| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
|
Data corrente: |
20/11/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
20/05/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Nota Técnica/Nota Científica |
|
Autoria: |
MELLO, L. M. R. de; SANTOS, A. C. C. dos. |
|
Afiliação: |
LOIVA MARIA RIBEIRO DE MELLO, CNPUV; ANDRE CARLOS CAU DOS SANTOS, CNPUV. |
|
Título: |
Novas Cultivares de uvas sem sementes BRS Vitória e BRS Isis: Relatório de avaliação dos impactos de tecnologias geradas pela Embrapa 2019-2020. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Bento Gonçalves, RS: Embrapa Uva e Vinho, Jan. 2020. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
O programa de melhoramento genético de uva foi estruturado visando atender às demandas do Setor vitivinícola, com olhar no mercado a prazo mais longo e na sustentabilidade da vitivinicultura. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
BRS Isis; BRS Vitória; Cultivares; Uvas sem sementes; Vale do São Francisco. |
|
Thesagro: |
Uva; Variedade. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/218050/1/Rel.Tec.2020-uvaevinho-brsisisbrsvitoria.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00869nam a2200205 a 4500
001 2126882
005 2021-05-20
008 2020 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d
100 1 $aMELLO, L. M. R. de
245 $aNovas Cultivares de uvas sem sementes BRS Vitória e BRS Isis$bRelatório de avaliação dos impactos de tecnologias geradas pela Embrapa 2019-2020.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aBento Gonçalves, RS: Embrapa Uva e Vinho, Jan. 2020.$c2020
520 $aO programa de melhoramento genético de uva foi estruturado visando atender às demandas do Setor vitivinícola, com olhar no mercado a prazo mais longo e na sustentabilidade da vitivinicultura.
650 $aUva
650 $aVariedade
653 $aBRS Isis
653 $aBRS Vitória
653 $aCultivares
653 $aUvas sem sementes
653 $aVale do São Francisco
700 1 $aSANTOS, A. C. C. dos
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Uva e Vinho (CNPUV) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos. |
|
Data corrente: |
21/05/2008 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
04/12/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
WANDER, A. E.; MAGALHÃES, M. C.; VEDOVOTO, G. L.; MARTINS, E. C. |
|
Afiliação: |
Alcido Elenor Wander, CNPC; GRACIELA LUZIA VEDOVOTO, SGE; ESPEDITO CEZARIO MARTINS, CNPC. |
|
Título: |
Using the economic surplus method to assess economic impacts of new technologies: case studies of Embrapa. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2004 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: CONFERENCE ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOR DEVELOPMENT, 2004, Berlin. Book of abstracts... Berlin: International Research on Food Security, Natural Resource Management and Rural Development, 2004. 10 f. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Abstract - Assessment of economic impacts of new technologies delivers helpful information to justify investment efforts in research and development to generate new technologies. In Brazilian agricultural research and development, it?s a convention to assess economic impacts of technologies generated and adapted by EMBRAPA. As soon as new technologies are adopted, expost assessment is conducted to evaluate net benefits of its adoption. In agricultural research, the economic surplus method represents one of the suitable frameworks to measure the aggregated social benefits of a research project. With this method it is possible to estimate the return of investments by calculating a variation of consumer and producer surplus through a technological change originated by research results. Therefore, in a first step the gain of adoption i.e., increases in productivity, quality improvements, cost reduction etc. is estimated. In a second step, costs involved in generation and adaptation of the technology are enumerated. The difference between the gains and the costs of generation and transfer represents the net benefit of the technology, explained by the net present value, the internal rate of return and the benefit-costratio. The so far obtained results serve as additional information for each technology to improve its adoption by beneficiaries and to enable access to the new financing sources. Some examples of such technologies are (a) the finishing of lambs in confinement in the Brazilian semi-arid Northeast during the dry season, when feeding resources are scarce and the lamb meat prices are high; (b) strategic vermifugation of goats herds and sheep flocks in the Brazilian semi-arid areas; (c) standardized cuts for goat and sheep carcass and (d) enrichment of the native pastures in Brazilian Northeast with Cynodon dactylon for sheep production. The assessment of the economic impacts of these technologies estimated positive net present values for all four considered technologies, internal rates of return of 26.2% (a), 13.8% (b), 52.8% (c) and 31.0% (d) and the benefit-cost-ratios of 2.92 (a), 1.19 (b), 11.64 (c) and 3.37 (d). MenosAbstract - Assessment of economic impacts of new technologies delivers helpful information to justify investment efforts in research and development to generate new technologies. In Brazilian agricultural research and development, it?s a convention