| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Soja. |
|
Data corrente: |
07/11/2013 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
02/12/2013 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
CARDOSO, E. J. B. N.; VASCONCELLOS, R. L. F.; BINI, D.; MIYAUCHI, M. Y. H.; SANTOS, C. A. dos; ALVES, P. R. L.; PAULA, A. M. de; NAKATANI, A. S.; PEREIRA, J. de M.; NOGUEIRA, M. A. |
|
Afiliação: |
ELKE JURANDY BRAN NOGUEIRA CARDOSO, USP/ESALQ; RAFAEL LEANDRO FIGUEIREDO VASCONCELLOS, USP/ESALQ; DANIEL BINI, USP/ESALQ; MARINA YUMI HORTA MIYAUCHI, USP/ESALQ; CRISTIANE ALCANTARA DOS SANTOS, USP/ESALQ; PAULO ROGER LOPES ALVES, USP/ESALQ; ALESSANDRA MONTEIRO DE PAULA, UFPR; ANDRÉ SHIGUEYOSHI NAKATANI, USP/ESALQ; JAMIL DE MORAES PEREIRA, USP/ESALQ; MARCO ANTONIO NOGUEIRA, CNPSO. |
|
Título: |
Soil health: looking for suitable indicators. What should be considered to assess the effects of use and management on soil health? |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2013 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Scientia Agricola, Piracicaba, v. 70, n. 4, p. 274-289, July/Aug. 2013. |
|
DOI: |
10.1590/S0103-90162013000400009 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Soil Health refers to the ecological equilibrium and the functionality of a soil and its capacity to maintain a well balanced ecosystem with high biodiversity above and below surface, and productivity. To understand and use soil health as a tool for sustainability, physical, chemical, and biological properties must be employed to verify which respond to the soil use and management within a desired timescale. Attributes with a rapid response to natural or anthropogenic actions are considered good indicators of soil health. Among the physical indicators, soil texture, aggregation, moisture, porosity, and bulk density have been used, while among chemical indicators total C and N, mineral nutrients, organic matter, cation exchange capacity, among others are well established. However, most of them generally have a slow response, when compared to the biological ones, such as microbial biomass C and N, biodiversity, soil enzymes, soil respiration, etc., in addition to macro and mesofauna. Thus, a systemic approach based on different kinds of indicators (physical, chemical and biological) in assessing soil health would be safer than using only one kind of attribute. Many human activities have caused desertification, loss of biodiversity, disruption of aggregates, loss of organic matter and nutrients, among others. Today, it is imperious to maintain soil health and productivity with increasing emphasis on reforestation and recuperation of degraded areas through the use of organic amendments, reintroduction of plants, soil fauna and microorganisms. This review focused on an integrative view on indicators of soil health to be used as tools for prediction of sustainability in production systems. MenosSoil Health refers to the ecological equilibrium and the functionality of a soil and its capacity to maintain a well balanced ecosystem with high biodiversity above and below surface, and productivity. To understand and use soil health as a tool for sustainability, physical, chemical, and biological properties must be employed to verify which respond to the soil use and management within a desired timescale. Attributes with a rapid response to natural or anthropogenic actions are considered good indicators of soil health. Among the physical indicators, soil texture, aggregation, moisture, porosity, and bulk density have been used, while among chemical indicators total C and N, mineral nutrients, organic matter, cation exchange capacity, among others are well established. However, most of them generally have a slow response, when compared to the biological ones, such as microbial biomass C and N, biodiversity, soil enzymes, soil respiration, etc., in addition to macro and mesofauna. Thus, a systemic approach based on different kinds of indicators (physical, chemical and biological) in assessing soil health would be safer than using only one kind of attribute. Many human activities have caused desertification, loss of biodiversity, disruption of aggregates, loss of organic matter and nutrients, among others. Today, it is imperious to maintain soil health and productivity with increasing emphasis on reforestation and recuperation of degraded areas through the use of organic ame... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Saúde do solo. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/92114/1/Soil-health-looking-for-suitable-indicators.-What-should-be-considered-to-assess-the-effects-of-use-and-management-on-soil-health.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02547naa a2200253 a 4500
001 1970661
005 2013-12-02
008 2013 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1590/S0103-90162013000400009$2DOI
100 1 $aCARDOSO, E. J. B. N.
245 $aSoil health$blooking for suitable indicators. What should be considered to assess the effects of use and management on soil health?$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2013
520 $aSoil Health refers to the ecological equilibrium and the functionality of a soil and its capacity to maintain a well balanced ecosystem with high biodiversity above and below surface, and productivity. To understand and use soil health as a tool for sustainability, physical, chemical, and biological properties must be employed to verify which respond to the soil use and management within a desired timescale. Attributes with a rapid response to natural or anthropogenic actions are considered good indicators of soil health. Among the physical indicators, soil texture, aggregation, moisture, porosity, and bulk density have been used, while among chemical indicators total C and N, mineral nutrients, organic matter, cation exchange capacity, among others are well established. However, most of them generally have a slow response, when compared to the biological ones, such as microbial biomass C and N, biodiversity, soil enzymes, soil respiration, etc., in addition to macro and mesofauna. Thus, a systemic approach based on different kinds of indicators (physical, chemical and biological) in assessing soil health would be safer than using only one kind of attribute. Many human activities have caused desertification, loss of biodiversity, disruption of aggregates, loss of organic matter and nutrients, among others. Today, it is imperious to maintain soil health and productivity with increasing emphasis on reforestation and recuperation of degraded areas through the use of organic amendments, reintroduction of plants, soil fauna and microorganisms. This review focused on an integrative view on indicators of soil health to be used as tools for prediction of sustainability in production systems.
