| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 373 | |
| 201. |  | MAURER, T. R.; DONATI, M. R.; FERREIRA, P. E. P.; SUZANA-MILAN, C. S.; FERNANDES, J. M. C.; LAU, D. Populações de afídeos em trigo: efeitos da época do ano, cultivar e tratamento de sementes. In: MOSTRA DE INICIAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA, 18.; MOSTRA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO DA EMBRAPA TRIGO, 15., 2023, Passo Fundo. Resumos... Passo Fundo: Embrapa Trigo, 2023. p. 27. (Embrapa Trigo. Eventos técnicos e científicos, 1). ODS 2.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Trigo. |
|    |
| 202. | | SAVARIS, M.; LAMPERT, S.; SALVADORI, J. R.; LAU, D.; PEREIRA, P. R. V. da S.; SMANIOTTO, M. A. Population growth and damage caused by Rhopalosiphum padi (L.) (Hemiptera, Aphididae) on different cultivars and phenological stages of wheat. Neotropical Entomology, Londrina, v. 42, n. 5, p. 539-543, 2013.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Trigo. |
| |
| 203. | | ALEMANDRI, V.; BAINOTTI, C. T.; LAU, D.; FERREIRA, D. N. M.; RODRIGUEZ, S. M.; LAMBERTINI, P. L.; TRUOL, G. Reaction of South American wheat genotypes to wheat streak mosaic virus. Journal of Plant Pathology, v. 101, n. 1, p. 107-113, 2019.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Trigo. |
|  |
| 204. | | ALEMANDRI, V.; BAINOTTI, C. T.; LAU, D.; NAVIA, D.; RODRIGUEZ, S. M.; LAMBERTINI, P. L.; TRUOL, G. Reaction of South American wheat genotypes to wheat streak mosaic virus. Journal of Plant Pathology, v. 101, n. 1, p. 107-113, 2019.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
| |
| 205. | | LAMPERT, S.; SALVADORI, J. R.; LAU, D.; PEREIRA, P. R. V. da S.; ENGEL, E.; SAVARIS, M. Sipha maydis (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in the humid subtropical region of Brazil: distribution, seasonality and biology. Florida Entomologist, v. 106, n. 1, p. 1-9, 2023.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Trigo. |
| |
| 206. | | PEREIRA, P. R. V. da S.; LAU, D.; SALVADORI, J. R.; CARVALHO, R. C. Z. de; LAMPERT, S. Sipha (Rungsia) maydis Passerini, 1860 (Hemiptera, Aphididae): o pulgão-preto-dos-cereais. In: REUNIÃO DA COMISSÃO BRASILEIRA DE PESQUISA DE TRIGO E TRITICALE, 3., 2009, Veranópolis. Ata e resumos... Porto Alegre: Comissão Brasileira de Pesquisa de Trigo e Triticale: Fepagro; Veranóplis: ASAV; Passo Fundo: Embrapa Trigo, 2009. Entomologia, trabalho 58. 1 p.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Trigo. |
| |
| 208. | | LAU, D.; PEREIRA, P. R. V. da S.; FERREIRA, D. N. M.; SCHONS, J.; MAR, T. B.; SANCHES, M. M.; BENITO, N. P. O patossistema Aceria tosichella e vírus transmitidos no Brasil. In: WORKSHOP: COOPERAÇÃO INTERNACIONAL EMBRAPA / INTA, 2013, Passo Fundo. Livro de resumos... Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2013. Res. 7, p. 27-28.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
| |
| 209. | | LAU, D.; PEREIRA, P. R. V. da S.; FERREIRA, D. N. M.; SCHONS, J.; MAR, T. B.; SANCHES, M. M.; BENITO, N. P. O patossistema Aceria tosichella e vírus transmitidos no Brasil. In: WORKSHOP: COOPERAÇÃO INTERNACIONAL EMBRAPA / INTA, 2013, Passo Fundo. Livro de resumos... Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2013. Res. 7, p. 27-28.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Trigo. |
| |
| 210. | | LAU, D.; PEREIRA, P. R. V. da S.; NAVIA, D.; SCHONS, J.; MAR, T. B.; SANCHES, M. M.; BENITO, N. P. O patossistema Aceria tosichella e vírus transmitidos no Brasil. In: WORKSHOP: COOPERAÇÃO INTERNACIONAL EMBRAPA / INTA, 2013, Passo Fundo. Anais... Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2013. 1 CD-ROM. Palestra 7. Editado por Douglas Lau, Graciela Ana María Truol, Paulo Roberto Valle da Silva Pereira, Denise Navia Magalhães Ferreira, Vanina Maria Alemandri, María Fernanda Mattio.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Trigo. |
| |
| 211. | | WAQUIL, J. M.; LOPES-DA-SILVA, M.; SALVADORI, J. R.; LAZZAROTTO, C. M.; PEREIRA, P. R. V. da S.; LAU, D. Pulgão-verde-dos-cereais, Schizaphis graminum (Rondani). In: VILELA, E. F.; ZUCCHI, R. A. (Ed.). Pragas introduzidas no Brasil: insetos e ácaros. Piracicaba: FEALQ, 2015. cap. 38, p. 653-681| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia; Embrapa Trigo. |
| |
| 213. | | CHRISTO, G. G. O.; LAU, D.; ALONSO, S. K.; COUTO, M. M. F.; GRAÇA, R. N.; ALFENAS, A. C.; GRATTAPAGLIA, D. Herança da resistência a Puccinia psidii em progênies oriundas de cruzamentos inter-específicos de Eucalyptus spp. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE GENÉTICA, 52., 2006, Foz do Iguaçu, PR. Resumos... Ribeirão Preto, SP: Sociedade Brasileira de Genética, 2006. p. 1249.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
| |
