| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste. |
|
Data corrente: |
20/10/2009 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
14/08/2017 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Folder/Folheto/Cartilha |
|
Autoria: |
MORELLO, C. de L.; SUASSUNA, N. D.; FARIAS, F. J. C.; LAMAS, F. M.; SILVA FILHO, J. L. da; PEDROSA, M. B.; RIBEIRO, J. L.; GODINHO, V. de P. C.; FERREIRA, A. C. de B.; CUNHA, A. F. da; ASMUS, G. L.; LANZA, M. de A. |
|
Afiliação: |
CAMILO DE LELIS MORELLO, CNPA; NELSON DIAS SUASSUNA, CNPA; FRANCISCO JOSE CORREIA FARIAS, CNPA; FERNANDO MENDES LAMAS, CPAO; JOAO LUIS DA SILVA FILHO, CNPA; JOSE LOPES RIBEIRO, CPAMN; VICENTE DE PAULO CAMPOS GODINHO, CPAF-RO; ALEXANDRE CUNHA DE B FERREIRA, CNPA; AIRTON FREIRE DA CUNHA, CNPA; GUILHERME LAFOURCADE ASMUS, CPAO. |
|
Título: |
Cultivar BRS 293: maiores produtividades em altitudes elevadas. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2009 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Campina Grande: Embrapa Algodão, 2009. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Notas: |
1 Folder |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Algodão no cerrado; BRS 293; Cruzamento biparental; Cultivar de algodão. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/CPAO-2010/31932/1/Folder-BRS-293-1ed.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00812nam a2200289 a 4500
001 1572622
005 2017-08-14
008 2009 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d
100 1 $aMORELLO, C. de L.
245 $aCultivar BRS 293$bmaiores produtividades em altitudes elevadas.
260 $aCampina Grande: Embrapa Algodão$c2009
500 $a1 Folder
653 $aAlgodão no cerrado
653 $aBRS 293
653 $aCruzamento biparental
653 $aCultivar de algodão
700 1 $aSUASSUNA, N. D.
700 1 $aFARIAS, F. J. C.
700 1 $aLAMAS, F. M.
700 1 $aSILVA FILHO, J. L. da
700 1 $aPEDROSA, M. B.
700 1 $aRIBEIRO, J. L.
700 1 $aGODINHO, V. de P. C.
700 1 $aFERREIRA, A. C. de B.
700 1 $aCUNHA, A. F. da
700 1 $aASMUS, G. L.
700 1 $aLANZA, M. de A
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste (CPAO) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
|
Data corrente: |
21/01/2015 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
21/01/2015 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
GARCIA, L. F.; MELLO, A. C. T.; CARNEVALLI, R. A.; SHIRATSUCHI, L. S.; PEDREIRA, B. C. e; LOPES, L. B.; CRESTANI, S. |
|
Afiliação: |
LARISSA F. GARCIA, UFMT; ANDRÉIA C. T. MELLO, UFMT; ROBERTA APARECIDA CARNEVALLI, CPAMT; LUCIANO SHOZO SHIRATSUCHI, CPAMT; BRUNO CARNEIRO E PEDREIRA, CPAMT; LUCIANO BASTOS LOPES, CPAMT; STEBEN CRESTANI, USP-ESALQ. |
|
Título: |
Spatial Distribution of Dung in Integrated Dairy Systems |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2014 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 51, 2014, Barra dos Coqueiros. A produção animal frente às mudanças climáticas e tecnológicas. Anais... Barra dos coqueiros: Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia, 2014. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Animals in grazing work as catalyst in the nutrient cycling processes of the ecosystems. Part of biomass that animal intake returning to soil in the degraded way like faeces and urine. The return is around 90% of the mineral nutrients, including nitrogen. However, it is necessary to know how these dejects are distributed on the area by animals. The environment management affects directly spatial distribution of these dejects. Drinking fountain, salt and feed trough, portress, rest area and shadow are structures that change the way that animal graze. Sward structure and herbage morphology affect the grazing behaviour as well. So, the objective this experiment was evaluate the spatial distribution of dung from dairy heifers in integrated systems of production at Mato Grosso, Brazil. The experiment was accomplished at Embrapa (Sinop/Mato Grosso/ Brazil). The experimental area was 10 ha divided in three systems: full sun, marginal shadowing (300 trees per ha) and intensive shadowing (750 trees per ha). Each system had different sizes, but 2.4 ha was useful area for all systems divided in 10 paddocks each. The tree used was Eucalyptus urograndis, H13 clone and the pasture was piata Grass (Urochloa brizantha). The grazing was done when the sward reached 95% light interception. It was evaluated a group of 24 breed heifers with 350 kg in three periods of year. Each paddock was divided in 25 grids for count of faeces boards. The spatial faeces distribution was evaluated with GPS, by walking and capturing points where there was faeces boards in all steps for the grassland paddocks, in three periods of year (rainy, rainy-drought transition and dry period). The dataset was analysed by SAS 9.2 version, using PROC MIXED and PDIFF to 5% of significance. The spatial distribution of dung had significant difference only in rainy-drought transition period (P=0.0165) and interaction effect between shadowing and site (P=0.0025) in this period of year and dry period as well (P=0. 