| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Cerrados. |
|
Data corrente: |
16/02/2017 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
23/02/2018 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
RINALDI, M. M.; VIEIRA, E. A.; FIALHO, J. de F.; MALAQUIAS, J. V. |
|
Afiliação: |
MARIA MADALENA RINALDI, CPAC; EDUARDO ALANO VIEIRA, CPAC; JOSEFINO DE FREITAS FIALHO, CPAC; JUACI VITORIA MALAQUIAS, CPAC. |
|
Título: |
Shelf life of minimally processed cassava roots submitted to different conservation methods. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2017 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Científica, v. 45, n. 1, p. 9-17, 2017. |
|
Páginas: |
p. 9-17 |
|
Série: |
1984-5529 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The useful life of minimally processed cassava roots submitted to different conservation methods was evaluated. Cassava roots in natura were physically characterized, minimally processed and stored after submission to treatments in different packaging types. During storage period, the product was submitted to physicochemical, sensorial and microbiological analyzes. Storage time and treatment influenced on minimally processed cassava roots quality. When only the sensorial analysis is considered, the useful life of minimally processed cassava roots was of 28 days for all treatments, except for the roots submitted to the CONTROL and CA treatments, which had a 24-day shelf life. However, at 14 days of storage, CONTROL, VAC, CA, and H2O treatments showed high psychotrophic count. Mold and yeast counts were also high for CONTROL and VAC treatments at 14 days of storage. At 28 days of storage, psychrotrophs, molds and yeasts count was high for all treatments. In general, the most recommended treatments, due to having a longer shelf life, were CA and H2O reaching a maximum period of 14 days of storage. Considering the cooking time and the other physicochemical analyzes, the 2.5% H2O+CA treatment is not recommended for the commercialization of minimally processed cassava roots. |
|
Thesagro: |
Conservação; Embalagem; Mandioca; Manihot esculenta; Pós-colheita; Processamento mínimo; Temperatura. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/173048/1/975-6684-1-PB.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02013naa a2200265 a 4500
001 2064416
005 2018-02-23
008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aRINALDI, M. M.
245 $aShelf life of minimally processed cassava roots submitted to different conservation methods.
260 $c2017
300 $ap. 9-17
490 $a1984-5529
520 $aThe useful life of minimally processed cassava roots submitted to different conservation methods was evaluated. Cassava roots in natura were physically characterized, minimally processed and stored after submission to treatments in different packaging types. During storage period, the product was submitted to physicochemical, sensorial and microbiological analyzes. Storage time and treatment influenced on minimally processed cassava roots quality. When only the sensorial analysis is considered, the useful life of minimally processed cassava roots was of 28 days for all treatments, except for the roots submitted to the CONTROL and CA treatments, which had a 24-day shelf life. However, at 14 days of storage, CONTROL, VAC, CA, and H2O treatments showed high psychotrophic count. Mold and yeast counts were also high for CONTROL and VAC treatments at 14 days of storage. At 28 days of storage, psychrotrophs, molds and yeasts count was high for all treatments. In general, the most recommended treatments, due to having a longer shelf life, were CA and H2O reaching a maximum period of 14 days of storage. Considering the cooking time and the other physicochemical analyzes, the 2.5% H2O+CA treatment is not recommended for the commercialization of minimally processed cassava roots.
650 $aConservação
650 $aEmbalagem
650 $aMandioca
650 $aManihot esculenta
650 $aPós-colheita
650 $aProcessamento mínimo
650 $aTemperatura
700 1 $aVIEIRA, E. A.
700 1 $aFIALHO, J. de F.
700 1 $aMALAQUIAS, J. V.
