| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 9 | |
| 1. |  | MENANDRO, M. de S.; NASSUR, C. A. Programa de extensão para recomposição florestal. In: CONGRESSO FLORESTAL PANAMERICANO, 1.; CONGRESSO FLORESTAL BRASILEIRO, 7., 1993, Curitiba. Floresta para o Desenvolvimento: Política, Ambiente, Tecnologia e Mercado: anais. São Paulo: SBS; [S.l.]: SBEF, 1993. v.2, p.722.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
|   |
| 3. | | JESUS, R. M. de; DIAS, G. B. N.; CARDOSO, E. M.; MENANDRO, M. de S. Enriquecimento em matas degradadas e em formação de menor potencial. Silvicultura em São Paulo, São Paulo, v. 16-A, pt. 2, p. 831-836, 1982. Edição dos Anais do Congresso Nacional sobre Essências Nativas, 1982, Campos do Jordão.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
| 4. | | NASSUR, C. A.; ALMEIDA, A. C. de; CASTRO, A. G.; MENANDRO, M. de S. Modelos para recuperacao de areas ciliares. In: CONGRESSO FLORESTAL PANAMERICANO, 1.; CONGRESSO FLORESTAL BRASILEIRO, 7., 1993, Curitiba. Floresta para o Desenvolvimento: Política, Ambiente, Tecnologia e Mercado: anais. São Paulo: SBS; [S.l.]: SBEF, 1993. v.2, p.718.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
| 7. | | FARIA, S. M. de; FRANCO, A. A.; JESUS, R. M. de; MENANDRO, M. de S.; BAITELLO, J. B.; MUCCI, E. S. F.; DÖBEREINER, Johanna; SPRENT, J. I. New nodulating legume trees from South-East Brazil. New Phytologist, London, v. 98, p. 317-328, 1984.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrobiologia. |
| |
| 8. | | FARIA, S. M. DE; FRANCO, A. A.; JESUS, R. M. DE; MENANDRO, M. DE S.; BAITELLO, J. B.; MUCCI, E. S. F.; DOBEREINER, J.; SPRENT, J. I. New nodulating legume trees from South-East Brazil. New Phytol., v.98, p.317-328, 1984.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrobiologia. |
| |
| 9. | | FARIA, S. M. de; FRANCO, A. A.; JESUS, R. M. de; MENANDRO, M. de S.; BATELLO, J. B.; MUCCI, E. S. F.; DOBEREINER, J.; SPRENT, J. I. New nodulating legume trees from southeast Brazil. New Phytologist, v.98, p.317-328, 1984.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 9 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Solos. |
|
Data corrente: |
27/11/2018 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
11/11/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
AGUIAR, N. O.; OLIVARES, F. L.; NOVOTNY, E. H.; CANELLAS, L. P. |
|
Afiliação: |
NATALIA O. AGUIAR, UENF; FABIO L. OLIVARES, UENF; ETELVINO HENRIQUE NOVOTNY, CNPS; LUCIANO P. CANELLAS, UENF. |
|
Título: |
Changes in metabolic profiling of sugarcane leaves induced by endophytic diazotrophic bacteria and humic acids. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2018 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
PeerJ, v. 6, article e5445, 2018. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5445 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) and humic acids (HA) have been used as biostimulants in field conditions. The complete genomic and proteomic transcription of Herbaspirillum seropedicae and Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus is available but interpreting and utilizing this information in the field to increase crop performance is challenging. The identification and characterization of metabolites that are induced by genomic changes may be used to improve plant responses to inoculation. The objective of this study was to describe changes in sugarcane metabolic profile that occur when HA and PGPB are used as biostimulants. Inoculum was applied to soil containing 45-day old sugarcane stalks. One week after inoculation, the methanolic extracts from leaves were obtained and analyzed by gas chromatography coupled to time-of-flight mass spectrometry; a total of 1,880 compounds were observed and 280 were identified in all samples. The application of HA significantly decreased the concentration of 15 metabolites, which generally included amino acids. HA increased the levels of 40 compounds, and these included metabolites linked to the stress response (shikimic, caffeic, hydroxycinnamic acids, putrescine, behenic acid, quinoline xylulose, galactose, lactose proline, oxyproline and valeric acid) and cellular growth (adenine and adenosine derivatives, ribose, ribonic acid and citric acid). Similarly, PGPB enhanced the level of metabolites identified in HA-treated soils; e.g., 48 metabolites were elevated and included amino acids, nucleic acids, organic acids, and lipids. Co-inoculation (HACPGPB) boosted the level of 110 metabolites with respect to non-inoculated controls; these included amino acids, lipids and nitrogenous compounds. Changes in the metabolic profile induced by HA+PGPB influenced both glucose and pentose pathways and resulted in the accumulation of heptuloses and riboses, which are substrates in the nucleoside biosynthesis and shikimic acid pathways. The mevalonate pathway was also activated, thus increasing phytosterol synthesis. The improvement in cellular metabolism observed with PGPB+HA was compatible with high levels of vitamins. Glucuronate and amino sugars were stimulated in addition to the products and intermediary compounds of tricarboxylic acid metabolism. Lipids and amino acids were the main compounds induced by co-inoculation in addition to antioxidants, stress-related metabolites, and compounds involved in cellular redox. The primary compounds observed in each treatment were identified, and the effect of co-inoculation (HACPGPB) on metabolite levels was