| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Soja. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com valeria.cardoso@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Soja. |
|
Data corrente: |
14/03/2018 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
07/05/2018 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
GODOY, C. V.; GRIGOLLI, J. F. J.; MOREIRA, E. N.; CAMPOS, H. D.; DEUNER, C.; MARTINS, M. C. |
|
Afiliação: |
CLAUDIA VIEIRA GODOY, CNPSO; FUNDAÇÃO MS; FACEM; UNIRV; UPF; CÍRCULO VERDE. |
|
Título: |
Eterna vilã. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2018 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Cultivar: grandes culturas, v. 18, n. 225, p. 14-18, fev. 2018. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Thesagro: |
Doença de planta; Ferrugem; Fungo; Phakopsora pachyrhizi; Soja. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Microbial growth; Plant diseases and disorders; Soybean rust. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
X Pesquisa, Tecnologia e Engenharia |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00706naa a2200265 a 4500
001 2089078
005 2018-05-07
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aGODOY, C. V.
245 $aEterna vilã.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
650 $aMicrobial growth
650 $aPlant diseases and disorders
650 $aSoybean rust
650 $aDoença de planta
650 $aFerrugem
650 $aFungo
650 $aPhakopsora pachyrhizi
650 $aSoja
700 1 $aGRIGOLLI, J. F. J.
700 1 $aMOREIRA, E. N.
700 1 $aCAMPOS, H. D.
700 1 $aDEUNER, C.
700 1 $aMARTINS, M. C.
773 $tCultivar: grandes culturas$gv. 18, n. 225, p. 14-18, fev. 2018.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Soja (CNPSO) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpaf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura. |
|
Data corrente: |
07/02/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
07/02/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
PINHO, S. M.; FLORES, R. M. V.; DAVID, L. H.; EMERENCIANO, M. G. C.; QUAGRAINIE, K. K.; PORTELLA, M. C. |
|
Afiliação: |
SARA M. PINHO, UNESP, Jaboticabal-SP; ROBERTO MANOLIO VALLADAO FLORES, CNPASA; LUIZ H. DAVID, UNESP, Jaboticabal-SP; MAURICIO G. C. EMERENCIANO, UDESC; KWAMENA K. QUAGRAINIE, PURDUE UNIVERSITY; MARIA CELIA PORTELLA, UNESP, Jaboticabal-SP. |
|
Título: |
Economic comparison between conventional aquaponics and FLOCponics systems. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Aquaculture, v. 552, 737987, Apr. 2022. |
|
ISSN: |
0044-8486 |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.737987 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Biofloc-based fish production involves a dense microbial co-culture that supports nutrient cycling, generally reducing the amount of feed utilized and the need for mechanic and biological filters. These technical benefits of biofloc technology can lower the costs compared to traditional intensive techniques such as recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS). The RAS is conventionally adopted to integrated fish-plant production in aquaponics systems, and recent studies demonstrated the potential for integrating biofloc technology and hydroponics production in FLOCponics systems. The present study compared the economic viability for integrated agri-aquaculture production of tilapia juveniles and lettuce in FLOCponics (FP) and conventional aquaponics (AP) systems. The study was developed as an investment analysis for the commercial production of tilapia juveniles and lettuce in Brazil under four different scenarios. Two scenarios considered previous experimental results of marketable lettuce in both systems, i.e., 37% of total lettuce production would be marketable in FP (scenario 1) and 98% marketable lettuce in AP (scenario 2). The other two scenarios (using FP and AP systems) considered a hypothetical production in which all the lettuce produced have the marketable quality (scenario 3 and 4, respectively). The economic viability indicators calculated were: Internal Rate of Return (IRR); Net Present Value (NPV); PayBack (PB); Discounted PayBack (DPB); Benefit/Cost ratio (B/C) and Discounted Benefit/Cost ratio (DB/DC). The results showed that the production of Nile tilapia juveniles and lettuce in AP (scenario 2) is profitable, but the 37% marketable lettuce from FP (scenario 1) is not. Both hypothetical scenarios 3 and 4 were identified as profitable. A break-even point was calculated in scenario 1 (FP) to assess the quantities of plants that should be visually suitable for marketing to make such an investment project economically profitable. It was estimated that 68.7% of the lettuces produced should have desirable visual marketable characteristics to make FP feasible. The results show that investing in research to evaluate a multi-cycle production to prove the stability of long-term FLOCponics projects is highly recommended since the financial analysis indicates that FLOCponics could be financially feasible. MenosBiofloc-based fish production involves