144,700) and intercropped sorghum and guinea grass (145,000) with topdressingof fertilizers for the sorghum resulted in the highest sorghum grain yields (6238 and 6127 kg ha−1forintercropping with palisade grass and guinea grass, respectively). Forage production (8112, 10,972 and13,193 Mg ha−1for the first, second and third cuts, respectively) was highest when sorghum and guineagrass were intercropped. The timing of intercropping is an important factor in sorghum grain yield andforage production. Palisade grass or guinea grass must be intercropped with sorghum with topdressingfertilization to achieve the highest sorghum grain yield, but this significantly reduces the forage produc-tion. Intercropping sorghum with guinea grass sown simultaneously yielded the highest revenue per ha(1074.4), which was 2.4 times greater than the revenue achieved by sowing sorghum only. MenosSorghum is an excellent alternative to other grains in poor soil where corn does not develop very well,as well as in regions with warm and dry winters. Intercropping sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]with forage crops, such as palisade grass [Brachiaria brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich) Stapf] or guinea grass(Panicum maximum Jacq.), provides large amounts of biomass for use as straw in no-tillage systems or aspasture. However, it is important to determine the appropriate time at which these forage crops have tobe sown into sorghum systems to avoid reductions in both sorghum and forage production and to maxi-mize the revenue of the cropping system. This study, conducted for three growing seasons at Botucatu inthe State of São Paulo in Brazil, evaluated how nutrient concentration, yield components, sorghum grainyield, revenue, and forage crop dry matter production were affected by the timing of forage intercrop-ping. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design. Intercropping systems werenot found to cause reductions in the nutrient concentration in sorghum plants. The number of pani-cles per unit area of sorghum alone (133,600), intercropped sorghum and palisade grass (133,300) andintercropped sorghum and guinea grass (134,300) corresponded to sorghum grain yields of 5439, 5436and 5566 kg ha−1, respectively. However, the number of panicles per unit area of intercropped sorghumand palisade grass (144,700) and intercropped sorghum and guinea grass (145,0... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesagro: |
Biomassa; Brachiaria brizantha; Consorciação de cultura; Gramínea forrageira; Panicum maximum; Sorghum Bicolor; Sorgo. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Cropping systems; Forage; Intercropping; Urochloa brizantha. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03322naa a2200349 a 4500
001 1966661
005 2013-09-19
008 2013 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1161-0301
024 7 $ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2013.08.006$2DOI
100 1 $aBORGHI, E.
245 $aSorghum grain yield, forage biomass production and revenue as affected by intercropping time.
260 $c2013
520 $aSorghum is an excellent alternative to other grains in poor soil where corn does not develop very well,as well as in regions with warm and dry winters. Intercropping sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]with forage crops, such as palisade grass [Brachiaria brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich) Stapf] or guinea grass(Panicum maximum Jacq.), provides large amounts of biomass for use as straw in no-tillage systems or aspasture. However, it is important to determine the appropriate time at which these forage crops have tobe sown into sorghum systems to avoid reductions in both sorghum and forage production and to maxi-mize the revenue of the cropping system. This study, conducted for three growing seasons at Botucatu inthe State of São Paulo in Brazil, evaluated how nutrient concentration, yield components, sorghum grainyield, revenue, and forage crop dry matter production were affected by the timing of forage intercrop-ping. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design. Intercropping systems werenot found to cause reductions in the nutrient concentration in sorghum plants. The number of pani-cles per unit area of sorghum alone (133,600), intercropped sorghum and palisade grass (133,300) andintercropped sorghum and guinea grass (134,300) corresponded to sorghum grain yields of 5439, 5436and 5566 kg ha−1, respectively. However, the number of panicles per unit area of intercropped sorghumand palisade grass (144,700) and intercropped sorghum and guinea grass (145,000) with topdressingof fertilizers for the sorghum resulted in the highest sorghum grain yields (6238 and 6127 kg ha−1forintercropping with palisade grass and guinea grass, respectively). Forage production (8112, 10,972 and13,193 Mg ha−1for the first, second and third cuts, respectively) was highest when sorghum and guineagrass were intercropped. The timing of intercropping is an important factor in sorghum grain yield andforage production. Palisade grass or guinea grass must be intercropped with sorghum with topdressingfertilization to achieve the highest sorghum grain yield, but this significantly reduces the forage produc-tion. Intercropping sorghum with guinea grass sown simultaneously yielded the highest revenue per ha(1074.4), which was 2.4 times greater than the revenue achieved by sowing sorghum only.
650 $aCropping systems
650 $aForage
650 $aIntercropping
650 $aUrochloa brizantha
650 $aBiomassa
650 $aBrachiaria brizantha
650 $aConsorciação de cultura
650 $aGramínea forrageira
650 $aPanicum maximum
650 $aSorghum Bicolor
650 $aSorgo
700 1 $aCRUSCIOL, C. A. C.
700 1 $aNASCENTE, A. S.
700 1 $aSOUSA, V. V.
700 1 $aMARTINS, P. O.
700 1 $aMATEUS, G. P.
700 1 $aCOSTA, C.
773 $tEuropean Journal of Agronomy$gv. 51, p. 130-139, 2013.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura (CNPASA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Trigo. |
|
Data corrente: |
20/05/2010 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
05/11/2019 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
KOVALESKI, S.; DALMAGO, G. A.; TAZZO, I. F.; SANTI, A.; MÜLLER, A.; BOLIS, L. M.; KERBER, T. L.; SCHWEIG, E.; CUNHA, G. R. da; PIRES, J. L. F. |
|
Afiliação: |
Samuel Kovaleski, Estudante; GENEI ANTONIO DALMAGO, CNPT; Ivonete Fátima Tazzo, UPF; ANDERSON SANTI, CNPT; Alexandre Müller, Estudante; Laise Maria Bolis, Estudante; Tiago Luis Kerber, Estudante; Evandro Schweig, Estudante; GILBERTO ROCCA DA CUNHA, CNPT; JOAO LEONARDO FERNANDES PIRES, CNPT. |
|
Título: |
Filocrono de diferentes genótipos de canola cultivados a campo. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2009 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: MOSTRA DE INICIAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA DA EMBRAPA TRIGO, 5., 2009, Passo Fundo. Resumos... Passo Fundo: Embrapa Trigo, 2009. |
|
Páginas: |
1 p. html. |
|
Série: |
(Embrapa Trigo. Documentos online, 115). |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Thesagro: |
Fisiologia. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
URL: |
https://www.cnpt.embrapa.br/biblio/do/p_do115_13.htm
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00793naa a2200253 a 4500
001 1853671
005 2019-11-05
008 2009 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aKOVALESKI, S.
245 $aFilocrono de diferentes genótipos de canola cultivados a campo.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2009
300 $a1 p. html.
490 $a(Embrapa Trigo. Documentos online, 115).
650 $aFisiologia
700 1 $aDALMAGO, G. A.
700 1 $aTAZZO, I. F.
700 1 $aSANTI, A.
700 1 $aMÜLLER, A.
700 1 $aBOLIS, L. M.
700 1 $aKERBER, T. L.
700 1 $aSCHWEIG, E.
700 1 $aCUNHA, G. R. da
700 1 $aPIRES, J. L. F.
773 $tIn: MOSTRA DE INICIAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA DA EMBRAPA TRIGO, 5., 2009, Passo Fundo. Resumos... Passo Fundo: Embrapa Trigo, 2009.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Trigo (CNPT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
