| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
|
Data corrente: |
24/01/2023 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
14/03/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
PIRES, F. P. A. de A.; TOMICH, T. R.; PEREIRA, L. G. R.; MACHADO, F. S.; CAMPOS, M. M.; OLIVEIRA, A. F. de; MENEZES, G. L.; MENEZES, R. A. de; SOUSA, P. G. de; JAYME, D. G.; GONÇALVES, L. C. |
|
Afiliação: |
FREDERICO PATRUS ANANIAS DE ASSIS PIRES, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; THIERRY RIBEIRO TOMICH, CNPGL; LUIZ GUSTAVO RIBEIRO PEREIRA, CNPGL; FERNANDA SAMARINI MACHADO, CNPGL; MARIANA MAGALHAES CAMPOS, CNPGL; ALAN FIGUEIREDO DE OLIVEIRA, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; GUILHERME LOBATO MENEZES, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; RAFAEL ARAÚJO DE MENEZES, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; PAMELLA GROSSI DE SOUSA, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; DIOGO GONZAGA JAYME, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; LÚCIO CARLOS GONÇALVES, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. |
|
Título: |
Effect of the Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Lentilactobacillus buchneri on corn and sorghum silage quality and sheep energy partition under tropical conditions. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2023 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Grass and Forage Science, v. 78, p. 224-235, 2023. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12604 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
This study aimed to evaluate the silage quality, ingestive behaviour, and sheep energy partition fed corn and sorghum silages, with or without inoculation with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Lentilactobacillus buchneri. Whole plants of one dent corn hybrid (DCS), one flint corn hybrid (FCS), and one forage sorghum hybrid (SS) were ensiled with or without an inoculant containing L. plantarum and L. buchneri (4?×?105?CFU?g?1), totalling six treatments (3?×?2 factorial scheme). The treatments were ensiled in metal drums with 200?L capacity. The lactic acid concentrations in the inoculated FCS and DCS were higher by 13.4% and 12.8%, respectively, than those in the non-inoculated plants. In contrast, the lactic acid concentration in the inoculated SS was 23.1% lower than that in the non-inoculated SS. Furthermore, there were differences in pH and acetic acid concentrations only in SS, which were 2.3% and 45.2% higher, respectively, in inoculated silage than in non-inoculated silage. In inoculated DCS and SS, propionic acid concentrations were 1.7 times higher (for both silages), and 1-propanol was 3.7 and 1.8 times higher compared than those in non-inoculated silages. There was a main effect of the inoculant on 1,2-propanediol concentrations, which were 37.5% higher in inoculated silages than in non-inoculated silages. However, ingestive behaviour, heat and methane production, and silage net energy concentrations were not affected by inoculant use. Fermentative modifications caused by inoculation with L. plantarum and L. buchneri in whole plant corn or sorghum silage did not modify sheep energy partition. MenosThis study aimed to evaluate the silage quality, ingestive behaviour, and sheep energy partition fed corn and sorghum silages, with or without inoculation with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Lentilactobacillus buchneri. Whole plants of one dent corn hybrid (DCS), one flint corn hybrid (FCS), and one forage sorghum hybrid (SS) were ensiled with or without an inoculant containing L. plantarum and L. buchneri (4?×?105?CFU?g?1), totalling six treatments (3?×?2 factorial scheme). The treatments were ensiled in metal drums with 200?L capacity. The lactic acid concentrations in the inoculated FCS and DCS were higher by 13.4% and 12.8%, respectively, than those in the non-inoculated plants. In contrast, the lactic acid concentration in the inoculated SS was 23.1% lower than that in the non-inoculated SS. Furthermore, there were differences in pH and acetic acid concentrations only in SS, which were 2.3% and 45.2% higher, respectively, in inoculated silage than in non-inoculated silage. In inoculated DCS and SS, propionic acid concentrations were 1.7 times higher (for both silages), and 1-propanol was 3.7 and 1.8 times higher compared than those in non-inoculated silages. There was a main effect of the inoculant on 1,2-propanediol concentrations, which were 37.5% higher in inoculated silages than in non-inoculated silages. However, ingestive behaviour, heat and methane production, and silage net energy concentrations were not affected by inoculant use. Fermentative modifications c... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Respirometria. |
|
Thesagro: |
Metano; Milho; Ovino; Silagem; Sorgo. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Methane. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/247756/1/Effect-of-the-Lactiplantibacillus-plantarum.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02643naa a2200337 a 4500
001 2151180
005 2023-03-14
008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12604$2DOI
100 1 $aPIRES, F. P. A. de A.
245 $aEffect of the Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Lentilactobacillus buchneri on corn and sorghum silage quality and sheep energy partition under tropical conditions.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2023
520 $aThis study aimed to evaluate the silage quality, ingestive behaviour, and sheep energy partition fed corn and sorghum silages, with or without inoculation with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Lentilactobacillus buchneri. Whole plants of one dent corn hybrid (DCS), one flint corn hybrid (FCS), and one forage sorghum hybrid (SS) were ensiled with or without an inoculant containing L. plantarum and L. buchneri (4?×?105?CFU?g?1), totalling six treatments (3?×?2 factorial scheme). The treatments were ensiled in metal drums with 200?L capacity. The lactic acid concentrations in the inoculated FCS and DCS were higher by 13.4% and 12.8%, respectively, than those in the non-inoculated plants. In contrast, the lactic acid concentration in the inoculated SS was 23.1% lower than that in the non-inoculated SS. Furthermore, there were differences in pH and acetic acid concentrations only in SS, which were 2.3% and 45.2% higher, respectively, in inoculated silage than in non-inoculated silage. In inoculated DCS and SS, propionic acid concentrations were 1.7 times higher (for both silages), and 1-propanol was 3.7 and 1.8 times higher compared than those in non-inoculated silages. There was a main effect of the inoculant on 1,2-propanediol concentrations, which were 37.5% higher in inoculated silages than in non-inoculated silages. However, ingestive behaviour, heat and methane production, and silage net energy concentrations were not affected by inoculant use. Fermentative modifications caused by inoculation with L. plantarum and L. buchneri in whole plant corn or sorghum silage did not modify sheep energy partition.