a dense microbial co-culture that supports nutrient cycling, generally reducing the amount of feed utilized and the need for mechanic and biological filters. These technical benefits of biofloc technology can lower the costs compared to traditional intensive techniques such as recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS). The RAS is conventionally adopted to integrated fish-plant production in aquaponics systems, and recent studies demonstrated the potential for integrating biofloc technology and hydroponics production in FLOCponics systems. The present study compared the economic viability for integrated agri-aquaculture production of tilapia juveniles and lettuce in FLOCponics (FP) and conventional aquaponics (AP) systems. The study was developed as an investment analysis for the commercial production of tilapia juveniles and lettuce in Brazil under four different scenarios. Two scenarios considered previous experimental results of marketable lettuce in both systems, i.e., 37% of total lettuce production would be marketable in FP (scenario 1) and 98% marketable lettuce in AP (scenario 2). The other two scenarios (using FP and AP systems) considered a hypothetical production in which all the lettuce produced have the marketable quality (scenario 3 and 4, respectively). The economic viability indicators calculated were: Internal Rate of Return (IRR); Net Present Value (NPV); PayBack (PB); Discounted PayBack (DPB); Benefit/Cost ratio (B/C) an... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Agri-aquaculture production; Break-even point; FLOCponics. |
|
Thesagro: |
Aquicultura; Peixe; Tilápia. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Aquaculture; Aquaponics; Biofloc technology; Fish. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
E Economia e Indústria Agrícola |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03260naa a2200325 a 4500
001 2139748
005 2022-02-07
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0044-8486
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.737987$2DOI
100 1 $aPINHO, S. M.
245 $aEconomic comparison between conventional aquaponics and FLOCponics systems.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
520 $aBiofloc-based fish production involves a dense microbial co-culture that supports nutrient cycling, generally reducing the amount of feed utilized and the need for mechanic and biological filters. These technical benefits of biofloc technology can lower the costs compared to traditional intensive techniques such as recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS). The RAS is conventionally adopted to integrated fish-plant production in aquaponics systems, and recent studies demonstrated the potential for integrating biofloc technology and hydroponics production in FLOCponics systems. The present study compared the economic viability for integrated agri-aquaculture production of tilapia juveniles and lettuce in FLOCponics (FP) and conventional aquaponics (AP) systems. The study was developed as an investment analysis for the commercial production of tilapia juveniles and lettuce in Brazil under four different scenarios. Two scenarios considered previous experimental results of marketable lettuce in both systems, i.e., 37% of total lettuce production would be marketable in FP (scenario 1) and 98% marketable lettuce in AP (scenario 2). The other two scenarios (using FP and AP systems) considered a hypothetical production in which all the lettuce produced have the marketable quality (scenario 3 and 4, respectively). The economic viability indicators calculated were: Internal Rate of Return (IRR); Net Present Value (NPV); PayBack (PB); Discounted PayBack (DPB); Benefit/Cost ratio (B/C) and Discounted Benefit/Cost ratio (DB/DC). The results showed that the production of Nile tilapia juveniles and lettuce in AP (scenario 2) is profitable, but the 37% marketable lettuce from FP (scenario 1) is not. Both hypothetical scenarios 3 and 4 were identified as profitable. A break-even point was calculated in scenario 1 (FP) to assess the quantities of plants that should be visually suitable for marketing to make such an investment project economically profitable. It was estimated that 68.7% of the lettuces produced should have desirable visual marketable characteristics to make FP feasible. The results show that investing in research to evaluate a multi-cycle production to prove the stability of long-term FLOCponics projects is highly recommended since the financial analysis indicates that FLOCponics could be financially feasible.
650 $aAquaculture
650 $aAquaponics
650 $aBiofloc technology
650 $aFish
650 $aAquicultura
650 $aPeixe
650 $aTilápia
653 $aAgri-aquaculture production
653 $aBreak-even point
653 $aFLOCponics
700 1 $aFLORES, R. M. V.
700 1 $aDAVID, L. H.
700 1 $aEMERENCIANO, M. G. C.
700 1 $aQUAGRAINIE, K. K.
700 1 $aPORTELLA, M. C.
773 $tAquaculture$gv. 552, 737987, Apr. 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura (CNPASA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
