| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 5 | |
| 5. |  | NEWTON, P.; GOMEZ, A. E. A.; JUNG, S.; KELLY, T.; MENDES, T. de A.; RASMUSSEN, L. V.; REIS, J. C. dos; RODRIGUES, R. de A. R.; TIPPER, R.; HORST, D. van der; WATKINS, C. Overcoming barriers to low carbon agriculture and forest restoration in Brazil: The Rural Sustentável project. World Development Perspectives, v. 4, p. 5-7, Dec. 2016.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril; Embrapa Solos. |
|    |
| Registros recuperados : 5 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Solos. |
|
Data corrente: |
25/08/2016 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
02/09/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
|
Autoria: |
OTTONI FILHO, T. B.; LEAL, I. F.; MACEDO, J. R. de; REIS, B. C. B. |
|
Afiliação: |
THEOPHILO B. OTTONI FILHO, UFRJ; ISAIAS F. LEAL, UFRJ; JOSE RONALDO DE MACEDO, CNPS; BRUNO C. B. REIS, UFRJ. |
|
Título: |
An algebraic pedotransfer function to calculate standardized in situ determined field capacity. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal of Agricultural Science, v. 8, n. 8, p. 158-170, 2016. |
|
DOI: |
10.5539/jas.v8n8p158 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Despite the large applicability of the field capacity (FC) concept in hydrology and engineering, it presents various ambiguities and inconsistencies due to a lack of methodological procedure standardization. Experimental field and laboratory protocols taken from the literature were used in this study to determine the value of FC for different depths in 29 soil profiles, totaling 209 soil samples. The volumetric water content (θ) values were also determined at three suction values (6 kPa, 10 kPa, 33 kPa), along with bulk density (BD), texture (T) and organic matter content (OM). The protocols were devised based on the water processes involved in the FC concept aiming at minimizing hydraulic inconsistencies and procedural difficulty while maintaining the practical meaning of the concept. A high correlation between FC and θ(6 kPa) allowed the development of a pedotransfer function (Equation 3) quadratic for θ(6 kPa), resulting in an accurate and nearly bias-free calculation of FC for the four database geographic areas, with a global root mean squared residue (RMSR) of 0.026 m3·m-3. At the individual soil profile scale, the maximum RMSR was only 0.040 m3·m-3. The BD, T and OM data were generally of a low predicting quality regarding FC when not accompanied by the moisture variables. As all the FC values were obtained by the same experimental protocol and as the predicting quality of Equation 3 was clearly better than that of the classical method, which considers FC equal to θ(6), θ(10) or θ(33), we recommend using Equation 3 rather than the classical method, as well as the protocol presented here, to determine in-situ FC. MenosDespite the large applicability of the field capacity (FC) concept in hydrology and engineering, it presents various ambiguities and inconsistencies due to a lack of methodological procedure standardization. Experimental field and laboratory protocols taken from the literature were used in this study to determine the value of FC for different depths in 29 soil profiles, totaling 209 soil samples. The volumetric water content (θ) values were also determined at three suction values (6 kPa, 10 kPa, 33 kPa), along with bulk density (BD), texture (T) and organic matter content (OM). The protocols were devised based on the water processes involved in the FC concept aiming at minimizing hydraulic inconsistencies and procedural difficulty while maintaining the practical meaning of the concept. A high correlation between FC and θ(6 kPa) allowed the development of a pedotransfer function (Equation 3) quadratic for θ(6 kPa), resulting in an accurate and nearly bias-free calculation of FC for the four database geographic areas, with a global root mean squared residue (RMSR) of 0.026 m3·m-3. At the individual soil profile scale, the maximum RMSR was only 0.040 m3·m-3. The BD, T and OM data were generally of a low predicting quality regarding FC when not accompanied by the moisture variables. As all the FC values were obtained by the same experimental protocol and as the predicting quality of Equation 3 was clearly better than that of the classical method, which considers F... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Capacidade de campo; Drenagem interna; Funções de pedotransferência. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/146729/1/2016-026.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02338naa a2200205 a 4500
001 2051668
005 2020-09-02
008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.5539/jas.v8n8p158$2DOI
100 1 $aOTTONI FILHO, T. B.
245 $aAn algebraic pedotransfer function to calculate standardized in situ determined field capacity.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2016
520 $aDespite the large applicability of the field capacity (FC) concept in hydrology and engineering, it presents various ambiguities and inconsistencies due to a lack of methodological procedure standardization. Experimental field and laboratory protocols taken from the literature were used in this study to determine the value of FC for different depths in 29 soil profiles, totaling 209 soil samples. The volumetric water content (θ) values were also determined at three suction values (6 kPa, 10 kPa, 33 kPa), along with bulk density (BD), texture (T) and organic matter content (OM). The protocols were devised based on the water processes involved in the FC concept aiming at minimizing hydraulic inconsistencies and procedural difficulty while maintaining the practical meaning of the concept. A high correlation between FC and θ(6 kPa) allowed the development of a pedotransfer function (Equation 3) quadratic for θ(6 kPa), resulting in an accurate and nearly bias-free calculation of FC for the four database geographic areas, with a global root mean squared residue (RMSR) of 0.026 m3·m-3. At the individual soil profile scale, the maximum RMSR was only 0.040 m3·m-3. The BD, T and OM data were generally of a low predicting quality regarding FC when not accompanied by the moisture variables. As all the FC values were obtained by the same experimental protocol and as the predicting quality of Equation 3 was clearly better than that of the classical method, which considers FC equal to θ(6), θ(10) or θ(33), we recommend using Equation 3 rather than the classical method, as well as the protocol presented here, to determine in-situ FC.
653 $aCapacidade de campo
653 $aDrenagem interna
653 $aFunções de pedotransferência
700 1 $aLEAL, I. F.
700 1 $aMACEDO, J. R. de
700 1 $aREIS, B. C. B.
773 $tJournal of Agricultural Science$gv. 8, n. 8, p. 158-170, 2016.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Solos (CNPS) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
