| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. |
|
Data corrente: |
31/05/2000 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
31/05/2000 |
|
Autoria: |
FANG, D.; KRUEGER, R. R.; ROOSE, M. L. |
|
Afiliação: |
Department of Botany and Plant Dciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521. |
|
Título: |
Phylogenetic relationships among selected Citrus germplasm accrssions revealed by inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers |
|
Ano de publicação: |
1998 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, v.123, n.4,p.612-617, Alexandria, Virginia, 1998 |
|
ISSN: |
0003-1062 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
ISSR markers were analyzed to study phylogenetic relationships among 46 Citrus L. accessions representing 35 species. A dendrogram based on the unweighted pair-group method, arithhhmetic average cluster analysis was constructed using a similarity matrix derived from 642 polymorphic ISSR fragments generated by 10 primers. These 46 accessions could be classified into five major groups: 1) C. indica Tan.; 2) C. maxima (Burm.) Merrill; 3) lemon [C. limon (L.) Burm.] or lime [C. aurantifolia (Christm.) Swingle] type accessions; 4) C. halimii B.C. Stone; and 5) sour orange (C. aurantium L.), mandarins and their hybrids. Group 5 was further divided into three subgroups. Although some previous work had grouped it with mandarins, C. indica appearedd to be a distinct genotype or species that was not close to mandarins. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
DNA markers; Microsatellites; Systematics. |
|
Thesagro: |
Rutaceae. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01470naa a2200205 a 4500
001 1635714
005 2000-05-31
008 1998 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0003-1062
100 1 $aFANG, D.
245 $aPhylogenetic relationships among selected Citrus germplasm accrssions revealed by inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers
260 $c1998
520 $aISSR markers were analyzed to study phylogenetic relationships among 46 Citrus L. accessions representing 35 species. A dendrogram based on the unweighted pair-group method, arithhhmetic average cluster analysis was constructed using a similarity matrix derived from 642 polymorphic ISSR fragments generated by 10 primers. These 46 accessions could be classified into five major groups: 1) C. indica Tan.; 2) C. maxima (Burm.) Merrill; 3) lemon [C. limon (L.) Burm.] or lime [C. aurantifolia (Christm.) Swingle] type accessions; 4) C. halimii B.C. Stone; and 5) sour orange (C. aurantium L.), mandarins and their hybrids. Group 5 was further divided into three subgroups. Although some previous work had grouped it with mandarins, C. indica appearedd to be a distinct genotype or species that was not close to mandarins.
650 $aRutaceae
653 $aDNA markers
653 $aMicrosatellites
653 $aSystematics
700 1 $aKRUEGER, R. R.
700 1 $aROOSE, M. L.
773 $tJournal of the American Society for Horticultural Science$gv.123, n.4,p.612-617, Alexandria, Virginia, 1998
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura (CNPMF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 2 | |
| Registros recuperados : 2 | |
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