773 $tCientífica$gv. 45, n. 1, p. 9-17, 2017.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Cerrados (CPAC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. |
|
Data corrente: |
03/11/2017 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
03/11/2017 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 3 |
|
Autoria: |
SOUZA, I. R. P. de; MACEDO, G. A. R.; BARBOSA, M. H. P.; BARROS, B. de A.; CARVALHO, S. G. M.; XAVIER, A. da S.; GONÇALVES, I. A. M. |
|
Afiliação: |
ISABEL REGINA PRAZERES DE SOUZA, CNPMS; Geraldo Antônio Resende Macêdo, Epamig; Márcio Henrique Pereira Barbosa, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; BEATRIZ DE ALMEIDA BARROS, CNPMS; Samanta Gabriela Medeiros Carvalho, UFLA; André da Silva Xavier, Bolsista; Isabella Aparecida Maia Gonçalves, UNIFEMM. |
|
Título: |
Reaction of sugarcane genotypes to strains of the sugarcane mosaic virus. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2017 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
International Journal of Current Research, v. 9, n. 10, p. 59112-59119, Oct. 2017. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Sugarcane crops are cultivated in nearly all tropical and sub-tropical regions worldwide andhave a prominent position in the agricultural scenario in Brazil. However, viral diseases can threaten the production of this important commodity leading to large production losses. In the present study, we evaluatedthe reaction of 20 sugarcane genotypes independently inoculated with two different strains of Sugarcane mosaic virus (SCMV) isolated from naturally infected sugarcane (SCMV-SGC) and maize (SCMV-MZ). The maize inbred line L19 was used as a control of susceptibility to the SCMV-MZ strain. Symptoms intensity was evaluated through a visual scale with three levels of severity: weak, intermediate, and intense. The viral infection was confirmed by PCR and DNA sequencing. We observed that, although both strains were able to infect sugarcane genotypes and the maize inbred line, SCMV-SGC was more aggressive, resulting in only four resistant genotypes: IN84-58 (S. spontaneum), RB855536, RB 928064, and SP71-6163. Thirteen genotypes were resistant to SCMV-MZ: IN84-58 (S.spontaneum), NA56-79, CB47-355,CB49-260, RB72454, RB855113, RB855536, RB867515, RB928064, SP70-1143, SP71-1406, SP71-6163, and SP81-3250. This is the first report showingSCMV strains capable of cross-infectingand causing mosaic in sugarcane and maize. Our data emphasize the importance of continuous monitoring and screening for virus resistantgenotypes to be used in breeding programs for the development of new resistant cultivars. MenosSugarcane crops are cultivated in nearly all tropical and sub-tropical regions worldwide andhave a prominent position in the agricultural scenario in Brazil. However, viral diseases can threaten the production of this important commodity leading to large production losses. In the present study, we evaluatedthe reaction of 20 sugarcane genotypes independently inoculated with two different strains of Sugarcane mosaic virus (SCMV) isolated from naturally infected sugarcane (SCMV-SGC) and maize (SCMV-MZ). The maize inbred line L19 was used as a control of susceptibility to the SCMV-MZ strain. Symptoms intensity was evaluated through a visual scale with three levels of severity: weak, intermediate, and intense. The viral infection was confirmed by PCR and DNA sequencing. We observed that, although both strains were able to infect sugarcane genotypes and the maize inbred line, SCMV-SGC was more aggressive, resulting in only four resistant genotypes: IN84-58 (S. spontaneum), RB855536, RB 928064, and SP71-6163. Thirteen genotypes were resistant to SCMV-MZ: IN84-58 (S.spontaneum), NA56-79, CB47-355,CB49-260, RB72454, RB855113, RB855536, RB867515, RB928064, SP70-1143, SP71-1406, SP71-6163, and SP81-3250. This is the first report showingSCMV strains capable of cross-infectingand causing mosaic in sugarcane and maize. Our data emphasize the importance of continuous monitoring and screening for virus resistantgenotypes to be used in breeding programs for the development of new resistant ... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesagro: |
Cana de açucar; Doença de planta; Mosaico. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
H Saúde e Patologia |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/166067/1/Reaction-sugarcane.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02211naa a2200229 a 4500
001 2078844
005 2017-11-03
008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aSOUZA, I. R. P. de
245 $aReaction of sugarcane genotypes to strains of the sugarcane mosaic virus.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2017
520 $aSugarcane crops are cultivated in nearly all tropical and sub-tropical regions worldwide andhave a prominent position in the agricultural scenario in Brazil. However, viral diseases can threaten the production of this important commodity leading to large production losses. In the present study, we evaluatedthe reaction of 20 sugarcane genotypes independently inoculated with two different strains of Sugarcane mosaic virus (SCMV) isolated from naturally infected sugarcane (SCMV-SGC) and maize (SCMV-MZ). The maize inbred line L19 was used as a control of susceptibility to the SCMV-MZ strain. Symptoms intensity was evaluated through a visual scale with three levels of severity: weak, intermediate, and intense. The viral infection was confirmed by PCR and DNA sequencing. We observed that, although both strains were able to infect sugarcane genotypes and the maize inbred line, SCMV-SGC was more aggressive, resulting in only four resistant genotypes: IN84-58 (S. spontaneum), RB855536, RB 928064, and SP71-6163. Thirteen genotypes were resistant to SCMV-MZ: IN84-58 (S.spontaneum), NA56-79, CB47-355,CB49-260, RB72454, RB855113, RB855536, RB867515, RB928064, SP70-1143, SP71-1406, SP71-6163, and SP81-3250. This is the first report showingSCMV strains capable of cross-infectingand causing mosaic in sugarcane and maize. Our data emphasize the importance of continuous monitoring and screening for virus resistantgenotypes to be used in breeding programs for the development of new resistant cultivars.
650 $aCana de açucar
650 $aDoença de planta
650 $aMosaico
700 1 $aMACEDO, G. A. R.
700 1 $aBARBOSA, M. H. P.
700 1 $aBARROS, B. de A.
700 1 $aCARVALHO, S. G. M.
700 1 $aXAVIER, A. da S.
700 1 $aGONÇALVES, I. A. M.
773 $tInternational Journal of Current Research$gv. 9, n. 10, p. 59112-59119, Oct. 2017.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Milho e Sorgo (CNPMS) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
