| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
|
Data corrente: |
31/10/2017 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
15/07/2019 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
TREVISOL, I. M.; KRAMER, B.; COLDEBELLA, A.; SILVA, V. S. |
|
Afiliação: |
IARA MARIA TREVISOL, CNPSA; BEATRIS KRAMER, CNPSA; ARLEI COLDEBELLA, CNPSA; VIRGINIA SANTIAGO SILVA, CNPSA. |
|
Título: |
Seroprevalence of brucella spp, lepstospira spp and toxoplasma gondii in wild board (sus scrofa) from southern Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2017 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THE EPIDEMIOLOGY AND CONTROL OF BIOLOGICAL, CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL HAZARDS IN PIG AND PORK, 12., 2017, Foz do Iguaçu. Proceedings Book. Concórdia: Embrapa Suínos e Aves, 2017. p. 76-80. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
SafePork 2017. |
|
Conteúdo: |
Abstract:The wild boar (Sus scrofa), exotic invasive specie, is currently distributed in many Brazilian states, including Santa Catarina (SC) and Rio Grande do Sul (RS). Since the wild pigs are susceptible to zoonotic pathogens as Leptospira spp, Toxoplasma gondii and Brucella spp, their large populations, movements and dispersion can spread diseases, being a potential transmission source to humans, livestock and other sylvatic sympatric species. Despite its importance are there few information about sanitary status of this wild populations and their impact for human and livestock health in Brazil. Objective this work was to investigate the presence of antibodies to Brucella spp, Toxoplasma gondii and Leptospira spp in blood samples of wild boar legally hunted for population control in SC and RS states. From January 2014 to July 2016, 193 samples were tested to antibodies against Brucella spp (buffered acidified plate agglutination test-BAPA) and Leptospira spp (micro agglutination test-MAT). Of these 193, 149 were tested to Toxoplasma gondii antibodies (HAI test). Overall, serological results showed negativity to Brucella spp and low prevalence for Toxoplasma gondii (2,7%). On the other hand, the seroprevalence of Leptospira spp was 6,74% with significantly greater percentage of positivity in RS (12,5%) compared to SC (3,88%). The most prevalent serovars ware Icterohaemorragiae and Pomona, with titers ranging from 1:400 to 1:12,800 in RS. Icterohaemorragiae was the most prevalent serovar in SC but with lowest titres. Seroprevalence of these pathogens in wild population indicate the environmental health, including sympatric livestock and wildlife. Ecological factors should be considered to understand the role of wild boars in the cycle of these diseases. Our results indicate that hunters and consumers of wild boar meat of must be aware about zoonotic risk in carcass handling and meat intake. MenosAbstract:The wild boar (Sus scrofa), exotic invasive specie, is currently distributed in many Brazilian states, including Santa Catarina (SC) and Rio Grande do Sul (RS). Since the wild pigs are susceptible to zoonotic pathogens as Leptospira spp, Toxoplasma gondii and Brucella spp, their large populations, movements and dispersion can spread diseases, being a potential transmission source to humans, livestock and other sylvatic sympatric species. Despite its importance are there few information about sanitary status of this wild populations and their impact for human and livestock health in Brazil. Objective this work was to investigate the presence of antibodies to Brucella spp, Toxoplasma gondii and Leptospira spp in blood samples of wild boar legally hunted for population control in SC and RS states. From January 2014 to July 2016, 193 samples were tested to antibodies against Brucella spp (buffered acidified plate agglutination test-BAPA) and Leptospira spp (micro agglutination test-MAT). Of these 193, 149 were tested to Toxoplasma gondii antibodies (HAI test). Overall, serological results showed negativity to Brucella spp and low prevalence for Toxoplasma gondii (2,7%). On the other hand, the seroprevalence of Leptospira spp was 6,74% with significantly greater percentage of positivity in RS (12,5%) compared to SC (3,88%). The most prevalent serovars ware Icterohaemorragiae and Pomona, with titers ranging from 1:400 to 1:12,800 in RS. Icterohaemorragiae was the most pre... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Brasil; Safe pork; Santa Catarina. |
|
Thesagro: |
Javali; Sanidade animal; Segurança alimentar. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/165875/1/final8604.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02784nam a2200229 a 4500
001 2078554
005 2019-07-15
008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aTREVISOL, I. M.
245 $aSeroprevalence of brucella spp, lepstospira spp and toxoplasma gondii in wild board (sus scrofa) from southern Brazil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THE EPIDEMIOLOGY AND CONTROL OF BIOLOGICAL, CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL HAZARDS IN PIG AND PORK, 12., 2017, Foz do Iguaçu. Proceedings Book. Concórdia: Embrapa Suínos e Aves, 2017. p. 76-80.$c2017
500 $aSafePork 2017.