0465). In both periods, the distribution was the same. The full sun system promoted more concentration of faeces boards in sites next portress and border fence in site opposite to portress. In marginal shadowing system, the major concentration was in the central area and under shadow. In intensive shadowing system, the major concentration of dung boards was under shadow, sites preferred by heifers for rumination and leisure activities. The kind of shade and the year periods affected in spatial dung distribution. There were places with more dung concentration, in all kind of shade, but when the pasture had the intensive shade, the dispersion was more homogeneous. Unlike expected, the dung deposition didn?t happens only under treetops. The distribution is more homogeneous when trees are in large quantities. The shadow area available in the grassland affected the spatial dung distribution, and can be more homogeneous than no shadow. MenosAnimals in grazing work as catalyst in the nutrient cycling processes of the ecosystems. Part of biomass that animal intake returning to soil in the degraded way like faeces and urine. The return is around 90% of the mineral nutrients, including nitrogen. However, it is necessary to know how these dejects are distributed on the area by animals. The environment management affects directly spatial distribution of these dejects. Drinking fountain, salt and feed trough, portress, rest area and shadow are structures that change the way that animal graze. Sward structure and herbage morphology affect the grazing behaviour as well. So, the objective this experiment was evaluate the spatial distribution of dung from dairy heifers in integrated systems of production at Mato Grosso, Brazil. The experiment was accomplished at Embrapa (Sinop/Mato Grosso/ Brazil). The experimental area was 10 ha divided in three systems: full sun, marginal shadowing (300 trees per ha) and intensive shadowing (750 trees per ha). Each system had different sizes, but 2.4 ha was useful area for all systems divided in 10 paddocks each. The tree used was Eucalyptus urograndis, H13 clone and the pasture was piata Grass (Urochloa brizantha). The grazing was done when the sward reached 95% light interception. It was evaluated a group of 24 breed heifers with 350 kg in three periods of year. Each paddock was divided in 25 grids for count of faeces boards. The spatial faeces distribution was evaluated with GPS, by ... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Feces; Silvopastoral systems. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/116171/1/cpamt-2014-shozo-distribution-of-dung-integrated.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03698nam a2200205 a 4500
001 2006311
005 2015-01-21
008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aGARCIA, L. F.
245 $aSpatial Distribution of Dung in Integrated Dairy Systems$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 51, 2014, Barra dos Coqueiros. A produção animal frente às mudanças climáticas e tecnológicas. Anais... Barra dos coqueiros: Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia$c2014
520 $aAnimals in grazing work as catalyst in the nutrient cycling processes of the ecosystems. Part of biomass that animal intake returning to soil in the degraded way like faeces and urine. The return is around 90% of the mineral nutrients, including nitrogen. However, it is necessary to know how these dejects are distributed on the area by animals. The environment management affects directly spatial distribution of these dejects. Drinking fountain, salt and feed trough, portress, rest area and shadow are structures that change the way that animal graze. Sward structure and herbage morphology affect the grazing behaviour as well. So, the objective this experiment was evaluate the spatial distribution of dung from dairy heifers in integrated systems of production at Mato Grosso, Brazil. The experiment was accomplished at Embrapa (Sinop/Mato Grosso/ Brazil). The experimental area was 10 ha divided in three systems: full sun, marginal shadowing (300 trees per ha) and intensive shadowing (750 trees per ha). Each system had different sizes, but 2.4 ha was useful area for all systems divided in 10 paddocks each. The tree used was Eucalyptus urograndis, H13 clone and the pasture was piata Grass (Urochloa brizantha). The grazing was done when the sward reached 95% light interception. It was evaluated a group of 24 breed heifers with 350 kg in three periods of year. Each paddock was divided in 25 grids for count of faeces boards. The spatial faeces distribution was evaluated with GPS, by walking and capturing points where there was faeces boards in all steps for the grassland paddocks, in three periods of year (rainy, rainy-drought transition and dry period). The dataset was analysed by SAS 9.2 version, using PROC MIXED and PDIFF to 5% of significance. The spatial distribution of dung had significant difference only in rainy-drought transition period (P=0.0165) and interaction effect between shadowing and site (P=0.0025) in this period of year and dry period as well (P=0. 0465). In both periods, the distribution was the same. The full sun system promoted more concentration of faeces boards in sites next portress and border fence in site opposite to portress. In marginal shadowing system, the major concentration was in the central area and under shadow. In intensive shadowing system, the major concentration of dung boards was under shadow, sites preferred by heifers for rumination and leisure activities. The kind of shade and the year periods affected in spatial dung distribution. There were places with more dung concentration, in all kind of shade, but when the pasture had the intensive shade, the dispersion was more homogeneous. Unlike expected, the dung deposition didn?t happens only under treetops. The distribution is more homogeneous when trees are in large quantities. The shadow area available in the grassland affected the spatial dung distribution, and can be more homogeneous than no shadow.
650 $aFeces
650 $aSilvopastoral systems
700 1 $aMELLO, A. C. T.
700 1 $aCARNEVALLI, R. A.
700 1 $aSHIRATSUCHI, L. S.
700 1 $aPEDREIRA, B. C. e
700 1 $aLOPES, L. B.
700 1 $aCRESTANI, S.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril (CPAMT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