650 $aMethane
650 $aMetano
650 $aMilho
650 $aOvino
650 $aSilagem
650 $aSorgo
653 $aRespirometria
700 1 $aTOMICH, T. R.
700 1 $aPEREIRA, L. G. R.
700 1 $aMACHADO, F. S.
700 1 $aCAMPOS, M. M.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, A. F. de
700 1 $aMENEZES, G. L.
700 1 $aMENEZES, R. A. de
700 1 $aSOUSA, P. G. de
700 1 $aJAYME, D. G.
700 1 $aGONÇALVES, L. C.
773 $tGrass and Forage Science$gv. 78, p. 224-235, 2023.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Gado de Leite (CNPGL) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Instrumentação. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpdia.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Instrumentação. |
|
Data corrente: |
28/09/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
23/01/2024 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
GORANOV, A. I.; TADINI, A. M.; MARTIN NETO, L.; BERNARDI, A. C. de C.; PEZZOPANE, J. R. M.; MILORI, D. M. B. P.; MOUNIER, S.; HATCHER, P. G. |
|
Afiliação: |
LADISLAU MARTIN NETO, CNPDIA; ALBERTO CARLOS DE CAMPOS BERNARDI, CPPSE; JOSE RICARDO MACEDO PEZZOPANE, CPPSE; DEBORA MARCONDES BASTOS PEREIRA, CNPDIA. |
|
Título: |
Comparison of sample preparation techniques for the (--)ESI-FT-ICR-MS analysis of humic and fulvic acids. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Environmental Science & Technology, v. 56, 2022. |
|
Páginas: |
12688 - 12701 |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c01125 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
: Soil organic matter (SOM) plays a key role in the global carbon and nitrogen cycles. Soil biogeochemistry is regularly studied by extracting the base-soluble fractions of SOM: acidinsoluble humic acid (HA) and acid-soluble fulvic acid (FA). Electrospray ionization−Fourier transform−ion cyclotron resonance−mass spectrometry (ESI-FT-ICR-MS) is commonly utilized for molecularly characterizing these fractions. Different sample preparation techniques exist for the analysis of HA and FA though questions remain regarding data comparability following different preparations. Comparisons of different sample preparation techniques here revealed that the negative-mode ESI-FT-ICRMS analytical window can be skewed to detect different groups of molecules, with primary differences in oxygenation, aromaticity, and molecular weight. It was also observed that HA and FA from soils versus an aquatic matrix behaved very differently. Thus, we conclude that sample preparation techniques determined to be ?most optimal? in our study are in no way universal. We recommend that future studies of HA and FA involve similar comparative studies for determining the most suitable sample preparation technique for their particular type of HA or FA matrices. This will enhance data comparability among different studies and environmental systems and ultimately allow us to better understand the complex composition of environmental matrices. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Data comparability; Electrospray ionization; FT-ICR-MS; Organic matter characterization. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02315naa a2200277 a 4500
001 2146932
005 2024-01-23
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c01125$2DOI
100 1 $aGORANOV, A. I.
245 $aComparison of sample preparation techniques for the (--)ESI-FT-ICR-MS analysis of humic and fulvic acids.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
300 $a12688 - 12701
520 $a: Soil organic matter (SOM) plays a key role in the global carbon and nitrogen cycles. Soil biogeochemistry is regularly studied by extracting the base-soluble fractions of SOM: acidinsoluble humic acid (HA) and acid-soluble fulvic acid (FA). Electrospray ionization−Fourier transform−ion cyclotron resonance−mass spectrometry (ESI-FT-ICR-MS) is commonly utilized for molecularly characterizing these fractions. Different sample preparation techniques exist for the analysis of HA and FA though questions remain regarding data comparability following different preparations. Comparisons of different sample preparation techniques here revealed that the negative-mode ESI-FT-ICRMS analytical window can be skewed to detect different groups of molecules, with primary differences in oxygenation, aromaticity, and molecular weight. It was also observed that HA and FA from soils versus an aquatic matrix behaved very differently. Thus, we conclude that sample preparation techniques determined to be ?most optimal? in our study are in no way universal. We recommend that future studies of HA and FA involve similar comparative studies for determining the most suitable sample preparation technique for their particular type of HA or FA matrices. This will enhance data comparability among different studies and environmental systems and ultimately allow us to better understand the complex composition of environmental matrices.
653 $aData comparability
653 $aElectrospray ionization
653 $aFT-ICR-MS
653 $aOrganic matter characterization
700 1 $aTADINI, A. M.
700 1 $aMARTIN NETO, L.
700 1 $aBERNARDI, A. C. de C.
700 1 $aPEZZOPANE, J. R. M.
700 1 $aMILORI, D. M. B. P.
700 1 $aMOUNIER, S.
700 1 $aHATCHER, P. G.
773 $tEnvironmental Science & Technology$gv. 56, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Instrumentação (CNPDIA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