520 $aAbstract:The wild boar (Sus scrofa), exotic invasive specie, is currently distributed in many Brazilian states, including Santa Catarina (SC) and Rio Grande do Sul (RS). Since the wild pigs are susceptible to zoonotic pathogens as Leptospira spp, Toxoplasma gondii and Brucella spp, their large populations, movements and dispersion can spread diseases, being a potential transmission source to humans, livestock and other sylvatic sympatric species. Despite its importance are there few information about sanitary status of this wild populations and their impact for human and livestock health in Brazil. Objective this work was to investigate the presence of antibodies to Brucella spp, Toxoplasma gondii and Leptospira spp in blood samples of wild boar legally hunted for population control in SC and RS states. From January 2014 to July 2016, 193 samples were tested to antibodies against Brucella spp (buffered acidified plate agglutination test-BAPA) and Leptospira spp (micro agglutination test-MAT). Of these 193, 149 were tested to Toxoplasma gondii antibodies (HAI test). Overall, serological results showed negativity to Brucella spp and low prevalence for Toxoplasma gondii (2,7%). On the other hand, the seroprevalence of Leptospira spp was 6,74% with significantly greater percentage of positivity in RS (12,5%) compared to SC (3,88%). The most prevalent serovars ware Icterohaemorragiae and Pomona, with titers ranging from 1:400 to 1:12,800 in RS. Icterohaemorragiae was the most prevalent serovar in SC but with lowest titres. Seroprevalence of these pathogens in wild population indicate the environmental health, including sympatric livestock and wildlife. Ecological factors should be considered to understand the role of wild boars in the cycle of these diseases. Our results indicate that hunters and consumers of wild boar meat of must be aware about zoonotic risk in carcass handling and meat intake.
650 $aJavali
650 $aSanidade animal
650 $aSegurança alimentar
653 $aBrasil
653 $aSafe pork
653 $aSanta Catarina
700 1 $aKRAMER, B.
700 1 $aCOLDEBELLA, A.
700 1 $aSILVA, V. S.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Suínos e Aves (CNPSA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Clima Temperado. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpact.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
|
Data corrente: |
20/06/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
11/08/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
OVERBECK, G. E.; VÉLEZ-MARTIN, E.; MENEZES, L. da S.; ANAND, M.; BAEZA, S.; CARLUCCI, M. B.; DECHOUM, M. S.; DURIGAN, G.; FIDELIS, A.; GUIDO, A.; MORO, M. F.; MUNHOZ, C. B. R.; REGINATO, M.; RODRIGUES, R. S.; ROSENFIELD, M. F.; SAMPAIO, A. B.; SILVA, F. H. B. da; SILVEIRA, F. A. O.; SOSINSKI JUNIOR, E. E.; STAUDE, I. R.; TEMPERTON, V. M.; TURCHETTO, C.; VELDMAN, J. W.; VIANA, P. L.; ZAPPI, D. C.; MÜLLER, S. C. |
|
Afiliação: |
GERHARD ERNST OVERBECK, UFRGS; EDUARDO VÉLEZ-MARTIN, UFRGS; LUCIANA DA SILVA MENEZES, UFRGS; MADHUR ANAND, University of Guelph; SANTIAGO BAEZA, Universidad de la República; MARCOS B. CARLUCCI, Universidade Federal do Paraná; MICHELE S. DECHOUM, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; GISELDA DURIGAN, Floresta Estadual de Assis, Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais; ALESSANDRA FIDELIS, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Rio Claro; ANACLARA GUIDO, Universidad de la República; MARCELO FREIRE MORO, Universidade Federal do Ceará; CÁSSIA BEATRIZ RODRIGUES MUNHOZ, Universidade de Brasília; MARCELO REGINATO, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; RODRIGO SCHÜTZ RODRIGUES, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; MILENA FERMINA ROSENFIELD, The Nature Conservancy Brasil; ALEXANDRE B. SAMPAIO, Centro Nacional de Avaliação da Biodiversidade e de Pesquisa e Conservação do Cerrado, Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade; FERNANDO HENRIQUE BARBOSA DA SILVA, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso; FERNANDO A. O. SILVEIRA, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; ENIO EGON SOSINSKI JUNIOR, CPACT; INGMAR R. STAUDE, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research; VICKY M. TEMPERTON, Leuphana-Universty of Lüneburg; CAROLINE TURCHETTO, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; JOSEPH W. VELDMAN, Texas A&M University; PEDRO L. VIANA, Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi; DANIELA C. ZAPPI, Universidade de Brasília; SANDRA C. MÜLLER, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. |
|
Título: |
Placing Brazil's grasslands and savannas on the map of science and conservation. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, v. 56, 125687, Sept. 2022. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Available online 3 June 2022. |
|
Conteúdo: |