653 $aSaúde do solo
700 1 $aVASCONCELLOS, R. L. F.
700 1 $aBINI, D.
700 1 $aMIYAUCHI, M. Y. H.
700 1 $aSANTOS, C. A. dos
700 1 $aALVES, P. R. L.
700 1 $aPAULA, A. M. de
700 1 $aNAKATANI, A. S.
700 1 $aPEREIRA, J. de M.
700 1 $aNOGUEIRA, M. A.
773 $tScientia Agricola, Piracicaba$gv. 70, n. 4, p. 274-289, July/Aug. 2013.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Soja (CNPSO) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Milho e Sorgo; Embrapa Trigo. |
|
Data corrente: |
29/03/2021 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
22/06/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 5 |
|
Autoria: |
FONTANELI, R. S.; FONTANELI, R. S.; BONDAN, C.; SANTOS, H. P. dos; MACHADO, J. R. de A.; MANFRON, A. C. A.; ZENI, M.; LEAO, R. C.; PANISSON, F. T.; DALL’AGNOL, E. C.; ESCOBAR, F. M.; CEOLIN, M. E. T.; WEBBER, M. P. C. |
|
Afiliação: |
RENATO SERENA FONTANELI, CNPT; ROBERTO SERENA FONTANELI; CARLOS BONDAN; HENRIQUE PEREIRA DOS SANTOS, CNPT; JANE ROCRIGUES DE ASSIS MACHADO; ANGELICA CONSOLADORA ANDRADE MANFRON; MANUELE ZENI; RICARDO COSTA LEAO, CNPT; FRANCINE TALIA PANISSON; EMANUEL CASSOL DALL’AGNOL; FELIPE MARTINAZZO ESCOBAR; MARIA EDUARDA TRAMONTINI CEOLIN; MYLENA PALMA CONSOLI WEBBER. |
|
Título: |
Utilização estratégica de gramíneas anuais de verão para vazio forrageiro outonal e cobertura de solo. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Plantio Direto, n. 179, p.42-48, 2021. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
Culturas como milheto e sorgos são espécies de crescimento intensivo, altamente produtivos e de elevado valor nutritivo. Geralmente são estabelecidos em sucessão aos cereais de inverno e pastagens anuais, muito importantes para sistemas de produção intensivos principalmente para bovinos confinados, vacas leiteiras, novilhas e terneiras de reposição na região sul-brasileira. Na região tropical brasileira é cultivado na safrinha e como cobertura de solo. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Capim sudão; Forrageira. |
|
Thesagro: |
Milheto; Milho; Sorgo; Sorgo Forrageiro. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/222215/1/JAN-FEV-2021-RPD-179-UTILIZACAO-ESTRATEGICA-DE-GRAMINEAS-DE-VERAO-para-vazio-forrageiro-outonal-e-cobertura-de-solo.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01402naa a2200337 a 4500
001 2130948
005 2021-06-22
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aFONTANELI, R. S.
245 $aUtilização estratégica de gramíneas anuais de verão para vazio forrageiro outonal e cobertura de solo.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
520 $aCulturas como milheto e sorgos são espécies de crescimento intensivo, altamente produtivos e de elevado valor nutritivo. Geralmente são estabelecidos em sucessão aos cereais de inverno e pastagens anuais, muito importantes para sistemas de produção intensivos principalmente para bovinos confinados, vacas leiteiras, novilhas e terneiras de reposição na região sul-brasileira. Na região tropical brasileira é cultivado na safrinha e como cobertura de solo.
650 $aMilheto
650 $aMilho
650 $aSorgo
650 $aSorgo Forrageiro
653 $aCapim sudão
653 $aForrageira
700 1 $aFONTANELI, R. S.
700 1 $aBONDAN, C.
700 1 $aSANTOS, H. P. dos
700 1 $aMACHADO, J. R. de A.
700 1 $aMANFRON, A. C. A.
700 1 $aZENI, M.
700 1 $aLEAO, R. C.
700 1 $aPANISSON, F. T.
700 1 $aDALL’AGNOL, E. C.
700 1 $aESCOBAR, F. M.
700 1 $aCEOLIN, M. E. T.
700 1 $aWEBBER, M. P. C.
773 $tPlantio Direto$gn. 179, p.42-48, 2021.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Trigo (CNPT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