discussed. MenosPlant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) and humic acids (HA) have been used as biostimulants in field conditions. The complete genomic and proteomic transcription of Herbaspirillum seropedicae and Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus is available but interpreting and utilizing this information in the field to increase crop performance is challenging. The identification and characterization of metabolites that are induced by genomic changes may be used to improve plant responses to inoculation. The objective of this study was to describe changes in sugarcane metabolic profile that occur when HA and PGPB are used as biostimulants. Inoculum was applied to soil containing 45-day old sugarcane stalks. One week after inoculation, the methanolic extracts from leaves were obtained and analyzed by gas chromatography coupled to time-of-flight mass spectrometry; a total of 1,880 compounds were observed and 280 were identified in all samples. The application of HA significantly decreased the concentration of 15 metabolites, which generally included amino acids. HA increased the levels of 40 compounds, and these included metabolites linked to the stress response (shikimic, caffeic, hydroxycinnamic acids, putrescine, behenic acid, quinoline xylulose, galactose, lactose proline, oxyproline and valeric acid) and cellular growth (adenine and adenosine derivatives, ribose, ribonic acid and citric acid). Similarly, PGPB enhanced the level of metabolites identified in HA-treated soils; e.g., 48 meta... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Bactéria fixadora de nitrogênio; Bioestimulante; Promoção do crescimento vegetal; Substância húmica. |
|
Thesagro: |
Biofertilizante. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Biofertilizers; Humic substances; Metabolomics; Nitrogen-fixing bacteria; Plant growth. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/187136/1/2018-053.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03533naa a2200289 a 4500
001 2100181
005 2021-11-11
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5445$2DOI
100 1 $aAGUIAR, N. O.
245 $aChanges in metabolic profiling of sugarcane leaves induced by endophytic diazotrophic bacteria and humic acids.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
520 $aPlant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) and humic acids (HA) have been used as biostimulants in field conditions. The complete genomic and proteomic transcription of Herbaspirillum seropedicae and Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus is available but interpreting and utilizing this information in the field to increase crop performance is challenging. The identification and characterization of metabolites that are induced by genomic changes may be used to improve plant responses to inoculation. The objective of this study was to describe changes in sugarcane metabolic profile that occur when HA and PGPB are used as biostimulants. Inoculum was applied to soil containing 45-day old sugarcane stalks. One week after inoculation, the methanolic extracts from leaves were obtained and analyzed by gas chromatography coupled to time-of-flight mass spectrometry; a total of 1,880 compounds were observed and 280 were identified in all samples. The application of HA significantly decreased the concentration of 15 metabolites, which generally included amino acids. HA increased the levels of 40 compounds, and these included metabolites linked to the stress response (shikimic, caffeic, hydroxycinnamic acids, putrescine, behenic acid, quinoline xylulose, galactose, lactose proline, oxyproline and valeric acid) and cellular growth (adenine and adenosine derivatives, ribose, ribonic acid and citric acid). Similarly, PGPB enhanced the level of metabolites identified in HA-treated soils; e.g., 48 metabolites were elevated and included amino acids, nucleic acids, organic acids, and lipids. Co-inoculation (HACPGPB) boosted the level of 110 metabolites with respect to non-inoculated controls; these included amino acids, lipids and nitrogenous compounds. Changes in the metabolic profile induced by HA+PGPB influenced both glucose and pentose pathways and resulted in the accumulation of heptuloses and riboses, which are substrates in the nucleoside biosynthesis and shikimic acid pathways. The mevalonate pathway was also activated, thus increasing phytosterol synthesis. The improvement in cellular metabolism observed with PGPB+HA was compatible with high levels of vitamins. Glucuronate and amino sugars were stimulated in addition to the products and intermediary compounds of tricarboxylic acid metabolism. Lipids and amino acids were the main compounds induced by co-inoculation in addition to antioxidants, stress-related metabolites, and compounds involved in cellular redox. The primary compounds observed in each treatment were identified, and the effect of co-inoculation (HACPGPB) on metabolite levels was discussed.
650 $aBiofertilizers
650 $aHumic substances
650 $aMetabolomics
650 $aNitrogen-fixing bacteria
650 $aPlant growth
650 $aBiofertilizante
653 $aBactéria fixadora de nitrogênio
653 $aBioestimulante
653 $aPromoção do crescimento vegetal
653 $aSubstância húmica
700 1 $aOLIVARES, F. L.
700 1 $aNOVOTNY, E. H.
700 1 $aCANELLAS, L. P.
773 $tPeerJ$gv. 6, article e5445, 2018.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Solos (CNPS) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