In Brazil, the country with the highest plant species richness in the world, biodiverse savannas and grasslands ? i.e., grassy ecosystems, which occupy 27% of the country ? have historically been neglected in conservation and scientific treatments. Reasons for this neglect include misconceptions about the characteristics and dynamics of these ecosystems, as well as inconsistent or regionally restricted terminology that impeded a more adequate communication about Brazil's savannas and grasslands, both within the country and internationally. Toward improved communication and recognition of Brazil?s diversity of ecosystems, we present the key drivers that control the main types of grassy ecosystems across Brazil (including in regions of the country where forests dominate). In doing so, we synthesize the main features of each grassy ecosystem in terms of physiognomy and ecological dynamics (e.g., relationships with herbivores and fire). We propose a terminology both for major grassland regions and for regionally relevant vegetation physiognomies. We also discuss terms associated with human land management and restoration of grassy ecosystems. Finally, we suggest key research needs to advance our understanding of the ecology and conservation values of Brazil?s grassy ecosystems. We expect that a common and shared terminology and understanding, as proposed here, will stimulate more integrative research that will be fundamental to developing improved conservation and restoration strategies. MenosIn Brazil, the country with the highest plant species richness in the world, biodiverse savannas and grasslands ? i.e., grassy ecosystems, which occupy 27% of the country ? have historically been neglected in conservation and scientific treatments. Reasons for this neglect include misconceptions about the characteristics and dynamics of these ecosystems, as well as inconsistent or regionally restricted terminology that impeded a more adequate communication about Brazil's savannas and grasslands, both within the country and internationally. Toward improved communication and recognition of Brazil?s diversity of ecosystems, we present the key drivers that control the main types of grassy ecosystems across Brazil (including in regions of the country where forests dominate). In doing so, we synthesize the main features of each grassy ecosystem in terms of physiognomy and ecological dynamics (e.g., relationships with herbivores and fire). We propose a terminology both for major grassland regions and for regionally relevant vegetation physiognomies. We also discuss terms associated with human land management and restoration of grassy ecosystems. Finally, we suggest key research needs to advance our understanding of the ecology and conservation values of Brazil?s grassy ecosystems. We expect that a common and shared terminology and understanding, as proposed here, will stimulate more integrative research that will be fundamental to developing improved conservation and restoration st... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesagro: |
Campo; Cerrado; Gramínea; Pastagem; Vegetação. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02867naa a2200493 a 4500
001 2144142
005 2022-08-11
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aOVERBECK, G. E.
245 $aPlacing Brazil's grasslands and savannas on the map of science and conservation.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
500 $aAvailable online 3 June 2022.
520 $aIn Brazil, the country with the highest plant species richness in the world, biodiverse savannas and grasslands ? i.e., grassy ecosystems, which occupy 27% of the country ? have historically been neglected in conservation and scientific treatments. Reasons for this neglect include misconceptions about the characteristics and dynamics of these ecosystems, as well as inconsistent or regionally restricted terminology that impeded a more adequate communication about Brazil's savannas and grasslands, both within the country and internationally. Toward improved communication and recognition of Brazil?s diversity of ecosystems, we present the key drivers that control the main types of grassy ecosystems across Brazil (including in regions of the country where forests dominate). In doing so, we synthesize the main features of each grassy ecosystem in terms of physiognomy and ecological dynamics (e.g., relationships with herbivores and fire). We propose a terminology both for major grassland regions and for regionally relevant vegetation physiognomies. We also discuss terms associated with human land management and restoration of grassy ecosystems. Finally, we suggest key research needs to advance our understanding of the ecology and conservation values of Brazil?s grassy ecosystems. We expect that a common and shared terminology and understanding, as proposed here, will stimulate more integrative research that will be fundamental to developing improved conservation and restoration strategies.
650 $aCampo
650 $aCerrado
650 $aGramínea
650 $aPastagem
650 $aVegetação
700 1 $aVÉLEZ-MARTIN, E.
700 1 $aMENEZES, L. da S.
700 1 $aANAND, M.
700 1 $aBAEZA, S.
700 1 $aCARLUCCI, M. B.
700 1 $aDECHOUM, M. S.
700 1 $aDURIGAN, G.
700 1 $aFIDELIS, A.
700 1 $aGUIDO, A.
700 1 $aMORO, M. F.
700 1 $aMUNHOZ, C. B. R.
700 1 $aREGINATO, M.
700 1 $aRODRIGUES, R. S.
700 1 $aROSENFIELD, M. F.
700 1 $aSAMPAIO, A. B.
700 1 $aSILVA, F. H. B. da
700 1 $aSILVEIRA, F. A. O.
700 1 $aSOSINSKI JUNIOR, E. E.
700 1 $aSTAUDE, I. R.
700 1 $aTEMPERTON, V. M.
700 1 $aTURCHETTO, C.
700 1 $aVELDMAN, J. W.
700 1 $aVIANA, P. L.
700 1 $aZAPPI, D. C.
700 1 $aMÜLLER, S. C.
773 $tPerspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics$gv. 56, 125687, Sept. 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Clima Temperado (CPACT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
