| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Hortaliças. |
|
Data corrente: |
20/06/2017 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
25/07/2017 |
|
Autoria: |
LANA, M. M.; TAVARES, S. A. |
|
Afiliação: |
MILZA MOREIRA LANA, CNPH; SELMA APARECIDA TAVARES, Emater-DF. |
|
Título: |
Hortaliça como comprar, conservar e consumir: aspargo. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Brasília, DF: Embrapa Hortaliças, 2016. |
|
Descrição Física: |
1 folder |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Thesagro: |
Asparagus officinalis; Aspargo; Hortaliça folhosa. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/160892/1/ASPARGOS-CCCC-2017.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00455nam a2200157 a 4500
001 2071145
005 2017-07-25
008 2016 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d
100 1 $aLANA, M. M.
245 $aHortaliça como comprar, conservar e consumir$baspargo.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aBrasília, DF: Embrapa Hortaliças$c2016
300 $c1 folder
650 $aAsparagus officinalis
650 $aAspargo
650 $aHortaliça folhosa
700 1 $aTAVARES, S. A.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Hortaliças (CNPH) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agroindústria de Alimentos. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com ctaa.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agroindústria de Alimentos. |
|
Data corrente: |
11/12/2023 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
12/12/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
GONZALES, M. J.; MARTINS, I. B. A.; ALCANTARA, M.; ALMEIDA, M. DE; ASSIS, R. DE; SANTOS, G. N.; ROSENTHAL, A.; DELIZA, R. |
|
Afiliação: |
M. J. GONZALES, UFRRJ; I. B. A. MARTINS, UFRRJ; M. ALCANTARA, UFRJ; M. DE ALMEIDA, UFRRJ; R. DE ASSIS, UFRRJ; G. N. SANTOS, UFRJ; AMAURI ROSENTHAL, CTAA; ROSIRES DELIZA, CTAA. |
|
Título: |
Brazilian consumers' understanding of food processing level: how the healthy, industrialized, and ultra-processed foods are perceived? |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2023 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: SIMPÓSIO LATINO AMERICANO DE CIÊNCIA DE ALIMENTOS E NUTRIÇÃO, 15., 2023, Campinas. A revolução da ciência de alimentos e nutrição: alimentando o mundo de forma sustentável: caderno [eletrônico] de resumos. Campinas: Galoá, 2023. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Pôster 168499; SLACAN. |
|
Conteúdo: |
Food processing includes a series of operations that transform raw materials into new products, ensuring the preservation and allowing safety to the consumer. The NOVA classification system includes the category named ultra-processed foods, which seems to be unfamiliar to Brazilians. This study aimed to explore the perception of Brazilians about food processing level, including their views on healthy food. 513 participants were recruited and took part in an online study through a word association task. They were invited to write down the first four words that came to mind when they thought of healthy, industrialized, and ultra-processed foods (UPF). They also answered socio-demographic questions. The terms with the same meaning were grouped into categories using inductive triangulation coding. A consensus between three researchers was achieved through open discussion. Statistical differences were assessed using X2 tests. A total of 6,138 associations were mentioned by participants and grouped into 50 categories. The most mentioned categories when participants thought of Healthy Foods were legumes and vegetables (61%), fruits with (47%), health (43%). For Industrialized they mentioned commercial brands (30%), convenience (25%) and bad to the health (22%). UPF comprised meat products (55%), bad to the health (26%), commercial brands (23%), and negative associations (23%). Industrialized and UPF had a more negative perception (p<0.05), being considered harmful to health, differently of the healthy food, which had positive mentions. Participant's level of education had a significant effect when making the associations and, the higher education, the greater the positive association with healthy foods, and the negative association with industrialized and ultra-processed foods. Results suggest that there was a misunderstanding between the meaning of industrialized and ultra-processed foods among participants. Communication strategies are recommended to inform the population about the difference between them aiming at allowing conscious food choices by Brazilian consumers. MenosFood processing includes a series of operations that transform raw materials into new products, ensuring the preservation and allowing safety to the consumer. The NOVA classification system includes the category named ultra-processed foods, which seems to be unfamiliar to Brazilians. This study aimed to explore the perception of Brazilians about food processing level, including their views on healthy food. 513 participants were recruited and took part in an online study through a word association task. They were invited to write down the first four words that came to mind when they thought of healthy, industrialized, and ultra-processed foods (UPF). They also answered socio-demographic questions. The terms with the same meaning were grouped into categories using inductive triangulation coding. A consensus between three researchers was achieved through open discussion. Statistical differences were assessed using X2 tests. A total of 6,138 associations were mentioned by participants and grouped into 50 categories. The most mentioned categories when participants thought of Healthy Foods were legumes and vegetables (61%), fruits with (47%), health (43%). For Industrialized they mentioned commercial brands (30%), convenience (25%) and bad to the health (22%). UPF comprised meat products (55%), bad to the health (26%), commercial brands (23%), and negative associations (23%). Industrialized and UPF had a more negative perception (p<0.05), being considered harmful to health, differ... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Food perception; Ultra-processed foods. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Food processing. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
Q Alimentos e Nutrição Humana |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03061nam a2200241 a 4500
001 2159492
005 2023-12-12
008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aGONZALES, M. J.
245 $aBrazilian consumers' understanding of food processing level$bhow the healthy, industrialized, and ultra-processed foods are perceived?$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: SIMPÓSIO LATINO AMERICANO DE CIÊNCIA DE ALIMENTOS E NUTRIÇÃO, 15., 2023, Campinas. A revolução da ciência de alimentos e nutrição: alimentando o mundo de forma sustentável: caderno [eletrônico] de resumos. Campinas: Galoá$c2023
500 $aPôster 168499; SLACAN.
520 $aFood processing includes a series of operations that transform raw materials into new products, ensuring the preservation and allowing safety to the consumer. The NOVA classification system includes the category named ultra-processed foods, which seems to be unfamiliar to Brazilians. This study aimed to explore the perception of Brazilians about food processing level, including their views on healthy food. 513 participants were recruited and took part in an online study through a word association task. They were invited to write down the first four words that came to mind when they thought of healthy, industrialized, and ultra-processed foods (UPF). They also answered socio-demographic questions. The terms with the same meaning were grouped into categories using inductive triangulation coding. A consensus between three researchers was achieved through open discussion. Statistical differences were assessed using X2 tests. A total of 6,138 associations were mentioned by participants and grouped into 50 categories. The most mentioned categories when participants thought of Healthy Foods were legumes and vegetables (61%), fruits with (47%), health (43%). For Industrialized they mentioned commercial brands (30%), convenience (25%) and bad to the health (22%). UPF comprised meat products (55%), bad to the health (26%), commercial brands (23%), and negative associations (23%). Industrialized and UPF had a more negative perception (p<0.05), being considered harmful to health, differently of the healthy food, which had positive mentions. Participant's level of education had a significant effect when making the associations and, the higher education, the greater the positive association with healthy foods, and the negative association with industrialized and ultra-processed foods. Results suggest that there was a misunderstanding between the meaning of industrialized and ultra-processed foods among participants. Communication strategies are recommended to inform the population about the difference between them aiming at allowing conscious food choices by Brazilian consumers.
650 $aFood processing
653 $aFood perception
653 $aUltra-processed foods
700 1 $aMARTINS, I. B. A.
700 1 $aALCANTARA, M.
700 1 $aALMEIDA, M. DE
700 1 $aASSIS, R. DE
700 1 $aSANTOS, G. N.
700 1 $aROSENTHAL, A.
700 1 $aDELIZA, R.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agroindústria de Alimentos (CTAA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