| 214. | | GUIMARÃES, L. M. da S.; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; LAU, D.; ROSSE, L. N.; ALVES, A. A.; ALFENAS, A. C. Genetic control of Eucalyptus urophylla and E. grandis resistance to canker caused by Chrysoporthe cubensis. Genetics and Molecular Biology, v. 33, n. 3, p. 525-531, 2010.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
| 215. | | MAR, T. B.; XAVIER, C. A. D.; LIMA, A. T. M.; NOGUEIRA, A. M.; SILVA, J. C. F.; RAMOS-SOBRINHO, R.; LAU, D.; ZERBINI, F. M. Genetic variability and population structure of the New World begomovirus Euphorbia yellow mosaic virus. Journal of General Virology, London, v. 98, n. 6, p. 1537-1551, Jun. 2017.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Trigo. |
| |
| 216. | | STEMPKOWSKI, L. A.; PEREIRA, F. S.; MAR, T. B.; LAU, D.; KUHNEM, P.; CASA, R. T.; SILVA, F. N. da; ZERBINI, F. M. Genetic variability and population structure of wheat stripe mosaic virus. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE VIROLOGIA, 33.; ENCONTRO DE VIROLOGIA DO MERCOSUL, 17., 2022, Porto Seguro. Anais... Brasília, DF: SBV, 2022.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Trigo. |
| |
| 218. | | ALVES, A. A.; ROSADO, C. C. G.; FARIA, D. A.; GUIMARÃES, L. M. da S.; LAU, D.; BROMMONSCHENKEL, S. H.; GRATTAPAGLIA, D.; ALFENAS, A. C. Genetic mapping provides evidence for the role of additive and non-additive QTLs in the response of inter-specific hybrids of Eucalyptus to Puccinia psidii rust infection. Euphytica, Wageningen, v. 183, n. 1, p. 27-38, Jan. 2012.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia; Embrapa Trigo. |
| |
| 220. | | PEREIRA, F. S.; STEMPKOWSKI, L. A.; LAU, D.; FAJARDO, T. V. M.; NHANI JUNIOR, A.; BOGO, A.; CASA, R. T.; SILVA, F. N. da. Caracterização molecular do vírus da espiga branca do trigo no Brasil. In: REUNIÃO DA COMISSÃO BRASILEIRA DE PESQUISA DE TRIGO E TRITICALE, 14., 2021, Passo Fundo. Atas e resumos. Castro: Fundação ABC, 2021. p. 276-279.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agricultura Digital. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 373 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Gado de Corte. |
|
Data corrente: |
27/12/2018 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
27/12/2018 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
|
Autoria: |
SERRA, A. P.; MARCHETTI, M. E.; DUPAS, E.; ENSINAS, S. C.; LOURENTE, E. R. P.; SILVA, E. F. da; ALMEIDA, R. G. de; CARDUCCI, C. E.; ALOVISI, A. M. T. |
|
Afiliação: |
ADEMAR PEREIRA SERRA, CNPGC; Marlene Estevão Marchetti; Elisângela Dupas; Simone Candido Ensinas; Elaine Reis Pinheiro Lourente; Eulene Francisco da Silva; Roberto Giolo de Almeida; Carla Eloize Carducci; Alessandra Mayumi Tokura Alovisi. |
|
Título: |
Best Management Practices (BMPs) for Nitrogen Fertilizer in Forage Grasses. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2018 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: EDVAN, R. L. New Perspectives in Forage Crops. London, United Kingdom: IntechOpen, 2018 |
|
Páginas: |
P. 243 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
There is a concern about the growing population and limitation in natural resources which are taking the population to direct its agricultural systems into a more productive and efficient activity, looking to avoid a negative impact on the surrounding environment. The industry energy expended to produce nitrogen (N)-fertilizer is considered an indirect consumption of energy in agriculture, which is higher with an increasing forage yield. Nitrogen is the key nutrient associated with high-yielding production in forage grass and grain crops. The aim of this chapter is to introduce the best management practices (BMPs) for N-fertilizer application in forage grasses to improve N-use efficiency, since the most economical way to feed livestock is forage plants where its potential biomass production is not well explored. The BMPs basically follow three management practices: (1) soil nutrient availability and forage requirement, (2) fertilizer application, and (3) decrease in nutrient losses from soil. In order to take a decision on applying N-fertilizer to accomplish forage grasses production with social, economic, and environmental benefits, the N-fertilizer use in forage grasses is going to follow the ?Right rate, Right source, Right place, and Right time (4R) nutrient stewardship.? The application of the 4R?s nutrients stewardship is directly associated with economic, social, and environmental impact. The capacity of the 4R?s implementation worldwide turns into a best guide to improve the striving of better N-use efficiency in forage grass. The 4R?s are interrelated; thus, the recommendation of N-fertilizer rates cannot be prescribed without the combination of the 4R?s where a whole