|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos. |
Data corrente: |
07/04/2005 |
Data da última atualização: |
07/04/2005 |
Autoria: |
McEWAN, J. C.; MORRIS, C. A.; FENNESSY, P. F.; GREER, G. J.; BAIN, W. E.; HICKEY, S. M. |
Título: |
Selection for high or low backfat depth in coopworth sheep: breeding-ewe traits. |
Ano de publicação: |
2001 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Animal Science, v. 73, pt 2, p. 241-252, 2001 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
A breeding experiment in Coopworth sheep where selection was applied to backfat depth was evaluated after 14 years (1981-94). There were three self-replacing lines, two selected for increased or decreased subcutaneous fat depth, and an unselected control (average size = 51 ewes per line per year). Reproductive traits, ewe body weight and ewe fleece weight were monitored in each line as potential correlated responses. In the last 4 years studied, the fat (F), control (C) and lean (L) lines differed significantly in the proportion of ewes lambing (0-87, 0-93, 0-94 respectively), litter size at birth (1-64, 1-83 and 1-89), and lamb survival up to weaning, unadjusted for birth rank and sex (0-88,0-81 and 0-74). The overall reproductive trait, lambs weaned per ewe joined (1-22,1-33 and 1-26), did not differ significantly among lines. From pre-mating weights of ewes present in 1993 or 1994, means for mature ewes by line were 60-1, 62-4 and 63-3 kg, respectively (P < 0.01). Means for weight at scanning time (7 months of age) by line, as a proportion of mature weight were.: 0-533, 0-561 and 0-559, respectively (P < 0-05). There were also significant line differences in ewe fleece weights, with the 1993 and 1994 data averaging 3-93, 4-05 and 4-27 kg respectively (P < 0-01). For weight of lamb weaned per ewe weaning at least one lamb, the L line had a 0-09 higher mean proportionally than the F line (P < 0-05), but for a composite trait which was a weighted combination of weight of lambs weaned and ewe fleece weight per ewe joined (with ar without allowance for different ewe live weights), the L line was no longer significantly different from the F line. Repeatabilities and single-record heritabilities were also estimated for various ewe traits. The implications are that lean-Iamb selection would be associated with only small changes in net reproduction, ewe fleece weight and live weight, but larger differences would be expected from selection in the opposite direction. MenosA breeding experiment in Coopworth sheep where selection was applied to backfat depth was evaluated after 14 years (1981-94). There were three self-replacing lines, two selected for increased or decreased subcutaneous fat depth, and an unselected control (average size = 51 ewes per line per year). Reproductive traits, ewe body weight and ewe fleece weight were monitored in each line as potential correlated responses. In the last 4 years studied, the fat (F), control (C) and lean (L) lines differed significantly in the proportion of ewes lambing (0-87, 0-93, 0-94 respectively), litter size at birth (1-64, 1-83 and 1-89), and lamb survival up to weaning, unadjusted for birth rank and sex (0-88,0-81 and 0-74). The overall reproductive trait, lambs weaned per ewe joined (1-22,1-33 and 1-26), did not differ significantly among lines. From pre-mating weights of ewes present in 1993 or 1994, means for mature ewes by line were 60-1, 62-4 and 63-3 kg, respectively (P < 0.01). Means for weight at scanning time (7 months of age) by line, as a proportion of mature weight were.: 0-533, 0-561 and 0-559, respectively (P < 0-05). There were also significant line differences in ewe fleece weights, with the 1993 and 1994 data averaging 3-93, 4-05 and 4-27 kg respectively (P < 0-01). For weight of lamb weaned per ewe weaning at least one lamb, the L line had a 0-09 higher mean proportionally than the F line (P < 0-05), but for a composite trait which was a weighted combination of weight of lam... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Melhoramento genético; Toucinho. |
Thesagro: |
Carcaça; Ovino; Reprodução Animal. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
Marc: |
LEADER 02646naa a2200241 a 4500 001 1531089 005 2005-04-07 008 2001 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aMcEWAN, J. C. 245 $aSelection for high or low backfat depth in coopworth sheep$bbreeding-ewe traits. 260 $c2001 520 $aA breeding experiment in Coopworth sheep where selection was applied to backfat depth was evaluated after 14 years (1981-94). There were three self-replacing lines, two selected for increased or decreased subcutaneous fat depth, and an unselected control (average size = 51 ewes per line per year). Reproductive traits, ewe body weight and ewe fleece weight were monitored in each line as potential correlated responses. In the last 4 years studied, the fat (F), control (C) and lean (L) lines differed significantly in the proportion of ewes lambing (0-87, 0-93, 0-94 respectively), litter size at birth (1-64, 1-83 and 1-89), and lamb survival up to weaning, unadjusted for birth rank and sex (0-88,0-81 and 0-74). The overall reproductive trait, lambs weaned per ewe joined (1-22,1-33 and 1-26), did not differ significantly among lines. From pre-mating weights of ewes present in 1993 or 1994, means for mature ewes by line were 60-1, 62-4 and 63-3 kg, respectively (P < 0.01). Means for weight at scanning time (7 months of age) by line, as a proportion of mature weight were.: 0-533, 0-561 and 0-559, respectively (P < 0-05). There were also significant line differences in ewe fleece weights, with the 1993 and 1994 data averaging 3-93, 4-05 and 4-27 kg respectively (P < 0-01). For weight of lamb weaned per ewe weaning at least one lamb, the L line had a 0-09 higher mean proportionally than the F line (P < 0-05), but for a composite trait which was a weighted combination of weight of lambs weaned and ewe fleece weight per ewe joined (with ar without allowance for different ewe live weights), the L line was no longer significantly different from the F line. Repeatabilities and single-record heritabilities were also estimated for various ewe traits. The implications are that lean-Iamb selection would be associated with only small changes in net reproduction, ewe fleece weight and live weight, but larger differences would be expected from selection in the opposite direction. 650 $aCarcaça 650 $aOvino 650 $aReprodução Animal 653 $aMelhoramento genético 653 $aToucinho 700 1 $aMORRIS, C. A. 700 1 $aFENNESSY, P. F. 700 1 $aGREER, G. J. 700 1 $aBAIN, W. E. 700 1 $aHICKEY, S. M. 773 $tAnimal Science$gv. 73, pt 2, p. 241-252, 2001
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos (CNPC) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpaf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. |
Data corrente: |
18/10/1994 |
Data da última atualização: |
05/04/2005 |
Autoria: |
YOKOYAMA, M. |
Título: |
Manejo integrado de pragas da cultura do feijão. |
Ano de publicação: |
1991 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: SEMINÁRIO SOBRE PRAGAS E DOENÇAS DO FEIJOEIRO, 4., 1991, Campinas. Anais. Campinas: Secretaria da Agricultura e Abastecimento, 1991. |
Páginas: |
p. 51-54. |
Idioma: |
Português |
Palavras-Chave: |
Manejo Integrado. |
Thesagro: |
Feijão; Phaseolus Vulgaris; Praga. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
Marc: |
LEADER 00533naa a2200169 a 4500 001 1197600 005 2005-04-05 008 1991 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aYOKOYAMA, M. 245 $aManejo integrado de pragas da cultura do feijão. 260 $c1991 300 $ap. 51-54. 650 $aFeijão 650 $aPhaseolus Vulgaris 650 $aPraga 653 $aManejo Integrado 773 $tIn: SEMINÁRIO SOBRE PRAGAS E DOENÇAS DO FEIJOEIRO, 4., 1991, Campinas. Anais. Campinas: Secretaria da Agricultura e Abastecimento, 1991.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão (CNPAF) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|