to assess economic impacts of technologies generated and adapted by EMBRAPA. As soon as new technologies are adopted, expost assessment is conducted to evaluate net benefits of its adoption. In agricultural research, the economic surplus method represents one of the suitable frameworks to measure the aggregated social benefits of a research project. With this method it is possible to estimate the return of investments by calculating a variation of consumer and producer surplus through a technological change originated by research results. Therefore, in a first step the gain of adoption i.e., increases in productivity, quality improvements, cost reduction etc. is estimated. In a second step, costs involved in generation and adaptation of the technology are enumerated. The difference between the gains and the costs of generation and transfer represents the net benefit of the technology, explained by the net present value, the internal rate of return and the benefit-costratio. The so far obtained results serve as additional information for each technology to improve its adoption by beneficiaries and to enable access to the new financing sources. Some examples of such technologies are (a) the finishing of lambs in confinement in the B... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Adoção de tecnologia; Avaliação de impactos; Avaliação econômica; Brasil; Embrapa; Environmental impact assessment; Fattening; Semiárido. |
|
Thesagro: |
Adoção de inovações; Análise de Risco; Análise econômica; Confinamento; Cordeiro; Impacto ambiental; Impacto econômico; Ovino; Terminação. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Brazil; Innovation adoption; Lambs; Risk analysis; Semiarid zones; Sheep; Technology transfer. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
B Sociologia Rural |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/50772/1/AAC-Using-the-economic.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03559nam a2200433 a 4500
001 1534035
005 2023-12-04
008 2004 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aWANDER, A. E.
245 $aUsing the economic surplus method to assess economic impacts of new technologies$bcase studies of Embrapa.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: CONFERENCE ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOR DEVELOPMENT, 2004, Berlin. Book of abstracts... Berlin: International Research on Food Security, Natural Resource Management and Rural Development, 2004. 10 f.$c2004
520 $aAbstract - Assessment of economic impacts of new technologies delivers helpful information to justify investment efforts in research and development to generate new technologies. In Brazilian agricultural research and development, it?s a convention to assess economic impacts of technologies generated and adapted by EMBRAPA. As soon as new technologies are adopted, expost assessment is conducted to evaluate net benefits of its adoption. In agricultural research, the economic surplus method represents one of the suitable frameworks to measure the aggregated social benefits of a research project. With this method it is possible to estimate the return of investments by calculating a variation of consumer and producer surplus through a technological change originated by research results. Therefore, in a first step the gain of adoption i.e., increases in productivity, quality improvements, cost reduction etc. is estimated. In a second step, costs involved in generation and adaptation of the technology are enumerated. The difference between the gains and the costs of generation and transfer represents the net benefit of the technology, explained by the net present value, the internal rate of return and the benefit-costratio. The so far obtained results serve as additional information for each technology to improve its adoption by beneficiaries and to enable access to the new financing sources. Some examples of such technologies are (a) the finishing of lambs in confinement in the Brazilian semi-arid Northeast during the dry season, when feeding resources are scarce and the lamb meat prices are high; (b) strategic vermifugation of goats herds and sheep flocks in the Brazilian semi-arid areas; (c) standardized cuts for goat and sheep carcass and (d) enrichment of the native pastures in Brazilian Northeast with Cynodon dactylon for sheep production. The assessment of the economic impacts of these technologies estimated positive net present values for all four considered technologies, internal rates of return of 26.2% (a), 13.8% (b), 52.8% (c) and 31.0% (d) and the benefit-cost-ratios of 2.92 (a), 1.19 (b), 11.64 (c) and 3.37 (d).
650 $aBrazil
650 $aInnovation adoption
650 $aLambs
650 $aRisk analysis
650 $aSemiarid zones
650 $aSheep
650 $aTechnology transfer
650 $aAdoção de inovações
650 $aAnálise de Risco
650 $aAnálise econômica
650 $aConfinamento
650 $aCordeiro
650 $aImpacto ambiental
650 $aImpacto econômico
650 $aOvino
650 $aTerminação
653 $aAdoção de tecnologia
653 $aAvaliação de impactos
653 $aAvaliação econômica
653 $aBrasil
653 $aEmbrapa
653 $aEnvironmental impact assessment
653 $aFattening
653 $aSemiárido
700 1 $aMAGALHÃES, M. C.
700 1 $aVEDOVOTO, G. L.
700 1 $aMARTINS, E. C.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos (CNPC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