system to be followed should be considered to decide about N-fertilizer in pasture. Consequently, any decision in one of the 4R?s is going to affect the expected N-fertilizer results and dry matter production. MenosThere is a concern about the growing population and limitation in natural resources which are taking the population to direct its agricultural systems into a more productive and efficient activity, looking to avoid a negative impact on the surrounding environment. The industry energy expended to produce nitrogen (N)-fertilizer is considered an indirect consumption of energy in agriculture, which is higher with an increasing forage yield. Nitrogen is the key nutrient associated with high-yielding production in forage grass and grain crops. The aim of this chapter is to introduce the best management practices (BMPs) for N-fertilizer application in forage grasses to improve N-use efficiency, since the most economical way to feed livestock is forage plants where its potential biomass production is not well explored. The BMPs basically follow three management practices: (1) soil nutrient availability and forage requirement, (2) fertilizer application, and (3) decrease in nutrient losses from soil. In order to take a decision on applying N-fertilizer to accomplish forage grasses production with social, economic, and environmental benefits, the N-fertilizer use in forage grasses is going to follow the ?Right rate, Right source, Right place, and Right time (4R) nutrient stewardship.? The application of the 4R?s nutrients stewardship is directly associated with economic, social, and environmental impact. The capacity of the 4R?s implementation worldwide turns into a best guide to imp... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
N-fertilizer recovery; N-use efficiency. |
|
Thesagro: |
Brachiaria sp; Panicum Maximum. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Soil fertility. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/189383/1/Best-management-practices-BMPs.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02771naa a2200289 a 4500
001 2102573
005 2018-12-27
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aSERRA, A. P.
245 $aBest Management Practices (BMPs) for Nitrogen Fertilizer in Forage Grasses.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
300 $aP. 243
520 $aThere is a concern about the growing population and limitation in natural resources which are taking the population to direct its agricultural systems into a more productive and efficient activity, looking to avoid a negative impact on the surrounding environment. The industry energy expended to produce nitrogen (N)-fertilizer is considered an indirect consumption of energy in agriculture, which is higher with an increasing forage yield. Nitrogen is the key nutrient associated with high-yielding production in forage grass and grain crops. The aim of this chapter is to introduce the best management practices (BMPs) for N-fertilizer application in forage grasses to improve N-use efficiency, since the most economical way to feed livestock is forage plants where its potential biomass production is not well explored. The BMPs basically follow three management practices: (1) soil nutrient availability and forage requirement, (2) fertilizer application, and (3) decrease in nutrient losses from soil. In order to take a decision on applying N-fertilizer to accomplish forage grasses production with social, economic, and environmental benefits, the N-fertilizer use in forage grasses is going to follow the ?Right rate, Right source, Right place, and Right time (4R) nutrient stewardship.? The application of the 4R?s nutrients stewardship is directly associated with economic, social, and environmental impact. The capacity of the 4R?s implementation worldwide turns into a best guide to improve the striving of better N-use efficiency in forage grass. The 4R?s are interrelated; thus, the recommendation of N-fertilizer rates cannot be prescribed without the combination of the 4R?s where a whole system to be followed should be considered to decide about N-fertilizer in pasture. Consequently, any decision in one of the 4R?s is going to affect the expected N-fertilizer results and dry matter production.
650 $aSoil fertility
650 $aBrachiaria sp
650 $aPanicum Maximum
653 $aN-fertilizer recovery
653 $aN-use efficiency
700 1 $aMARCHETTI, M. E.
700 1 $aDUPAS, E.
700 1 $aENSINAS, S. C.
700 1 $aLOURENTE, E. R. P.
700 1 $aSILVA, E. F. da
700 1 $aALMEIDA, R. G. de
700 1 $aCARDUCCI, C. E.
700 1 $aALOVISI, A. M. T.
773 $tIn: EDVAN, R. L. New Perspectives in Forage Crops. London, United Kingdom: IntechOpen, 2018
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Gado de Corte (CNPGC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
